Am hoping for the Cactus Bowl as I believe that would be our first January Bowl since the Citrus Bowl! Am hearing West Virginia would be a potential opponent and their record looks pretty darn good.
Strykur;842605178 said:
Would rather play a lower-tier opponent in Shreveport than the Cactus Bowl. It just doesn't seem like a very appealing bowl berth. But it's looking like that or Vegas.
NVBear78;842605147 said:
Am hoping for the Cactus Bowl as I believe that would be our first January Bowl since the Citrus Bowl! Am hearing West Virginia would be a potential opponent and their record looks pretty darn good.
ColoradoBear1;842605208 said:
Cactus Bowl vs WVU would be pretty cool. Seems unlikely though... with OU almost a shoe in for the CFP, the Sugar Bowl would get to choose a replacement from the reast of B12 teams, moving all other bowls down a slot (Cactus is #6... so they would get bumped to essentially #7). If WVU beats KSU, then the Big 12 would only have 6 eligible teams meaning the cactus would have to go outside of the B12. If WVU loses to KSU, KSU becomes eligible for the #7 slot. Not sure how much bowls can trade in the B12, but KSU would be probably more favorable for the cactus anyway. The B12 #5 game is the liberty bowl, so WVU would probably travel there better too.
People still mention the Vegas Bowl, but unless Wilner was wrong when he said the lower bowls can't change their pick order, I don't know how that would happen unless we get two teams into the big time bowls (ie furd to CFB playoff). I did see it mentioned somewhere that UCLA might try to skip out on the LV bowl since they played UNLV this year and because it's close to finals. If they can negotiate that, maybe we slide in. But it's better for Cal to play Jan 2 away from our finals, so if UCLA can bail on the LV Bowl, why wouldn't Cal try?
It also appears that the LV bowl has a one time option to kick the MWC champ to the curb and take BYU. And they are seriously looking into that this year. So if they want to avoid a Cal v SDSU rematch, they can make it happen.
KoreAmBear;842605212 said:
Please no BYU. Btw, do we have a return game v. BYU at Provo coming up soon?
KoreAmBear;842605179 said:
Would people rather play a mid-major that we likely beat, or a name opponent that may give us trouble (e.g. West Virginia)?
concordtom;842605231 said:
I read that Cactus Bowl may have a choice of 3 Pac teams, and I cannot understand why they would not take the hometown ASU team over Cal in order to sell more tickets.
Please explain.
(in other words, I don't see Phoenix in our future.)
KoreAmBear;842605179 said:
Would people rather play a mid-major that we likely beat, or a name opponent that may give us trouble (e.g. West Virginia)?
ColoradoBear1;842605221 said:
Looks like 9/8/2018.
Dbearson;842605249 said:
I would like the cactus bowl. Jan 2 game.
Look at the teams that played in it the last few years.
OK st.
Michigan
Michigan St
TCU
Iowa
Oklahoma
Seems like a legit bowl
concordtom;842605231 said:
I read that Cactus Bowl may have a choice of 3 Pac teams, and I cannot understand why they would not take the hometown ASU team over Cal in order to sell more tickets.
Please explain.
(in other words, I don't see Phoenix in our future.)
Unit2Sucks;842605262 said:
The biggest problem with playing WV is knowing which team you are actually rooting for. We should go blue tops and gold bottoms and have them go gold tops and blue bottoms and just see what happens.
Vegas Bear;842605254 said:
I honestly think some no name bowl like this is our most likely destination. I don't think the cactus bowl will pass on ASU, and I don't think the Vegas bowl will pass on wsu.
KoreAmBear;842605285 said:
What is the calculus for bowls that have local teams? Sonny mentioned briefly that he though Cal would help Cactus sell more hotel rooms (not to mention flights to Phx, rental cars, etc.). With Cal you would get more hotel rooms booked, maybe more spending at restaurants and shops, but lower attendance. With ASU you may get way better attendance, but way less hotel rooms and car rentals booked.
Vegas Bear;842605289 said:
Also, if the big 12 gets a second team into the ny6 bowls, expect sdsu to get an invite, which would ensure our trip to Shreveport (or the like).
Strykur;842605280 said:
Let's get real for a minute, if Furd goes Rose Bowling, that means the PAC-12 most likely has no other teams in the New Year's Six, and we probably get bounced out to Orlando. It's better than Shreveport. Still not sure about Vegas, we just played BYU 12 months ago and a re-match would not put many butts in the seats.
Strykur;842605287 said:
Bowl officials are primarily concerned with tickets sold.
Oh yeah, guess who is in consideration now for the Cactus Bowl: our old State pals in San Diego. A rematch of course would thwart an invite.
http://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/2015/nov/29/sdsu-aztecs-football-bowl-options/
Anyway, current ESPN predictions:
Gildan New Mexico Bowl
University Stadium, Albuquerque, New Mexico
Saturday, Dec. 19, 2 p.m. (ABC)
Schlabach: California vs. New Mexico
Quick Lane Bowl
Ford Field, Detroit
Monday, Dec. 28, 5 p.m. (ESPN2)
McMurphy: Cal vs. Minnesota
Shocky1;842605398 said:
due to finals which are a priority at the #1 ranked public university in the world, cal will not accept a bowl game for december 19th due to academic priorities for student athletes & also the challenges of trying to utilize all of the allocated practices prior to the bowl game which are critical for the development of future starters
NVBear78;842605404 said:
That makes a lot of sense.
ps but somebody needs to tell Bryce Treggs, he was lobbying for the Las Vegas bowl on Twitter!
Strykur;842605287 said:
Gildan New Mexico Bowl
University Stadium, Albuquerque, New Mexico
Saturday, Dec. 19, 2 p.m. (ABC)
Strykur;842605292 said:
TCU and Baylor are currently ranked #11 and #12 in both non-playoff polls, one of them is most likely going.