Hard to compete with that in the NIL era
That's why everyone should be donating to Cal Legends instead of the athletic department.Strykur said:
Why give money to a place that gave huge extensions to Knowlton and Wilcox
Strykur said:
Why give money to a place that gave huge extensions to Knowlton and Wilcox
From Wikipedia:burritos said:
Is SMU generally considered a good school?
You mean the plane full of boosters they flew in for the Auburn game weren't donors? A reward for really good Cal fans, like they have great blue and gold outfits?bencgilmore said:BearSD said:CheezIt Bear said:You could give Cal Legends $100 Million and it still won't make Wilcox a winning coach. Nothing is going to change until Wilcox and Knowlton are gone.BearSD said:SMU's millionaires decided that the solution to wanting a new coach or a new AD or better recruiting is to donate enough money to make that happen.Strykur said:
Why give money to a place that gave huge extensions to Knowlton and Wilcox
That seems to be working better for SMU football than your approach is working for Cal football.
You are evading the point, which is that if millionaire donors cared enough, they would pay buyouts for those guys. At SMU, that buyout money would already have been pledged.
A more fundamental point is that those donors don't currently exist at Cal, so while it's a potentially interesting point it isn't a very helpful one
Better to express criticism and vitriol towards coaches, players, admin, and other posters(that don't align with one's negativity) on a fan board than towards your spouse. It might preserve marital harmony. It's also a form of therapy. I personally find playing piano better for my soul.AunBear89 said:
This isn't that hard. Football is more important to rich SMU alumni than it is to rich Berkeley alumni.
This isn't anything new. Football is a religion in Texas. Football is a barely tolerated (and just one of many) pastime in California.
They also had confidence that their school President was fully invested in the football program.BearSD said:Strykur said:
Why give money to a place that gave huge extensions to Knowlton and Wilcox
SMU's millionaires decided that the solution to wanting a new coach or a new AD or better recruiting is to donate enough money to make that happen.
That seems to be working better for SMU football than your approach is working for Cal football.
GoCal80 said:
The amount of money flowing into high profile college football programs is unreal, and the crazy thing is that it does not always produce the hoped-for results. All the TV money going to UCLA and USC has not gotten them top-flight teams. These budgets are starting to dwarf academic budgets at the institutions and arguments that trickle down lifts academics are dubious at best.
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/billionaire-larry-ellison-helped-give-a-high-school-student-10-million-to-play-football-for-michigan-and-gave-us-a-glimpse-behind-the-nil-curtain-6bf5d87f
https://sports.yahoo.com/oregon-football-unlimited-nil-backing-203209065.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAADlg62Td2WHcH5tNGKL84JjrkM_kAOFYDngzACAXIiY8Gha8JMPcTSE52M2-6eBBOSUpbblmoD5DWwq2Edj_Y0iEumgZALPpU-DsNKz17y4Nws7WVrWXQG8kHwOcYbzIf1srzeVW_UMhDyI0BpeOryGsv51q3kTBr5DOFEIGwy-U
https://today.usc.edu/usc-breaks-ground-on-state-of-the-art-bloom-football-performance-center/
Re USC and UCLA: Their first Big Ten distribution has not yet arrived, it will be paid next spring.BearoutEast67 said:I agree with you. SMU has all this football money but as soon as we entered two sports bars everyone was following Texas and Texas A&M. No celebrAting SMU fans. When their senior band and cheer were being rewarded, they listed off triple degree earners that would be nearly impossible at Cal's level of rigor: biomedicine, astrophysics, and mathematics for Buffy the cheerleader that seemed dubious. Cal will still attract student athletes that want an excellent education.GoCal80 said:
The amount of money flowing into high profile college football programs is unreal, and the crazy thing is that it does not always produce the hoped-for results. All the TV money going to UCLA and USC has not gotten them top-flight teams. These budgets are starting to dwarf academic budgets at the institutions and arguments that trickle down lifts academics are dubious at best.
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/billionaire-larry-ellison-helped-give-a-high-school-student-10-million-to-play-football-for-michigan-and-gave-us-a-glimpse-behind-the-nil-curtain-6bf5d87f
https://sports.yahoo.com/oregon-football-unlimited-nil-backing-203209065.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAADlg62Td2WHcH5tNGKL84JjrkM_kAOFYDngzACAXIiY8Gha8JMPcTSE52M2-6eBBOSUpbblmoD5DWwq2Edj_Y0iEumgZALPpU-DsNKz17y4Nws7WVrWXQG8kHwOcYbzIf1srzeVW_UMhDyI0BpeOryGsv51q3kTBr5DOFEIGwy-U
https://today.usc.edu/usc-breaks-ground-on-state-of-the-art-bloom-football-performance-center
Maybe we need a football GM like Stanford that frees our coach to coach. And a separate younger OL coach who can create recruiting miracles.
Add to the wish list, retaining certain key players and recruiting to the program for "graduation" losses on defense.BearSD said:Re USC and UCLA: Their first Big Ten distribution has not yet arrived, it will be paid next spring.BearoutEast67 said:I agree with you. SMU has all this football money but as soon as we entered two sports bars everyone was following Texas and Texas A&M. No celebrAting SMU fans. When their senior band and cheer were being rewarded, they listed off triple degree earners that would be nearly impossible at Cal's level of rigor: biomedicine, astrophysics, and mathematics for Buffy the cheerleader that seemed dubious. Cal will still attract student athletes that want an excellent education.GoCal80 said:
The amount of money flowing into high profile college football programs is unreal, and the crazy thing is that it does not always produce the hoped-for results. All the TV money going to UCLA and USC has not gotten them top-flight teams. These budgets are starting to dwarf academic budgets at the institutions and arguments that trickle down lifts academics are dubious at best.
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/billionaire-larry-ellison-helped-give-a-high-school-student-10-million-to-play-football-for-michigan-and-gave-us-a-glimpse-behind-the-nil-curtain-6bf5d87f
https://sports.yahoo.com/oregon-football-unlimited-nil-backing-203209065.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAADlg62Td2WHcH5tNGKL84JjrkM_kAOFYDngzACAXIiY8Gha8JMPcTSE52M2-6eBBOSUpbblmoD5DWwq2Edj_Y0iEumgZALPpU-DsNKz17y4Nws7WVrWXQG8kHwOcYbzIf1srzeVW_UMhDyI0BpeOryGsv51q3kTBr5DOFEIGwy-U
https://today.usc.edu/usc-breaks-ground-on-state-of-the-art-bloom-football-performance-center
Maybe we need a football GM like Stanford that frees our coach to coach. And a separate younger OL coach who can create recruiting miracles.
Re Capt. Andrew Luck and Stanford: I suspect his primary mission will be raising $$$$$$$ from donors for Stanford football. Our Bears absolutely, positively, need someone to do that for Cal football. (And of course we also need recruiting to deliver a huge upgrade to the O-line.)
southseasbear said:From Wikipedia:burritos said:
Is SMU generally considered a good school?
In the 2023 edition, U.S. News & World Report SMU is tied for 89th in the rankings of national universities, with its highest ranking by the U.S. News & World Report being 56th in 2011 and 2017.[url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_Methodist_University#cite_note-77][77][/url][url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_Methodist_University#cite_note-78][78][/url][url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_Methodist_University#cite_note-SMU_Rankings_and_Recognitions-79][79][/url]
In spring 2020, U.S. News & World Report ranked the Cox School's Executive M.B.A. program 27th in the nation.[url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_Methodist_University#cite_note-80][80][/url]
U.S. News & World Report ranked the Dedman School of Law tied for 56th in the U.S. for 2021.[url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_Methodist_University#cite_note-USNWR_Grad_School_Rankings-76][76][/url] and it ranks 23rd among the top 50 law schools with the highest average salaries of first-year graduates, according to data released by the U.S. Department of Education in April 2020 based on 2016 salaries.[url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_Methodist_University#cite_note-SMU_Rankings_and_Recognitions-79][79][/url]
In 2020, Cond Nast Traveler ranked SMU 6th among "The 50 Most Beautiful College Campuses in America".[url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_Methodist_University#cite_note-SMU_Rankings_and_Recognitions-79][79][/url][url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_Methodist_University#cite_note-81][81][/url]
In 2020 The Princeton Review in its 11th edition ranked SMU Guildhall as the No. 4 "Graduate Program for Game Design" in the world. Since the rankings debuted in 2010, the SMU Guildhall has ranked in the top 10, earning N0. 7 in 2013, No. 3 in 2014 and 2015, No. 2 in 2016 and 2019, and the No. 1 spot in 2017, and 2018 for two years in a row in a survey of over 150 institutions. The Princeton Review also ranked SMU as one of the "Best Western Colleges" and as eighth in "Lots of Greek Life."[url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_Methodist_University#cite_note-Southern_Methodist_University-82][82][/url][url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_Methodist_University#cite_note-83][83][/url][url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_Methodist_University#cite_note-84][84][/url][url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_Methodist_University#cite_note-85][85][/url][url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_Methodist_University#cite_note-86][86][/url][url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_Methodist_University#cite_note-87][87][/url]
In the 2019 edition, SMU was ranked 91st in by Forbes.[url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_Methodist_University#cite_note-:3-88][88][/url]
In 2016, Bloomberg Businessweek ranked the Cox School B.B.A. program No. 21 in the nation the second consecutive ranking at No. 21 in that publication, and No. 5 in the nation for post-graduation B.B.A. salaries.[url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_Methodist_University#cite_note-SMU_Rankings_and_Recognitions-79][79][/url] The 2016 Bloomberg Businessweek undergraduate rankings survey, which the publication announced it will no longer conduct after this year, ranked 114 U.S. schools based heavily on career outcomes. Bloomberg Businessweek also ranked the SMU Cox Professional MBA program No. 7 in the nation; the SMU Cox Full-Time MBA program No. 31 in the nation; and ranked the SMU Cox Executive MBA program no. 3 in the world in 2013, the last year the publication ranked EMBA programs.[url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_Methodist_University#cite_note-89][89][/url]
In 2015, Forbes named Southern Methodist University 14th among America's Most Entrepreneurial Universities.[url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_Methodist_University#cite_note-90][90][/url]
In 2014, USA Today ranked SMU as the number 1 music college in the United States.[url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_Methodist_University#cite_note-91][91][/url]
burritos said:
Wonder what the dynamics will be if a top recruit is getting a million but then support players get only a fraction of that?
AunBear89 said:
This isn't that hard. Football is more important to rich SMU alumni than it is to rich Berkeley alumni.
This isn't anything new. Football is a religion in Texas. Football is a barely tolerated (and just one of many) pastime in California.
OK but.....bencgilmore said:BearSD said:CheezIt Bear said:You could give Cal Legends $100 Million and it still won't make Wilcox a winning coach. Nothing is going to change until Wilcox and Knowlton are gone.BearSD said:SMU's millionaires decided that the solution to wanting a new coach or a new AD or better recruiting is to donate enough money to make that happen.Strykur said:
Why give money to a place that gave huge extensions to Knowlton and Wilcox
That seems to be working better for SMU football than your approach is working for Cal football.
You are evading the point, which is that if millionaire donors cared enough, they would pay buyouts for those guys. At SMU, that buyout money would already have been pledged.
A more fundamental point is that those donors don't currently exist at Cal, so while it's a potentially interesting point it isn't a very helpful one