01Bear said:calumnus said:SoFlaBear said:
You've clearly blacked out the Holmoe years, but it's the worst I've seen in at least a decade.
When we faced Top 10 schedules, used to beat USC and UCLA and sent great players to the NFL?
TBF, $C and UCLA were not good then., either.
Holmoe was horrible, but he recruited better than Wilcox and played much tougher schedules in a much tougher conference. He lost to a Rose Bowl Stanford team. Wilcox loses to the worst Stanford team in decades. Taking strength of schedule into account, Holmoe's teams were better rated than Wilcox's have been, but why debate? Neither coach should have been extended after their initial contracts.