cubzwin said:
East Tennessee did not have slaves and the majority people there were pro-union. West Tennessee had a cotton-based economy and pushed the state into joining the Confederacy. Ironically, what most people consider southern culture is stronger in East Tennessee than West Tennessee.
Fyght4Cal, you equate the modern South with slavery and with the Confederacy so you must also equate the modern Democratic Party with slavery and the Confederacy.
If people in Alabama are traitors (based on their political alignment in 1861) then so are all Democrats.
Might be time to update your world view.
Alabama & Mississippi are mainly unreconstructed. Thankfully we can't say the same about the Democratic Party.
I give Tennessee credit for its split sympathies. But in point of fact, Tennessee sent 4x as many troops to fight for the Confederacy as it did for the Union. Pro-slavery seems the more passionate side.
As for what constitutes the South, when your country fought a bloody, traumatic civil war clearly based on regional antipathies, then those regions will tend to be cemented into history. But beyond that, the North vs South, free vs slave split is in our national DNA. It is enshrined in all of our founding documents. Its institutions, such as the Electoral College, continue to haunt us in the present day.
The largest concentration of the African American population continues to reside in the former slave states. Almost, I repeat, almost all of the HBCUs are in the old Confederacy. Current Southern racial and political attitudes can be tracked by antebellum black/white population ratios at the county level.
As Kurt Vonnegut wrote, "The past is prologue". The South, modern and historical, cannot escape its enslaving and seditious identity. It scarcely tries, as it remains mired in its own self-indulgent mythos.
Patience is a virtue, but I’m not into virtue signaling these days.