Off Topic
Sponsored by

Trump now wants public executions!

1,931 Views | 26 Replies | Last: 21 days ago by BearlySane88
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Pentagon says the firing squad execution of Fort Hood shooter Nidal Malik Hasan will be livestreamed.

He'd better be careful about the blood thirst and revenge culture he apparently hopes to ignite!!

FAFO
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Agreed, be careful for the boomerang
"I Abide by Old and New Rules, and I Never Personally Attack. Gambling is illegal at Bushwood, sir, and I never slice."
chazzed
How long do you want to ignore this user?
That would be barbaric. Let's hope they do not go ahead with this vulgar idea.
Eastern Oregon Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
chazzed said:

That would be barbaric. Let's hope they do not go ahead with this vulgar idea.
I saw a news story yesterday that claimed Trump had cooled on the idea when he realized that the firing squad would be shooting a paraplegic in a wheelchair. Bad optics that.
Sorry, no signature here.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm surprised that Trump isnt trying to make money off of it. Pay Per View comes to mind.
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
No, pay per view on the boomerang.
Retire the deficit!
chazzed
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It seems that they received too much pushback.

https://www.theverge.com/policy/1011991/trump-nidal-hasan-execution-not-livestreaming?utm_source=firefox-newtab-en-us
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
chazzed said:

It seems that they received too much pushback.

https://www.theverge.com/policy/1011991/trump-nidal-hasan-execution-not-livestreaming?utm_source=firefox-newtab-en-us


Flip flop.
As expected.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oh wait . . .
I'm sure that Trump apologists will "clarify" what the President said since I only got 1000 on my SAT.




Trump says leakers should be shot: 'They're the scum of the earth'
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Put that on live stream! Probably includes his sons, Kushy, Tiffany, Melania abd Ivanka

Vote Blue and Vote Talarico
"I Abide by Old and New Rules, and I Never Personally Attack. Gambling is illegal at Bushwood, sir, and I never slice."
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

Oh wait . . .
I'm sure that Trump apologists will "clarify" what the President said since I only got 1000 on my SAT.




Trump says leakers should be shot: 'They're the scum of the earth'


No clarification needed, if you leak military secrets putting the men and women protecting us further into harm, you're committing treason and deserve the consequences you earn. Why would you have a problem with Trump saying people who commit treason should be put to death?
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
For the simple reason that I'd never trust Trump and his DoJ.
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

For the simple reason that I'd never trust Trump and his DoJ.



Got it. That's a different point than you were making when posting the story. Either way, I agree with that being a punishment for treason.
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

Oh wait . . .
I'm sure that Trump apologists will "clarify" what the President said since I only got 1000 on my SAT.




Trump says leakers should be shot: 'They're the scum of the earth'


No clarification needed, if you leak military secrets putting the men and women protecting us further into harm, you're committing treason and deserve the consequences you earn. Why would you have a problem with Trump saying people who commit treason should be put to death?


Oh wow!

If I'm reading your posting correctly, you believe Trump should be shot for Treason?

Because we've all known for a long time that he has revealed military secrets!
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
concordtom said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

Oh wait . . .
I'm sure that Trump apologists will "clarify" what the President said since I only got 1000 on my SAT.




Trump says leakers should be shot: 'They're the scum of the earth'


No clarification needed, if you leak military secrets putting the men and women protecting us further into harm, you're committing treason and deserve the consequences you earn. Why would you have a problem with Trump saying people who commit treason should be put to death?


Oh wow!

If I'm reading your posting correctly, you believe Trump should be shot for Treason?

Because we've all known for a long time that he has revealed military secrets!

that is how I read it as well

"I Abide by Old and New Rules, and I Never Personally Attack. Gambling is illegal at Bushwood, sir, and I never slice."
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
concordtom said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

Oh wait . . .
I'm sure that Trump apologists will "clarify" what the President said since I only got 1000 on my SAT.




Trump says leakers should be shot: 'They're the scum of the earth'


No clarification needed, if you leak military secrets putting the men and women protecting us further into harm, you're committing treason and deserve the consequences you earn. Why would you have a problem with Trump saying people who commit treason should be put to death?


Oh wow!

If I'm reading your posting correctly, you believe Trump should be shot for Treason?

Because we've all known for a long time that he has revealed military secrets!


You're not reading it correctly but it's not surprising that's what you go straight for.

We've known that? I sure haven't.

There is an important difference between Trump saying he possessed a classified document and establishing that he actually showed its classified contents to unauthorized individuals. Trump was recorded discussing what he described as classified military information at Bedminster, and prosecutors alleged he displayed classified material. Whether he actually disclosed classified contents to unauthorized people was not conclusively established in court.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SBGold said:

concordtom said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

Oh wait . . .
I'm sure that Trump apologists will "clarify" what the President said since I only got 1000 on my SAT.




Trump says leakers should be shot: 'They're the scum of the earth'


No clarification needed, if you leak military secrets putting the men and women protecting us further into harm, you're committing treason and deserve the consequences you earn. Why would you have a problem with Trump saying people who commit treason should be put to death?


Oh wow!

If I'm reading your posting correctly, you believe Trump should be shot for Treason?

Because we've all known for a long time that he has revealed military secrets!

that is how I read it as well




Same here.

https://thehill.com/policy/defense/5807115-donald-trump-military-complex-white-house-ballroom/amp/

concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

concordtom said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

Oh wait . . .
I'm sure that Trump apologists will "clarify" what the President said since I only got 1000 on my SAT.




Trump says leakers should be shot: 'They're the scum of the earth'


No clarification needed, if you leak military secrets putting the men and women protecting us further into harm, you're committing treason and deserve the consequences you earn. Why would you have a problem with Trump saying people who commit treason should be put to death?


Oh wow!

If I'm reading your posting correctly, you believe Trump should be shot for Treason?

Because we've all known for a long time that he has revealed military secrets!


We've known that? I sure haven't.



HearstMining
How long do you want to ignore this user?
How about revealing you're not going to attack another country until after the mid-term elections? Oh, sorry, that's a clever negotiating tactic, not a security breach.
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Please show me proof that Trump has done what you claimed. I provided proof he didn't and you responded with a gif.
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

Please show me proof that Trump has done what you claimed. I provided proof he didn't and you responded with a gif.


We've been presenting you with proof for TEN YEARS!!

You always come back with "not found guilty in a court of law" - but there's a problem with your excuses.

1. Trump has successfully maneuvered within the court system to block his prosecutions, and

2. The SCOTUS has now effectively given given license to do whatever the hell he wants, so long as he claims that his actions were within his "official capacities". Well, all he has to do is claim everything is official.

You can keep on with your lame ass excuses. Even when he was found civilly responsible for sexual assault you wouldn't criticize him.

The man is scum, liar, criminal, thief!
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It makes no sense to talk to you - except for my own entertainment purposes!

You are off the rails.

Have a nice weekend.

BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This is the worst presentation of your case possible. The Supreme Court has ruled against Trump repeatedly, and on big cases too. Your entire argument just flew out the window. It's also not the claim you made first which is that Trump revealed military secrets.
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm not going to review and litigate trump's criminality with you.
You're a wall of excuses and denial and not a fair counterparty worth my time.
Cheers.
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
concordtom said:

I'm not going to review and litigate trump's criminality with you.
You're a wall of excuses and denial and not a fair counterparty worth my time.
Cheers.


Classic move when you can't back up your claims. I already knew you couldn't but I gave you the opportunity anyways.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
concordtom said:

I'm not going to review and litigate trump's criminality with you.
You're a wall of excuses and denial and not a fair counterparty worth my time.
Cheers.


It stands to reason that OT could be a much better forum if posters posted in good faith.
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

concordtom said:

I'm not going to review and litigate trump's criminality with you.
You're a wall of excuses and denial and not a fair counterparty worth my time.
Cheers.


It stands to reason that OT could be a much better forum if posters posted in good faith.



Yes and CT didn't do that in this thread. Can you provide evidence of his claims because he couldn't after arguing the point, bad faith.
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.