concernedparent said:
SLTX Bear said:
You are probably right. However with the power conferences getting so huge now after the Pac-12 was blown up, these 5-way ties become more likely than ever before. Unfortunately, there just aren't any great ways to set up a 5-way tie breaker. All the more reason for realignment again in the near future. A super league where an NFL style standing-based system seems like the only way out of this mess long-term.
Also Miami has no one to blame but themselves. Cal beat both Louisville and SMU, Miami is unable to say the same. If they would have beat at least one of those teams, they'd be in and a heavy favorite against Virginia.
Highest ranked team absent a head-to-head win seems the most fair.
The tiebreaker should go something like this.
In a two team tie, if one team beat the other head to head, that team wins the tiebreaker.
In a 3+ team tie, if one team beat all of the other tied teams, that team wins.
In any other tie, the first tiebreaker is best overall record, and every team that isn't at least tied for best overall record is eliminated from the tiebreaker.
I would allow one exception: If a team with a worse overall record is the conference's highest-placed team in the committee's CFP rankings, and is only one overall win behind the record of any other team in the tiebreaker, then that highest ranked team wins the tiebreaker.