RGB could have retired during the Obama presidency.

BearForce2 said:

---

RGB could have retired during the Obama presidency.

---

And then what? Mitch would leave her spot vacant.

A crazy eyed Fundamentalist Christian cult member appointed by a self admitted meow meow grabbing serial sexual predator and sworn in by a porno fan and sexual harasser.

Angry Resistance Tweeters promise riots in the street but settle for take out sushi.

concordtom said:

---

bearister said:

---

Why did Scalia's family decline an autopsy when the Right claimed foul play?

---

I'd venture an easy and reasonable guess.
1) Families often don't want to cut up their loved one. They are gone. They are satisfied with how it happened. No need to sully their death.
2) Meanwhile, others' interests are far less personal, and if they can twist a story one way or another, they will.

---

The Right was saying he was offed.....but his family wanted no part of finding out what was in his bloodstream.

Meanwhile RBG and Scalia are reunited in 18th century heaven


&q=85

RBG; " My deathbed wish comes true."

Scalia; : " Place your hand on my redoubtable staff."

Her Commander husband looks displeased...like he is going to give his handmaid Justice a beating if she doesn't display appropriate enthusiasm at their next Ceremony.

" I have very particular set of skills. Skills I have acquired over a very long career. Skills that make me a nightmare for people like you. I will look for you, I will find you... and I will kill you."

It's on! Thousands of raging protesting Karens in the streets with pumpkin scented candles!

bearister said:

---

" I have very particular set of skills. Skills I have acquired over a very long career. Skills that make me a nightmare for people like you. I will look for you, I will find you... and I will kill you."

---

r u ok?

Anarchistbear said:

---

It's on! Thousands of raging protesting Karens in the streets with pumpkin scented candles!

---

You know ANTIFA is getting dressed up, the protests give them an excuse to try out new gear bought over the hiatus using Amazon prime.

Not only has she blurred the divide between church and state, but she has stepped over the line between branches of government. She swore an oath of loyalty....to tRump....and he is showing off his possession just like he shows off Hope Hicks. His self pardon will be ratified by SCOTUS now.

They hold campaign rallies at the White House?

Bearister: At this point, I think you are beyond therapy. maybe a presidential commission to make recommendations as what to do with people who present your mindset. No building in Oklahoma City is sAfe with you roaming the streets. "If you think you are thinking of harming others or are thinking of harming yourself, please call 911. Please do not drink and drive."

Dear Go Bears: Please google all the videos regarding Obamas' teenage years in Hawaii and his formative years in Chicago. Yes-----yes--he was/is...and Michelle????you do know what Joan Rivers said about Michelle, right????And, you know what she said about Obama, right?????One month later, she wound up dead...not that there's anything wrong with that. .

Pack the court.

*Copyright B.A. Bearacus All Rights Reserved

going4roses said:

---

---

It's both.

Karl Marx said:

---

going4roses said:

---

---

It's both.

---

Indeed plausible. Depending on whose vantage point we are looking from plays role

The Left Doesn't Fear Amy Coney Barrett, It Fears the Constitution

https://www.nationalreview.com/2020/10/the-left-doesnt-fear-amy-coney-barrett-it-fears-the-constitution/

Quote:

---

Nothing threatens the progressive project more than the existence of a Supreme Court that adheres to the Constitution. It's really that simple.

That's what the tantrum over Justice Amy Coney Barrett's confirmation is all about. The notion that the same Democrats who shelved the judicial filibuster and now threaten to destroy the separation of powers with a Court-packing revenge scheme the same people, incidentally, so fond of smear-drenched confirmation hearings are sticklers for process or decorum is simply ludicrous.

---

Please...leftists....you don't care about the Constitution and then you're worried it will be discarded?

All this hypocritical, self-righteous democratic and leftist caterwauling is classic.

Does anyone with a shred of objectivity think for a millisecond the dems wouldn't have added their own nominee to replace both justices, just like the republicans did?

bearlyamazing said:

---

All this hypocritical, self-righteous democratic and leftist caterwauling is classic.

Does anyone with a shred of objectivity think for a millisecond the dems wouldn't have added their own nominee to replace both justices, just like the republicans did?

---

It's not about right or wrong or fairness. It's just whining from the losers because they would have done the exact same thing.

Two liberals on Amy Barrett.

We need a core of liberal and conservative centrists who work together to preserve the institutions.

Hypocrites calling others hypocritical. Nice.

Classic projection, too. Assume the other side would act or has acted in the same underhanded way your side has. Anything to convince yourself that your side's behavior is ok.

IOIYAR

Hey, a female justice, some Democrats must be secretly happy, I think.

BearForce2 said:

---

Hey, a female justice, some Democrats must be secretly happy, I think.

---

Yeah, just like we were happy about a black justice named Clarence Thomas.

dimitrig said:

---

BearForce2 said:

---

Hey, a female justice, some Democrats must be secretly happy, I think.

---

Yeah, just like we were happy about a black justice named Clarence Thomas.

---

LOL.

bearlyamazing said:

---

All this hypocritical, self-righteous democratic and leftist caterwauling is classic.

Does anyone with a shred of objectivity think for a millisecond the dems wouldn't have added their own nominee to replace both justices, just like the republicans did?

---

To me that isn't the issue. The issue is the Supreme Court has now been constructed by minority governance to impose their will on the American people for the next 30 years. Tyranny of the minority. The Constitution has checks and balances and one of the checks against the Supreme Court is that Congress gets to "ordain and establish" it.

Government of the people, by the people, and for the people.

dajo9 said:

---

bearlyamazing said:

---

All this hypocritical, self-righteous democratic and leftist caterwauling is classic.

Does anyone with a shred of objectivity think for a millisecond the dems wouldn't have added their own nominee to replace both justices, just like the republicans did?

---

To me that isn't the issue. The issue is the Supreme Court has now been constructed by minority governance to impose their will on the American people for the next 30 years. Tyranny of the minority. The Constitution has checks and balances and one of the checks against the Supreme Court is that Congress gets to "ordain and establish" it.

Government of the people, by the people, and for the people.

---

But the Supreme Court is for a lifetime and the makeup of the Congress changes over time. Seems like a big flaw in the "by the people, for the people" rule. Why not just have an equal number of right/left judges and one libertarian/centrist continually?

82gradDLSdad said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

bearlyamazing said:

---

All this hypocritical, self-righteous democratic and leftist caterwauling is classic.

Does anyone with a shred of objectivity think for a millisecond the dems wouldn't have added their own nominee to replace both justices, just like the republicans did?

---

To me that isn't the issue. The issue is the Supreme Court has now been constructed by minority governance to impose their will on the American people for the next 30 years. Tyranny of the minority. The Constitution has checks and balances and one of the checks against the Supreme Court is that Congress gets to "ordain and establish" it.

Government of the people, by the people, and for the people.

---

But the Supreme Court is for a lifetime and the makeup of the Congress changes over time. Seems like a big flaw in the "by the people, for the people" rule. Why not just have an equal number of right/left judges and one libertarian/centrist continually?

---

Part of the issue there is that the definitions of "right/left" change over time. And for a lifetime appointment that could be an issue.

But I think there is a good argument for term limits on SCOTUS. Lifetime appointments clearly can become political deathmatches, but if you know you're getting regular turnover on the court then it's not so much.

sycasey said:

---

82gradDLSdad said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

bearlyamazing said:

---

All this hypocritical, self-righteous democratic and leftist caterwauling is classic.

Does anyone with a shred of objectivity think for a millisecond the dems wouldn't have added their own nominee to replace both justices, just like the republicans did?

---

To me that isn't the issue. The issue is the Supreme Court has now been constructed by minority governance to impose their will on the American people for the next 30 years. Tyranny of the minority. The Constitution has checks and balances and one of the checks against the Supreme Court is that Congress gets to "ordain and establish" it.

Government of the people, by the people, and for the people.

---

But the Supreme Court is for a lifetime and the makeup of the Congress changes over time. Seems like a big flaw in the "by the people, for the people" rule. Why not just have an equal number of right/left judges and one libertarian/centrist continually?

---

Part of the issue there is that the definitions of "right/left" change over time. And for a lifetime appointment that could be an issue.

But I think there is a good argument for term limits on SCOTUS. Lifetime appointments clearly can become political deathmatches, but if you know you're getting regular turnover on the court then it's not so much.

---

I think the best solution would be 9 Judges with 18 year terms. A President picks a new Justice every 2 years. We also need to add states like Puerto Rico and Washington D.C. to eliminate the Senate imbalance with the people. Would be good to break California in two also - dare to dream.

But since term limits would require a Constitutional amendment, I think we should just have a 13 Justice Supreme Court. Easiest way to rebalance the Court with the American people.