Sources: Jim Knowlton is retiring as Cal's athletic director. He's been the AD at Cal since 2018. pic.twitter.com/MwS5zOfhL8
— Pete Thamel (@PeteThamel) June 16, 2025
Sources: Jim Knowlton is retiring as Cal's athletic director. He's been the AD at Cal since 2018. pic.twitter.com/MwS5zOfhL8
— Pete Thamel (@PeteThamel) June 16, 2025
Don't know but seems likely there would be some "incentives" for "retiring".TedfordTheGreat said:
Wow! Christmas comes early!
Wilcox, you now have 1 last year to prove it. Let's see who we hire as our new AD. 8 to 9 wins keep your job, 10 wins get you a 1 year extension, and anything else you are out.
Despite not knowing who that is, I am much more optimistic to entrust this new individual making the changes. (that's how bad it's been)
Does anyone know if we owe Knowlton anything? is this a buyout situation or strictly retirement?
Has to be.... but since he didn't get to negotiate the terms we might see him leave without taking us to the cleaners...6956bear said:Don't know but seems likely there would be some "incentives" for "retiring".TedfordTheGreat said:
Wow! Christmas comes early!
Wilcox, you now have 1 last year to prove it. Let's see who we hire as our new AD. 8 to 9 wins keep your job, 10 wins get you a 1 year extension, and anything else you are out.
Despite not knowing who that is, I am much more optimistic to entrust this new individual making the changes. (that's how bad it's been)
Does anyone know if we owe Knowlton anything? is this a buyout situation or strictly retirement?
I am just happy he is going. This is a great day. The next hire is beyond crucial.petalumabear said:Has to be.... but since he didn't get to negotiate the terms we might see him leave without taking us to the cleaners...6956bear said:Don't know but seems likely there would be some "incentives" for "retiring".TedfordTheGreat said:
Wow! Christmas comes early!
Wilcox, you now have 1 last year to prove it. Let's see who we hire as our new AD. 8 to 9 wins keep your job, 10 wins get you a 1 year extension, and anything else you are out.
Despite not knowing who that is, I am much more optimistic to entrust this new individual making the changes. (that's how bad it's been)
Does anyone know if we owe Knowlton anything? is this a buyout situation or strictly retirement?
Source: Going forward, Cal football coach Justin Wilcox will report to football general manager Ron Rivera.
— Pete Thamel (@PeteThamel) June 16, 2025
he took us to the cleaners from Day One.petalumabear said:Has to be.... but since he didn't get to negotiate the terms we might see him leave without taking us to the cleaners...6956bear said:Don't know but seems likely there would be some "incentives" for "retiring".TedfordTheGreat said:
Wow! Christmas comes early!
Wilcox, you now have 1 last year to prove it. Let's see who we hire as our new AD. 8 to 9 wins keep your job, 10 wins get you a 1 year extension, and anything else you are out.
Despite not knowing who that is, I am much more optimistic to entrust this new individual making the changes. (that's how bad it's been)
Does anyone know if we owe Knowlton anything? is this a buyout situation or strictly retirement?
pingpong2 said:
Fitting that this happened the week of Juneteenth
MilleniaBear said:
Not nearly as much as the ol' Pac 12 commissioner. That guy took us (and the rest of the Pac12) for DOUBLE the salary (one for commish and one for leader of Pac12 Network).
I'm just hoping he didn't hand out extensions on his way out the door.
I concede that he did it (can't imagine that Knowlton came to this decision on his own), but it took him how long?BearSD said:
Every commenter here who claimed that this would never happen owes the chancellor an apology. (Not that we should expect any of those folks to publicly admit they were wrong.)
BearSD said:
Every commenter here who claimed that this would never happen owes the chancellor an apology. (Not that we should expect any of those folks to publicly admit they were wrong.)
DiabloWags said:MilleniaBear said:
Not nearly as much as the ol' Pac 12 commissioner. That guy took us (and the rest of the Pac12) for DOUBLE the salary (one for commish and one for leader of Pac12 Network).
I'm just hoping he didn't hand out extensions on his way out the door.
Larry $cott was a pompous a^^hole that walked around like an entitled pri^^
Last I heard Annika Sorenstam was pimping him for LPGA Commissioner.
He made $50 million from the Pac-12
Canzano: Are we talking about the same Larry Scott?
I don't know what's been going on behind the scenes, but I can think of some reasons why a new leader wouldn't want to just come in and fire all of the existing ones immediately. Sometimes you can start a mass exodus of employees (including those who actually are critical) by doing that.01Bear said:BearSD said:
Every commenter here who claimed that this would never happen owes the chancellor an apology. (Not that we should expect any of those folks to publicly admit they were wrong.)
It only took him a year to (finally!) get it done, even though he was supposed to be a Cal football fan and know what needed to be fixed from the get go. Knownothin should've been fired on Day 1. Lyons should've said, "Look, you know you screwed the pooch with the Teri McKeever situation. Either you resign immediately or I will publish a report saying how badly you screwed up and you'll never get another job again."
01Bear said:BearSD said:
Every commenter here who claimed that this would never happen owes the chancellor an apology. (Not that we should expect any of those folks to publicly admit they were wrong.)
It only took him a year to (finally!) get it done, even though he was supposed to be a Cal football fan and know what needed to be fixed from the get go. Knownothin should've been fired on Day 1. Lyons should've said, "Look, you know you screwed the pooch with the Teri McKeever situation. Either you resign immediately or I will publish a report saying how badly you screwed up and you'll never get another job again."

sycasey said:I don't know what's been going on behind the scenes, but I can think of some reasons why a new leader wouldn't want to just come in and fire all of the existing ones immediately. Sometimes you can start a mass exodus of employees (including those who actually are critical) by doing that.01Bear said:BearSD said:
Every commenter here who claimed that this would never happen owes the chancellor an apology. (Not that we should expect any of those folks to publicly admit they were wrong.)
It only took him a year to (finally!) get it done, even though he was supposed to be a Cal football fan and know what needed to be fixed from the get go. Knownothin should've been fired on Day 1. Lyons should've said, "Look, you know you screwed the pooch with the Teri McKeever situation. Either you resign immediately or I will publish a report saying how badly you screwed up and you'll never get another job again."
sycasey said:I don't know what's been going on behind the scenes, but I can think of some reasons why a new leader wouldn't want to just come in and fire all of the existing ones immediately. Sometimes you can start a mass exodus of employees (including those who actually are critical) by doing that.01Bear said:BearSD said:
Every commenter here who claimed that this would never happen owes the chancellor an apology. (Not that we should expect any of those folks to publicly admit they were wrong.)
It only took him a year to (finally!) get it done, even though he was supposed to be a Cal football fan and know what needed to be fixed from the get go. Knownothin should've been fired on Day 1. Lyons should've said, "Look, you know you screwed the pooch with the Teri McKeever situation. Either you resign immediately or I will publish a report saying how badly you screwed up and you'll never get another job again."
sycasey said:I don't know what's been going on behind the scenes, but I can think of some reasons why a new leader wouldn't want to just come in and fire all of the existing ones immediately. Sometimes you can start a mass exodus of employees (including those who actually are critical) by doing that.01Bear said:BearSD said:
Every commenter here who claimed that this would never happen owes the chancellor an apology. (Not that we should expect any of those folks to publicly admit they were wrong.)
It only took him a year to (finally!) get it done, even though he was supposed to be a Cal football fan and know what needed to be fixed from the get go. Knownothin should've been fired on Day 1. Lyons should've said, "Look, you know you screwed the pooch with the Teri McKeever situation. Either you resign immediately or I will publish a report saying how badly you screwed up and you'll never get another job again."
I don't know that anyone actually claimed that, but does it occur to you that it very well may not have happened if key benefactors didn't publicly force it too? That people with inside knowledge didn't think it was going to happen to the extent that they very publicly held the program hostage until they were convinced it was going to happen? I am still dumbfounded that the key people were not contacted at the time and told "Look, I know you are impatient, but I'm working on it. Knowlton will be gone. Rivera will be in charge. We can't say it now, but trust me and stop tanking our program".BearSD said:
Every commenter here who claimed that this would never happen owes the chancellor an apology. (Not that we should expect any of those folks to publicly admit they were wrong.)
Yeah, no matter what happens, this is likely the end of Wilcox at Cal after next season. Unless it exceeds expectations and I mean really exceeds them. The new AD will likely want their person on the job. That's pretty common. But who knows? Maybe this thing with Harsin comes together and we end up with a better than average for Wilcox type of defense.TedfordTheGreat said:
Wilcox, you now have 1 last year to prove it. Let's see who we hire as our new AD. 8 to 9 wins keep your job, 10 wins get you a 1 year extension, and anything else you are out.
I mean, I would have gotten rid of him immediately too, but again I don't know what the internal politics were.01Bear said:sycasey said:I don't know what's been going on behind the scenes, but I can think of some reasons why a new leader wouldn't want to just come in and fire all of the existing ones immediately. Sometimes you can start a mass exodus of employees (including those who actually are critical) by doing that.01Bear said:BearSD said:
Every commenter here who claimed that this would never happen owes the chancellor an apology. (Not that we should expect any of those folks to publicly admit they were wrong.)
It only took him a year to (finally!) get it done, even though he was supposed to be a Cal football fan and know what needed to be fixed from the get go. Knownothin should've been fired on Day 1. Lyons should've said, "Look, you know you screwed the pooch with the Teri McKeever situation. Either you resign immediately or I will publish a report saying how badly you screwed up and you'll never get another job again."
There's a significant difference between firing the clearly-in-over-his-head AD who was asleep at the switch in Cal Athletics's most perilous time and firing everyone in the department. From the very beginning, Knownothin should've been terminated with cause as a result of the McKeever scandal (he was either complicit and tried to cover up or he was entirely clueless about the department he was supposed to be running). It should not have taken a year to force Knownothin to take an early retirement (likely with a severance package*).
*The money for the severance package would've been better spent as damages for McKeever's victims, IMHO.
Yeah this was likely coerced. My question is: Did he take the call from Colorado Springs? Haha. A zoom call while WFH? Haha.Rushinbear said:
I concede that he did it (can't imagine that Knowlton came to this decision on his own), but it took him how long?
Cal has had 15 years of losing record in conference. Last 8 under Wilcox. That needs to change this year or we need to make a change. To be honest, I'm not convinced that Cal makes a change if Cal wins 7 or 8 games but finishes in the bottom half of the conference. Today those odds go up because:BancroftSteps said:Yeah, no matter what happens, this is likely the end of Wilcox at Cal after next season. Unless it exceeds expectations and I mean really exceeds them. The new AD will likely want their person on the job. That's pretty common. But who knows? Maybe this thing with Harsin comes together and we end up with a better than average for Wilcox type of defense.TedfordTheGreat said:
Wilcox, you now have 1 last year to prove it. Let's see who we hire as our new AD. 8 to 9 wins keep your job, 10 wins get you a 1 year extension, and anything else you are out.