Seth Greenberg just made a pitch for this to happen (based entirely on men's BB, of course). Is he right?
If I had a vote, I'd vote no. They screwed up the PAC10 by adding Utah and Colorado, for basketball anyway. conference ball should be a home and home competition between conference schools, as it always has been. Adding Utah and Colorado wrecked that, because it would make for too long a conference schedule. I would maybe go for it if they eliminated some of the pushover non-conference games instead.510 Bear said:
Seth Greenberg just made a pitch for this to happen (based entirely on men's BB, of course). Is he right?
How good is their football program?510 Bear said:
Seth Greenberg just made a pitch for this to happen (based entirely on men's BB, of course). Is he right?
The rule is they have to play football so the discussion is pointless. Of course a lot of discussion is pointless. Let's assume they could join just for basketball. You have to look at a schools potential bad days as well as good. If at any point they have a down turn in fortunes, they are completely useless to the conference.510 Bear said:
Seth Greenberg just made a pitch for this to happen (based entirely on men's BB, of course). Is he right?
510 Bear said:
Seth Greenberg just made a pitch for this to happen (based entirely on men's BB, of course). Is he right?
rather stupid idea from Seth. The CFB championship will expand to 16 teams before the Pac even considers a non-R1, non-football Uni.510 Bear said:
Seth Greenberg just made a pitch for this to happen (based entirely on men's BB, of course). Is he right?