pingpong2 said:
GMP said:
heartofthebear said:
BTW, Cal beat Devonte Adams and Derek Carr at Candlestick park to start the 2011 season, iirc. by Zach Maynard and company. Michael Kendricks was one of a deep core of LBs that helped make that defense good enough to beat future NFL guys like that.
They played the rest of their home games that season at the Giant's ballpark, then called AT&T park.
Not correct. Davante redshirted that year. He only played two seasons at Fresno - went over 100 catches each year, for a total of over 3,000 yards and 38 TDs.
If we can't take a guy that good because of a couple Ds, we are never going to be good again. Instead of being snobs, we should work to help the kid succeed at Cal. We can't take them all, but you have to make an exception or two every year.
There's only so much that hand-holding and preferrential treatment can do. Frankly the amount of support any scholorship football player needs is already borderline. Lowering the standards even more and you'd be taking the "student" completely out of what little student there is in the word student-athlete. Do we want to be like UNC where players who read at an elementary-school level are admitted and rubber-stamped through their classes so that they can play?
First of all, the context of a bad grade matters a lot. Was it freshmen year? Or junior year? Was something in the student's personal life at that time impacting academcis? What is the academic trajectory? What other indications are there that the student is academically motivated or bright?
Beyond that, grades are not the only metric of success at Cal. Leon Powe had earl life obstacles beyond any of those faced by 99% of the students at Cal and I'm sure it affected his academics. And the Russell White example has already been mentioned.
No one is saying football players (or anyone else) should be rubberstamped through Cal. That is a strawman.
Cal and other universities admit many people with exceptional non-academic talents (music, art, etc.) based on factors outside the classroom. Athletics is such a talent and should be no different - perhaps even more preferenced given the outsized role in the University and $$ impacts (i.e., football basically paying for all other sports).
If Cal wants to have a successful D-1 football team, you have to compete on an even playing field. Every school makes academic exceptions for athletes. Choosing to be different and applying an academic purity test is a recipe for losing. Cal's current policies in that regard are a self inflicted wound.