bencgilmore said:
Chapman_is_Gone said:
LunchTime said:
MathTeacherMike said:
Love that Tedford led of out of a dark time (Holmoe), and - for a brief period of time - put Cal football on the map. But, he didn't lead us to any colleges playoffs, BCS bowls, Rose Bowls, New Years Day bowls or a single conference championship. He led us to what? A 2-loss season that did not include a bowl win? He was a good coach at Cal - not great, but good. Are our standards so low that "good" is Hall of Fame worthy?
The Al Grigsby hall of fame?
He won a pac championship.
Many of us think that the tie in 2006 is flat-out silly, given USC smacked down Cal that year. Cal had the chance to "win" the conference and failed.
2006 against sc was far from a smackdown
Spin it how you will, the final score was 23--9 in favor of USC, which by my calculation, is a 14 point victory for USC. I remember the game well. USC's final score was in the middle of the 4th quarter... not exactly a last minute meaningless score.
In a series where fairly recent scores have been 61-0 and 63-28, perhaps a 14 point spread pales in comparison, but 14 points is 14 points. And, in football, 14 points is a lot.
Those who state that Tedford never even led Cal to a major bowl game are, quite simply, correct, even though it tends to piss off the sunshine pumpers. Don't get me wrong...the first few years of Tedford wereterrific. But the last few years set the program waaaaaay back. The man does not deserve a statue or any sort of Hall of Fame status, because part of achieving legendary status is longevity (and winning a major bowl game or two). And for those who point out he is the "winningest" coach ever at Cal, his is also the "losingest."
I am a bit tired of how, when I post anything against the sunshine pumping baseline that exists on this board, people immediately mouth off (I'm not specifically talking about you). **** gets old.