Pregame Bears vs $C Thread (not game thread)

6,507 Views | 88 Replies | Last: 4 yr ago by HoopDreams
socaltownie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
But hey - remember, SFBear says talent doesn't matter so it must be Fox that is missing these shots and not that USC has about 3 inches on us at every position or that Lars picked up 2 fouls in 83 seconsds;
Take care of your Chicken
calbearinamaze
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rebounds -13
calgo430
How long do you want to ignore this user?
not enuf points scored by our bears. fire power ugly. we need some scorers/shooters.
IssyBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I think we are better shooters than we saw in the first half. We were getting more open shots than we normally do, but our better shooters were just off target. We may have a better shooting 2nd half, at least I hope we will.
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
California vs. USC - Game Summary - January 16, 2020 - ESPN


https://www.espn.com/mens-college-basketball/game?gameId=401170667
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
socaltownie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We lack scorers other than Matt. Just frustrating to watch them throw up bricks or miss shots they can, sometimes, make.
Take care of your Chicken
socaltownie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

California vs. USC - Game Summary - January 16, 2020 - ESPN


https://www.espn.com/mens-college-basketball/game?gameId=401170667
Those are some UGLY stats. At least limiting turnovers to 2.
Take care of your Chicken
socaltownie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Seriously? Is Jefferson a U$C alumn?
Take care of your Chicken
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
socaltownie said:

Seriously? Is Jefferson a U$C alumn?


Jefferson's $3.5M gift will help finance new Arizona practice facility


https://www.espn.com/mens-college-basketball/news/story?id=2979756
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
socaltownie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

socaltownie said:

Seriously? Is Jefferson a U$C alumn?


Jefferson's $3.5M gift will help finance new Arizona practice facility


https://www.espn.com/mens-college-basketball/news/story?id=2979756
Thats right. I had put that out of my memory.
Take care of your Chicken
socaltownie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
OK. Work tomorrow. I am out. Lack of talent showing in this one. That is the bar - much to SFBears waxing about 1960 - this is the talent level we have to get to so as to compete in this league. Aint going to cut it to be the reincarnation of Pete N. and "coach em up."
Take care of your Chicken
ncbears
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Hey, it is only 24. We got ten more minutes to ... um ... um.... play!
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
My cheerleading personality needs an iron lung. We have reached the part where the sportscasters have gone into the Stream of Consciousness Riffing on Non Game Related Topics Mode.
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
IssyBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Hey, we got us a shooter! I like this kid. Klonaras needs to play more..
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Can't blame Fox for the talent on the roster as much as you'd like to
ncbears
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gee, you think Jefferson still hurts about his Team USA experience?
socaltownie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SBGold said:

Can't blame Fox for the talent on the roster as much as you'd like to
i don't blame him. I do blame what looks like a bust of next year's class. He has to pick it up (as he knows) or rinse and repeat. I particularly blame farts that wax about Newell and don't understand the talent gap.
Take care of your Chicken
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Grant had a tough day at the office.
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
calgo430
How long do you want to ignore this user?
our talent level is not pac 12 caliber.. tough to watch.
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
$C may dump Furd.
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
calgo430 said:

our talent level is not pac 12 caliber.. tough to watch.


Huskies, prior to losing their PG, beat $C by 32 pts.
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
13 made 3's vs Bears' 5 at present.
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
socaltownie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The fact that USC is out there shooting threes shows just what dicks they are. I hope we ROAST the Toejams in football next year.
Take care of your Chicken
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

Bet 14 bitcoin for Bears to cover the 11.


I give stock tips and predict POTUS elections if anyone is interested.

Coach and wife are pleased.

Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
calbearinamaze
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

bearister said:

Bet 14 bitcoin for Bears to cover the 11.


I give stock tips and predict POTUS elections if anyone is interested.

Coach and wife are pleased.


Any chance this can be converted into a "Coaches' Wives Hotties thread"?
UrsaMajor
How long do you want to ignore this user?
socaltownie said:

But hey - remember, SFBear says talent doesn't matter so it must be Fox that is missing these shots and not that USC has about 3 inches on us at every position or that Lars picked up 2 fouls in 83 seconsds;
that's a cheap shot and totally unnecessary (and you know it). I get it that you don't like SFCity (apparently you can't even be bothered to use his actual handle), but he never said that. He has only said that coaching is as important as talent and that you don't need a team full of 5* if you have the right talent.
Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I thought the two pieces of good news last night were...

1. WSU beat the Ducks and made our win over them look better.

2. Fox gave Thorpe, Kuany and even Klonaras some decent minutes.
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearup said:

bearister said:

bearister said:

Bet 14 bitcoin for Bears to cover the 11.


I give stock tips and predict POTUS elections if anyone is interested.

Coach and wife are pleased.


Any chance this can be converted into a "Coaches' Wives Hotties thread"?


Real Coaches Housewives of Beverly Hills

Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
socaltownie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
UrsaMajor said:

socaltownie said:

But hey - remember, SFBear says talent doesn't matter so it must be Fox that is missing these shots and not that USC has about 3 inches on us at every position or that Lars picked up 2 fouls in 83 seconsds;
that's a cheap shot and totally unnecessary (and you know it). I get it that you don't like SFCity (apparently you can't even be bothered to use his actual handle), but he never said that. He has only said that coaching is as important as talent and that you don't need a team full of 5* if you have the right talent.
He has denied you even need 4 stars..
Take care of your Chicken
calbearinamaze
How long do you want to ignore this user?
socaltownie said:

SBGold said:

Can't blame Fox for the talent on the roster as much as you'd like to
i don't blame him. I do blame what looks like a bust of next year's class. He has to pick it up (as he knows) or rinse and repeat. I particularly blame farts that wax about Newell and don't understand the talent gap.
SCT,

Brilliant signature.

Take care of your chicken

RESPECT
SFCityBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
socaltownie said:

SBGold said:

Can't blame Fox for the talent on the roster as much as you'd like to
i don't blame him. I do blame what looks like a bust of next year's class. He has to pick it up (as he knows) or rinse and repeat. I particularly blame farts that wax about Newell and don't understand the talent gap.
Newell understood the talent gap, and sometimes beat the hell out of it. On other occasions, like when Cal got blown out in the NCAA Final in 1960, by an Ohio State team with two Hall of Famers, Lucas and Havlicek, plus another who started and won championships with the Celtics, and Joe Roberts who helped kill Cal with 25 foot hook shots and played 3 years for Syracuse in the NBA, and Mel Nowell, who played in both the NBA and ABA.

Newell got overwhelmed and embarrassed by the talent of USF with Bill Russell, KC Jones, both NBA Hall of Famers, and Mike Farmer, who played 8 seasons in the NBA. Newell lost to Wilt Chamberlain and Kansas in 1957 and 1958 preseason, but went to the Regional final in both years, losing to more talented teams each time, USF in 1957 (twice), and Seattle with Elgin Baylor and Charley Brown, again more talented. In 1959, Newell lost to Kansas State with All-American Bob Boozer (who played 11 years in the NBA, averaging 15 pts and 8 rebs).

In 1959 and 1960, Cincinnati with Oscar Robertson was more talented and Newell beat them. He was to beat Cincinnati and Oscar in 1960. In 1959 Newell was able to beat a more talented West Virginia team with Jerry West.

Newell won 4 conference titles, beating the more talented (IMO) teams of UCLA and Washington. He won and NIT title in 1949 reportedly beating some teams with better talent. In 1950, Newell's USF team got blown out by 19 points by a powerful CCNY team in the first round. CCNY went on to beat Kentucky by 39 points, Duquesne by 9 and Bradley by 8. By the way, CCNY was so good, they also won the NCAA in 1950.

Is that enough waxing negative on Pete Newell for you? He was not John Wooden or Adolph Rupp or Red Auerbach who all had long winning careers. Newell was a guy who could teach skills and teach players to get better, and teach teams to get better, reach their potential and sometimes more. He was like a .300 hitter in baseball, successful about 3 times out of ten. Why I "wax" about him is because he is the only coach at Cal who ever won the Big One. He understood what Cal was and he understood the talent gap. And he understood that at Cal, there was always going to be a gap, because the Admin will not have us be known as a basketball school. If we win fine, but we will not allow the temptation of probation to sully our reputation because we bought some highly rated talent. So we are faced with landing one or two of these kids and having them for a year, and hoping we get enough very good 4-year players to support these stars, and then maybe win something. That is the way Newell recruited, and he was successful at winning. You just can't seem to come to grips with who we are. You are obsessed with winning championships, and obsessed with getting as many one-and-dones to do the job for you. What Cal is about is developing kids into men and developing their minds and their characters. My advice is enjoy watching the players develop and watching the the team develop. If this happens, we will win some games we should not win. If it doesn't happen, we need to get a new coach, but to try and change the culture into Kentucky and Calipari is a waste of time. Maybe you need to switch your allegiance to another school, before you get too depressed.

I've taken some shots at you, primarily because I don't like the way you ridicule or trash Cal players. These are young kids, and you have followed basketball long enough to know most players don't become productive until their 3rd or 4th year in college. There are only about 30 players in the nation who were good enough to be taken by the NBA after their first year. The odds of you getting 3 or 4 of them on a Cal team is zip, I'm sorry to tell you. Get five, and unless you've got a good coach, they likely won't win a championship for you anyway, IMO. You already have trashed the incoming players for next season, when the rest of us are trying to become their fans. Are you pleased with yourself? You have been trashing our new players all season (and some of the veterans) and now you want to trash players coming to Cal that none of us have even seen? You are a smart guy, but you are letting your emotions cloud your opinions. Enjoy the good points of the season, few as they may be. We are only here for a short time, and it is best to enjoy life, instead of grousing about it all the time, isn't it?
SFCityBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
socaltownie said:

UrsaMajor said:

socaltownie said:

But hey - remember, SFBear says talent doesn't matter so it must be Fox that is missing these shots and not that USC has about 3 inches on us at every position or that Lars picked up 2 fouls in 83 seconsds;
that's a cheap shot and totally unnecessary (and you know it). I get it that you don't like SFCity (apparently you can't even be bothered to use his actual handle), but he never said that. He has only said that coaching is as important as talent and that you don't need a team full of 5* if you have the right talent.
He has denied you even need 4 stars..
That is a lie. Recruit rankings are most accurate for the top 30 players or so. After that the accuracy decreases markedly. What I have said is that we need very good players. I'm not gullible enough to trust the rankings of 4-stars, nor am I smart enough to rank the players I'd like to have while they are in high school. Many teams have 4-star players who did not live up to their rankings, and many have 2-star or 3-star players who exceed their rankings as college players, and even some players who were unranked making the ranking gurus look not too smart. Hawaii in 2016 was a perfect example. They had nothing. Cal had two players hurt, but if talent is the answer to everything, Rabb and Brown should have beaten Hawaii all by themselves with one hand tied behind their backs, not to mention that 3-stars Mathews and Singer helped keep Cal in the game. Without them, it's a blowout. You just can't grasp that this is a team game. It requires 7 or 8 good players and a coach to be successful, the same as it was 70 years ago. One big difference between us is your blind faith in recruit rankings. I remain skeptical of them. I'd rather see a player in action and then make up my own mind if I'd want him.
socaltownie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SFCityBear said:

socaltownie said:

UrsaMajor said:

socaltownie said:

But hey - remember, SFBear says talent doesn't matter so it must be Fox that is missing these shots and not that USC has about 3 inches on us at every position or that Lars picked up 2 fouls in 83 seconsds;
that's a cheap shot and totally unnecessary (and you know it). I get it that you don't like SFCity (apparently you can't even be bothered to use his actual handle), but he never said that. He has only said that coaching is as important as talent and that you don't need a team full of 5* if you have the right talent.
He has denied you even need 4 stars..
That is a lie. Recruit rankings are most accurate for the top 30 players or so. After that the accuracy decreases markedly. What I have said is that we need very good players. I'm not gullible enough to trust the rankings of 4-stars, nor am I smart enough to rank the players I'd like to have while they are in high school. Many teams have 4-star players who did not live up to their rankings, and many have 2-star or 3-star players who exceed their rankings as college players, and even some players who were unranked making the ranking gurus look not too smart. Hawaii in 2016 was a perfect example. They had nothing. Cal had two players hurt, but if talent is the answer to everything, Rabb and Brown should have beaten Hawaii all by themselves with one hand tied behind their backs, not to mention that 3-stars Mathews and Singer helped keep Cal in the game. Without them, it's a blowout. You just can't grasp that this is a team game. It requires 7 or 8 good players and a coach to be successful, the same as it was 70 years ago. One big difference between us is your blind faith in recruit rankings. I remain skeptical of them. I'd rather see a player in action and then make up my own mind if I'd want him.
Again, that is just false. I have REPEATEDLY linked an article that showed a valid statistical samplying which showed that 5 stars have about a 60% chance of being drafted, 4* a 35% and 3 and below a less than 10% (by memory those precentages). This was over a big enough sample size to be fully statistically valid. Thus people whose JOB IT IS TO EVALUATE TALENT are reaching a far different conclusion to you as to skill and talent.

I too long questioned rankings. I still wonder about them in respect to football because of the lack of travel teams and the reliance on tape to try to evaluate. But increasingly with AAU ball and travel and summer tournaments the best graders are seeing these kids at least once live. And again, draft day don't lie.

BTW - your sad saw about the Hawaii game is BEYOND old. We lost that game not because of Rabb and Brown. We lost that because we had to rely upon Chauca - you know a 2 start - to try to run point. It was a disaster. No coaching in the world was going to make up for what he was - a kid without a handle, who couldn't shoot over folks and who couldn't guard folks to save soul. But hey, playing professionally in Manila so there is that.

You KNOW that the team was woeful without Wallace - with the losses coming when he was hurt. We win going away in that game, even without Bird, if Ty was there.

Frankly your underappreciation for that team is really really irritating - but hey , it fits your narrative that all we need to do is run a weave and worship at the god of 1960 basketball.
Take care of your Chicken
oskidunker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Singer playedin that game
Go Bears!
UrsaMajor
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oskidunker said:

Singer playedin that game
But he was in early foul trouble and I believe fouled out.
Page 2 of 3
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.