Simple solution for what to do with the land. The Albany A's. Alliteration, baby!
okaydo said:95bears said:TandemBear said:
We have a HUGE homelessness problem in the Bay Area and you think this huge tract of land coming available is a negative?
Wow, that's kinda strange. I'd look at this as a great opportunity to actually do something about the problem.
But nope, I'm not that naive! This land will be sold to the highest bidder so some massive project can get built consisting of high-end commercial space, luxury apartments, condos and homes and be sold (for cash) to the highest foreign bidders. No Bay Area blue collar kids will be buying a home here. And for sure there we be NO relocated homeless living here pursuing the American Dream.
So I guess you're right
You would turn all that land into a massive homeless shelter that is guaranteed to be a blight and fail? I don't think that helps the east bay.
There's a massive housing shortage, forcing people who are poor people (those making under $60,000) onto the street. Why not redevelop that area for more housing or something? It doesn't have to be a homeless shelter.
JimSox said:
Simple solution for what to do with the land. The Albany A's. Alliteration, baby!
Vegas has the casino companies to "influence" the state legislature into giving lots of taxpayer money to sports team owners, and they have the casino companies and the mob to bribe or threaten anyone who might try to file lawsuits to block or delay a project. Albany has neither.calumnus said:You would think, but Albany is too small to be able to give Fischer all the taxpayer subsidies he is looking for.JimSox said:
Simple solution for what to do with the land. The Albany A's. Alliteration, baby!
No, you must be right. Give the homeless some of the best land in the East Bay. That makes tons of sense to me. Another clueless solution to a complex homeless problem.TandemBear said:
We have a HUGE homelessness problem in the Bay Area and you think this huge tract of land coming available is a negative?
Wow, that's kinda strange. I'd look at this as a great opportunity to actually do something about the problem.
But nope, I'm not that naive! This land will be sold to the highest bidder so some massive project can get built consisting of high-end commercial space, luxury apartments, condos and homes and be sold (for cash) to the highest foreign bidders. No Bay Area blue collar kids will be buying a home here. And for sure there we be NO relocated homeless living here pursuing the American Dream.
So I guess you're right
OdontoBear66 said:No, you must be right. Give the homeless some of the best land in the East Bay. That makes tons of sense to me. Another clueless solution to a complex homeless problem.TandemBear said:
We have a HUGE homelessness problem in the Bay Area and you think this huge tract of land coming available is a negative?
Wow, that's kinda strange. I'd look at this as a great opportunity to actually do something about the problem.
But nope, I'm not that naive! This land will be sold to the highest bidder so some massive project can get built consisting of high-end commercial space, luxury apartments, condos and homes and be sold (for cash) to the highest foreign bidders. No Bay Area blue collar kids will be buying a home here. And for sure there we be NO relocated homeless living here pursuing the American Dream.
So I guess you're right
I agree, but read the room.CNHTH said:
Thanks this is what I was worried about. They are hyper focused on the threat of losing tax revenue so they will build more 1.8mm condos. When in reality the biggest thief of tax revenue is of federal tax revenue and it's to pay for nice roads in southern welfare states. Of course they'll spin it like they spun decentralization to get Gray Davis removed and then low and behold oops Enron and Ken Lay and btw have fun with wildfires because we bankrupted your utility provider; or like they're currently doing with the apparent gas tax. Remember it's a gas tax not corporate greed. It's a gas tax people. Oregon has zero refining capacity and imports fuel from Benicia and mandates someone pump your gas and pays a total gas tax of .24 and the price is 3.5 while at the source in benecia the tax is .37 and yet the price is 6.25
Remember it's the .13 tax difference that accounts for the price difference.
I swear the world has gone full brawndo with realignment and everything else.
Shame we're letting republican grifters Jack this state all to hell all to be able to spin some stupid narrative about why democrats suck and they need to be in charge to push an absolutely insane conservative social agenda and an overthought of a fiscal policy that is more liberal than democrats
Nah.CNHTH said:
Trying my best.
I thought most blues simply want Greek orgies, Moscow mules, Ada access, intelligent discussions at ccc, yearly boho grove visits to piss on stuff, and noon kickoffs sans the inconvenience of paying high taxes that benefit the heathens in secessionist states
Do you know who runs this state, and the city of Oakland, and has for decades? It ain't "Republican grifters".CNHTH said:
Thanks this is what I was worried about. They are hyper focused on the threat of losing tax revenue so they will build more 1.8mm condos. When in reality the biggest thief of tax revenue is of federal tax revenue and it's to pay for nice roads in southern welfare states. Of course they'll spin it like they spun decentralization to get Gray Davis removed and then low and behold oops Enron and Ken Lay and btw have fun with wildfires because we bankrupted your utility provider; or like they're currently doing with the apparent gas tax. Remember it's a gas tax not corporate greed. It's a gas tax people. Oregon has zero refining capacity and imports fuel from Benicia and mandates someone pump your gas and pays a total gas tax of .24 and the price is 3.5 while at the source in benecia the tax is .37 and yet the price is 6.25
Remember it's the .13 tax difference that accounts for the price difference.
I swear the world has gone full brawndo with realignment and everything else.
Shame we're letting republican grifters Jack this state all to hell all to be able to spin some stupid narrative about why democrats suck and they need to be in charge to push an absolutely insane conservative social agenda and an overthought of a fiscal policy that is more liberal than democrats
BigDaddy said:Do you know who runs this state, and the city of Oakland, and has for decades? It ain't "Republican grifters".CNHTH said:
Thanks this is what I was worried about. They are hyper focused on the threat of losing tax revenue so they will build more 1.8mm condos. When in reality the biggest thief of tax revenue is of federal tax revenue and it's to pay for nice roads in southern welfare states. Of course they'll spin it like they spun decentralization to get Gray Davis removed and then low and behold oops Enron and Ken Lay and btw have fun with wildfires because we bankrupted your utility provider; or like they're currently doing with the apparent gas tax. Remember it's a gas tax not corporate greed. It's a gas tax people. Oregon has zero refining capacity and imports fuel from Benicia and mandates someone pump your gas and pays a total gas tax of .24 and the price is 3.5 while at the source in benecia the tax is .37 and yet the price is 6.25
Remember it's the .13 tax difference that accounts for the price difference.
I swear the world has gone full brawndo with realignment and everything else.
Shame we're letting republican grifters Jack this state all to hell all to be able to spin some stupid narrative about why democrats suck and they need to be in charge to push an absolutely insane conservative social agenda and an overthought of a fiscal policy that is more liberal than democrats
The rest is just bong talk.
BigDaddy said:Do you know who runs this state, and the city of Oakland, and has for decades? It ain't "Republican grifters".CNHTH said:
Thanks this is what I was worried about. They are hyper focused on the threat of losing tax revenue so they will build more 1.8mm condos. When in reality the biggest thief of tax revenue is of federal tax revenue and it's to pay for nice roads in southern welfare states. Of course they'll spin it like they spun decentralization to get Gray Davis removed and then low and behold oops Enron and Ken Lay and btw have fun with wildfires because we bankrupted your utility provider; or like they're currently doing with the apparent gas tax. Remember it's a gas tax not corporate greed. It's a gas tax people. Oregon has zero refining capacity and imports fuel from Benicia and mandates someone pump your gas and pays a total gas tax of .24 and the price is 3.5 while at the source in benecia the tax is .37 and yet the price is 6.25
Remember it's the .13 tax difference that accounts for the price difference.
I swear the world has gone full brawndo with realignment and everything else.
Shame we're letting republican grifters Jack this state all to hell all to be able to spin some stupid narrative about why democrats suck and they need to be in charge to push an absolutely insane conservative social agenda and an overthought of a fiscal policy that is more liberal than democrats
The rest is just bong talk.