Report: Stanford football receives $50 million gift from Bradford M. Freeman

1,629 Views | 16 Replies | Last: 13 days ago by ducktilldeath
SoFlaBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Source: Stanford Report

"Stanford philanthropist and former trustee Bradford M. Freeman, '64, has made a $50 million gift to benefit Stanford football.

The gift comes at a critical time for Stanford Athletics, which has been adapting to seismic shifts in the college athletics landscape."
upsetof86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SoFlaBear said:

Source: Stanford Report

"Stanford philanthropist and former trustee Bradford M. Freeman, '64, has made a $50 million gift to benefit Stanford football.

The gift comes at a critical time for Stanford Athletics, which has been adapting to seismic shifts in the college athletics landscape."


Does he have a spiteful jealous equally wealthy brother?
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
That's an extremely generous donation considering that the guy might not even be a billionaire, he is donating a good chunk of his net worth. Furd has nearly 100 billionaire alums.
going4roses
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Possible game changer
How (are) you gonna win when you ain’t right within…
SoFlaBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
going4roses said:

Possible game changer


Think about how far that program has fallen since Shaw left.

What gets me is that they built a new, smaller on-campus stadium (like 45K capacity?) and it looks empty most times I've seen them play at home.
going4roses
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Smu is competitive with 60 million …?
How (are) you gonna win when you ain’t right within…
Fred Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SoFlaBear said:

Source: Stanford Report

"Stanford philanthropist and former trustee Bradford M. Freeman, '64, has made a $50 million gift to benefit Stanford football.

The gift comes at a critical time for Stanford Athletics, which has been adapting to seismic shifts in the college athletics landscape."

Meanwhile Cal alums collectively can't raise $15M to fix the mistakes of Michael Williams, Nicholas Dirks, Jim Knowlton, and Carol Christ.

Cal is not a serious football school.
Strykur
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Fred Bear said:

SoFlaBear said:

Source: Stanford Report

"Stanford philanthropist and former trustee Bradford M. Freeman, '64, has made a $50 million gift to benefit Stanford football.

The gift comes at a critical time for Stanford Athletics, which has been adapting to seismic shifts in the college athletics landscape."

Meanwhile Cal alums collectively can't raise $15M to fix the mistakes of Michael Williams, Nicholas Dirks, Jim Knowlton.

Cal is not a serious football school.

If Ron really wants to pull the trigger, he will probably have to shoot first and ask the donors later once they see he is for real
okaydo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
He was business partners with former Los Angeles Mayor Richard Riordan.


CNHTH
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The optics of a reagan library "super star" buying a hipster coffee company like Philz Coffee and cancelling all employee stock options with No Consideration which were worth around 50 million; and then less than a month later donating 50 million dollars to a Junior University football team are ummmm yeah pretty bad.
Bobodeluxe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
CNHTH said:

The optics of a reagan library "super star" buying a hipster coffee company like Philz Coffee and cancelling all employee stock options with No Consideration which were worth around 50 million; and then less than a month later donating 50 million dollars to a Junior University football team are ummmm yeah pretty bad.


Sounds like a successful businessman. As someone posted here, 'Look at the stock market."
CALiforniALUM
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Fred Bear said:

SoFlaBear said:

Source: Stanford Report

"Stanford philanthropist and former trustee Bradford M. Freeman, '64, has made a $50 million gift to benefit Stanford football.

The gift comes at a critical time for Stanford Athletics, which has been adapting to seismic shifts in the college athletics landscape."

Meanwhile Cal alums collectively can't raise $15M to fix the mistakes of Michael Williams, Nicholas Dirks, Jim Knowlton, and Carol Christ.

Cal is not a serious football school.



It took you how long to figure that out? Let's be honest, our problems aren't with the coach, they are with us as fans.
HKBear97!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
CNHTH said:

The optics of a reagan library "super star" buying a hipster coffee company like Philz Coffee and cancelling all employee stock options with No Consideration which were worth around 50 million; and then less than a month later donating 50 million dollars to a Junior University football team are ummmm yeah pretty bad.


Interesting. Don't see anything online discussing the worth of the stock options. From what it sounds like the firm was heavily indebted so the $145 mm investment from the firm/fund (not him personally) basically paid off the debt meaning the equity was worthless anyway. Do you know more details on the transaction?
Fred Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
CALiforniALUM said:

Fred Bear said:

SoFlaBear said:

Source: Stanford Report

"Stanford philanthropist and former trustee Bradford M. Freeman, '64, has made a $50 million gift to benefit Stanford football.

The gift comes at a critical time for Stanford Athletics, which has been adapting to seismic shifts in the college athletics landscape."

Meanwhile Cal alums collectively can't raise $15M to fix the mistakes of Michael Williams, Nicholas Dirks, Jim Knowlton, and Carol Christ.

Cal is not a serious football school.

It took you how long to figure that out? Let's be honest, our problems aren't with the coach, they are with us as fans.

Son, I knew that a decade ago. I'm not writing the above for the 75% of Cal fans on this board who realize Cal is just pretending when it comes to the revenue sports. I'm writing for the 25% who thinks "Ron has the keys" means anything.

And our problems are with the coach, the idiot admins who picked him and paid him, and the donors who are too small-time to play in this pool.
Golden One
How long do you want to ignore this user?
CALiforniALUM said:

Fred Bear said:

SoFlaBear said:

Source: Stanford Report

"Stanford philanthropist and former trustee Bradford M. Freeman, '64, has made a $50 million gift to benefit Stanford football.

The gift comes at a critical time for Stanford Athletics, which has been adapting to seismic shifts in the college athletics landscape."

Meanwhile Cal alums collectively can't raise $15M to fix the mistakes of Michael Williams, Nicholas Dirks, Jim Knowlton, and Carol Christ.

Cal is not a serious football school.



It took you how long to figure that out? Let's be honest, our problems aren't with the coach, they are with us as fans.

We have many problems with the football program. But the biggest one is our head coach.
CNHTH
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HKBear97! said:

CNHTH said:

The optics of a reagan library "super star" buying a hipster coffee company like Philz Coffee and cancelling all employee stock options with No Consideration which were worth around 50 million; and then less than a month later donating 50 million dollars to a Junior University football team are ummmm yeah pretty bad.


Interesting. Don't see anything online discussing the worth of the stock options. From what it sounds like the firm was heavily indebted so the $145 mm investment from the firm/fund (not him personally) basically paid off the debt meaning the equity was worthless anyway. Do you know more details on the transaction?

Honestly I'm just assuming it's shady because it's a furdy…but no seriously it's a furdy sooo it's most likely shady. And their was probably roofalin involved as well.

Anyway, being a former lover of Philz I did follow this a few months back and what's weird is that they cancelled the common stock, as opposed to declaring it worthless which from where I'm sitting just exposed them legally.
And from what I've heard the number of former employees that held common stock ranges anywhere from a dozen or so people to 100 with the amount originally invested being anywhere from 10k to over 100k per.
The interesting thing here is that the defense of the equity group claim is that Philz was near bankruptcy and in massive debt thus making the common stock worthless after debt obligations and p stock…
The problem for them is that's not true because the debt and p stock didn't total to the 145mm purchase price and furthermore they didn't declare common stock worthless.
They cancelled it.
Which from my vantage point tells me they are counting on nobody bringing suit against them because the amount to be gained is less than the legal fees. Which implies maybe the number of former employees really is just 10 or so; or maybe it's more in which case they could be in seriously deep legal doo doo if the former employees get class certification.
ducktilldeath
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It's obviously a big deal, but that amount is basically 3 years of competing for an ACC championship to lose in the first round of the playoffs.
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.