Jaydn Ott

10,278 Views | 55 Replies | Last: 4 yr ago by FreeTrialMan
KenBurnski
How long do you want to ignore this user?
82gradDLSdad said:

concernedparent said:

82gradDLSdad said:

going4roses said:

Didn't Hicks commit to a staff in turnover?


No idea who Hicks is.
Elijah.


No idea who Elijah Hicks is. Does not change what I wrote, in my mind.

Did you know him when he played corner and you just mean you don't really recognize him since the swap to safety? It HAS been a rocky transition but the dude definitely still exists.
82gradDLSdad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
KenBurnski said:

82gradDLSdad said:

concernedparent said:

82gradDLSdad said:

going4roses said:

Didn't Hicks commit to a staff in turnover?


No idea who Hicks is.
Elijah.


No idea who Elijah Hicks is. Does not change what I wrote, in my mind.

Did you know him when he played corner and you just mean you don't really recognize him since the swap to safety? It HAS been a rocky transition but the dude definitely still exists.


Don't know who he is. I'm not a fan of anyone who commits to coaches and a school and then decommits because of how the team and coaches look. As is the case with a couple of our current commits.
BerlinerBaer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
82gradDLSdad said:

KenBurnski said:

82gradDLSdad said:

concernedparent said:

82gradDLSdad said:

going4roses said:

Didn't Hicks commit to a staff in turnover?


No idea who Hicks is.
Elijah.


No idea who Elijah Hicks is. Does not change what I wrote, in my mind.

Did you know him when he played corner and you just mean you don't really recognize him since the swap to safety? It HAS been a rocky transition but the dude definitely still exists.


Don't know who he is. I'm not a fan of anyone who commits to coaches and a school and then decommits because of how the team and coaches look. As is the case with a couple of our current commits.

https://www.espn.com/college-football/player/_/id/4242402/elijah-hicks
ARbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
He literally did the EXACT opposite. He committed to Cal when we didn't even have a coaching staff after Dykes left. Was a crucial piece of the Takers.
BerlinerBaer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Just last night I speed watched the 2017 WSU game, along with all 7 turnovers the Takers forced. Only the second win over a top #10 team at home? I don't remember the stat, but wow...
prospeCt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BI thick with mad hicks



82gradDLSdad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ARbear said:

He literally did the EXACT opposite. He committed to Cal when we didn't even have a coaching staff after Dykes left. Was a crucial piece of the Takers.


Great.
calbear80
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Failure in Football.

Failure in MBB.

Failure in WBB.

There is only one conmen thread:

Knowlton.
Econ141
How long do you want to ignore this user?
calbear80 said:

Failure in Football.

Failure in MBB.

Failure in WBB.

There is only one conmen thread:

Knowlton.


The biggest do-nothing AD in all the land. I can do his job of simply extending nonsensical contracts.
rafterfan180
How long do you want to ignore this user?
82gradDLSdad said:

concernedparent said:

82gradDLSdad said:

going4roses said:

Didn't Hicks commit to a staff in turnover?


No idea who Hicks is.
Elijah.


No idea who Elijah Hicks is. Does not change what I wrote, in my mind.
Get to know him. He's a fantastic Cal Bear.

https://interceptpovertyfoundation.com/
rafterfan180
How long do you want to ignore this user?
fat_slice said:

calbear80 said:

Failure in Football.

Failure in MBB.

Failure in WBB.

There is only one conmen thread:

Knowlton.


The biggest do-nothing AD in all the land. I can do his job of simply extending nonsensical contracts.
That's not true. Interviewing for the AD position at Northwestern takes a lot more effort and preparation than you'd imagine.
OdontoBear66
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Would anyone on this board be surprised were we not to hear that Ott in the next 4 years has a move or two more in him? I wouldn't. We may have dodged one here, talent aside.
71Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
OdontoBear66 said:

Would anyone on this board be surprised were we not to hear that Ott in the next 4 years has a move or two more in him? I wouldn't. We may have dodged one here, talent aside.
Yeah, what the hell, never sign anyone with any talent because they will only transfer somewhere else anyway.

Doc - I am nominating your post for a spot in the "Classic Cal Sour Grapes Hall of Fame".

In fact, Cal needs to sign as many guys like Ott as possible and let the chips fall where they may……
OdontoBear66
How long do you want to ignore this user?
71Bear said:

OdontoBear66 said:

Would anyone on this board be surprised were we not to hear that Ott in the next 4 years has a move or two more in him? I wouldn't. We may have dodged one here, talent aside.
Yeah, what the hell, never sign anyone with any talent because they will only transfer somewhere else anyway.

Doc - I am nominating your post for a spot in the "Classic Cal Sour Grapes Hall of Fame".

In fact, Cal needs to sign as many guys like Ott as possible and let the chips fall where they may……
If you interpreted that from my post you are crazy. I was speaking of a recruit of any talent level who exhibits of track record of moving for any number or reasons (even though I can guess pretty accurately at the real ones) multiple times.

I would love for Cal to have a full cupboard of 4-5* talent. Just have old strong memories of the Ronnie Knox event of yesteryear. MB and BG have more than once, with class, alluded to Ott's mobility and maybe a dad who has come on board.
71Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
OdontoBear66 said:

71Bear said:

OdontoBear66 said:

Would anyone on this board be surprised were we not to hear that Ott in the next 4 years has a move or two more in him? I wouldn't. We may have dodged one here, talent aside.
Yeah, what the hell, never sign anyone with any talent because they will only transfer somewhere else anyway.

Doc - I am nominating your post for a spot in the "Classic Cal Sour Grapes Hall of Fame".

In fact, Cal needs to sign as many guys like Ott as possible and let the chips fall where they may……
If you interpreted that from my post you are crazy. I was speaking of a recruit of any talent level who exhibits of track record of moving for any number or reasons (even though I can guess pretty accurately at the real ones) multiple times.

I would love for Cal to have a full cupboard of 4-5* talent. Just have old strong memories of the Ronnie Knox event of yesteryear. MB and BG have more than once, with class, alluded to Ott's mobility and maybe a dad who has come on board.

Perhaps, you might want to go back and review the last sentence in your post. To suggest Cal "dodged one" smacks of sour grapes. In fact, Cal took a major recruiting hit.
OdontoBear66
How long do you want to ignore this user?
71Bear said:

OdontoBear66 said:

71Bear said:

OdontoBear66 said:

Would anyone on this board be surprised were we not to hear that Ott in the next 4 years has a move or two more in him? I wouldn't. We may have dodged one here, talent aside.
Yeah, what the hell, never sign anyone with any talent because they will only transfer somewhere else anyway.

Doc - I am nominating your post for a spot in the "Classic Cal Sour Grapes Hall of Fame".

In fact, Cal needs to sign as many guys like Ott as possible and let the chips fall where they may……
If you interpreted that from my post you are crazy. I was speaking of a recruit of any talent level who exhibits of track record of moving for any number or reasons (even though I can guess pretty accurately at the real ones) multiple times.

I would love for Cal to have a full cupboard of 4-5* talent. Just have old strong memories of the Ronnie Knox event of yesteryear. MB and BG have more than once, with class, alluded to Ott's mobility and maybe a dad who has come on board.

Perhaps, you might want to go back and review the last sentence in your post. To suggest Cal "dodged one" smacks of sour grapes. In fact, Cal took a major recruiting hit
It is sour grapes. From what I know I would love that he stayed. These are 18 year olds and in the spotlight, so oft time what they do is off the wall. But there seems suggestion of more there. Wish him well in his move on.
calumnus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
OdontoBear66 said:

71Bear said:

OdontoBear66 said:

71Bear said:

OdontoBear66 said:

Would anyone on this board be surprised were we not to hear that Ott in the next 4 years has a move or two more in him? I wouldn't. We may have dodged one here, talent aside.
Yeah, what the hell, never sign anyone with any talent because they will only transfer somewhere else anyway.

Doc - I am nominating your post for a spot in the "Classic Cal Sour Grapes Hall of Fame".

In fact, Cal needs to sign as many guys like Ott as possible and let the chips fall where they may……
If you interpreted that from my post you are crazy. I was speaking of a recruit of any talent level who exhibits of track record of moving for any number or reasons (even though I can guess pretty accurately at the real ones) multiple times.

I would love for Cal to have a full cupboard of 4-5* talent. Just have old strong memories of the Ronnie Knox event of yesteryear. MB and BG have more than once, with class, alluded to Ott's mobility and maybe a dad who has come on board.

Perhaps, you might want to go back and review the last sentence in your post. To suggest Cal "dodged one" smacks of sour grapes. In fact, Cal took a major recruiting hit
It is sour grapes. From what I know I would love that he stayed. These are 18 year olds and in the spotlight, so oft time what they do is off the wall. But there seems suggestion of more there. Wish him well in his move on.


Who knows? The season is not over and LOI day is months away. With the turnover at SC a lot Is in flux. Martin and Ott may still end up as Bears.
going4roses
How long do you want to ignore this user?
going4roses
How long do you want to ignore this user?
82gradDLSdad said:

going4roses said:

Didn't Hicks commit to a staff in turnover?


No idea who Hicks is.


How (are) you gonna win when you ain’t right within…
82gradDLSdad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
going4roses said:

82gradDLSdad said:

going4roses said:

Didn't Hicks commit to a staff in turnover?


No idea who Hicks is.





Great. My initial post in this whole thing talked about kids who decommit when the only thing that has changed is a couple of losses. Not sure how this whole Who is Hicks thing plays into my post. But good for this kid.
prospeCt
How long do you want to ignore this user?


" . . . sitting in here with a bunch of dumb hicks . . . "



the great lost Bill Hicks



FreeTrialMan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This is all super weird
Refresh
Page 2 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.