Happy PatRIOTs Day, fellow Champions!
ColoradoBear said:
Cal should really reduce the capicty of CMS again by putting in plastic chairbacks on all sideline seats that are not the student section. The benchbacks are crap and sections like T and TT that could actually go for some decent prices are still spaced like 1920's sized seats. I say this as someone who is 6'2', making seats wider doesn't help the fact the depth is not enough for taller people. Benchbacks are also obnoxious because the seat doesn't flip up, so it's still hard to pass without stepping on people's feet, beer, etc.
They could also add more specialty seats like the ones with tables in the corners/endzone. Having such a gradient between club and regular seat prices and comfort was a huge mistake in hindsight. Making non-club seats totally suck has just not driven many to pay 5k-8k for club seats...
In person attendence is competing with TV where every game is televised and a decent 65" TV can be had for the price of one season ticket.
And all those attendence figures are sadly jacked up due to season ticket sales, but people are skipping 2-3 games a year.
Worst game experience of my life was sitting a couple of sections north of the student section at the Big Game when it was like in Sept or Oct during the first season of the new CMS. The section was completely packed and we all had to sit at a 45 degree angle just for a little space. It took us the entire halftime to go get a beer and come back to our seats -- play already started when we got back and we were hustling the whole time. Unless it's one of those socially distanced games due to it being an unattractive draw, I am always going to sit on the westside and preferably in a chairback.ColoradoBear said:
Cal should really reduce the capicty of CMS again by putting in plastic chairbacks on all sideline seats that are not the student section. The benchbacks are crap and sections like T and TT that could actually go for some decent prices are still spaced like 1920's sized seats. I say this as someone who is 6'2', making seats wider doesn't help the fact the depth is not enough for taller people. Benchbacks are also obnoxious because the seat doesn't flip up, so it's still hard to pass without stepping on people's feet, beer, etc.
They could also add more specialty seats like the ones with tables in the corners/endzone. Having such a gradient between club and regular seat prices and comfort was a huge mistake in hindsight. Making non-club seats totally suck has just not driven many to pay 5k-8k for club seats...
In person attendence is competing with TV where every game is televised and a decent 65" TV can be had for the price of one season ticket.
And all those attendence figures are sadly jacked up due to season ticket sales, but people are skipping 2-3 games a year.
Not true. There are least 20K in fans masquerading as empty seats each game.Golden One said:
Anyone who believes Stanford has averaged 43,263 over the past 5 years is delusional.
Golden One said:
Anyone who believes Stanford has averaged 43,263 over the past 5 years is delusional.
Apparently UCLA is now the Trojans as well as USCDiabloWags said:
Sad
Pac-12 Football: Ranking the teams by 5-year attendance - Pacific Takes
The article seems to think they share a stadium too.heartofthebear said:Apparently UCLA is now the Trojans as well as USCDiabloWags said:
Sad
Pac-12 Football: Ranking the teams by 5-year attendance - Pacific Takes