Based on the things Lions coach Dan Campbell said Sunday and Monday, it's not out of the question that QB Jared Goff will be getting benched, soon. https://t.co/wbM00kF4lI
— ProFootballTalk (@ProFootballTalk) October 19, 2021
Based on the things Lions coach Dan Campbell said Sunday and Monday, it's not out of the question that QB Jared Goff will be getting benched, soon. https://t.co/wbM00kF4lI
— ProFootballTalk (@ProFootballTalk) October 19, 2021
Mahomes' slow evolution into Jared Goff has begun 😂pic.twitter.com/FOtJhrgSdo
— Isaac (@WorldofIsaac) October 17, 2021
bearister said:
Only AR could perform on a team that wretched. I wish Jared had 2.5 seconds of protection and Ruggs as his WR.
bearister said:
Only AR could perform on a team that wretched. I wish Jared had 2.5 seconds of protection and Ruggs as his WR.
hanky1 said:
Everyone turns into Jared GoffMahomes' slow evolution into Jared Goff has begun 😂pic.twitter.com/FOtJhrgSdo
— Isaac (@WorldofIsaac) October 17, 2021
For me to even acknowledge Jackson Mahomes he must've done something irredeemably stupid like dancing on the memorial of a beloved player who died prematurely while his family was in attendance on the day they retired his number. I need apologies stat & not just from him. pic.twitter.com/Hw8b2RBVWX
— Reese Waters (@reesewaters) October 18, 2021
The Rams gave up a lot to draft Goffcalbear93 said:bearister said:
Only AR could perform on a team that wretched. I wish Jared had 2.5 seconds of protection and Ruggs as his WR.
He had Kupp and Woods last year and decent protection. He was still making poor decisions. He was great at Cal, and I will always be his fan. But he is a bust as the #1 pick and should most likely be a back-up in the NFL.
I think it is the whole Cal rooting for the downtrodden thing kicking in. I suffer from it too.okaydo said:
Here's the question I'm trying to ask myself: Goff sucking this year and the past couple years, including the Super Bowl, has sucked my joy out of football. I don't know why I care. Why do I care? I have come to the point where I've stopped following Goff on social media and stop watching his games. But the problem is, NFL Red Zone doesn't offer an option to omit Lions games.
Anyways, I've become uncaring about Rodgers' success. I mean, I'm happy for him. But I'm sort of ambivalent about Rodgers. But for some reason, Goff sucking is like nails to a chalkboard for me. While Rodgers' success is ho-hum. Yet Rodgers means more to me in me being a football fan than Goff did. I can't explain it.
Some of this is you have seen Goff when he controls games, and the recent games are such a disconnect. Goff's issues of late may have to do with Goff's skill sets. He is relatively immobile, but given some time is an accurate NFL passer. He needs to be in an offense where he can get the ball out quickly or he benefits from a top oline.okaydo said:
Here's the question I'm trying to ask myself: Goff sucking this year and the past couple years, including the Super Bowl, has sucked my joy out of football. I don't know why I care. Why do I care? I have come to the point where I've stopped following Goff on social media and stop watching his games. But the problem is, NFL Red Zone doesn't offer an option to omit Lions games.
Anyways, I've become uncaring about Rodgers' success. I mean, I'm happy for him. But I'm sort of ambivalent about Rodgers. But for some reason, Goff sucking is like nails to a chalkboard for me. While Rodgers' success is ho-hum. Yet Rodgers means more to me in me being a football fan than Goff did. I can't explain it.
I wanted success for him, and was thrilled when it looked like he was making the turn to being an elite QB, but then it all fell apart again. It has to be tough but, with all the money he has already made, he is more fortunate than most.edg64 said:The Rams gave up a lot to draft Goffcalbear93 said:bearister said:
Only AR could perform on a team that wretched. I wish Jared had 2.5 seconds of protection and Ruggs as his WR.
He had Kupp and Woods last year and decent protection. He was still making poor decisions. He was great at Cal, and I will always be his fan. But he is a bust as the #1 pick and should most likely be a back-up in the NFL.
The Rams gave up a lot to get rid of goff
I feel embarrassed for Goff. He just doesn't have it
Probably a very biased view and partly due to lack of success at that position since Rodgers and early Longshore.Chapman_is_Gone said:
He wasn't "great" at Cal, IMO. He was "very good" at best. At Cal he was not clutch and he failed in a number of close game 4th quarter situations.
I think you hit the nail on the head - but because he was the only bright light during the frustrating Dykes years, it made him appear "great" and being drafted #1 reinforced this perception. But that draft was an incredibly weak QB class (Carson Wentz has had an uneven career and the only other 1st round pick was Paxton Lynch who lasted two seasons with the Broncos). Personally, I was frustrated as Goff repeatedly under-threw or over-threw Treggs on deep routes.Chapman_is_Gone said:
He wasn't "great" at Cal, IMO. He was "very good" at best. At Cal he was not clutch and he failed in a number of close game 4th quarter situations.
Chapman_is_Gone said:
He wasn't "great" at Cal, IMO. He was "very good" at best. At Cal he was not clutch and he failed in a number of close game 4th quarter situations.
Bobodeluxe said:
Sonny made Goff a multi millionaire.
A simple story.
A true story.
We agree on very little Chapman; however, on this point, you nailed it…Chapman_is_Gone said:
He wasn't "great" at Cal, IMO. He was "very good" at best. At Cal he was not clutch and he failed in a number of close game 4th quarter situations.
calbear93 said:Probably a very biased view and partly due to lack of success at that position since Rodgers and early Longshore.Chapman_is_Gone said:
He wasn't "great" at Cal, IMO. He was "very good" at best. At Cal he was not clutch and he failed in a number of close game 4th quarter situations.
HungryCalBear said:
Maybe good for Goff to stand on the sideline and observe a few games. He never did that at Cal, and he sat out only the first few games in his Rams career. Rodgers was on the bench the first few years at Green Bay. For those who played football before: does it help?
I think the pre-Oregon injury Longshore was pretty clutch. It was after we barely beat Oregon with the last second fluke fumble that went into the endzone that he was never the same. Maybe I am misremembering.calumnus said:calbear93 said:Probably a very biased view and partly due to lack of success at that position since Rodgers and early Longshore.Chapman_is_Gone said:
He wasn't "great" at Cal, IMO. He was "very good" at best. At Cal he was not clutch and he failed in a number of close game 4th quarter situations.
Early Longshore? 2006? How was that "clutch"? His penchant for throwing 4th quarter interceptions began then. With the Rose Bowl on the line he threw three picks against Arizona and then 3 more against USC. That with an NFL line, NFL TEs and two NFL HOF skill players to throw to. The weakness of that team was 1) scheme 2. Longshore.
Goff put up amazing numbers in 2015. We did not do better than we did because of the defense. However, a lot if Goff's success was scheme, which was perfect for him. I was anxious for him when he went #1. I knew that he went too high but hoped for the best. He was definitely a "system quarterback." That propelled him to #1 like Alex Smith over Aaron Rogers. Smith managed to survive being a "bust" and has had a long career. Hopefully Goff does too. However there are just a lot of good young quarterbacks coming out of the college ranks these days (unfortunately not from Cal).
HungryCalBear said:
Maybe good for Goff to stand on the sideline and observe a few games. He never did that at Cal, and he sat out only the first few games in his Rams career. Rodgers was on the bench the first few years at Green Bay. For those who played football before: does it help?
calumnus said:calbear93 said:Probably a very biased view and partly due to lack of success at that position since Rodgers and early Longshore.Chapman_is_Gone said:
He wasn't "great" at Cal, IMO. He was "very good" at best. At Cal he was not clutch and he failed in a number of close game 4th quarter situations.
Early Longshore? 2006? How was that "clutch"? His penchant for throwing 4th quarter interceptions began then. With the Rose Bowl on the line he threw three picks against Arizona and then 3 more against USC. That with an NFL line, NFL TEs and two NFL HOF skill players to throw to. The weakness of that team was 1) scheme 2. Longshore.
Goff put up amazing numbers in 2015. We did not do better than we did because of the defense. However, a lot if Goff's success was scheme, which was perfect for him. I was anxious for him when he went #1. I knew that he went too high but hoped for the best. He was definitely a "system quarterback." That propelled him to #1 like Alex Smith over Aaron Rogers. Smith managed to survive being a "bust" and has had a long career. Hopefully Goff does too. However there are just a lot of good young quarterbacks coming out of the college ranks these days (unfortunately not from Cal).
71Bear said:We agree on very little Chapman; however, on this point, you nailed it…Chapman_is_Gone said:
He wasn't "great" at Cal, IMO. He was "very good" at best. At Cal he was not clutch and he failed in a number of close game 4th quarter situations.
Goff's biggest drawback at Cal was his inability to produce when the lights were brightest. The Utah game in SLC is a prime example of that.
The Rams wisely dumped him and Detroit is now learning that he just is not very good, primarily because he just doesn't have "it". Another nice guy struggling to make his way in a kick-ass environment. Hmmmm, that sounds awfully familiar…..
How is calling someone "very good" "dumping" on them? It's not...golden sloth said:Chapman_is_Gone said:
He wasn't "great" at Cal, IMO. He was "very good" at best. At Cal he was not clutch and he failed in a number of close game 4th quarter situations.
He also had a few late game winning drives in the 4th. It's unfair to dump on someone when they fall short but not praise them for their successes. Specifically I'm thinking Arizona state and colorado. He also had a big play to seal the game against uw.
82gradDLSdad said:calumnus said:calbear93 said:Probably a very biased view and partly due to lack of success at that position since Rodgers and early Longshore.Chapman_is_Gone said:
He wasn't "great" at Cal, IMO. He was "very good" at best. At Cal he was not clutch and he failed in a number of close game 4th quarter situations.
Early Longshore? 2006? How was that "clutch"? His penchant for throwing 4th quarter interceptions began then. With the Rose Bowl on the line he threw three picks against Arizona and then 3 more against USC. That with an NFL line, NFL TEs and two NFL HOF skill players to throw to. The weakness of that team was 1) scheme 2. Longshore.
Goff put up amazing numbers in 2015. We did not do better than we did because of the defense. However, a lot if Goff's success was scheme, which was perfect for him. I was anxious for him when he went #1. I knew that he went too high but hoped for the best. He was definitely a "system quarterback." That propelled him to #1 like Alex Smith over Aaron Rogers. Smith managed to survive being a "bust" and has had a long career. Hopefully Goff does too. However there are just a lot of good young quarterbacks coming out of the college ranks these days (unfortunately not from Cal).
I do remember attending a preseason practice during Goff's first year. We all assumed one of the returners would be the starting QB. But I remember being impressed with how much more quicky got the ball out in drills. I didn't think much about it other than he was good but I guess Franklin figured he'd be able to groom his own guy for 3-4 years by picking Goff as the starter.
Oski87 said:
Goff does not look good but he does not have a single NFL quality receiver on his team. So...that is tough.
He is still careless with the ball. But - he had two game winning drives this year - which the defense immediately gave back and let the other team score 2 long distance field goals.
Regardless of what you think of Goff - and the whole world seems to love to hate him for some reason - probably because is he not an ******* so they love to pile on - he does what he is paid to do. He has two receivers in the top 80 of the NFL - who have caught about 1/3 of his passes. One is his tight end, and the other is his RB. The running game is the 29th in the NFL. He has NO ONE to throw to. Yet he is 15th in passing yardage, 14th in completion percentage. Give him Devante Adams or Cooper Kupp, or Mike Williams or DK Metcalf and I am sure he would be a hell of a lot better QB.
This is basically an expansion team right now. We'll see how he comes out of this but he is clearly the best QB on his team and probably about 14 other teams.
calumnus said:Oski87 said:
Goff does not look good but he does not have a single NFL quality receiver on his team. So...that is tough.
He is still careless with the ball. But - he had two game winning drives this year - which the defense immediately gave back and let the other team score 2 long distance field goals.
Regardless of what you think of Goff - and the whole world seems to love to hate him for some reason - probably because is he not an ******* so they love to pile on - he does what he is paid to do. He has two receivers in the top 80 of the NFL - who have caught about 1/3 of his passes. One is his tight end, and the other is his RB. The running game is the 29th in the NFL. He has NO ONE to throw to. Yet he is 15th in passing yardage, 14th in completion percentage. Give him Devante Adams or Cooper Kupp, or Mike Williams or DK Metcalf and I am sure he would be a hell of a lot better QB.
This is basically an expansion team right now. We'll see how he comes out of this but he is clearly the best QB on his team and probably about 14 other teams.
It is the blessing/curse of being drafted #1 or just in the first round. The money is good but the criticism is high. Those who opposed the pick want to say "I told you so" and pike on. You see it in the discussions of Trey Lance.