Amusing Preview of Cal/CU on All Buffs

5,135 Views | 31 Replies | Last: 14 yr ago by RioGrrandeFan
edwinbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I was pretty amused ha.

http://www.allbuffs.com/content.php/1027-A-really-******-preview-of-the-Colorado-vs-Cal-game
TheFiatLux
How long do you want to ignore this user?
edwinbear;563290 said:

I was pretty amused ha.

http://www.allbuffs.com/content.php/1027-A-really-******-preview-of-the-Colorado-vs-Cal-game


Meh. It's a bunch of hippie jokes... clever. Though I did like this comment [CODE]I laughed so hard I blew milk out my nose. And I wasn't even drinking milk.[/CODE]

But was he serious about the Fulmer Cup thing since it shows we're not in the Top 10, we're #7 in the PAC 10?
ManBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
meh, not much effort put into that. and talk about throwing stones in glass houses with all the stoner/hippie stuff.
Shadowhand
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I find it amusing that 8 points in the fullmer cup is top 10, when its clearly just pac-10 rankings.
cyrusthebear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Funny, didn't see any hippies when I was on campus. Saw a lot of everything, though.
Blueblood
How long do you want to ignore this user?
....double yawn......zzzZZZzzzzZZZZzzzzZZZzzzzzzzz
BeachyBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Tired, lame hippie humor. Shock of all shocks, the Buff fan thinks his team is going to win.

Apparently he compiled his stats on the number of winning seasons under JT by scouring this message board, as opposed to actually looking up our record - thus the assessment that we have had "SOME losing seasons." Either that or the math department at CU is in need of a serious upgrade.

For the benefit of CU fans lurking here who are unable to count or properly use Google, the correct answer is one, ONE losing season under Tedford. And it was last year when we blew out CU.

But the picture of Shaggy and Scooby Doo and calling them Cal students was... YYYYYYEEEEEAAH! :bluecarrot:
BeggarEd
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ManBear;563322 said:

meh, not much effort put into that. and talk about throwing stones in glass houses with all the stoner/hippie stuff.


"Smoke a BOUL(der)"

Boulder definitely has a well-represented demographic of rugged "mountain hippies". Last summer I spotted plenty of the tell-tale signs:

- White people with dreadlocks
- Lots of dashiki-pattern and tie-dye clothing
- Non-Aboriginal people with didgeridoos
- Lots of people with with the job title "Glass Blower" or "Botanist"
- Groups of people loitering about with no shoes and dirty feet
- A high proliferation of "hacky-sack circles"
- Lots of earlobe-expanding earrings
- Wafting scents of weed (good) and patchouli oil (bad)

I could go on for awhile... but you get the idea.
Blueblood
How long do you want to ignore this user?

"Here's a Colorado student questioning the rumor
that more weed is prevalent in Boulder?"
twister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
drunkoski;563346 said:

lot more weed smoked in boulder than berkeley.



And much of it done legally. There are 60% more dispensaries in Denver than there are Starbucks.
twister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FingeroftheBear;563360 said:

The irony is that there's more hippies in Boulder right now then Berkeley.


That is indeed the irony of the whole thing, although our hippies are less dirty/druggie and more want-a-be.

Is "trustafarian" a know term at Cal?
TheFiatLux
How long do you want to ignore this user?
twister;563366 said:

That is indeed the irony of the whole thing, although our hippies are less dirty/druggie and more want-a-be.

Is "trustafarian" a know term at Cal?


how did none of us ever think of that? See, glad you joined the conference.
Unit2Sucks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
xultaif;563386 said:

how did none of us ever think of that? See, glad you joined the conference.


You and DO have been in LA too long. Trustafarian is a well-known term at this point. Perhaps I've spent too much time in Tahoe and they bay area though ...
I Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Eh, whatever. Lots of talk from buff fans similar to the smack throw around last week by the dog fans, doesn't matter as long as we win the game(we will)! And last year does matter because we weren't a very good team but we still managed to kick the living sh*t out of the buffalo's and that wood shed preformance is still on their minds!
GMP
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Unit2Sucks;563393 said:

You and DO have been in LA too long. Trustafarian is a well-known term at this point. Perhaps I've spent too much time in Tahoe and they bay area though ...


Yeah, I've heard this for years.
Cal84
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Preview? That was more like a sedative given to a kid with ADHD. I mean half the article was a fable told to help the kid deal with the vicious, frightening flashbacks he's suffering.
ohsooso
How long do you want to ignore this user?
No, no....read the comment from Walrus posted at 7:38pm. Now THAT's funny.
ducky23
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Not very impressed with the level of intelligence shown by CU fans...so far. And not to sound too much like a furdite, but you would expect the CU fans to at least be as intelligent as FSU fans. you would think. while FSU fans were a tad bit delusional about their talent level before the game, at least you could have an intelligent football conversation with them.
Sonofafurd
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ducky23;563428 said:

Not very impressed with the level of intelligence shown by CU fans...so far. And not to sound too much like a furdite, but you would expect the CU fans to at least be as intelligent as FSU fans. you would think. while FSU fans were a tad bit delusional about their talent level before the game, at least you could have an intelligent football conversation with them.




Well, what do you expect? These yokels are pure Baltic Avenue.
ninetyfourbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:


The moral of this story is that Cal sucks and last year is irrelevant.

Cal's road woes are almost in the same league as CU's.



So... last year and Cal's road woes are irrelevant? Or last year is relevant as are Cal's road woes?
BeachyBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ninetyfourbear;563564 said:

So... last year and Cal's road woes are irrelevant? Or last year is relevant as are Cal's road woes?


Cal's road woes are relevant, man. In fact, according to the article, the fact that CU got trashed by a mediocre Hawaii team on the road is further evidence that Cal sucks on the road...

...yah, don't bother trying to wrap your head around that one.

Don't you see, man? Hawk and Phoenix, Hawaii destroyed CU and hippies live in trees while Cal is almost as bad on the road as CU. Last year is irrelevant. Buffs by two TDs. Can't you follow the logic, man??

:tree
KegBear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
drunkoski;563379 said:

not that i'm aware of, but we are well aware of the type. . .




...refers to us as "CSU Berkeley." :bigpuke:
Calcoholic
How long do you want to ignore this user?
That was supposed to be funny?
GoBears58
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ManBear;563322 said:

meh, not much effort put into that. and talk about throwing stones in glass houses with all the stoner/hippie stuff.


I went to one of their football sites, this one or some other and there were medicinal pot ads all over the site...:rollinglaugh:
BerlinerBaer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

We're also talking about a program that hasn't won anything significant since half its fan base was getting targeted by McCarthy.


Haha! So far so good...

Quote:

A program that was so desperate to start winning that it sold its soul.

Bring in a bunch of JUCOs? Check.

By-pass the UC system standards by mis-using a special exemption for "scholar" athletes? Check.

Get yourself into the Top Ten for the Fulmer Cup? Check.


WTF??
XXXBEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It wasn't funny or even amusing, the metaphor was weak, the facts were inaccurate, the football content was about zero, The hippie jokes are about 30 years old, and you couldn't dance to it...At least the USC board is funny and has good football knowledge.

Remind me - why did we add Colorado again?
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The easy road win, which is a rare thing in this conference.
RioGrrandeFan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ohsooso;563423 said:

No, no....read the comment from Walrus posted at 7:38pm. Now THAT's funny.


echoing Ohsooso, keep reading. Some good stuff in there, makes me happy to have CU aboard. Reproducing here:

walrus post:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

To further dply's point:

We've got slimy Baptists in Waco who smeared our program with outright lies; not the fans alone, mind you, but from the highest levels of leadership. Also, Kenneth Starr is that slimy leader, need I say more?

And then there are a number of schools in the Big 12 whoes academic standards are questionable. One of those schools features a mascot which is really just a skinny dude with a giant purple cat-head costume. He brandishes a weapon known as a "power towel" which debuted in a video so cheesy that Roxette would have blushed had their name been attached to it.

nebraska fans will waste no time explaining that they're the classiest. Apparently "classy" is a euphemism for wearing red-polyester every day of your life and being generally dull. Also, the entire featureless state boasts an impressive meth infestation. The movie, Boys Don't Cry was based on a football roadtrip to lincoln to give you a point of reference.

Iowa State? We chose not to make fun of them, in the same way you don't laugh when a crippled person trips on a curb. Well, my wife would laugh at that, but most people wouldn't, and even my wife doesn't make fun of Iowa State.

Oklahoma State's mascot is a sexual deviant.

Jayhawk rhymes with "gayhawk", and there is something wrong with that. No, not with being gay, but rather with being a Jayhawk. Christ!

The number of articles on Texas' hubris are mounting--it's pretty easy to pick on those guys.

We owned Oklahoma for an entire decade, and have more subsequent wins against them than any other team, so we at least have bragging rights on some level, no matter how feeble.

Texas Tech? Hawkins is undefeated against them in Lubbock! Mother****ing Dan Hawkins! They'd love to have Miami's problems right now, if that gives you some sense of scope.

So what I'm saying is that Cal ****ing sucks. Why? Because there's really nothing to poke fun of. You've got the all time record against us, and destroyed us last year. You reside in a great area. You've got hippies? We've got hippies. Academically, your school is more respected than ours (though I do wish you'd send smarter fans over to this chat site). So we've got nothing...and that ****ing sucks, and I'm really starting to resent you assholes for it.

**** Cal!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.