Unit2Sucks said:
GBear4Life said:
It's a logical fallacy, that's been observed and documented to the partisan ideologues on this board numberous times. The "if you reject an entity that supports X, how can you support X". This is illogic 4th graders can discern.
You don't appear to have a clear enough grasp on logic to know when to apply logical fallacies. You've done this "numberous" times as well. The fallacy you point to here is not apt.
If my argument were that someone who rejects Qanon should reject Trump because Qanon supports Trump, you would have a case. You would have an easier time making that case about white supremacists. You can't make that case for Qanon though since Trump supports and amplifies Qanon even though Trump knows that Qanon is a fraudulent group. This is the piece that you seem to be missing which I spelled out in my prior post.
Either keep up with the discussion or run along and waste other people's time with your inapt claims of logical fallacies.
This is getting tiresome.
Your inclusion of another variable -- that Person X also supports Entity Y that I reject -- does not change the illogic of your original assertion: that it's morally hypocritical or incongruent to support Trump because he supports X which we all reject.
The only premise that would render your assertion fair would be a false one: that 'supporting' somebody magically implies you support EVERYTHING about them.
One is not culpable for rape apologetics simply by supporting Shilary as a politician.
I hope we are done with this one, but I doubt it.
