Wilner: "Financial Challenges for Cal & UCLA Intensify"

1,825 Views | 6 Replies | Last: 1 yr ago by calumnus
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Today, for the Bay Area News Group
Jon Wilner

The Mercury News






"Cults don't end well. They really don't."
Bobodeluxe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Things look pretty, pretty, pretty good, then?
BearoutEast67
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Given the baby bear stabbing the Golden Bear in the back, and the future locations in different conferences, it's probably time for Wilner and others to stop combining Cal and UCLA in their stories.
Donate to Cal's NIL at https://calegends.com/donation/
ninetyfourbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wilner: "If you subtract income and financial support, they are in a deficit." Yes, so is everybody else if you subtract money coming in.
LunchTime
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The campus budget is like $3b.

Running a full scale department for a few million seems like a win. Its like a half percent of the budget for a pretty significant department. Is there any department on campus that costs less? I am guessing records storage costs more.

Every time this comes up, it reminds me that the core of the problem with college athletics is the idea that it shouldn't cost money.

Why do we need idiots to come into the school? Because they are good at football, and that makes the department balanced.

Why does UCLA need to leave for the Big10? Because it brings in a few million more dollars, and that helps balance the department.

Why did we give up tradition for a national championship scheme? Because it helps balance the budget.

EVERYTHING wrong with college athletics comes back to the anti-intellectual stance that a department must pay for itself. That is the core of what has to change in athletics.

Cal should be saying "We will spend $100m on college athletics, we will not spend all of our time trying to squeeze $100m back out, we will make it a Cal focused environment start to finish."
bluehenbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
calumnus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LunchTime said:

The campus budget is like $3b.

Running a full scale department for a few million seems like a win. Its like a half percent of the budget for a pretty significant department. Is there any department on campus that costs less? I am guessing records storage costs more.

Every time this comes up, it reminds me that the core of the problem with college athletics is the idea that it shouldn't cost money.

Why do we need idiots to come into the school? Because they are good at football, and that makes the department balanced.

Why does UCLA need to leave for the Big10? Because it brings in a few million more dollars, and that helps balance the department.

Why did we give up tradition for a national championship scheme? Because it helps balance the budget.

EVERYTHING wrong with college athletics comes back to the anti-intellectual stance that a department must pay for itself. That is the core of what has to change in athletics.

Cal should be saying "We will spend $100m on college athletics, we will not spend all of our time trying to squeeze $100m back out, we will make it a Cal focused environment start to finish."



The other UCs and most CSUs have athletics. Do all the other UCs and CSUs break even in athletics? I doubt it.
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.