Beau Baldwin to UA talk is heating up

31,590 Views | 164 Replies | Last: 6 yr ago by BearGoggles
ColoradoBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
82gradDLSdad said:

UrsaMajor said:

FWIW, latest rumor on BearDown--Rick Nueweasel is a candidate! Their Board is in full meltdown at that prospect.


As it should be. Not that Neuheisal wouldn't be an absolutely awesome hire for the cats. They'd be crazy to let him slip through their hands.

he'd be a home run, yah?

(though he'd probably take marques tuiasosopo)
TheSouseFamily
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Looks like UofA is looking to save a few bones on this hire.
chazzed
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Uthaithani said:

I'm not freaking out either way on this one. I think he might be a better HC than OC and last season's offense is very easily replaceable, he didn't exactly work magic. It would be nice if he stuck around and could be HC at Cal when the time is right, but we'll be okay either way.
Baldwin had very little to work with this season, especially after the first few games. I want to see what he can do with Robertson, Watson, two or three good tight ends, etc.
going4roses
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So TE's /WR's would get new coaches plus a change in scheme / terminology

Would the new OC mesh with greatwood/blocking philosophy
Tell someone you love them and try to have a good day
sheki
How long do you want to ignore this user?
would we consider Jedd Fisch if Baldwin left?
socaliganbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sheki said:

would we consider Jedd Fisch if Baldwin left?
I'm a fan.
going4roses
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Why does it seem so hard to find coaches that want to build something here?
Tell someone you love them and try to have a good day
socaliganbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
going4roses said:

Why does it seem so hard to find coaches that want to build something here?
I don't think is very fair. We knowingly hired an a total up & comer as an OC. This was always going to be the case and I'm sure JW knew it the day he hired him. Our assistant coach retention the last few years hasn't been that bad. The only notable guy we've lost in recent year was Azz and he left for a clear promotion under his old boss.
Bobodeluxe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
going4roses said:

Why does it seem so hard to find coaches that want to build something here?
Anyone have an answer?
Yogi58
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bobodeluxe said:

going4roses said:

Why does it seem so hard to find coaches that want to build something here?
Anyone have an answer?
Come on folks.

Azzinaro left for a promotion he wouldn't have gotten here and to reunite with his friend. Baldwin would be leaving for a head coaching job and more money. Nobody is going to choose to stay in a lesser role at Cal just because they want to build something here. These are logical and natural moves for both guys. We hired Baldwin knowing that his ultimate goal was a P5 head coaching job.
6956bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
going4roses said:

Why does it seem so hard to find coaches that want to build something here?
Assistant coaches are vagabonds. They move a lot. Very few programs have the same staff together for more than a few years. Head coaches get hired away, get fired, get pressured to change staff members, assistants get promotions elsewhere etc. By nature the assistants move around. The days of staffs being together for years like Greatwood enjoyed at Oregon are few and far between.

So they are all chasing their own dreams of being HC or coordinator. Wilcox has moved a lot himself in recent years. Some by his choice, some not. Nature of the Beast. But it would be nice for Cal to keep its OC for more than 1 season. If Baldwin goes it will make 4 in 4 years. That is too much movement at a very key position on the staff.
ayetee11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
going4roses said:

Why does it seem so hard to find coaches that want to build something here?


Probably because Nationally we are looked at as a stepping stone program.
TheSouseFamily
How long do you want to ignore this user?
6956bear said:

going4roses said:

Why does it seem so hard to find coaches that want to build something here?
Assistant coaches are vagabonds. They move a lot. Very few programs have the same staff together for more than a few years. Head coaches get hired away, get fired, get pressured to change staff members, assistants get promotions elsewhere etc. By nature the assistants move around. The days of staffs being together for years like Greatwood enjoyed at Oregon are few and far between.

So they are all chasing their own dreams of being HC or coordinator. Wilcox has moved a lot himself in recent years. Some by his choice, some not. Nature of the Beast. But it would be nice for Cal to keep its OC for more than 1 season. If Baldwin goes it will make 4 in 4 years. That is too much movement at a very key position on the staff.


Nothing odd going on here, like you say. In the last crank of the numbers I saw, 60% of P5 assistants turn over during a 4 year period.
Cave Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bobodeluxe said:

going4roses said:

Why does it seem so hard to find coaches that want to build something here?
Anyone have an answer?
Well there was this guy

XXXBEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I like Baldwin, but in all honesty, he hasn't done enough to warrant the promotion, nor would his hiring fire up the Arizona fan base. Sumlin would be a much better choice, though they are talking on the Arizona boards about waiting for a former Arizona player now a coach in the NFL.
tequila4kapp
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bobodeluxe said:

going4roses said:

Why does it seem so hard to find coaches that want to build something here?
Anyone have an answer?
Isn't it obvious? How long would you stay some place that never pays top dollar, usually pay less than market rate, where the community isn't really rabid about football, the faculty/administration is sometimes hostile to football and cost of living is really high?
tequila4kapp
How long do you want to ignore this user?
XXXBEAR said:

I like Baldwin, but in all honesty, he hasn't done enough to warrant the promotion, nor would his hiring fire up the Arizona fan base. Sumlin would be a much better choice, though they are talking on the Arizona boards about waiting for a former Arizona player now a coach in the NFL.
I wouldn't have been surprised at all if we had hired Baldwin last year.
Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?
tequila4kapp said:

Bobodeluxe said:

going4roses said:

Why does it seem so hard to find coaches that want to build something here?
Anyone have an answer?
Isn't it obvious? How long would you stay some place that never pays top dollar, usually pay less than market rate, where the community isn't really rabid about football, the faculty/administration is sometimes hostile to football and cost of living is really high?
nailed it
calumnus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
tequila4kapp said:

XXXBEAR said:

I like Baldwin, but in all honesty, he hasn't done enough to warrant the promotion, nor would his hiring fire up the Arizona fan base. Sumlin would be a much better choice, though they are talking on the Arizona boards about waiting for a former Arizona player now a coach in the NFL.
I wouldn't have been surprised at all if we had hired Baldwin last year.


Agreed.
calumnus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
chazzed said:

Uthaithani said:

I'm not freaking out either way on this one. I think he might be a better HC than OC and last season's offense is very easily replaceable, he didn't exactly work magic. It would be nice if he stuck around and could be HC at Cal when the time is right, but we'll be okay either way.
Baldwin had very little to work with this season, especially after the first few games. I want to see what he can do with Robertson, Watson, two or three good tight ends, etc.


I was still disappointed with what he did with what we had--I assumed he put together good offenses with lesser talent at Eastern Washington and thought he was predictable/not very imaginative or flexible this year. We went from the #1 offense in the conference to #11 (while improving from the #10 defense to #7).

Still, I will chalk up last year as an aberation and hope we see MUCH better results when he has more tools available to run the offense he wants to run. He does seem to be a leader and good HC.
Skeedabear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Big C said:

tequila4kapp said:

Bobodeluxe said:

going4roses said:

Why does it seem so hard to find coaches that want to build something here?
Anyone have an answer?
Isn't it obvious? How long would you stay some place that never pays top dollar, usually pay less than market rate, where the community isn't really rabid about football, the faculty/administration is sometimes hostile to football and cost of living is really high?
nailed it
Yep, and don't forget CAL is not very flexible on their admissions for student athletes.
packawana
How long do you want to ignore this user?
calumnus said:

chazzed said:

Uthaithani said:

I'm not freaking out either way on this one. I think he might be a better HC than OC and last season's offense is very easily replaceable, he didn't exactly work magic. It would be nice if he stuck around and could be HC at Cal when the time is right, but we'll be okay either way.
Baldwin had very little to work with this season, especially after the first few games. I want to see what he can do with Robertson, Watson, two or three good tight ends, etc.


I was still disappointed with what he did with what we had--I assumed he put together good offenses with lesser talent at Eastern Washington and thought he was predictable/not very imaginative or flexible this year. We went from the #1 offense in the conference to #11 (while improving from the #10 defense to #7).

Still, I will chalk up last year as an aberation and hope we see MUCH better results when he has more tools available to run the offense he wants to run. He does seem to be a leader and good HC.
Eh, I think that's a lot to be expected when you have not 4/5* talent and even a lot of your top talent goes out (Demetris, Tre, Melquise), plus a transition to a new system, etc. Looking at his EW record, Baldwin started at 6-5, then took EW to the playoffs, and in the third year took them to an FCS title. I just think it's going to take time for the team to settle. Plus, considering the direction that Wilcox wants to go offense-wise, I don't even think the final evolution of the offense would be what Baldwin would want to run.
ducky23
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Pskriv said:

Big C said:

tequila4kapp said:

Bobodeluxe said:

going4roses said:

Why does it seem so hard to find coaches that want to build something here?
Anyone have an answer?
Isn't it obvious? How long would you stay some place that never pays top dollar, usually pay less than market rate, where the community isn't really rabid about football, the faculty/administration is sometimes hostile to football and cost of living is really high?
nailed it
Yep, and don't forget CAL is not very flexible on their admissions for student athletes.


And yet our head coach declined an interview with arguably his dream job
Sebastabear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ducky23 said:

Pskriv said:

Big C said:

tequila4kapp said:

Bobodeluxe said:

going4roses said:

We 'Why does it seem so hard to find coaches that want to build something here?
Anyone have an answer?
Isn't it obvious? How long would you stay some place that never pays top dollar, usually pay less than market rate, where the community isn't really rabid about football, the faculty/administration is sometimes hostile to football and cost of living is really high?
nailed it
Yep, and don't forget CAL is not very flexible on their admissions for student athletes.


And yet our head coach declined an interview with arguably his dream job
I know people on here love Cal, but I think they sometimes forget to appreciate it.

Look this is one of the top schools in the world with a degree that sells itself. You don't think it's an issue to recruit kids and parents who are serious about academics to an Oregon or an ASU or whatever? It is.

We have a long, rich storied football tradition, and, lest you forget, we're the protagonists in the most famous play in college football history. And we know what the word "protagonists" means (yeah, intellectual snobbery, blah, blah, blah).

We have a very large and affluent alumni base with a hard core of passionate fans.

Our stadium is among the most beautiful in the world - I've certainly never seen one better. Our facilities are top rate, our weather is fantastic and the Bay Area beats the living hell as a place to live out of 99.9% of the country in terms of food, culture, natural beauty and entertainment.

Of course we have challenges and issues, but come on. This is not exactly the Siberian front of coaching gigs. Finding coaches who appreciate what we have to offer should be a no brainer if we can get out of our own way.
socaliganbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
calumnus said:

chazzed said:

Uthaithani said:

I'm not freaking out either way on this one. I think he might be a better HC than OC and last season's offense is very easily replaceable, he didn't exactly work magic. It would be nice if he stuck around and could be HC at Cal when the time is right, but we'll be okay either way.
Baldwin had very little to work with this season, especially after the first few games. I want to see what he can do with Robertson, Watson, two or three good tight ends, etc.


I was still disappointed with what he did with what we had--I assumed he put together good offenses with lesser talent at Eastern Washington and thought he was predictable/not very imaginative or flexible this year. We went from the #1 offense in the conference to #11 (while improving from the #10 defense to #7).

Still, I will chalk up last year as an aberation and hope we see MUCH better results when he has more tools available to run the offense he wants to run. He does seem to be a leader and good HC.
We had the #1 offense in the Pac in 2016, only because of yardage. We were not the highest scoring offense in the Pac. Nor the most efficient. We didn't score the most touchdowns or average the most ppg.

We went from the 3rd highest scoring offense to the 10th, which is about right for a team that lost it's QB, top 2 WR, and top 2 RB, on top of learning a new system with a frosh QB and relying on a walk on to carry our offense.
Goobear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Now reading that Mike Sanford of Western Kentucky may be the leading guy...
going4roses
How long do you want to ignore this user?
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.azdesertswarm.com/platform/amp/football/2018/1/11/16877596/arizona-football-head-coach-mike-sanford-candidate-sumlin-yates-miles-baldwin-fipp-western-kentucky
Tell someone you love them and try to have a good day
azgreg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TheSouseFamily said:

Looks like UofA is looking to save a few bones on this hire.
We have no choice. Between paying RR $6 mil in walking money and the money we've already committed to stadium and basketball arena renovations we're broke.
FloriDreaming
How long do you want to ignore this user?
going4roses said:

Why does it seem so hard to find coaches that want to build something here?
Well, there's the HC.

I've left good jobs for better ones. I've had employees do the same. Good employers survive turnover and do fine. Alabama has gone through a few OCs, doesn't seem to have hurt them much.

I don't see Cal being in the same situation as it was post-Tedford, pre-Wilcox. When you have strength at the top, things in the middle work out ok. You'll see.
socaliganbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
azgreg said:

TheSouseFamily said:

Looks like UofA is looking to save a few bones on this hire.
We have no choice. Between paying RR $6 mil in walking money and the money we've already committed to stadium and basketball arena renovations we're broke.

Welcome to the club!
ColoradoBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
tequila4kapp said:

XXXBEAR said:

I like Baldwin, but in all honesty, he hasn't done enough to warrant the promotion, nor would his hiring fire up the Arizona fan base. Sumlin would be a much better choice, though they are talking on the Arizona boards about waiting for a former Arizona player now a coach in the NFL.
I wouldn't have been surprised at all if we had hired Baldwin last year.
As the HC?

If that had happened, Cal fans would have lost their mind, and we'd probably have had 30k fans at each game last year.

One year at the P5 level as Cal's OC hasn't shown much, though there were injury issues galore with offensive skill players.

If Az is going cheap, I can see why they might take Baldwin, but the jump from FCS to P5 is a big one.
ayetee11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
azgreg said:

TheSouseFamily said:

Looks like UofA is looking to save a few bones on this hire.
We have no choice. Between paying RR $6 mil in walking money and the money we've already committed to stadium and basketball arena renovations we're broke.


Per Matt Scott, might save some money if Miller stops paying players.
boredom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ColoradoBear said:

tequila4kapp said:

XXXBEAR said:

I like Baldwin, but in all honesty, he hasn't done enough to warrant the promotion, nor would his hiring fire up the Arizona fan base. Sumlin would be a much better choice, though they are talking on the Arizona boards about waiting for a former Arizona player now a coach in the NFL.
I wouldn't have been surprised at all if we had hired Baldwin last year.
As the HC?

If that had happened, Cal fans would have lost their mind, and we'd probably have had 30k fans at each game last year.

One year at the P5 level as Cal's OC hasn't shown much, though there were injury issues galore with offensive skill players.

If Az is going cheap, I can see why they might take Baldwin, but the jump from FCS to P5 is a big one.

It was good enough for Ohio State (Tressel) and they did pretty well with that hire.

I would've been fine with that kind of hire (Baldwin as HC) last year. He won a national championship and conference titles in 4 others years. He won 11+ games 6 of his 10 years as a head coach. Never had a losing record. It's obviously a big jump and there'd be recruiting concerns but I think you look for guys who have a history of winning (which was a problem with Dykes, his teams never won big anywhere he went) and hope it translates.

And attendance was going to tank regardless of hire (obviously unless we somehow got a Saban type which wasn't going to happen).
aws56
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sebastabear said:

ducky23 said:

Pskriv said:

Big C said:

tequila4kapp said:

Bobodeluxe said:

going4roses said:

We 'Why does it seem so hard to find coaches that want to build something here?
Anyone have an answer?
Isn't it obvious? How long would you stay some place that never pays top dollar, usually pay less than market rate, where the community isn't really rabid about football, the faculty/administration is sometimes hostile to football and cost of living is really high?
nailed it
Yep, and don't forget CAL is not very flexible on their admissions for student athletes.


And yet our head coach declined an interview with arguably his dream job
I know people on here love Cal, but I think they sometimes forget to appreciate it.

Look this is one of the top schools in the world with a degree that sells itself. You don't think it's an issue to recruit kids and parents who are serious about academics to an Oregon or an ASU or whatever? It is.

We have a long, rich storied football tradition, and, lest you forget, we're the protagonists in the most famous play in college football history. And we know what the word "protagonists" means (yeah, intellectual snobbery, blah, blah, blah).

We have a very large and affluent alumni base with a hard core of passionate fans.

Our stadium is among the most beautiful in the world - I've certainly never seen one better. Our facilities are top rate, our weather is fantastic and the Bay Area beats the living hell as a place to live out of 99.9% of the country in terms of food, culture, natural beauty and entertainment.

Of course we have challenges and issues, but come on. This is not exactly the Siberian front of coaching gigs. Finding coaches who appreciate what we have to offer should be a no brainer if we can get out of our own way.
Recruiting here isn't easy. Coaches know that getting top talent is the best way to consistently win.

We just don't have a lot of competitive advantages that can't be countered by the elite football programs in the pac-12. I think that is out biggest issue.
bonsallbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aws56 said:

Sebastabear said:

ducky23 said:

Pskriv said:

Big C said:

tequila4kapp said:

Bobodeluxe said:

going4roses said:

1We 'Why does it seem so hard to find coaches that want to build something here?
Anyone have an answer?
Isn't it obvious? How long would you stay some place that never pays top dollar, usually pay less than market rate, where the community isn't really rabid about football, the faculty/administration is sometimes hostile to football and cost of living is really high?
nailed it
Yep, and don't forget CAL is not very flexible on their admissions for student athletes.


And yet our head coach declined an interview with arguably his dream job
I know people on here love Cal, but I think they sometimes forget to appreciate it.

Look this is one of the top schools in the world with a degree that sells itself. You don't think it's an issue to recruit kids and parents who are serious about academics to an Oregon or an ASU or whatever? It is.

We have a long, rich storied football tradition, and, lest you forget, we're the protagonists in the most famous play in college football history. And we know what the word "protagonists" means (yeah, intellectual snobbery, blah, blah, blah).

We have a very large and affluent alumni base with a hard core of passionate fans.

Our stadium is among the most beautiful in the world - I've certainly never seen one better. Our facilities are top rate, our weather is fantastic and the Bay Area beats the living hell as a place to live out of 99.9% of the country in terms of food, culture, natural beauty and entertainment.

Of course we have challenges and issues, but come on. This is not exactly the Siberian front of coaching gigs. Finding coaches who appreciate what we have to offer should be a no brainer if we can get out of our own way.
Recruiting here isn't easy. Coaches know that getting top talent is the best way to consistently win.

We just don't have a lot of competitive advantages that can't be countered by the elite football programs in the pac-12. I think that is out biggest issue.

1: For those that qualify------the best academic school
2:Arguably, the nicest traditional/ classic campus in a beautiful setting
3: Diversity in student population.
4: Proximity to international city - San Francisco
5: Best overall year round weather

What did i miss?
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.