Oakland Soldiers AAU

14,667 Views | 32 Replies | Last: 15 yr ago by calumnus
tsubamoto2001
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Well, AAU Spring ball has started up and the Oakland Soldiers are at the Boo Williams Invitational in Hampton, VA. This year's edition of the Soldiers is LOADED. There are a bunch of Cal prospects on the squad...

PG - 6'3" - Josiah Turner (2011)
SG - 6'4" - Jabari Brown (2011)
CG - 6'3" - Nick Johnson (2011)
PG - 5'7" - Kiwi Gardner (2011)
PF - 6'9" - Kyle Wiltjer (2011)
PF - 6'9" - Brandon Ashley (2012)
SG - 6'4" - Kori Babineaux (2011)
PG - 5'8" - Dominic Artis (2012)
C - 6'8" - Freddie Tagaloa (2012 football prospect)

To put it precisely, Monty needs to land some dudes. IMO, there's no excuse for Cal not to be an elite-level program with the type of talent the Bay Area will offer these next couple of years and possibly beyond. The 2011 class will tell a lot about Monty and his staff as recruiters.

Also, Jabari Brown has reportedly been playing some ridiculous ball out there. He's quickly becoming a "must get" guy.
SaintBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
tsubamoto2001;315586 said:

Well, AAU Spring ball has started up and the Oakland Soldiers are at the Boo Williams Invitational in Hampton, VA. This year's edition of the Soldiers is LOADED. There are a bunch of Cal prospects on the squad...

PG - 6'3" - Josiah Turner (2011)
SG - 6'4" - Jabari Brown (2011)
CG - 6'3" - Nick Johnson (2011)
PG - 5'7" - Kiwi Gardner (2011)
PF - 6'9" - Kyle Wiltjer (2011)
PF - 6'9" - Brandon Ashley (2012)
SG - 6'4" - Kori Babineaux (2011)
PG - 5'8" - Dominic Artis (2012)
C - 6'8" - Freddie Tagaloa (2012 football prospect)

To put it precisely, Monty needs to land some dudes. IMO, there's no excuse for Cal not to be an elite-level program with the type of talent the Bay Area will offer these next couple of years and possibly beyond. The 2011 class will tell a lot about Monty and his staff as recruiters.

Also, Jabari Brown has reportedly been playing some ridiculous ball out there. He's quickly becoming a "must get" guy.


The team is 4-0 and has a chance this afternoon to undefeated against the nation's best talent. Brown went for 33 this morning to beat the #1 PG in the country (Marquis Teague) by 50 points.

Ashley, Wiltjer, Turner and Brown are the must gets IMO. Kiwi Gardner would be a great backup plan as his quickness, defensive disruption and ability to find teammates makes him special despite his diminutive size.
wvitbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
But lots of time don't end up as the best team.

Still, there is a lot of talent on this team. Freddie has been offered by Cal as a football player. Will be one of the best offensive linemen in the state.

By the way, I have just retired and prefer high school ball to AAU ball but where would you gentlemen suggest if you had to pick one tourney to attend. and one tourney in Northern Cal.
SaintBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
wvitbear;315590 said:

But lots of time don't end up as the best team.

Still, there is a lot of talent on this team. Freddie has been offered by Cal as a football player. Will be one of the best offensive linemen in the state.

By the way, I have just retired and prefer high school ball to AAU ball but where would you gentlemen suggest if you had to pick one tourney to attend. and one tourney in Northern Cal.


I'm a fan of the elite eight at RSF in Berkeley which normally happens in July.
I don't know if they are still holding the event but in years past, it has brought out the very best of west coast and national talent. I can still remember meeting Lebron James when he played out here as a HS sophomore.
SFBearz
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GregRichardson;315589 said:

The team is 4-0 and has a chance this afternoon to undefeated against the nation's best talent. Brown went for 33 this morning to beat the #1 PG in the country (Marquis Teague) by 50 points.

Ashley, Wiltjer, Turner and Brown are the must gets IMO. Kiwi Gardner would be a great backup plan as his quickness, defensive disruption and ability to find teammates makes him special despite his diminutive size.


I don't know that I'd call Wiltjer a must get since he isn't local. Monty has to get the top norcal guys, esp bay area guys like Brown and Ashley. At the point, I'd put Turner ahead of everyone but Bell would be very good too unless Cal gets a JC 2010 guard.
Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SFBearz;315846 said:

I don't know that I'd call Wiltjer a must get since he isn't local. Monty has to get the top norcal guys, esp bay area guys like Brown and Ashley. At the point, I'd put Turner ahead of everyone but Bell would be very good too unless Cal gets a JC 2010 guard.


I don't think anybody is ever really a "must get" and I eschew the idea that we "must get" the top players from "our own back yard". Basically, we need good players and it doesn't matter where they come from.

As I understand it, the reason Wiltjer has the "must get" tag on him is that we are targeting him and he will be a litmus test for Monty's ability to get the guys he really wants.
smokeyrover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SFBearz;315846 said:

I don't know that I'd call Wiltjer a must get since he isn't local. Monty has to get the top norcal guys, esp bay area guys like Brown and Ashley. At the point, I'd put Turner ahead of everyone but Bell would be very good too unless Cal gets a JC 2010 guard.


Iowa JC point guard Kaylon Williams committed to UW Milwaukee on a visit there over the weekend. He was said to be visiting Cal in the next couple weeks.

Not sure if this is what you meant SFBearz, but I don't think a 2010 JC guard (point or shooting) would rule out going after Turner or Bell. A JC addition would essentially take Seeley's spot. There would still be at least two rides available for 2011.
smokeyrover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Big C_Cal;315854 said:

I don't think anybody is ever really a "must get" and I eschew the idea that we "must get" the top players from "our own back yard". Basically, we need good players and it doesn't matter where they come from.

As I understand it, the reason Wiltjer has the "must get" tag on him is that we are targeting him and he will be a litmus test for Monty's ability to get the guys he really wants.


I agree...it's all about who the staff evaluates as the best fit for their needs, who balances the roster, and which players look to mesh the best with the current players and with Cal's academics.

Just going after highly rated local players isn't always the best strategy (Braun and Howland know something about it).

That said, Brandon Ashley looks like a pretty good fit. Not sure yet about Turner and Brown.
KoreAmBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Darn on Williams. He looked to be the turn-key type of guy we could use. Any other rumors on who Monty is looking at to be part of the 2010-2011 season?
BGGB2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
What are the rules about what a Cal alum like Kevin Johnson could do to boost Cal recruiting? Turner plays for Sac High, and of course KJ is a Sac High grad. (Plus KJ led the charge to turn Sac High into a charter school in order to boost the academics. Then he ran the school for a number of years as part of his HOPE foundation, before he became the mayor a couple of years ago. So KJ's profile there should still be pretty high, even though he graduated in 1983.)

I've always wondered if Michael Jordan could pick up the phone and make recruiting calls for UNC. I've got to figure that's against the rules.
tsubamoto2001
How long do you want to ignore this user?
smokeyrover;315911 said:

I agree...it's all about who the staff evaluates as the best fit for their needs, who balances the roster, and which players look to mesh the best with the current players and with Cal's academics.

Just going after highly rated local players isn't always the best strategy (Braun and Howland know something about it).

That said, Brandon Ashley looks like a pretty good fit. Not sure yet about Turner and Brown.


It's a double edged sword. The fact is you need elite talent to win a national championship. I assume that's the goal here at Cal.

Yeah, Butler was an unbelievable feel good story, but they are very much the exception. And they got lucky to get 2 or 3 guys that developed into players that can play anywhere (Hayward, Mack, and Howard). To go along with that, I think they were also aided by a talent drain in college basketball as a whole. Not taking anything away from them, though, they were indeed a very good team.

Also, should Howland have passed on Farmar and Afflalo, guys that were elite players (that left early) from their backyard? These guys don't grow on trees. Typically, they are difference makers and game changers. I agree, fit is important, but getting the elite talent in your backyard is as well, especially for a program like Cal, which is not a national program at this point. North Carolina, Kansas, Kentucky, etc. can get a elite player from anywhere in the country. Cal doesn't have that luxury. So when an elite player happens to be in your area, he's a "must get." You think Illinois didn't want Derrick Rose? Or even Sherron Collins? Bruce Weber wishes he got those guys.

I'm curious to see how Monty will deal with guys that leave his program early for the NBA. If we land Ashley, he could very well be a one or two and out player. Even so, he's a guy you have to get, IMO.
wvitbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
and he sat in the Sacramento cheering section. Sacramento had both its girls and boys teams there. Girls got creamed but the boys lost in the last seconds.
SaintBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
tsubamoto2001;315974 said:

It's a double edged sword. The fact is you need elite talent to win a national championship. I assume that's the goal here at Cal.

Yeah, Butler was an unbelievable feel good story, but they are very much the exception. And they got lucky to get 2 or 3 guys that developed into players that can play anywhere (Hayward, Mack, and Howard). To go along with that, I think they were also aided by a talent drain in college basketball as a whole. Not taking anything away from them, though, they were indeed a very good team.

Also, should Howland have passed on Farmar and Afflalo, guys that were elite players (that left early) from their backyard? These guys don't grow on trees. Typically, they are difference makers and game changers. I agree, fit is important, but getting the elite talent in your backyard is as well, especially for a program like Cal, which is not a national program at this point. North Carolina, Kansas, Kentucky, etc. can get a elite player from anywhere in the country. Cal doesn't have that luxury. So when an elite player happens to be in your area, he's a "must get." You think Illinois didn't want Derrick Rose? Or even Sherron Collins? Bruce Weber wishes he got those guys.

I'm curious to see how Monty will deal with guys that leave his program early for the NBA. If we land Ashley, he could very well be a one or two and out player. Even so, he's a guy you have to get, IMO.


I agree and let me reinforce one of your points. Cal has a set of inherent strengths and weaknesses in recruiting talent. The biggest strength is our proximity to quality talent in Northern California. If Montgomery ignores or misses on local talent, he will put us in a very challenged recruiting position. We are several years of consistent winning away from recruiting well outside the west coast and at this point we are not clearly a better choice than other west coast programs such as UCLA, Arizona, UW and Gonzaga,

I'm not suggesting that Monty ignore character and fit issues but among the best 5-6 players over the next three years, I can't imagine we can't find a fit with at least three of them.

To consistently win at Cal, you need to keep local talent here. Kevin Johnson, Jason Kidd, Lamond Murray, Leon Powe, Ryan Anderson - What they all have in common in addition to being all time Bear greats is that they were all local.
smokeyrover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
tsubamoto2001;315974 said:

It's a double edged sword. The fact is you need elite talent to win a national championship. I assume that's the goal here at Cal.


Yes.


tsubamoto2001;315974 said:

So when an elite player happens to be in your area, he's a "must get."


No


GregRichardson;315989 said:

I agree and let me reinforce one of your points. Cal has a set of inherent strengths and weaknesses in recruiting talent. The biggest strength is our proximity to quality talent in Northern California. If Montgomery ignores or misses on local talent, he will put us in a very challenged recruiting position. We are several years of consistent winning away from recruiting well outside the west coast and at this point we are not clearly a better choice than other west coast programs such as UCLA, Arizona, UW and Gonzaga,

I'm not suggesting that Monty ignore character and fit issues but among the best 5-6 players over the next three years, I can't imagine we can't find a fit with at least three of them.

To consistently win at Cal, you need to keep local talent here. Kevin Johnson, Jason Kidd, Lamond Murray, Leon Powe, Ryan Anderson - What they all have in common in addition to being all time Bear greats is that they were all local.



To me, winning games is what drives recruiting, not landing local stars. If Cal is able to land Wiltjer and Bell (and either misses or passes on some of the local highly rated players), goes on to win another Pac-10 championship with those guys + the 2010 class (L.A. and Chicago), and goes deep in the tourney, how does that "put us in a very challenged recruiting position"?

Cal's profile will be elevated from where it is now, and the young local talent, their parents, HS and AAU coaches of 2013 and beyond will look favorably at Cal as a winning program, not to mention the out-of-the-area schools where Cal's 2010 and 2011 classes matriculated from.

All that said, Ashley is a must-get the same way that Powe was -- he has a pro future and really would create some buzz for the program (i.e. ticket sales).

I agree with you guys that Monty needs to land some elite talent, but I trust him with his evaluations. If he deems a better fit with an elite player who happens to be from Portland, Seattle, or L.A. (all areas with consistently more higher rated players than the Bay Area) and LANDS that player at the expense of a local player who is not as good a fit, I don't see a problem there.
GB54
How long do you want to ignore this user?
tsubamoto2001;315974 said:

It's a double edged sword. The fact is you need elite talent to win a national championship. I assume that's the goal here at Cal.

IMO.


That's not really the goal. The goal is to compete for a title in the Pac10 and occasionally go deep in the tournament.
HoopDreams
How long do you want to ignore this user?
smokeyrover;316022 said:

I agree with you guys that Monty needs to land some elite talent, but I trust him with his evaluations.


Not to be too picky, but Crabbe IS an elite talent
tsubamoto2001
How long do you want to ignore this user?
CalRanger;316048 said:

Not to be too picky, but Crabbe IS an elite talent


I agree that Crabbe is elite, but keep in mind that when Crabbe committed to Cal, he only had other offers from schools like Utah, OSU, and Nevada. Monty did a great job in evaluating Crabbe and getting him to commit early - and was a bit lucky due to the fact that Crabbe grew a couple of inches and blew up in his senior year.
HoopDreams
How long do you want to ignore this user?
tsubamoto2001;316087 said:

I agree that Crabbe is elite, but keep in mind that when Crabbe committed to Cal, he only had other offers from schools like Utah, OSU, and Nevada. Monty did a great job in evaluating Crabbe and getting him to commit early - and was a bit lucky due to the fact that Crabbe grew a couple of inches and blew up in his senior year.


part of signing an elite player is identifying him, and getting his verbal.
the other part is keeping him after he blows up.

Crabbe has been getting a lot of press recently with winning the championship, but he was rising like a rocket before he signed with Cal. Monty was able to keep his prize recruit in the Cal fold when the power programs were certainly trying to bend his ear (I'm assuming)
tsubamoto2001
How long do you want to ignore this user?
CalRanger;316125 said:

part of signing an elite player is identifying him, and getting his verbal.
the other part is keeping him after he blows up.

Crabbe has been getting a lot of press recently with winning the championship, but he was rising like a rocket before he signed with Cal. Monty was able to keep his prize recruit in the Cal fold when the power programs were certainly trying to bend his ear (I'm assuming)


Actually, Crabbe had a solid summer in AAU but his stock really rose during his high school season.

Also, Crabbe had already signed, so other schools wouldn't have been able to recruit him anyways.
SaintBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
smokeyrover;316022 said:

Yes.




No





To me, winning games is what drives recruiting, not landing local stars. If Cal is able to land Wiltjer and Bell (and either misses or passes on some of the local highly rated players), goes on to win another Pac-10 championship with those guys + the 2010 class (L.A. and Chicago), and goes deep in the tourney, how does that "put us in a very challenged recruiting position"?

Cal's profile will be elevated from where it is now, and the young local talent, their parents, HS and AAU coaches of 2013 and beyond will look favorably at Cal as a winning program, not to mention the out-of-the-area schools where Cal's 2010 and 2011 classes matriculated from.

All that said, Ashley is a must-get the same way that Powe was -- he has a pro future and really would create some buzz for the program (i.e. ticket sales).

I agree with you guys that Monty needs to land some elite talent, but I trust him with his evaluations. If he deems a better fit with an elite player who happens to be from Portland, Seattle, or L.A. (all areas with consistently more higher rated players than the Bay Area) and LANDS that player at the expense of a local player who is not as good a fit, I don't see a problem there.


Perhaps we disagree on our confidence about Monty's ability to land elite recruits OUTSIDE the Bay Area? I think that is a HUGE question mark. Local talent is always easier to land because players want to play in front of friends and family. Look at it this way, players want to win, they want lots of TV exposure, they want the perception of having played BIG time basketball and they want to get to the NBA. They also want to play in nice facilities, have a great environment around the campus and some want a degree that matters.

Cal's measurement against those criteria:

Winning: B
Exposure: B
Prestige: B
NBA: B+
Facilities: B+
Campus location/environment: A-
Academics: A

Give Monty five years of taking the team to the NCAAs with another P10 title and our winning and exposure and prestige will rise to a B+ and perhaps an A-. But that isn't going to happen overnight and five years is a LONG time. And by the way, those criteria are almost certain to take a hit next year as we are in big time rebuilding mode.

My premise is that Monty will struggle to land elite recruits outside of NorCal. That's based on his track record at Stanford where he landed some national elite recruits but not as many as you might think and he had the "Stanford" draw pulling players in a way that Cal can't match. So far at Cal, he has struck out on every elite recruit he's gone after. Crabbe might now be an elite prospect but he wasn't when he signed his NLI.

If you agree with my premise and believe as I do that local elite talent will lean heavily into staying close at home then Monty does in fact need to land some of the surplus of great talent from NorCal.

And don't be confused, it's not about evaluation. Monty has evaluated them and is ALL OVER Jabari Brown and Brandon Ashley and we are actively recruiting Turner as well as Drew Gordon's younger brother (who is every bit as big a recruit as Ashley).

Summed up, it is my belief that for us to be a top 20 national program in the next five years, we will need to keep the majority of elite NorCal talent at home. My guess is that there will be 6-7 elite recruits in NorCal in the next three years (Turner, Brown, Ashley, Gordon + 2-3 others) with elite defined as top 50 players. We need at least three of those guys.
RoseBowlBears
How long do you want to ignore this user?
What a silly argument. Of course it doesn't matter where the players come from when they are already in your program. The question is, do you have the same ability/likelihood to land players from elsewhere as you do with local players that are just as talented. Given the current state of things, the answer is "of course not". Thus, the conclusion is that highly talented local players should be targeted first and foremost.
tsubamoto2001
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GregRichardson;316188 said:

Perhaps we disagree on our confidence about Monty's ability to land elite recruits OUTSIDE the Bay Area? I think that is a HUGE question mark. Local talent is always easier to land because players want to play in front of friends and family. Look at it this way, players want to win, they want lots of TV exposure, they want the perception of having played BIG time basketball and they want to get to the NBA. They also want to play in nice facilities, have a great environment around the campus and some want a degree that matters.

Cal's measurement against those criteria:

Winning: B
Exposure: B
Prestige: B
NBA: B+
Facilities: B+
Campus location/environment: A-
Academics: A


Our facilites were "good" 10 years ago. Now, we're one of 3 PAC-10 schools (along with Oregon State and UCLA) that doesn't have a dedicated practice facility. But Oregon State has one planned and UCLA is renovating Pauley.

I'd give the "facilities" a C+ (and I'm taking it easy on them).

Quote:

Give Monty five years of taking the team to the NCAAs with another P10 title and our winning and exposure and prestige will rise to a B+ and perhaps an A-. But that isn't going to happen overnight and five years is a LONG time. And by the way, those criteria are almost certain to take a hit next year as we are in big time rebuilding mode.

My premise is that Monty will struggle to land elite recruits outside of NorCal. That's based on his track record at Stanford where he landed some national elite recruits but not as many as you might think and he had the "Stanford" draw pulling players in a way that Cal can't match. So far at Cal, he has struck out on every elite recruit he's gone after. Crabbe might now be an elite prospect but he wasn't when he signed his NLI.


Most coaches other than K, Roy Williams, Pitino, Self, and Calipari will struggle to get elite players nationally. Even UCLA struggles to recruit on a national level. They have to rely on the West Coast. Most of Michigan States guys are from their area or Ohio. Same with Villanova and most Big East schools (DC/Maryland, Philly, NY/NJ).

Monty's elite recruits were mostly SoCal guys. The Collins twins, Jacobsen, and Childress were McDonald's All-Americans. Justin Davis from Berkeley was top 50 if I recall and Madsen was pretty highly rated as well. Brevin Knight was an NJ guy that no one wanted who turned out to be one of the best PG's in PAC-10 history.

You're right, I also think the "Stanford factor" was in play in his recruiting for the most part. They have no choice but to recruit nationally and their reputation greatly helps them. As much as I love Cal, it doesn't have a national reputation, as unfair as that may be.

Quote:

If you agree with my premise and believe as I do that local elite talent will lean heavily into staying close at home then Monty does in fact need to land some of the surplus of great talent from NorCal.

And don't be confused, it's not about evaluation. Monty has evaluated them and is ALL OVER Jabari Brown and Brandon Ashley and we are actively recruiting Turner as well as Drew Gordon's younger brother (who is every bit as big a recruit as Ashley).

Summed up, it is my belief that for us to be a top 20 national program in the next five years, we will need to keep the majority of elite NorCal talent at home. My guess is that there will be 6-7 elite recruits in NorCal in the next three years (Turner, Brown, Ashley, Gordon + 2-3 others) with elite defined as top 50 players. We need at least three of those guys.


I agree. But if we do miss on the Bay Area guys, we better come up with something good from SoCal or the Northwest.
Adrian The Cal Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
2011 is the year we need to stack up on these recruits. Witljer and Brown are definitely guys I would love to see in a Cal uniform.

But let's be realistic - does Cal have enough of the national appeal to retain these players from schools like Kansas, UK, etc etc?
6956bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I agree that Cal needs to put a full court press on for Brown and Ashley and perhaps Turner. Monty needs to sell these guys on building a lasting legacy at Cal.

Nor Cal has not had this number of high level players in some time. I don't care where Cal finds the players as long as they find them. It should be easier to recruit them if they are local, but if Kentucky, North Carolina or Kansas come calling and they will with Ashley (Turner has a Kansas offer) it may be hard to keep them local.

Greg, I think you overrate Cal's basketball profile. The facilities are ok but hardly a B+ and the prestige (basketball prestige) is not that strong either. What Cal does have is a great Urban location, a proven winning coach and very strong academics. They also have something else to sell. Playing Time. Elite players normally believe they will play wherever they go, but Cal has minutes maybe big minutes to offer right now.

Every Stanford coach always complained about recruiting and admissions and how hard it was to recruit there. Yet Monty brought in lots of highly sought guys Collins twins, Lopez twins, Jacobsen, Keefe, Childress and Borchardt were all heavily recruited. I think Monty can recruit top guys and has a larger pool to pick from at Cal.

Monty is out on the road after winning the title, going to back to back tourneys and has a good class already coming in. All good stuff to sell. This next class will be critical. I would love Brown, Wiltjer and any number of PG candidates they are looking at. If they add Ashley in 2011 then Cal has a chance to be special.
BGGB2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
6956bear;316249 said:

.... Every Stanford coach always complained about recruiting and admissions and how hard it was to recruit there. Yet Monty brought in lots of highly sought guys Collins twins, Lopez twins, Jacobsen, Keefe, Childress and Borchardt were all heavily recruited. I think Monty can recruit top guys and has a larger pool to pick from at Cal.......


Teeny-weeny question: were the Lopez twins recruited by Monty, or by Trent Johnson? I'm pretty sure they played for Johnson, but perhaps they were signed by Monty, and then Trent kept them on board.

I agree with your larger point: once Monty established Furd as one of the top 2-3 programs in the Pac10 (and a national player), then he did pretty darn well signing top-drawer talent.

To me, the 2011 class is make or break for the program. If we sign an elite class, then with the strong 2010 class, Cal should be good to go for the next 2-3 years as a Pac10 contender; and then further recruiting success feeds on that winning trend. But if the 2011 class is lackluster, combined with likely lackluster 2010-11 results on the court, then our recruiting momentum could really die off; and Monty might never get Cal over the hump toward being a perennial Pac10 contender before he retires.
Civil Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Does anyone know what is Kyle Wiltjer's connection is with the Soldiers? Maybe Cal would have the same advantage in recruiting him?
tsubamoto2001
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Civil Bear;316498 said:

Does anyone know what is Kyle Wiltjer's connection is with the Soldiers? Maybe Cal would have the same advantage in recruiting him?


He plays for the team. They have another out of area guy - Nick Johnson - playing for them. Kevin Love (Lake Oswego, OR) played for the SoCal All-stars for one summer, so it isn't uncommon for guys to play for AAU teams out of their area.
Mr. Frumble
How long do you want to ignore this user?
He played for them last summer as well. Not sure what the initial connection was.

Scout still lists 16 schools as in the running for him - nine Pac-10 schools (all except WSU), Gonzaga, Marquette, Texas, Wake Forest, Maryland, Kansas, and Kentucky.

He played with Cadougan (Marquette), Thompson (Texas), Kabongo (Texas), and Arop (Gonzaga) on Canada's team at the Nike Global Challenge in 09, and Gonaza and Texas especially seem to be developing a pipeline to top Canadian talent, but I am not sure if that will give those schools any advantage with Wiltjer.
Civil Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
tsubamoto2001;316507 said:

He plays for the team. They have another out of area guy - Nick Johnson - playing for them. Kevin Love (Lake Oswego, OR) played for the SoCal All-stars for one summer, so it isn't uncommon for guys to play for AAU teams out of their area.


It's not all that uncommon, but the player typically has a reason such as close familly living in the area (ala Lebron James). That is what I was asking.
jyamada
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Civil Bear;316580 said:

It's not all that uncommon, but the player typically has a reason such as close familly living in the area (ala Lebron James). That is what I was asking.


Is that why Lebron played out here?
calumnus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mike Zillion;316422 said:

The Lopezes were in the class of 2006. Monty left Stanford in 2004.


And the Lopezes were heading to Stanford since birth, regardless of the coach.
Civil Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
jyamada;316592 said:

Is that why Lebron played out here?


Yes, but I foget who it was. Uncle or Dad or something. That was when he was quoted as saying that he and Powe would be playing for Cal one day.
calumnus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Civil Bear;316631 said:

Yes, but I foget who it was. Uncle or Dad or something. That was when he was quoted as saying that he and Powe would be playing for Cal one day.


:cry:
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.