oskidunker;508417 said:
One telling thing was when asked why He didn't change the defensive scheme when it wasn't working, Tom replied, "The defensive coach won't change it"
What, Tedford did that with BG.
oskidunker;508417 said:
One telling thing was when asked why He didn't change the defensive scheme when it wasn't working, Tom replied, "The defensive coach won't change it"
santacruzbear;508412 said:
After all he was bright, had NFL experience and superbowl rings with the local team and was perceived (correctly?) as having integrity. Yet he was a disaster as a coach. Why? One hint from a Cal offensive lineman I knew in the 98-01 period is that he didn't command respect letting players like Ainsworth and Davenport run over him. I don't know if this is true. Any thoughts?
drunkoski;508582 said:
welcome to cal athletics.
Genykologist;508647 said:
But even though he was such a terrible coach, somewhere between 60-70% of the board still shouted down anyone who dared suggest that he be replaced. This is why it's so unsurprising that Tedford gets as much support here despite having a losing conference record over the last four seasons. If people could convince themselves that Holmoe was about to turn the corner back then, it's very very easy for them to convince themselves that a guy who had a one-loss regular season many seasons ago is about to turn it around.
KoreAmBear;508666 said:
What, Tedford did that with BG.
TorBear;509028 said:
Is Bob Gregory still on the Cal staff?
calumnus;508580 said:
True, but I can even excuse that--clearly Holmoe was a bad bet, but sometimes people take chances and make bad decisions under time pressure and the advice of "The Genius" --what I can't excuse is that Holmoe was our head coach for 5 years with contract extensions and left with a big payout because he had years left on his contract (and had just received another extension that he "needed" for "recruiting"?). When he got it, all the Holmoe supporters said "Tom needs this extension for recruiting purposes, but he is such a good and honorable man that he would not take the money if he was asked to step down next year." He took the money.
KoreAmBear;509031 said:
Was he on the staff from 2006-2009?
Calbach;509382 said:
Hard to believe that he played defense 7 years in the NFL, and multiple Super Bowl rings.
Didn't seem to have either the size or the temperment to be an NFLer.

gardenstatebear;509559 said:
I saw the Rutgers-Cal game that year -- Cal's only win of the season. So he's been gone for nearly a decade. Isn't it time to let this go?
gardenstatebear;509559 said:
I saw the Rutgers-Cal game that year -- Cal's only win of the season. So he's been gone for nearly a decade. Isn't it time to let this go?
southseasbear;509592 said:
While I do believe we should release ourselves of anger, it is always appropriate and useful to analyze mistakes we made in the past to ensure they are not repeated. No matter how happy you are with Tedford (and I know opinions vary on this board) the fact is that he will have to be replaced at some point (unless we have a future Nobel Laureate who discovers the antidote for aging).
FingeroftheBear;508532 said:
Wow, talk about a "picking at scabs" story.
Any way, Holmoe was a bad coach because:
d) poor support staff and no support from the AD