New RB Coach: Aristotle Thompson

16,380 Views | 105 Replies | Last: 4 yr ago by 79 Bear
ColoradoBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
https://calbears.com/news/2020/1/14/football-aristotle-thompson-joins-cal-as-running-backs-coach.aspx
B.A. Bearacus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Poaching a coach from Beau Baldwin's staff at Cal Poly. Wilcox overlapped with him at Boise State.
Cal Strong!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal Strong see this as head scratcher. Not particularly strong hire.

To be fair, Cal Strong never heard of this guy. So maybe he surprise everyone and turn out to be strong.

But this also strongly fair to say -- Aristotle coach for 19 years and only became position coach at two small time programs. He went from one to a HS (Cal Strong assume he was fired). Then at his second job, no one tried to poach him for a decade. This not a strong sign.
touchdownbears43
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Hmmmm familiarity seems to be the factor here. Zero recruiting bump. Seems to have coached a fair number of 1K rushers but at the DI-AA level. Hmmm....
NYCGOBEARS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
touchdownbears43 said:

Hmmmm familiarity seems to be the factor here. Zero recruiting bump. Seems to have coached a fair number of 1K rushers but at the DI-AA level. Hmmm....

Disagree. With him being a recruiting coordinator for 9 years, he must have strong relationships with programs all over the west coast. Also, Cal Poly is a good school so he knows what the academics at Cal are like. Also, he'll have a lot more leverage at Cal. Another great hire.
MilleniaBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Familiarity and commitment. Its nice to have an all-star lineup of coaches but the #1 requirement is commitment to JW. Nothing brings down a football team like coaches that are on different pages.

Interesting that he is from Cal Poly. Did BB clean house when he moved in down there?
bonsallbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Good grief! It's this the best Wilcox could do? After a great hire in Musgrave, this is a total let down. What input did Musgrave have? This indeed is a head scratcher. We needed a solid recruiter and I don't see this as being the answer.
tequila4kapp
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Seems to me to be an under the radar "insider" type move. Not one that will necessarily excite the fan base but he checks a lot of boxes, not the least of which is recruiting. This is the 2nd position coach with that as a strength...not a coincidence.
wifeisafurd
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal Strong! said:

Cal Strong see this as head scratcher. Not particularly strong hire.

To be fair, Cal Strong never heard of this guy. So maybe he surprise everyone and turn out to be strong.

But this also strongly fair to say -- Aristotle coach for 19 years and only became position coach at two small time programs. He went from one to a HS (Cal Strong assume he was fired). Then at his second job, no one tried to poach him for a decade. This not a strong sign.
Position coach and recruiting coordinator (he also is run game coordinator, which is a title to pay someone more money). Like the hire.
ColoradoBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
wifeisafurd said:

Cal Strong! said:

Cal Strong see this as head scratcher. Not particularly strong hire.

To be fair, Cal Strong never heard of this guy. So maybe he surprise everyone and turn out to be strong.

But this also strongly fair to say -- Aristotle coach for 19 years and only became position coach at two small time programs. He went from one to a HS (Cal Strong assume he was fired). Then at his second job, no one tried to poach him for a decade. This not a strong sign.
Position coach and recruiting coordinator (he also is run game coordinator, which is a title to pay someone more money). Like the hire.
Recruiting Coordinator at Poly, not Cal, right? Unless it's changed, Sirmon is the RC.

Thompson made $76k at SLO. Cal has started their entry assistant coaches at around $175k, so I'd guess not much higher than that given no FBS experience on his resume.

It could be that there was no money left for a more flashy/experienced hire, but that doesn't mean it won't work out.

I'm personally not going to worry about it without seeing on field performance next fall. Wilcox has past experience with Thompson, so it's not just pulling a name out of a hat or anything like that.
Unit2Sucks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Hard to judge a hire like this before we see results. He's not a big time coach who we had to pry away from another program. Here's hoping Wilcox and Musgrave know something that no one else does and that he works out for us.
Marty
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It's impossible to predict with certainty how any hire, including a football coach, will turn out. So with that in mind, and admitting I've never heard of him, I like his background and profile, especially compared to some of our other older coaches, in terms of the diversity it brings. And you can never have enough recruiting talent, which is something he appears to have. We lost one of our younger coaches in Edwards, and this is a youthful coach. I like the Musgrave hire, but this helps to make up for what will undoubtedly be some catching up Musgrave will need to do in getting up to speed in recruiting. He wouldn't have had those jobs, and had the time to establish tenure, if he wasn't effective. Bonus that it's west coast centric as well. Wilcox has done a steady job of building what appears to be a competent staff, and I like the fact that he's not afraid of the unconventional, out-of-the-box hire.
tequila4kapp
How long do you want to ignore this user?
UrsaMajor
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal Strong! said:

Cal Strong see this as head scratcher. Not particularly strong hire.

To be fair, Cal Strong never heard of this guy. So maybe he surprise everyone and turn out to be strong.

But this also strongly fair to say -- Aristotle coach for 19 years and only became position coach at two small time programs. He went from one to a HS (Cal Strong assume he was fired). Then at his second job, no one tried to poach him for a decade. This not a strong sign.
Sorry, this be weak post. Saying someone is not strong because YOU never heard of him = weak.
Cal89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
He became an Assistant HC at a pretty young age. I would guess he's highly regarded / respected.

Cal Poly ran 4.24 yards per carry in 2019. That's 42nd in FCS (124 teams). They were 9th in ground yards per game at 254. They were a running team for sure. Passing they were 117th in yards per game. They didn't average 12 passes a game. Wow.
Sig test...
joe amos yaks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal Strong! said:

Cal Strong see this as head scratcher. Not particularly strong hire.

To be fair, Cal Strong never heard of this guy. So maybe he surprise everyone and turn out to be strong.

But this also strongly fair to say -- Aristotle coach for 19 years and only became position coach at two small time programs. He went from one to a HS (Cal Strong assume he was fired). Then at his second job, no one tried to poach him for a decade. This not a strong sign.

Cal Strong need to eat ful medames. Cure head itch and make STRONG like Cal . . . CAL STRONG.
Coach Aristotle STRONG hire.
Also need to eat ful medames and koshari and kafta.
Be STRONG like Cal.
"Those who say don't know, and those who know don't say." - LT
Cal89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We are given Aristotle, and invariably some will whine that we didn't get Socrates!

Sig test...
nwbear84
How long do you want to ignore this user?
One thought, totally without any knowledge or facts, so take it for what it's worth. Perhaps he stayed put at Cal Poly due to the age of his five kids. Maybe to not move the oldest from high school or just to spend more time with them. The oldest is 20, the younger ones 5-10, per his Cal Poly bio. I know I made career decisions at that point in my life as my job allowed the flexibility to spend more time with the kids.

Anyway, not a splashy hire, but I'll give him a chance and hope he uses this opportunity to expand his recruiting experience and contacts.

NYCGOBEARS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
For the Aristotle detractors here... Ron Gould wasn't coming back. Full Stop. It's a good hire.















Unless it isn't.
Ncsf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bonsallbear said:

Good grief! It's this the best Wilcox could do? After a great hire in Musgrave, this is a total let down. What input did Musgrave have? This indeed is a head scratcher. We needed a solid recruiter and I don't see this as being the answer.
Here's the good part- you have no clue on this. Neither do I. If we trust him on the hires we like, shouldn't we trust him on the ones we honestly have no idea on?
Cal89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ncsf said:

bonsallbear said:

Good grief! It's this the best Wilcox could do? After a great hire in Musgrave, this is a total let down. What input did Musgrave have? This indeed is a head scratcher. We needed a solid recruiter and I don't see this as being the answer.
Here's the good part- you have no clue on this. Neither do I. If we trust him on the hires we like, shouldn't we trust him on the ones we honestly have no idea on?
That works for me. In JT, sorry, JW we trust!
Sig test...
Cal89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
nwbear84 said:

One thought, totally without any knowledge or facts, so take it for what it's worth. Perhaps he stayed put at Cal Poly due to the age of his five kids. Maybe to not move the oldest from high school or just to spend more time with them. The oldest is 20, the younger ones 5-10, per his Cal Poly bio. I know I made career decisions at that point in my life as my job allowed the flexibility to spend more time with the kids.

Anyway, not a splashy hire, but I'll give him a chance and hope he uses this opportunity to expand his recruiting experience and contacts.


Noticed the same and that might indeed be the case. I know it was for me and others...
Sig test...
Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Unit2Sucks said:

Hard to judge a hire like this before we see results. He's not a big time coach who we had to pry away from another program. Here's hoping Wilcox and Musgrave know something that no one else does and that he works out for us.
Yeah, I love it how some Cal fans know so much about college football that they can have an opinion on whether some not-so-well-known guy is going to be a good position coach or not.
Chapman_is_Gone
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm sorry to report that I visited ask8ball.net, and the answer to the question, "Is Wilcox's choice for Cal's new running backs coach a smart decision?" the answer was:

"My sources say no."
Rushinbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bonsallbear said:

Good grief! It's this the best Wilcox could do? After a great hire in Musgrave, this is a total let down. What input did Musgrave have? This indeed is a head scratcher. We needed a solid recruiter and I don't see this as being the answer.
You think JW and WM didn't work together on this?
B.A. Bearacus
How long do you want to ignore this user?



Cal Strong!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
UrsaMajor said:

Cal Strong! said:

Cal Strong see this as head scratcher. Not particularly strong hire.

To be fair, Cal Strong never heard of this guy. So maybe he surprise everyone and turn out to be strong.

But this also strongly fair to say -- Aristotle coach for 19 years and only became position coach at two small time programs. He went from one to a HS (Cal Strong assume he was fired). Then at his second job, no one tried to poach him for a decade. This not a strong sign.
Sorry, this be weak post. Saying someone is not strong because YOU never heard of him = weak.
Illiteracy WEAK! Ursa need to be more like Cal, less like weak illiterate. Cal not weak illiterate.

Cal Strong not hearing of him not part of Cal Strong's argument.
bonsallbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ncsf said:

bonsallbear said:

Good grief! It's this the best Wilcox could do? After a great hire in Musgrave, this is a total let down. What input did Musgrave have? This indeed is a head scratcher. We needed a solid recruiter and I don't see this as being the answer.
Here's the good part- you have no clue on this. Neither do I. If we trust him on the hires we like, shouldn't we trust him on the ones we honestly have no idea on?
Two thoughts
1. Neither of us has a clue about his recruiting ability at a PAC 12 level. Has he successfully pulled recruits away from PAC 12 level schools? I was hoping for someone who has.
2. He has credentials for being a RB coach. Great! Hopefully he will succeed at this level.

An underwhelming hire from my perspective.
MoragaBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Staff
At least Wilcox had two stints working with him so he's in a good position to know what he's getting and what his upside is at Cal.
heartofthebear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ColoradoBear said:

wifeisafurd said:

Cal Strong! said:

Cal Strong see this as head scratcher. Not particularly strong hire.

To be fair, Cal Strong never heard of this guy. So maybe he surprise everyone and turn out to be strong.

But this also strongly fair to say -- Aristotle coach for 19 years and only became position coach at two small time programs. He went from one to a HS (Cal Strong assume he was fired). Then at his second job, no one tried to poach him for a decade. This not a strong sign.
Position coach and recruiting coordinator (he also is run game coordinator, which is a title to pay someone more money). Like the hire.
Recruiting Coordinator at Poly, not Cal, right? Unless it's changed, Sirmon is the RC.

Thompson made $76k at SLO. Cal has started their entry assistant coaches at around $175k, so I'd guess not much higher than that given no FBS experience on his resume.

Doesn't mean he won't work out, but it also could be that there was no money left for a more flashy/experienced hire.

But I'm personally not going to worry about it without seeing on field performance next fall.

Pretty much my exact thoughts.
heartofthebear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm hoping there was a connection with the Fresno area. I'd love it if we could land more academically eligible talent out of Fresno/Clovis area.
wifeisafurd
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ColoradoBear said:

wifeisafurd said:

Cal Strong! said:

Cal Strong see this as head scratcher. Not particularly strong hire.

To be fair, Cal Strong never heard of this guy. So maybe he surprise everyone and turn out to be strong.

But this also strongly fair to say -- Aristotle coach for 19 years and only became position coach at two small time programs. He went from one to a HS (Cal Strong assume he was fired). Then at his second job, no one tried to poach him for a decade. This not a strong sign.
Position coach and recruiting coordinator (he also is run game coordinator, which is a title to pay someone more money). Like the hire.
Recruiting Coordinator at Poly, not Cal, right? Unless it's changed, Sirmon is the RC.

Thompson made $76k at SLO. Cal has started their entry assistant coaches at around $175k, so I'd guess not much higher than that given no FBS experience on his resume.

Doesn't mean he won't work out, but it also could be that there was no money left for a more flashy/experienced hire.

But I'm personally not going to worry about it without seeing on field performance next fall.
yes, the response to a post saying he couldn't move beyond being a position coach, and in fact he did. I'm assuming that Sirmon will keep that title unless he move to DC if TDR gets a head coach offer that he takes. In that case, recruiting coordinator probably goes to Angus, Rangle or GA.

I do think this move reflects some budget limits. They picked up a OC coach who will get paid more than Baldwin and some of the defensive coaches likely are getting good raises so they won't be poached.
Cal_79
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bonsallbear said:

Ncsf said:

bonsallbear said:

Good grief! It's this the best Wilcox could do? After a great hire in Musgrave, this is a total let down. What input did Musgrave have? This indeed is a head scratcher. We needed a solid recruiter and I don't see this as being the answer.
Here's the good part- you have no clue on this. Neither do I. If we trust him on the hires we like, shouldn't we trust him on the ones we honestly have no idea on?
Two thoughts
1. Neither of us has a clue about his recruiting ability at a PAC 12 level. Has he successfully pulled recruits away from PAC 12 level schools? I was hoping for someone who has.
2. He has credentials for being a RB coach. Great! Hopefully he will succeed at this level.

An underwhelming hire from my perspective.

Are you seriously judging this hire on the basis of being able to pull Pac-12 level recruits down to an FCS-level program? OMG... What the heck are you smoking?
Rushinbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MoragaBear said:

At least Wilcox had two stints working with him so he's in a good position to know what he's getting and what his upside is at Cal.
Has any knowledgeable person assessed the coaching our rb's got from the last guy? I read a lot that hyped them, but didn't see top level technique from them. Maybe I don't know enough about what I'm looking at, but...
Looperbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MoragaBear said:

At least Wilcox had two stints working with him so he's in a good position to know what he's getting and what his upside is at Cal.
This counts for a lot. Tedford hired some guys who weren't household names who turned out to be good, like Kieseau.
Recruiting coordinator with strong West Coast ties, I like this hire.
Last Page
Page 1 of 4
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.