[Cal Junkie]

Obvious troll. You have been marked for Shernination.

Originally Posted by spambait11

Are you a freshman or something? Even Tedford was hugely successful in his early years. His only problem during that time was USC was experiencing a resurgence at the same time.

Beat it, son.

[jebus]

Originally Posted by spambait11

Are you a freshman or something? Even Tedford was hugely successful in his early years. His only problem during that time was USC was experiencing a resurgence at the same time.

Beat it, son.

Is your IQ below 70? Can't tell sarcasm? Beat it, son?

Keep making a fool of yourself.

[Cal_Fan2]

Originally Posted by spambait11

Are you a freshman or something? Even Tedford was hugely successful in his early years. His only problem during that time was USC was experiencing a resurgence at the same time.

Beat it, son.

[CalBearinLA]

Originally Posted by spambait11

Are you a freshman or something? Even Tedford was hugely successful in his early years. His only problem during that time was USC was experiencing a resurgence at the same time.

Beat it, son.

A freshman can recognize sarcasm. U cant?

[CalBearsRoll]

Originally Posted by CalBearinLA

A freshman can recognize sarcasm. U cant?

Andy Buh, children...from Escondido. So he's from cali so were screwed or not? I lost track with the colorful debating :-)

[GivemTheAxe]

Originally Posted by BarcaBear

anyone notice Dykes sentiments on the existing Oline talent?
gotta make you wonder why the O-line was under-performing.
culture of failure setting in after so many years of never quite good enough under Tedford. maybe playing for a qb that they felt hadn't under the position. possibly a combination of all the above. whatever it was, I never thought it was Coach M's inability to coach.


http://www.contracostatimes.com/cal-...ces?source=rss

Could also be that the opposing D knew that ZM could not beat them passing so they went all out to stop the run and dared ZM to throw.

[Vandalus]

Originally Posted by GivemTheAxe

Could also be that the opposing D knew that ZM could not beat them passing so they went all out to stop the run and dared ZM to throw.

This is pretty much exactly what I saw happening all year long. We faced +1 in the box constantly all year, and ZM refused, or was not given the latitude, to check out of a run and into a pass.

[drizzlybears brother]

Originally Posted by SonOfCalVa

Which four games did he watch ... but it doesn't matter because Dykes SEES things that the casual fan does not. How (and why) the OL performed before is really kind of irrelevant. It's a new system and the current OL, including now those who blueshirted, have an opportunity to "fit" which wasn't the case before.

Past performance should not prejudice the anticipation of future results.

On the surface you seem to make perfect sense, but it's well known that no coach sees better than we hear on this forum. That's just a fact. Suggesting otherwise is asking for a wee bit o the trouble.

[GranadaHillsBear]

Where Coach M failed the most was the discipline on the line. His previous lines were never that sloppy or penalty prone.

[SonOfCalVa]

Originally Posted by drizzlybears brother

On the surface you seem to make perfect sense, but it's well known that no coach sees better than we hear on this forum. That's just a fact. Suggesting otherwise is asking for a wee bit o the trouble.

oops ... where's that damn "In BI We Trust" icon ...