calumnus said:oski003 said:calumnus said:BearGoggles said:okaydo said:BearGoggles said:okaydo said:Cal88 said:okaydo said:adujan said:
How important is today's game for deciding whether Rolovich should be our next HC? What would need to happen on the field and in the locker room to tilt the scales in his favor?
Eh, I think there is too much baggage....
Remember, Rivera and Rolovich will have to be on the same page and work together closely. And I don't see that happening.
A non-issue in 2025, and Rivera has to be on the same page as Rolo, not you. They have been co-workers for an entire season already.
What I'm trying to say that the article linked above and his engagement with conspiracy theories could be a problem in the future.
Heck, Justin Wilcox might be the same way. Perhaps every head coach is the same way. But Rolovich was public about it.
What conspiracy theories did he engage with? The article doesn't reference any.
And for the record, Rolo would not be my first choice for head coach, but he'd be a decent fall back option if Cal can't reach agreement with other options.
https://sports.yahoo.com/immunologist-now-fired-wsu-coach-nick-rolovich-asked-me-if-bill-gates-was-involved-in-covid-19-vaccine-125222760.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAC-YswWRFE4ViEWQPVT1sAVL_ASXLkWG9ttor1-4hlkBGsWULh9IcMoo28WKtl6gk5i_G-R1BnRKAw3psbH5hChbECF9qKDZlEEYAC1MN4b3kRgBVjWboJs-fz_G48qWs0e5011LYwqBLw031YUoWCnIDZIjgvnfdSjdY_Ytk7Pn
I have no problem with a person being skeptical and asking professionals questions about an emerging pandemic and the surrounding (mis)information - that is actually what all of us should have been doing more of during the pandemic. If questioning authority/prevailing thought (something Berkeley is very much known for) is regarded by some as "engaging with conspiracy theories" then so be it.
People seem to forget there was a tremendous amount of misinformation spread by those in authority regarding COVID, including the false claim that the vax prevented a person from getting covid again/spreading the virus and the false claim that there were no side effects.
Here is the actual article where the WSU virologist Guy Palmer is quoted extensively. I think its fair to say some of Palmer's claims don't hold up particularly well ("the COVID vaccines are among the most studied and scrutinized in human history").
https://www.espn.com/college-football/story/_/id/32459767/inside-nick-rolovich-downfall-washington-state-covid-19-vaccine
There is no evidence Rolo is outside the mainstream on most issues, or for that matter with respect to COVID given what we know today (i.e., many concerns about the vax were shown to be true). This is only a "problem in the future" (your words) for people who view this in a political lens.
The Woods situation was pretty complicated and ultimately, Woods was upset that he could not opt out of the season (due to health/sickle cell concerns) and remain with the team for activities. Rolo did express a seemingly off base concern that the player might be sitting out for political, rather than health reasons.
https://www.espn.com/college-football/story/_/id/29592558/washington-state-ad-says-kassidy-woods-removal-team-activities-not-linked-pac-12-unity-group
As we saw tonight, Rolo is a good coach and has the trust of his players. If he's not at Cal, he'll land somewhere else.
The second article shows you how Chun, WSU's AD, was doing damage control for Rolo who clearly said on the taped converse thst he had no issue with sitting out for COVID but he instead had an issue, and dismissed him from the team, for being part of the Unity movement. It was a big part of the reason Chun fired Rolovich: he saw him as a liability and a dimb a**. The vaccine issue was part of state policy and was the proximate reason for firing him, but if Chun and WSU really wanted Rolovich, they would have tried to figure out a way to keep him.
And normally having sued your last employer for $25 million is a concern for your next employer. Especially if the exact same things are even more likely to happen in Berkeley than in Pullman.
Anyway, I like Rolo, I think he is a good guy and a lot of what he did was just due to ignorance and a bit of stupidity, not malice. I would not be upset if he is the HC or OC next year if that means Sagapolutele stays. I just think we can't sweep what happened at WSU under the rug.
Moreover, I want a HC who can sell Cal as a center of scientific learning and social justice to the top recruits that care about these things and fit our academic profile.
Please link the transcript of the taped conversation. Thanks.
It is part of the complaint:
https://interactive.krem.com/pdf/KassidyWoods.pdf
When Woods told Rolo he was opting out of the season:
"OK so that's going to be, that's gonna be an issue if you align with
them as far as future stuff, cause the COVID stuff is one thing . . . But,
um, joining this group is gonna put you on a, on a that's
obviously, you know, you get to keep your scholarship this year,
but it it's gonna be different. You know, if you, if you say, 'I'm
opting out 'cause of COVID and health and safety,' I'm good. But this
group is gonna change, uh, I guess, how things go in the future for
everybody, at least at our school."