Election Interference

10,997 Views | 199 Replies | Last: 16 days ago by bear2034
bear2034
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
5:54p, 8/27/24

Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson denied RFK's request to remove his name from the ballot.
But she just attempted to remove Cornel West from the ballot, losing a court case that she is now appealing.
Reply Quote
4
bearister
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
5:57p, 8/27/24
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
Reply Quote
3
bear2034
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
5:58p, 8/27/24

Amazing decision today! Thank you Nevada Supreme Court!
Reply Quote
3
bear2034
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to bearister • 6:01p, 8/27/24
The Democrats will never allow Trump to be president, we both understand this. I could see a scenario where they make Kamala president now and not allow the certification of results to go through after Trump wins the election.
Reply Quote
3
bearister
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:55p, 8/27/24
tRump is going to get landslid and render moot all his usual bs.
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
Reply Quote
4
bear2034
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to bearister • 7:04p, 8/27/24
The Democrats are really good at this. They play to win.

Reply Quote
2
bearister
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to bear2034 • 7:10p, 8/27/24
The only people going to the hoosegow are any Election Officials that withhold certification of the results by fraudulently declaring that there was election fraud, you know just like in 2020. The Republicans appear to be missing a few rocket scientists when it comes to strategizin' this election tampering' stuff.
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
Reply Quote
4
1 edit
bear2034
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to bearister • 7:56p, 8/27/24
It's usually a woman, isn't it? A liberal one.

Reply Quote
3
oski003
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to bear2034 • 8:04p, 8/27/24
bear2034 said:
It's usually a woman, isn't it? A liberal one.



Election interference at its finest.
Reply Quote
5
blungld
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to oski003 • 10:02a, 8/28/24
oski003 said:
bear2034 said:
It's usually a woman, isn't it? A liberal one.



Election interference at its finest.
Remember when you were a reasonable conservative who sat sorta in the middle and could see both sides of an argument/issue? I remember. Now you are just as radicalized as the other crazies. You defend insanity and have gone wholly tribal in your thinking. You, more than any other poster here, are the prime example of the sad immolation of reason and ethics over the past decade of Trump because you used to appear to have reason and ethics.
Reply Quote
8
oski003
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to blungld • 10:21a, 8/28/24
blungld said:
oski003 said:
bear2034 said:
It's usually a woman, isn't it? A liberal one.



Election interference at its finest.
Remember when you were a reasonable conservative who sat sorta in the middle and could see both sides of an argument/issue? I remember. Now you are just as radicalized as the other crazies. You defend insanity and have gone wholly tribal in your thinking. You, more than any other poster here, are the prime example of the sad immolation of reason and ethics over the past decade of Trump because you used to appear to have reason and ethics.


How is this not an example of rigging the election for her preferred candidate?
Reply Quote
4
SBGold
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to oski003 • 11:57a, 8/28/24
oski003 said:
blungld said:
oski003 said:
bear2034 said:
It's usually a woman, isn't it? A liberal one.



Election interference at its finest.
Remember when you were a reasonable conservative who sat sorta in the middle and could see both sides of an argument/issue? I remember. Now you are just as radicalized as the other crazies. You defend insanity and have gone wholly tribal in your thinking. You, more than any other poster here, are the prime example of the sad immolation of reason and ethics over the past decade of Trump because you used to appear to have reason and ethics.


How is this not an example of rigging the election for her preferred candidate?
My understanding was that RFK missed the deadline to withdraw per their state statute. She can't just make up the rules as she goes along. No rigging, just following the prescribed state law.

VOTE BLUE
Reply Quote
7
blungld
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to oski003 • 1:25p, 8/28/24
oski003 said:
blungld said:
oski003 said:
bear2034 said:
It's usually a woman, isn't it? A liberal one.



Election interference at its finest.
Remember when you were a reasonable conservative who sat sorta in the middle and could see both sides of an argument/issue? I remember. Now you are just as radicalized as the other crazies. You defend insanity and have gone wholly tribal in your thinking. You, more than any other poster here, are the prime example of the sad immolation of reason and ethics over the past decade of Trump because you used to appear to have reason and ethics.


How is this not an example of rigging the election for her preferred candidate?
My comment is on the body of your posts and the demising drift of your comments and who & what you now defend. As I said, you were once one of the conservatives I disagreed with but read and respected. Now you are indistinguishable from movielover and outright lost causes.
Reply Quote
7
oski003
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to blungld • 1:32p, 8/28/24
blungld said:
oski003 said:
blungld said:
oski003 said:
bear2034 said:
It's usually a woman, isn't it? A liberal one.



Election interference at its finest.
Remember when you were a reasonable conservative who sat sorta in the middle and could see both sides of an argument/issue? I remember. Now you are just as radicalized as the other crazies. You defend insanity and have gone wholly tribal in your thinking. You, more than any other poster here, are the prime example of the sad immolation of reason and ethics over the past decade of Trump because you used to appear to have reason and ethics.


How is this not an example of rigging the election for her preferred candidate?
My comment is on the body of your posts and the demising drift of your comments and who & what you now defend. As I said, you were once one of the conservatives I disagreed with but read and respected. Now you are indistinguishable from movielover and outright lost causes.


I call it how I see it. Lots of people are doing shady things to keep Trump out of office, probably because they view him as a threat to the USA. You seem biased towards their cause and your condescending emotional appeal doesn't mean much to me.
Reply Quote
6
1 edit
SBGold
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to oski003 • 10:03p, 8/28/24
oski003 said:
blungld said:
oski003 said:
blungld said:
oski003 said:
bear2034 said:
It's usually a woman, isn't it? A liberal one.



Election interference at its finest.
Remember when you were a reasonable conservative who sat sorta in the middle and could see both sides of an argument/issue? I remember. Now you are just as radicalized as the other crazies. You defend insanity and have gone wholly tribal in your thinking. You, more than any other poster here, are the prime example of the sad immolation of reason and ethics over the past decade of Trump because you used to appear to have reason and ethics.


How is this not an example of rigging the election for her preferred candidate?
My comment is on the body of your posts and the demising drift of your comments and who & what you now defend. As I said, you were once one of the conservatives I disagreed with but read and respected. Now you are indistinguishable from movielover and outright lost causes.


I call it how I see it. Lots of people are doing shady things to keep Trump out of office, probably because they view him as a threat to the USA. You seem biased towards their cause and your condescending emotional appeal doesn't mean much to me.
following the prescribed law is shady? nah bruh, doing the oppo would be shady
Reply Quote
4
DiabloWags
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to bear2034 • 10:12p, 8/28/24
You still mad about the WORTHLESS Durham Investigation?

How dumb are you bro?
"Cults don't end well. They really don't."
Reply Quote
4
DiabloWags
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to oski003 • 10:14p, 8/28/24
oskiloser said:


I call it how I see it. Lots of people are doing shady things to keep Trump out of office, probably because they view him as a threat to the USA. You seem biased towards their cause and your condescending emotional appeal doesn't mean much to me.


Youre so funny.
"Cults don't end well. They really don't."
Reply Quote
3
blungld
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to oski003 • 9:37a, 8/29/24
oski003 said:
blungld said:
My comment is on the body of your posts and the demising drift of your comments and who & what you now defend. As I said, you were once one of the conservatives I disagreed with but read and respected. Now you are indistinguishable from movielover and outright lost causes.


I call it how I see it. Lots of people are doing shady things to keep Trump out of office, probably because they view him as a threat to the USA. You seem biased towards their cause and your condescending emotional appeal doesn't mean much to me.
The fact that you identify the emotion and need to attack it as "condescending" reads as "doth protest too much" defensiveness. I think you still have enough ethical framework to feel shame though you won't admit it. I think you know that some of what you post is cultish tribalism and not representative of who you really are or how you conduct yourself with friends and family. I think you know that that MAGA changed you and the country for the worse. I don't think the same is true of other MAGA nuts.
Reply Quote
oski003
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to blungld • 9:45a, 8/29/24
blungld said:
oski003 said:
blungld said:
My comment is on the body of your posts and the demising drift of your comments and who & what you now defend. As I said, you were once one of the conservatives I disagreed with but read and respected. Now you are indistinguishable from movielover and outright lost causes.


I call it how I see it. Lots of people are doing shady things to keep Trump out of office, probably because they view him as a threat to the USA. You seem biased towards their cause and your condescending emotional appeal doesn't mean much to me.
The fact that you identify the emotion and need to attack it as "condescending" reads as "doth protest too much" defensiveness. I think you still have enough ethical framework to feel shame though you won't admit it. I think you know that some of what you post is cultish tribalism and not representative of who you really are or how you conduct yourself with friends and family. I think you know that that MAGA changed you and the country for the worse. I don't think the same is true of other MAGA nuts.


I am not MAGA. I just analyze individual issues as I see them. Both candidates are awful.
Reply Quote
3
bear2034
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to DiabloWags • 11:56a, 8/29/24
DiabloWags said:
You still mad about the WORTHLESS Durham Investigation?

How dumb are you bro?

Bro, you pay money to read Peggy Noonan.
Reply Quote
3
SBGold
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to oski003 • 1:30p, 8/29/24
oski003 said:
blungld said:
oski003 said:
blungld said:
My comment is on the body of your posts and the demising drift of your comments and who & what you now defend. As I said, you were once one of the conservatives I disagreed with but read and respected. Now you are indistinguishable from movielover and outright lost causes.


I call it how I see it. Lots of people are doing shady things to keep Trump out of office, probably because they view him as a threat to the USA. You seem biased towards their cause and your condescending emotional appeal doesn't mean much to me.
The fact that you identify the emotion and need to attack it as "condescending" reads as "doth protest too much" defensiveness. I think you still have enough ethical framework to feel shame though you won't admit it. I think you know that some of what you post is cultish tribalism and not representative of who you really are or how you conduct yourself with friends and family. I think you know that that MAGA changed you and the country for the worse. I don't think the same is true of other MAGA nuts.


I am not MAGA. I just analyze individual issues as I see them. Both candidates are awful.
False, all you are is MAGA
Reply Quote
4
oski003
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to SBGold • 2:03p, 8/29/24
SBGold said:
oski003 said:
blungld said:
oski003 said:
blungld said:
My comment is on the body of your posts and the demising drift of your comments and who & what you now defend. As I said, you were once one of the conservatives I disagreed with but read and respected. Now you are indistinguishable from movielover and outright lost causes.


I call it how I see it. Lots of people are doing shady things to keep Trump out of office, probably because they view him as a threat to the USA. You seem biased towards their cause and your condescending emotional appeal doesn't mean much to me.
The fact that you identify the emotion and need to attack it as "condescending" reads as "doth protest too much" defensiveness. I think you still have enough ethical framework to feel shame though you won't admit it. I think you know that some of what you post is cultish tribalism and not representative of who you really are or how you conduct yourself with friends and family. I think you know that that MAGA changed you and the country for the worse. I don't think the same is true of other MAGA nuts.


I am not MAGA. I just analyze individual issues as I see them. Both candidates are awful.
False, all you are is MAGA


If that makes you feel better about things, so be it.
Reply Quote
3
AunBear89
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to blungld • 3:21p, 8/29/24
blungld said:
oski003 said:
blungld said:
My comment is on the body of your posts and the demising drift of your comments and who & what you now defend. As I said, you were once one of the conservatives I disagreed with but read and respected. Now you are indistinguishable from movielover and outright lost causes.


I call it how I see it. Lots of people are doing shady things to keep Trump out of office, probably because they view him as a threat to the USA. You seem biased towards their cause and your condescending emotional appeal doesn't mean much to me.
The fact that you identify the emotion and need to attack it as "condescending" reads as "doth protest too much" defensiveness. I think you still have enough ethical framework to feel shame though you won't admit it. I think you know that some of what you post is cultish tribalism and not representative of who you really are or how you conduct yourself with friends and family. I think you know that that MAGA changed you and the country for the worse. I don't think the same is true of other MAGA nuts.

I understand, and to a degree appreciate, the desire to give the benefit of the doubt to a fellow Cal fan.

But I really believe you are giving concerntroll003 far too much credit for intelligence and reason.

AND he has absolutely no self awareness whatsoever. His posts are frequent reminders that irony died during the first Bush administration.
"There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics." -- (maybe) Benjamin Disraeli, popularized by Mark Twain
Reply Quote
2
SBGold
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to oski003 • 3:42p, 8/29/24
oski003 said:
SBGold said:
oski003 said:
blungld said:
oski003 said:
blungld said:
My comment is on the body of your posts and the demising drift of your comments and who & what you now defend. As I said, you were once one of the conservatives I disagreed with but read and respected. Now you are indistinguishable from movielover and outright lost causes.


I call it how I see it. Lots of people are doing shady things to keep Trump out of office, probably because they view him as a threat to the USA. You seem biased towards their cause and your condescending emotional appeal doesn't mean much to me.
The fact that you identify the emotion and need to attack it as "condescending" reads as "doth protest too much" defensiveness. I think you still have enough ethical framework to feel shame though you won't admit it. I think you know that some of what you post is cultish tribalism and not representative of who you really are or how you conduct yourself with friends and family. I think you know that that MAGA changed you and the country for the worse. I don't think the same is true of other MAGA nuts.


I am not MAGA. I just analyze individual issues as I see them. Both candidates are awful.
False, all you are is MAGA


If that makes you feel better about things, so be it
Doesn't really effect me, I just don't like reading falsehoods and will call them out when I see them. You have shown your stripes, no one is fooled
Reply Quote
1
HawaiiBear33
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to blungld • 4:27p, 8/29/24


Are those Cal students?
Reply Quote
3
wc22
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to SBGold • 5:05p, 8/29/24
SBGold said:
oski003 said:
blungld said:
oski003 said:
blungld said:
My comment is on the body of your posts and the demising drift of your comments and who & what you now defend. As I said, you were once one of the conservatives I disagreed with but read and respected. Now you are indistinguishable from movielover and outright lost causes.


I call it how I see it. Lots of people are doing shady things to keep Trump out of office, probably because they view him as a threat to the USA. You seem biased towards their cause and your condescending emotional appeal doesn't mean much to me.
The fact that you identify the emotion and need to attack it as "condescending" reads as "doth protest too much" defensiveness. I think you still have enough ethical framework to feel shame though you won't admit it. I think you know that some of what you post is cultish tribalism and not representative of who you really are or how you conduct yourself with friends and family. I think you know that that MAGA changed you and the country for the worse. I don't think the same is true of other MAGA nuts.


I am not MAGA. I just analyze individual issues as I see them. Both candidates are awful.
False, all you are is MAGA
Reply Quote
4
SBGold
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to wc22 • 6:35p, 8/29/24
wc22 said:
SBGold said:
oski003 said:
blungld said:
oski003 said:
blungld said:
My comment is on the body of your posts and the demising drift of your comments and who & what you now defend. As I said, you were once one of the conservatives I disagreed with but read and respected. Now you are indistinguishable from movielover and outright lost causes.


I call it how I see it. Lots of people are doing shady things to keep Trump out of office, probably because they view him as a threat to the USA. You seem biased towards their cause and your condescending emotional appeal doesn't mean much to me.
The fact that you identify the emotion and need to attack it as "condescending" reads as "doth protest too much" defensiveness. I think you still have enough ethical framework to feel shame though you won't admit it. I think you know that some of what you post is cultish tribalism and not representative of who you really are or how you conduct yourself with friends and family. I think you know that that MAGA changed you and the country for the worse. I don't think the same is true of other MAGA nuts.


I am not MAGA. I just analyze individual issues as I see them. Both candidates are awful.
False, all you are is MAGA
u r the racist that kept opining that Harris isn't black. Your posts can be dismissed
Reply Quote
5
HawaiiBear33
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to wc22 • 1:45a, 8/30/24


There is only one sane conclusion possible
Reply Quote
3
wc22
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to SBGold • 6:56a, 8/30/24
SBGold said:
wc22 said:
SBGold said:
oski003 said:
blungld said:
oski003 said:
blungld said:
My comment is on the body of your posts and the demising drift of your comments and who & what you now defend. As I said, you were once one of the conservatives I disagreed with but read and respected. Now you are indistinguishable from movielover and outright lost causes.


I call it how I see it. Lots of people are doing shady things to keep Trump out of office, probably because they view him as a threat to the USA. You seem biased towards their cause and your condescending emotional appeal doesn't mean much to me.
The fact that you identify the emotion and need to attack it as "condescending" reads as "doth protest too much" defensiveness. I think you still have enough ethical framework to feel shame though you won't admit it. I think you know that some of what you post is cultish tribalism and not representative of who you really are or how you conduct yourself with friends and family. I think you know that that MAGA changed you and the country for the worse. I don't think the same is true of other MAGA nuts.


I am not MAGA. I just analyze individual issues as I see them. Both candidates are awful.
False, all you are is MAGA
u r the racist that kept opining that Harris isn't black. Your posts can be dismissed
I can't decide if you are intentionally lying or your brain is so warped with TDS it has to insert racism/sexism/fascism randomly so as not to implode from logical contradictions.
Reply Quote
5
dajo9
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to wc22 • 7:17a, 8/30/24
wc22 said:
SBGold said:
wc22 said:
SBGold said:
oski003 said:
blungld said:
oski003 said:
blungld said:
My comment is on the body of your posts and the demising drift of your comments and who & what you now defend. As I said, you were once one of the conservatives I disagreed with but read and respected. Now you are indistinguishable from movielover and outright lost causes.


I call it how I see it. Lots of people are doing shady things to keep Trump out of office, probably because they view him as a threat to the USA. You seem biased towards their cause and your condescending emotional appeal doesn't mean much to me.
The fact that you identify the emotion and need to attack it as "condescending" reads as "doth protest too much" defensiveness. I think you still have enough ethical framework to feel shame though you won't admit it. I think you know that some of what you post is cultish tribalism and not representative of who you really are or how you conduct yourself with friends and family. I think you know that that MAGA changed you and the country for the worse. I don't think the same is true of other MAGA nuts.


I am not MAGA. I just analyze individual issues as I see them. Both candidates are awful.
False, all you are is MAGA
u r the racist that kept opining that Harris isn't black. Your posts can be dismissed
I can't decide if you are intentionally lying or your brain is so warped with TDS it has to insert racism/sexism/fascism randomly so as not to implode from logical contradictions.


Same old tired playbook. Next question, please
Reply Quote
3
SBGold
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to wc22 • 9:24a, 8/30/24
wc22 said:
SBGold said:
wc22 said:
SBGold said:
oski003 said:
blungld said:
oski003 said:
blungld said:
My comment is on the body of your posts and the demising drift of your comments and who & what you now defend. As I said, you were once one of the conservatives I disagreed with but read and respected. Now you are indistinguishable from movielover and outright lost causes.


I call it how I see it. Lots of people are doing shady things to keep Trump out of office, probably because they view him as a threat to the USA. You seem biased towards their cause and your condescending emotional appeal doesn't mean much to me.
The fact that you identify the emotion and need to attack it as "condescending" reads as "doth protest too much" defensiveness. I think you still have enough ethical framework to feel shame though you won't admit it. I think you know that some of what you post is cultish tribalism and not representative of who you really are or how you conduct yourself with friends and family. I think you know that that MAGA changed you and the country for the worse. I don't think the same is true of other MAGA nuts.


I am not MAGA. I just analyze individual issues as I see them. Both candidates are awful.
False, all you are is MAGA
u r the racist that kept opining that Harris isn't black. Your posts can be dismissed
I can't decide if you are intentionally lying or your brain is so warped with TDS it has to insert racism/sexism/fascism randomly so as not to implode from logical contradictions.
side stepped my point I see, we saw your Harris isn't black posts. Own your racism
Reply Quote
3
oski003
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to SBGold • 9:28a, 8/30/24
SBGold said:
wc22 said:
SBGold said:
wc22 said:
SBGold said:
oski003 said:
blungld said:
oski003 said:
blungld said:
My comment is on the body of your posts and the demising drift of your comments and who & what you now defend. As I said, you were once one of the conservatives I disagreed with but read and respected. Now you are indistinguishable from movielover and outright lost causes.


I call it how I see it. Lots of people are doing shady things to keep Trump out of office, probably because they view him as a threat to the USA. You seem biased towards their cause and your condescending emotional appeal doesn't mean much to me.
The fact that you identify the emotion and need to attack it as "condescending" reads as "doth protest too much" defensiveness. I think you still have enough ethical framework to feel shame though you won't admit it. I think you know that some of what you post is cultish tribalism and not representative of who you really are or how you conduct yourself with friends and family. I think you know that that MAGA changed you and the country for the worse. I don't think the same is true of other MAGA nuts.


I am not MAGA. I just analyze individual issues as I see them. Both candidates are awful.
False, all you are is MAGA
u r the racist that kept opining that Harris isn't black. Your posts can be dismissed
I can't decide if you are intentionally lying or your brain is so warped with TDS it has to insert racism/sexism/fascism randomly so as not to implode from logical contradictions.
side stepped my point I see, we saw your Harris isn't black posts. Own your racism


He mocked her for changing her racial identity as needed to advance in her career. She is a chameleon who has done anything to get ahead, such as giving bjs to Willie Brown who had taxpayers paying grifter Kamala for two jobs. Calling everything racist belittles attempts to fight actual racism.
Reply Quote
2
wc22
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to SBGold • 9:39a, 8/30/24
SBGold said:
wc22 said:
SBGold said:
wc22 said:
SBGold said:
oski003 said:
blungld said:
oski003 said:
blungld said:
My comment is on the body of your posts and the demising drift of your comments and who & what you now defend. As I said, you were once one of the conservatives I disagreed with but read and respected. Now you are indistinguishable from movielover and outright lost causes.


I call it how I see it. Lots of people are doing shady things to keep Trump out of office, probably because they view him as a threat to the USA. You seem biased towards their cause and your condescending emotional appeal doesn't mean much to me.
The fact that you identify the emotion and need to attack it as "condescending" reads as "doth protest too much" defensiveness. I think you still have enough ethical framework to feel shame though you won't admit it. I think you know that some of what you post is cultish tribalism and not representative of who you really are or how you conduct yourself with friends and family. I think you know that that MAGA changed you and the country for the worse. I don't think the same is true of other MAGA nuts.


I am not MAGA. I just analyze individual issues as I see them. Both candidates are awful.
False, all you are is MAGA
u r the racist that kept opining that Harris isn't black. Your posts can be dismissed
I can't decide if you are intentionally lying or your brain is so warped with TDS it has to insert racism/sexism/fascism randomly so as not to implode from logical contradictions.
side stepped my point I see, we saw your Harris isn't black posts. Own your racism
Leaning towards your "brain is so warped with TDS it has to insert racism/sexism/fascism randomly so as not to implode from logical contradictions" because at least a couple others here have the same false memories as you do.
Reply Quote
3
bearister
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
10:04a, 8/30/24
Giuliani is sued by Georgia election workers who won $148 million judgment

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/giuliani-is-sued-by-georgia-election-workers-who-won-148-million-judgment/ar-AA1pIUlt



Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
Reply Quote
4
1 edit
DiabloWags
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to bear2034 • 12:33p, 8/30/24
bear2034 said:
DiabloWags said:
You still mad about the WORTHLESS Durham Investigation?

How dumb are you bro?

Bro, you pay money to read Peggy Noonan.

I pay money ($700 which you don't have) to read the WSJ every day for a year.

Your stupidity here is exceeded by no one.
And that's saying a lot.


"Cults don't end well. They really don't."
Reply Quote
4
1 edit
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.