Wilner predicts Wilcox to Washington

16,020 Views | 111 Replies | Last: 4 yr ago by 82gradDLSdad
okaydo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
CaliforniaEternal
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Coaching trade or is Cal job too toxic?
KoreAmBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Might be a good result for us. But Knowlton hiring the next guy makes me scared. I thought Halloween was over?
82gradDLSdad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
CaliforniaEternal said:

Coaching trade or is Cal job too toxic?


Oh God. Lake = Wilcox.
Strykur
How long do you want to ignore this user?
82gradDLSdad said:

CaliforniaEternal said:

Coaching trade or is Cal job too toxic?
Oh God. Lake = Wilcox.
Lake lost his composure during a heated rivalry game, Wilcox has been mediocre for 5 years.
calumnus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
82gradDLSdad said:

CaliforniaEternal said:

Coaching trade or is Cal job too toxic?


Oh God. Lake = Wilcox.


Except Lake was fired for hitting a player.

UW buying out Wilcox's contract is far better than us having to fire him and buy out his contract. I just don't see UW doing that. Lake just beat Wilcox a few weeks ago.


Our basketball team just lost our home opener to UCSD 67-80.
Strykur
How long do you want to ignore this user?
calumnus said:

82gradDLSdad said:

CaliforniaEternal said:

Coaching trade or is Cal job too toxic?


Oh God. Lake = Wilcox.
Except Lake was fired for hitting a player.

UW buying out Wilcox's contract is far better than us having to fire him and buy out his contract. I just don't see UW doing that. Lake just beat Wilcox a few weeks ago.
Wilcox has familiarity with the program and would be obviously an unremarkable but stable hire. Of course the Husky fanbase will howl when it happens.
82gradDLSdad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
calumnus said:

82gradDLSdad said:

CaliforniaEternal said:

Coaching trade or is Cal job too toxic?


Oh God. Lake = Wilcox.


Except Lake was fired for hitting a player.

UW buying out Wilcox's contract is far better than us having to fire him and buy out his contract. I just don't see UW doing that. Lake just beat Wilcox a few weeks ago.


I saw nuns do more damage to grammar schoolers than what Lake did to that college football player.
kal kommie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Strykur said:

calumnus said:

82gradDLSdad said:

CaliforniaEternal said:

Coaching trade or is Cal job too toxic?


Oh God. Lake = Wilcox.
Except Lake was fired for hitting a player.

UW buying out Wilcox's contract is far better than us having to fire him and buy out his contract. I just don't see UW doing that. Lake just beat Wilcox a few weeks ago.
Wilcox has familiarity with the program and would be obviously an unremarkable but stable hire. Of course the Husky fanbase will howl when it happens.
Plus Wilcox has performed well vs UW here at Cal. 2-2 with both wins coming over top-15 ranked UW teams and one of the losses in OT. Relative to expectations, there probably isn't another Pac-12 team that Wilcox has done as well against. Of course this is not a good reason to hire someone, but it probably makes an impression on people.
KoreAmBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
He may want to go, and Sirmon may want to go with him to coach his son.
72CalBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Nope. He's not going. Much of this mess is institutional and of course there is no support from Berkeley for sports in general, but he's not leaving as a "loser." Remember when we suggested he was going to get plucked by a better program? Funny.
calbear93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
okaydo said:




I think I am OK with this.
diva1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wilcox will leave and be a success Cal will hire someone else and be mediocre
The problem at Cal is institutional and will never change
If Wilcox goes to UW they will rise again
Cal Strong!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This would be a dream come true.
heartofthebear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
okaydo said:




Makes sense, Husky fans are already used to seeing good defense and bad offense. It's a perfect match rivaling any on e-Harmony.
oobay
How long do you want to ignore this user?
And Brad Musgrave will be promoted to head coach!
UrsineMaximus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wilcox isn't going anywhere, he has the #3 defense in the conference and the #5 offense in the conference. The AZ game was an outlier for obvious reasons and prior to that one could argue that Cal's offense was one of the best in the PAC 12. This major bump in the road, COVID, will derail that a bit due to lack of practice time but it should be enough to beat 'furd. Fucla will be a challenge but by then both the O and D will have had significant reps.

The bigger problem for Cal is how many current players decide enough is enough and transfer out at the end of the year. Recruiting has already been impacted due to a poor start to the season and that may be exasperated with what has transpired in the last week.

Why Knowlton made the decision to stop testing during the season is a fireable offense. Christ has to roll a head and it has to be Knowlton's.

Go Bears!!
Unit2Sucks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I mean, this is certainly a better outcome than firing Wilcox and throwing good money after bad but do we really think this AD is going to replace Wilcox with someone better? We have a puncher's chance but more likely than not we end up worse off than we are now. Which is saying something.
71Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
KoreAmBear said:

He may want to go, and Sirmon may want to go with him to coach his son.
Nephew Son.
KenBurnski
How long do you want to ignore this user?
71Bear said:

KoreAmBear said:

He may want to go, and Sirmon may want to go with him to coach his son.
Nephew

Son
Bobodeluxe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Moon.
Bobodeluxe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
New hope!
59bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Strykur said:

calumnus said:

82gradDLSdad said:

CaliforniaEternal said:

Coaching trade or is Cal job too toxic?


Oh God. Lake = Wilcox.
Except Lake was fired for hitting a player.

UW buying out Wilcox's contract is far better than us having to fire him and buy out his contract. I just don't see UW doing that. Lake just beat Wilcox a few weeks ago.
Wilcox has familiarity with the program and would be obviously an unremarkable but stable hire. Of course the Husky fanbase will howl when it happens.
Absolutely! There is nothing in Wilcox's resume, even the 2 razor thin wins over the Dawgs, that would justify this hire for the fan base. Delusional Husky fans see the job as a career goal on the order of USC, 'Bama, ND, OK, tOSU! That said, Lake's record and recruiting failures are far more likely to bring him down than the player abuse incident.
FloriDreaming
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Good riddance. UW replacing a bad coach with an even worse one. This could potentially be great news for Cal if we could hire someone good. But Knowelton is our AD, so…
Oakbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"I saw nuns do more damage to grammar schoolers than what Lake did to that college football player."

yup, the old yardstick across the knuckles really hurt LOL
philbert
How long do you want to ignore this user?

FloriDreaming
How long do you want to ignore this user?
diva1 said:

Wilcox will leave and be a success Cal will hire someone else and be mediocre
The problem at Cal is institutional and will never change
If Wilcox goes to UW they will rise again
No they won't. UW doesn't fare any better than Cal when they have bad coaches.
See Gilbertson, Willingham, and Lake. Even Sark didn't do very well there. Sure, Petersen did well, but he's one of the best coaches around.

People look at Dykes at SMU and say "See? The problem is Cal." Yes, the problem for Dykes was Cal. It was a terrible fit for both sides. That doesn't mean "Cal is a problem for every coach," it means Cal needs to do a MUCH better job at finding a good coach who is a good fit. (Just like everyone else who hires people, this is Human Resources 101.)

Wilcox was "great fit, mediocre coach." At UW he would be "okay fit, still mediocre coach, but with much higher expectations." So if he goes, I hope he is saving his money and investing it well.

If Wilcox goes to UW, he will fail there, like he did at Cal. And if, God forbid, Lake comes to Cal, he will fail here, too. Miserably. He's the only coach in the Pac 12 who is arguably worse than Wilcox.

That's not to say I wouldn't blame Wilcox for leaving. The Lockdown Cult Crazies have ruined Cal and, by extension, the sports programs. He'll find out Seattle isn't any better in that regard, he should set is sights east. COVID is always going to be with us. Which means in Deep Blue America, COVID Cult Crazy will always be with us. The rest of the country is done with this and doing fine. Wilcox would just be changing addresses in Losertown. But, given his judgment as a coach, this move wouldn't surprise me in the least. Good luck and good riddance.

I'd take any other coach in the Pac 12 over those two (well, not SC's interim HC, but he's not a real HC).

If Cal wants to take a fired UW coach, the only one I'd feel remotely okay about would be Neuheisel. And that's because he was actually a good coach at UW.
bipolarbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
CaliforniaEternal said:

Coaching trade or is Cal job too toxic?
Frankly I think only a Cal person would take on this radioactive job now. Too bad Pawlawski did not go into coaching, he'd be great. Troy Taylor might come.
concernedparent
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I don't think Wilcox is a bad coach, but like... why would they want him?
Strykur
How long do you want to ignore this user?
concernedparent said:

I don't think Wilcox is a bad coach, but like... why would they want him?
They have an inkling of hope that Wilcox could do something up there, previously coached in Seattle, they have to get rid of Lake, and there are a ton of openings this year.
Strykur
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bipolarbear said:

CaliforniaEternal said:

Coaching trade or is Cal job too toxic?
Frankly I think only a Cal person would take on this radioactive job now. Too bad Pawlawski did not go into coaching, he'd be great. Troy Taylor might come.
Troy Taylor was getting $500K annual while at Utah but then took a 50% pay cut to $240K to coach Sac State, we just need to pay enough and he will come unless some other program takes a shot at him.
bipolarbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Strykur said:

bipolarbear said:

CaliforniaEternal said:

Coaching trade or is Cal job too toxic?
Frankly I think only a Cal person would take on this radioactive job now. Too bad Pawlawski did not go into coaching, he'd be great. Troy Taylor might come.
Troy Taylor was getting $500K annual while at Utah but then took a 50% pay cut to $240K to coach Sac State, we just need to pay enough and he will come unless some other program takes a shot at him.
Do not waste money on "search firms"
calbear93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bipolarbear said:

Strykur said:

bipolarbear said:

CaliforniaEternal said:

Coaching trade or is Cal job too toxic?
Frankly I think only a Cal person would take on this radioactive job now. Too bad Pawlawski did not go into coaching, he'd be great. Troy Taylor might come.
Troy Taylor was getting $500K annual while at Utah but then took a 50% pay cut to $240K to coach Sac State, we just need to pay enough and he will come unless some other program takes a shot at him.
Do not waste money on "search firms"
Could not agree more. Why keep going to the dry well?
eastbayyoungbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HuaHin (fka Uthai) said:

diva1 said:

Wilcox will leave and be a success Cal will hire someone else and be mediocre
The problem at Cal is institutional and will never change
If Wilcox goes to UW they will rise again
No they won't. UW doesn't fare any better than Cal when they have bad coaches.
See Gilbertson, Willingham, and Lake. Even Sark didn't do very well there. Sure, Petersen did well, but he's one of the best coaches around.

People look at Dykes at SMU and say "See? The problem is Cal." Yes, the problem for Dykes was Cal. It was a terrible fit for both sides. That doesn't mean "Cal is a problem for every coach," it means Cal needs to do a MUCH better job at finding a good coach who is a good fit. (Just like everyone else who hires people, this is Human Resources 101.)
I'm seriously questioning whether anyone at this point is a good fit for Cal. Every hire we've made in the last 50 years has either been terrible or in the three cases where they were okay, one was forced out, one left for a better job, and one flamed out hard. And the best of those still couldn't get us to a Rose Bowl.

Quote:

If Cal wants to take a fired UW coach, the only one I'd feel remotely okay about would be Neuheisel. And that's because he was actually a good coach at UW.
You mean the guy who flamed out with superior talent and location at UCLA? How would that work for us in any way?
calbear93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
eastbayyoungbear said:

HuaHin (fka Uthai) said:

diva1 said:

Wilcox will leave and be a success Cal will hire someone else and be mediocre
The problem at Cal is institutional and will never change
If Wilcox goes to UW they will rise again
No they won't. UW doesn't fare any better than Cal when they have bad coaches.
See Gilbertson, Willingham, and Lake. Even Sark didn't do very well there. Sure, Petersen did well, but he's one of the best coaches around.

People look at Dykes at SMU and say "See? The problem is Cal." Yes, the problem for Dykes was Cal. It was a terrible fit for both sides. That doesn't mean "Cal is a problem for every coach," it means Cal needs to do a MUCH better job at finding a good coach who is a good fit. (Just like everyone else who hires people, this is Human Resources 101.)
I'm seriously questioning whether anyone at this point is a good fit for Cal. Every hire we've made in the last 50 years has either been terrible or in the three cases where they were okay, one was forced out, one left for a better job, and one flamed out hard. And the best of those still couldn't get us to a Rose Bowl.

Quote:

If Cal wants to take a fired UW coach, the only one I'd feel remotely okay about would be Neuheisel. And that's because he was actually a good coach at UW.
You mean the guy who flamed out with superior talent and location at UCLA? How would that work for us in any way?
Snyder and Tedford were not just OK.
Last Page
Page 1 of 4
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.