Anthony League
Status:
Signed

Anthony League

Running Back
6′1″ / 205 lbs
Long Beach, CA
Milikan
Class of 2025
Rating: n/a
?

National Avg
Rating: 88.0
?

School Preferences

School
Interest
Offer
Official Visit
California
Signed
06/20/2024
Arizona
None
BYU
None
Colorado
None
Oregon State
None
Washington
None
+ 1 More

Videos

(1 Total)
League 1118yds A/P(995 / 9.6ypc) 15TD

Updates

Greg Richardson
7 days ago by Greg Richardson
BI Camp Report
Practice #3 - Shoulder Pads (Thump)Interesting to witness two full practices with a split squad. You can see the benefit in terms of the # of reps for players going way up and the coach to player ratio being better.Good to see some BI folks out there including Paws and ARBear.Observations:This might be the healthiest team in America. Only Burrell and incoming Freshman OL Ben Howard weren't participating. The best in my 30 year experience of attending camp.This is a big team, lots of huge bodies and S&C has clearly had an impact. Go back and look at weights on the roster as they've been updating them. For example, some of the younger DBs have added a lot of muscle and there were more than a handful of guys who popped with their obvious gains including Cade Uluave, Legend Journey, Trond Grizzell, Ryan McCulloch and Nick Morrow who all looked markedly larger and more muscularEarly in Fall Camp, there's not a ton of 11v11, I'd expect to see that shift next week as the go to combined practices starting Tuesday and there's an emphasis switch from technique, installation and assignment to more playingSome quick hits on the Summer newcomers:Brandon High - He's built, a solid rock at 220 and very quick. Not a lot of wiggle but good burstKendrick Raphael - Bigger than I had imagined and a very muscular 200. Quick feet, looks natural as a pass catcher, not quite the explosion of High and Johnson. More wiggle and lateral agility than Brandon and LJLJ Johnson - Bowling ball build, powerful lower body. Quicker than I had thought. Runs with power, catching the ball may be a development area for himThe above three look, practice and play like grown men and you can see the difference relative to Wiley and League in terms of physical development and practice demeanorTyson Ford - Big man, huge frame, moves well.Jordan Sanford - He can run, looks like a hybrid safety/CB typeQuimari Shemwell - Thin but with a lot of twitch and juice. I can imagine him playing a lot this year. Chris Victor - Mature frame and looks the part of an OLB, had a really good 1v1 pass rush rep TJ Bush - Big person, very thick lower body. Played opposite McCulloch. Justin Hasenhuetl - He moves well and plays with a feisty edge. He popped at LT. Needs to add some weight, not quite sure he's 6'5+Harrison Taggart - Played with an old school neck roll. Looked like Bobby Bouchette out thereAnthony League - Had one nice run, looks naturally strong and a tackle breaker. Not super explosiveMark Hamper - He's strongly built, moves wellQuaron Adams - Twitchy and clearly can run. Can he consistently catch the ball?Jayden Dixon-Veal - Thin, twitchy player, made a few nice catches. Along with Adams, struggled fielding puntsLandon Morris - Broad shoulders and thinner legs. Fluid athlete. Looks like a jumbo WRBrent Austin - He played but didn't see him much as he was on the Student side boundary the entire practiceDaveion Harley - Not tall but solidly built, ran with the 2s today. Chase Murray - Didn't hit all his FGs in drills but he did in 11v11. Consistent strike, not a huge legAbram Murray - Big leg, slightly less consistent than Murray. He can hit from 55 and likely is the KO specialistZae Smith - Not tall, but long, long arms and he's a thick. Arms like a blacksmith. Quick get off and stout at the point of attack. Quarterback play: Not a ton to review here given the more constrained 11v11 they ran today. Both Brown and JKS had their moments. I liked Brown's decision making. Smart throwaways, a nice ball fake keeper and a really good read on a passing play where he tucked and run. Fast! JKS release and arm continue to impress. Had some show off moments in accuracy passing drills. Defense was ahead of the offense though I might give a slight nod to the OL vs DL on running plays. The secondary had a good day with a couple of nice pass break ups and a huge hit by Crosby on Grizzell and a deep seam routeA couple of way too early and perhaps obvious takes: The competition at NB and the Safety opposite Crosby are going to be fierce. Ditto on the OL, It feels like there's a top 9 or 10 emerging but the pecking order is far from obvious. WR appears to have more of a hierarchy but there are a lot of guys out there vying for snaps. Will be interesting to see who emerges as the #1 outside WRGuys who popped: Cade Uluave, Derek Wilkins, Luke Ferelli, Shemwell. Masses, Crosby, Manutai, Morrow, Robinson, DeJesus, Morris, Mini, High, Johnson (Note that I couldn't see everything and basically didn't see the WR/DB matchups on one side of the field during 11v11
Greg Richardson
8 days ago by Greg Richardson
Some camp tidbits
First off, I'll have some thoughts from live observations this weekend so stay tuned.Some staff impressions of the new guys:- Anthony League showing he's the real deal. There's a lot of experienced depth in front of him so 2025 may not be his year but a bright future is projected- Quaron Adams is very bit as fast as advertised. - Chris Victor looks far better early than his rating- Brent Austin looking like CB1 thus far
2024 Roster vs. 2025 Roster - The Offense
1 mo ago by Bear Insider
2024 Roster vs. 2025 Roster - The Offense
We go position group by position group and provide grades on whether the roster has taken a step forward or back - First the Offense
The Football Roster Post Spring - The Running Back Room
3 mo ago by Bear Insider
The Football Roster Post Spring - The Running Back Room
Cal saw five of its top six backs leave following Spring practice leading to the staff adding three transfers via the portal. With five scholarship tailbacks now on the roster, we take a look at what can be expected from the group in 2025
Cal Football Depth Chart in 2025 - The Offense
5 mo ago by Bear Insider
Cal Football Depth Chart in 2025 - The Offense
Bear Insider's view of the depth chart as Cal is just over two weeks away from kicking off Spring Ball
All Updates
×

National Average Rating

The National Average Rating is a proprietary formula that calculates an industry-wide aggregate rating for each recruiting prospect. The formula includes publicly listed grades, scores, ratings and rankings by national recruiting services, along with a Bear Insider rating. Combining the data provides a rating for each prospect, which is then normalized to fit the Bear Insider Rating 100-point scale.

The intent of this rating is to provide Bear Insider readers with a comprehensive snapshot of how individual prospects rank nationally.
×

Bear Insider Rating

99-100: Elite national prospect (Five-star)

Considered one of the best prospects in the nation and a likely difference-maker at the collegiate level. Displays all of the physical skills to be a future All-American with potential to be an early-round NFL draft pick.

90-98: Elite state prospect (Four-star)

Considered one of the best 30-40 prospects in the state and a top 250 national prospect. Displays the physical skills to be a major early contributor at the collegiate level with high professional potential.

80-89: Quality prospect (Three-star)

Considered one of the best 100 prospects in the state and a top 500 national prospect. Displays the physical skills to develop into a contributor over the course of his college career. Has the ability to become a professional prospect over time with development.

70-79: Solid prospect (Two-star)

Considered one of the top 250 prospects in the state. Has the physical skills to be a potential contributor at a D-1 program over the course of his collegiate career with significant development. Professional potential is low.
×

Staff Predictions

The predictions represent which school each staff member believes will ultimately sign the recruit, and the confidence meter represents his level of certainty in that outcome.

Example #1

If the predicted school is Cal and confidence is set to “High”, then the staff member is saying “I believe that this recruit will ultimately sign with Cal and I feel very certain about that.”

Example #2

If the predicted school is “Alabama” and confidence is set to “Low,” then the staff member is saying “I believe that this recruit will ultimately sign with Alabama, but I’m not very certain about that.”
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.