Before the season started there were some predicting 10-2, etc

My guess was 6-6 with a shot at 7-5, i had faith that jw would underperform

So jw met expectations, can we expect jk to give him a raise

Fire Knowlton
Fire Wilcox

Knowlton and the ENTIRE coaching staff must go.

To me, Wilcox did not meet expectations which was 7 or 8 games. Not only that, the way he lost the games proves he is not the coach we need. If I had $15 million I'd offer it up, but I dont, and so I can just express my opinion which is:

Cal football would be better off without Justin Wilcox as the head coach.

As a very wise man once wrote about minor league professional football, "There is no salary cap."

I also predicted 6-6 so he met my expectations as well.

If there's one thing I've learned from 15+ years of managing and hiring/firing people, it's that a tiger can't change its stripes. If someone is inherently not competent enough to perform a job, no amount of additional resources or support will change that.

PtownBear1 said:

---

I also predicted 6-6 so he met my expectations as well.

If there's one thing I've learned from 15+ years of managing and hiring/firing people, it's that a tiger can't change its stripes. If someone is inherently not competent enough to perform a job, no amount of additional resources or support will change that.

---

This 1000%. My experience as well. Once you identify they are not competent they must be removed.

6956bear said:

---

PtownBear1 said:

---

I also predicted 6-6 so he met my expectations as well.

If there's one thing I've learned from 15+ years of managing and hiring/firing people, it's that a tiger can't change its stripes. If someone is inherently not competent enough to perform a job, no amount of additional resources or support will change that.

---

This 1000%. My experience as well. Once you identify they are not competent they must be removed.

---

Only at Cal would someone identified as not competent receive a 6-year $30M guaranteed extension.

BadNewsBear1 said:

---

6956bear said:

---

PtownBear1 said:

---

I also predicted 6-6 so he met my expectations as well.

If there's one thing I've learned from 15+ years of managing and hiring/firing people, it's that a tiger can't change its stripes. If someone is inherently not competent enough to perform a job, no amount of additional resources or support will change that.

---

This 1000%. My experience as well. Once you identify they are not competent they must be removed.

---

Only at Cal would someone identified as not competent receive a 6-year $30M guaranteed extension.

---

"Only at Cal"?

Do tell.

Bobodeluxe said:

---

BadNewsBear1 said:

---

6956bear said:

---

PtownBear1 said:

---

I also predicted 6-6 so he met my expectations as well.

If there's one thing I've learned from 15+ years of managing and hiring/firing people, it's that a tiger can't change its stripes. If someone is inherently not competent enough to perform a job, no amount of additional resources or support will change that.

---

This 1000%. My experience as well. Once you identify they are not competent they must be removed.

---

Only at Cal would someone identified as not competent receive a 6-year $30M guaranteed extension.

---

"Only at Cal"?

Do tell.

---

Uh OK.

After his first five years JW had compiled a 15-25 conference record (proving that he was not competent to lead this team).

At that point JK rewarded him with a 6 year $30M guaranteed extension.

This has never happened in the history of college football.

Hence, "Only at Cal".

BadNewsBear1 said:

---

Bobodeluxe said:

---

BadNewsBear1 said:

---

6956bear said:

---

PtownBear1 said:

---

I also predicted 6-6 so he met my expectations as well.

If there's one thing I've learned from 15+ years of managing and hiring/firing people, it's that a tiger can't change its stripes. If someone is inherently not competent enough to perform a job, no amount of additional resources or support will change that.

---

This 1000%. My experience as well. Once you identify they are not competent they must be removed.

---

Only at Cal would someone identified as not competent receive a 6-year $30M guaranteed extension.

---

"Only at Cal"?

Do tell.

---

Uh OK.

After his first five years JW had compiled a 15-25 conference record (proving that he was not competent to lead this team).

At that point JK rewarded him with a 6 year $30M guaranteed extension.

This has never happened in the history of college football.

Hence, "Only at Cal".

---

So, now you are limiting your statement to football coaches in the minor leagues with specific win/loss records? Does aTm ring a bell. Different numbers, same stupid.

Bobodeluxe said:

---

BadNewsBear1 said:

---

Bobodeluxe said:

---

BadNewsBear1 said:

---

6956bear said:

---

PtownBear1 said:

---

I also predicted 6-6 so he met my expectations as well.

If there's one thing I've learned from 15+ years of managing and hiring/firing people, it's that a tiger can't change its stripes. If someone is inherently not competent enough to perform a job, no amount of additional resources or support will change that.

---

This 1000%. My experience as well. Once you identify they are not competent they must be removed.

---

Only at Cal would someone identified as not competent receive a 6-year $30M guaranteed extension.

---

"Only at Cal"?

Do tell.

---

Uh OK.

After his first five years JW had compiled a 15-25 conference record (proving that he was not competent to lead this team).

At that point JK rewarded him with a 6 year $30M guaranteed extension.

This has never happened in the history of college football.

Hence, "Only at Cal".

---

So, now you are limiting your statement to football coaches in the minor leagues with specific win/loss records? Does aTm ring a bell. Different numbers, same stupid.

---

Yes it does ring a bell, and thank you for strengthening my point. Jimbo signed his extension after four years at A & M (with a 21-12 conference record in the SEC) and there was a legitimate chance that LSU was going to poach him.

If you don't see the difference in stupid between these situations I don't know what to tell you.

I'm not saying that there haven't been bad extensions in the history of college football, just that there hasn't been one as stupid as JW's.

I stand by my original statement that no coach has gotten as extension like this after posting a .375 conference winning percentage.

golden sloth said:

---

To me, Wilcox did not meet expectations which was 7 or 8 games. Not only that, the way he lost the games proves he is not the coach we need. If I had $15 million I'd offer it up, but I dont, and so I can just express my opinion which is:

Cal football would be better off without Justin Wilcox as the head coach.

---

there's a difference between prediction and expectation. I predicted 7-5. My expectations were and are for much more. We had a top ten rb, an improving young qb, portal adds to the OL and DL, some top db's, and a boatload of really good wr's bolstered by 2 top guys, ditto the lb's. Thus, my expectations for a good season.

what happened? a hc who shoots for one td per quarter or 4td's per game and holding the opponents to 3. how can you win with a hc who even thinks like that?Let him coach the chess team. this here's football, tackle football.

but, we must replace Knowlton first, otherwise, we'll just have JW 2.0.