Results from Witter Field: Cal rugby vs Santa Barbara

2,159 Views | 10 Replies | Last: 1 yr ago by Chabbear
chalcidbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal began the game with 4 wins for the season: 3 at the Dennis Storer Classic at UCLA (beating UCSD 94-0, Cal Poly 33-7 and UCLA 21-0), and one a couple of days ago at Santa Clara (91-0). This was UCSB's second game of the season, in their first they trounced Stanford 68-7.

It was raining before the game, but the precipitation stopped just before opening kickoff, and never returned. Cal was decidedly faster and bigger than the Gauchos. We dominated in the scrums as well as in the lineouts (I think we stole the ball from 1 or 2 of their lineouts). We also had speed: both Solomon Williams and Caleb Tomasin each had a beautiful long run, outstripping the defenders. And our conditioning showed up well - in the last moments of the game a Santa Barbara defender had his arms around a Cal ballcarrier, and our guy just shrugged him off.

Cal got the ball first and scored a pair of tries rather quickly. A Gaucho then got a yellow card and so they were down a man for the middle of the 1st period. At about the 26 minute mark, Cal was up 46-0, and Coach Clark pulled most, if not all, of the starters, and from there on we went with our second team. That brought a little more equality to the game, and for about 10 minutes of game time, play was mostly in our half of the field, with Santa Barbara threatening to score at least twice. But the Bears finally held firm and turned back the attack. At the end of the half, we led 60-0.

The second half was basically more of the same. Cal scored early and often, while Santa Barbara got the ball on our half of the field only a couple of times. On three separate occasions, the Gauchos failed to get the kickoff 10 meters downfield, so Cal got to start with a scrum at midfield. I think the game was notable by the lack of kicks during the game. Setting aside the "standard" kicking (for conversions, or after a score or penalty) I saw only 4 instances of a player kicking during the flow of the game - twice by Santa Barbara, and twice by us. However our second such kick was quite unusual, and a thing of beauty: we had the ball, just short of the Gaucho's goal line, and most of the players (of both teams) were at the south end of the field. A Cal man kicked a lovely high arching ball ... across to the north end of the field, where it was fielded by a Cal man who fought off one or two defenders to score a try. I don't remember seeing anything like that ever before.

Oh yes, I almost forgot, final score: 119-0.
Golden One
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Thanks for the great recap.
TomBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Thanks Chalcid.

This year I am modifying my rugby travel and will be up only for the big contests against Navy, BYU, St. Mary's and whatever playoff the Bears get into. Fortunately the Bears play UC(la) for a standard match in a couple of weeks and I'll be at that one too and will give a "mini" report at the conclusion of that game.
chalcidbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TomBear said:

Thanks Chalcid.

This year I am modifying my rugby travel and will be up only for the big contests against Navy, BYU, St. Mary's and whatever playoff the Bears get into. Fortunately the Bears play UC(la) for a standard match in a couple of weeks and I'll be at that one too and will give a "mini" report at the conclusion of that game.
Great! It seems that the number of rugby contests is markedly fewer this year, so we have that much less opportunity to "practice" on the pitch against opponents. Because it is still early in the season, I was expecting to see more ball handling errors by the Bears, and was pleasantly surprised to see very few (a few are always to be expected in wet conditions, such as yesterday's). But then, maybe that was due to an inferior opponent who failed to put as much pressure on us, compared to the other teams we will face down the road. I expect the road to the NC game to be just as grueling as last year.
TomBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?

In the limited action I've seen so far, I agree. Passing has been a bit crisper and far fewer knock-ons.

The match against UC(la) will be interesting. Bruins are bigger and more athletic than I have seen in a long time. But they just didn't get their offense going against Cal in the shorter tourney matches.

Bears are just so solid defensively.

Can't wait to see them in westwood.
cal83dls79
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I was on the edge of my seat at 110 - 0
chalcidbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cal83dls79 said:

I was on the edge of my seat at 110 - 0
I always wondered by Cal never a box on their scoreboard for the hundreds digit (they could save a little money by doing so for only the home team's score): the final score of "19-0" is a little underwhelming.
joe amos yaks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
119-0
Isn't there a mercy rule?
"Those who say don't know, and those who know don't say." - LT
grrrrah
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You sound like a Stanford rugger.
chalcidbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
joe amos yaks said:

119-0
Isn't there a mercy rule?
Well, sorta. Cal did sub out our first stringers about midway through the first period. Other than that, you really can't slow down play in rugby like you do in gridiron football. Play is continuous (like soccer), and players can be penalized for things like holding on to the ball too long after being tackled.
Chabbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Also, in 15s, when you score, you get the ball kicked back to you..
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.