Auburn's Position Grades Vs. Cal From An Auburn Perspective

1,853 Views | 9 Replies | Last: 11 mo ago by burritos
Eastern Oregon Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
From the Auburn Rivals Board:

Auburn position grades versus Cal

Auburn | What a difference seven days can make.
The previous Saturday, Auburn was riding the high of its revamped passing attack.
A week later, the offense spent most of the game looking lost again en route to a 21-14 loss to a Cal team that the Tigers had no business losing to.
Auburn's offense started off hot with a touchdown on its first drive, but after that, the Tiger offense only scored on one more drive.
Here are position grades from Auburn's loss at home against Cal:

Quarterbacks: F
It was a nearly flawless start for Payton Thorne as he swiftly marched Auburn down the field for a touchdown.
And then after that, it was an abject disaster.
On the ensuing drives, he missed an open Keandre Lambert-Smith on 4th-and-2 and threw a pick, though the interception went off the hands of Cam Coleman.
Things weren't much better in the second half as the Tiger offense stalled out the entire third quarter and ended with Thorne throwing an interception as he was hit.
After leading a touchdown drive to cut the lead in half, the Tigers had a chance to tie the game, but Thorne threw a jump ball that was intercepted to basically seal the game.
And then he threw his fourth to twist the dagger. A disaster of a day for Auburn's quarterback.



Running backs: C
Auburn should have run the ball more in the first half. At one point, the Tigers threw the ball eight times in a row, and Jarquez Hunter had just four carries in the first half.
Hunter ran the ball well in the second half, but his fumble early in the fourth negated, which set up Cal's dagger touchdown, negated his previous work.
Hunter ended the game with 12 rushes for 68 yards.
#Establi****



Wide receivers: C-
Similar to Thorne, the receivers had a great opening half as Cam Coleman caught a 41-yard pass into the red zone, and then on 3rd down, Lambert-Smith caught a beautiful toe-drag touchdown.
After that, it was a whole lot of nothing in the first half which included Coleman's drop that led to a Cal interception.
Freeze said postgame that the Tiger receivers got open but the pass protection wasn't able to hold up, which is why the grade isn't lower.



Tight ends: D
Rivaldo Fairweather has to be better. He wasn't needed much in week one, and even then he had a couple of drops.
In the first half, Fairweather dropped a pass that would have picked up a first down on 3rd-and-2. Fairweather also got dinged for a holding call late in the half.
In the second half, he was invisible. Auburn needs more from the guy that was its best receiving threat last season.



Offensive line: D+
The run blocking was great. Auburn was able to get chunk plays on the ground when it ran the ball with 57 percent of its runs being for over four yards.
The pass protection was a different story.
Auburn's offensive line allowed three sacks and five tackles for loss. It also allowed a free rusher to get to Throne leading to the interception at the end of the third quarter.
Great run blocking. Disastrous pass protection.



Defensive line: A
This unit kept Auburn in the game. Cal only rushed for 17 yards in the first half, and when the Tigers desperately needed a stop to end the half, Keldric Faulk came up with back-to-back sacks to force a Cal punt at midfield.
In the second half, DJ Durkin dialed up more pressure which forced rushed throws from Mendoza after he was nearly perfect in the first half.



Linebackers: C-
Jalen McLeod and Dorian Mausi had solid games, but Eugene Asante was a ghost on the field.
Eugene Asante and Dorian Mausi combined for just three tackles.



Defensive backs: C-
It was a tale of two halves for the Auburn secondary. Cal was targeting whatever one-on-one it saw on the boundary and won just about all of them in the first half. Cal quarterback Fernando Mendoza was 19-of-21 for 205 yards with two touchdowns in the first half alone.
The second half was a much different story. A lot of it was due to the Tiger pass rush, but the secondary also did its job locking up Cal's receivers despite being on islands for a lot of the half.
Kayin Lee and Jerrin Thompson both had great second halves, although Lee did drop what would have been a game-tying pick-6.


CALiforniALUM
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This year's win makes me all the more angry about losing last year. We should have beat these guys twice. I respect (maybe a bit jealous of) their expectations to win but they are lucky they can claim a split series.
bearsandgiants
How long do you want to ignore this user?
CALiforniALUM said:

This year's win makes me all the more angry about losing last year. We should have beat these guys twice. I respect (maybe a bit jealous of) their expectations to win but they are lucky they can claim a split series.



Had we beaten them they'd have been fired up for revenge. I prefer the way it played out!
CALiforniALUM
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearsandgiants said:

CALiforniALUM said:

This year's win makes me all the more angry about losing last year. We should have beat these guys twice. I respect (maybe a bit jealous of) their expectations to win but they are lucky they can claim a split series.



Had we beaten them they'd have been fired up for revenge. I prefer the way it played out!


Fair point that the previous result sets the stage for the next contest. In retrospect it still feels like we let one get away last year.
burritos
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearsandgiants said:

CALiforniALUM said:

This year's win makes me all the more angry about losing last year. We should have beat these guys twice. I respect (maybe a bit jealous of) their expectations to win but they are lucky they can claim a split series.



Had we beaten them they'd have been fired up for revenge. I prefer the way it played out!
Yup just like Tennessee. Though we did sweep Texass and Michigan State way back when. Got swept by Ohio state tho.
StillNoStanfurdium
How long do you want to ignore this user?
burritos said:

bearsandgiants said:

CALiforniALUM said:

This year's win makes me all the more angry about losing last year. We should have beat these guys twice. I respect (maybe a bit jealous of) their expectations to win but they are lucky they can claim a split series.



Had we beaten them they'd have been fired up for revenge. I prefer the way it played out!
Yup just like Tennessee. Though we did sweep Texass and Michigan State way back when. Got swept by Ohio state tho.


Incidentally, Ohio State is also a series where we played better Away than home and separately an instance of a winnable game doomed by poor kicking.
ninetyfourbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Game should've been 21-3 or more.

Auburn was gifted that first TD on a nonsense judgement call that one step in bounds was enough to reestablish inbounds. That was 3rd and ten so they likely would kick the FG.

We've rehashed the second TD a lot with the targeting call and two bogus PI calls.

I would've liked to see more points given the number of turnovers, the defensive dominance, and that monster second quarter.
Pittstop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Eastern Oregon Bear said:

From the Auburn Rivals Board:

Auburn position grades versus Cal

Auburn | What a difference seven days can make.
The previous Saturday, Auburn was riding the high of its revamped passing attack.
A week later, the offense spent most of the game looking lost again en route to a 21-14 loss to a Cal team that the Tigers had no business losing to.
Auburn's offense started off hot with a touchdown on its first drive, but after that, the Tiger offense only scored on one more drive.
Here are position grades from Auburn's loss at home against Cal:

Quarterbacks: F
It was a nearly flawless start for Payton Thorne as he swiftly marched Auburn down the field for a touchdown.
And then after that, it was an abject disaster.
On the ensuing drives, he missed an open Keandre Lambert-Smith on 4th-and-2 and threw a pick, though the interception went off the hands of Cam Coleman.
Things weren't much better in the second half as the Tiger offense stalled out the entire third quarter and ended with Thorne throwing an interception as he was hit.
After leading a touchdown drive to cut the lead in half, the Tigers had a chance to tie the game, but Thorne threw a jump ball that was intercepted to basically seal the game.
And then he threw his fourth to twist the dagger. A disaster of a day for Auburn's quarterback.



Running backs: C
Auburn should have run the ball more in the first half. At one point, the Tigers threw the ball eight times in a row, and Jarquez Hunter had just four carries in the first half.
Hunter ran the ball well in the second half, but his fumble early in the fourth negated, which set up Cal's dagger touchdown, negated his previous work.
Hunter ended the game with 12 rushes for 68 yards.
#Establi****



Wide receivers: C-
Similar to Thorne, the receivers had a great opening half as Cam Coleman caught a 41-yard pass into the red zone, and then on 3rd down, Lambert-Smith caught a beautiful toe-drag touchdown.
After that, it was a whole lot of nothing in the first half which included Coleman's drop that led to a Cal interception.
Freeze said postgame that the Tiger receivers got open but the pass protection wasn't able to hold up, which is why the grade isn't lower.



Tight ends: D
Rivaldo Fairweather has to be better. He wasn't needed much in week one, and even then he had a couple of drops.
In the first half, Fairweather dropped a pass that would have picked up a first down on 3rd-and-2. Fairweather also got dinged for a holding call late in the half.
In the second half, he was invisible. Auburn needs more from the guy that was its best receiving threat last season.



Offensive line: D+
The run blocking was great. Auburn was able to get chunk plays on the ground when it ran the ball with 57 percent of its runs being for over four yards.
The pass protection was a different story.
Auburn's offensive line allowed three sacks and five tackles for loss. It also allowed a free rusher to get to Throne leading to the interception at the end of the third quarter.
Great run blocking. Disastrous pass protection.



Defensive line: A
This unit kept Auburn in the game. Cal only rushed for 17 yards in the first half, and when the Tigers desperately needed a stop to end the half, Keldric Faulk came up with back-to-back sacks to force a Cal punt at midfield.
In the second half, DJ Durkin dialed up more pressure which forced rushed throws from Mendoza after he was nearly perfect in the first half.



Linebackers: C-
Jalen McLeod and Dorian Mausi had solid games, but Eugene Asante was a ghost on the field.
Eugene Asante and Dorian Mausi combined for just three tackles.



Defensive backs: C-
It was a tale of two halves for the Auburn secondary. Cal was targeting whatever one-on-one it saw on the boundary and won just about all of them in the first half. Cal quarterback Fernando Mendoza was 19-of-21 for 205 yards with two touchdowns in the first half alone.
The second half was a much different story. A lot of it was due to the Tiger pass rush, but the secondary also did its job locking up Cal's receivers despite being on islands for a lot of the half.
Kayin Lee and Jerrin Thompson both had great second halves, although Lee did drop what would have been a game-tying pick-6.





Thorne did NOT "lead a touchdown drive to cut the lead in half." He 'led' a "drive" that 'gifted' the Tigers THREE 15 yard penalties - TWO of them being utterly garbage - and a negated end zone interception by Cal, on the 2ND ridiculous penalty call of the drive, which ultimately resulted in an 'penalty-gifted' two-yard TD drive, that should never have taken place. The game was not as close as the score.
Pittstop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
burritos said:

bearsandgiants said:

CALiforniALUM said:

This year's win makes me all the more angry about losing last year. We should have beat these guys twice. I respect (maybe a bit jealous of) their expectations to win but they are lucky they can claim a split series.



Had we beaten them they'd have been fired up for revenge. I prefer the way it played out!
Yup just like Tennessee. Though we did sweep Texass and Michigan State way back when. Got swept by Ohio state tho.


And it 'could be' that Cal is just better than Auburn, when we don't beat ourselves.
burritos
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wait, we swept ol miss and UNC too right? Split with Northwestern and Maryland. Curb stomped Texas A&M and owned by Texas Tech.
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.