Cal fan categorization:<br /><br />Uber Sunshine Pumper - "Woohoo! Those losses were total flukes. Oregon and $C here we come! You better watch out! [incoming QB] looks like Aaron Rodgers."<br /><br />Pumper - "With our top recruiting classes, SAHPC, and awesome asst coaches we will be a strong competitor every year."<br /><br />Conflicted Soul - "The swings from week to week make my heart week. One day it's rah-rah-rah, other days it's DOOOOOM. We've tasted the Rose Bowl and I think we can get to that point again.. some day."<br /><br />Negabear - "JT has had success in the past but cannot get us to the next level. Time for him to go."<br /><br />UberNega - "Tedfraud", "Tedfurd", Amy

<blockquote><div class="name-said">drunkoski;649619 said:</div><hr>Bingo. Even I realize that rose bowls aren't easy. But let's compete for one say in november one year before we declare Tedford back.<hr></blockquote><br /><br />I recall that 2008 in November at the L.A. Coliseum was the last real shot we had at the Rose Bowl that late. That was the game where we had too many receivers on the LOS on that play that should have gotten us a TD from Riley to Vereen.

<blockquote><div class="name-said">bearblast;649462 said:</div><hr>Is it the 7 wins, now possibly 8?<br /><br />Or was it the DEVELOPMENT of a QB by the 'Guru' some considered as dead as Tiger Woods? <br /><br />Was it the grand opening of the TAJ MAHAL a.k.a SAHPC ?<br /><b><br />Or is it the news of another multi-star ditching USC so he could go push and elbow another multi-star out of the way to get that coveted Cal football scholarship?</b><br /><br />Probably all the above.<br /><br />GO BEARS<hr></blockquote><br /><br />How about this?<br /><br />Basically, the window will shut when either 1. We get to a BCS game; or 2. Tedford is fired. Why don't we avoid the war and just enjoy the victories and lament the defeats until either 1 or 2 happens.

<blockquote><div class="name-said">mvargus;650050 said:</div><hr>especially when you consider the emphasis he puts on education and making sure his players are also successful students at Cal. <hr></blockquote><br /><br />Really?<br /><br />Any data to back this up? I used to believe this, but it seems like BS to me (especially since the mods deleted a thread showing Cal is in the bottom 3 of bowl teams...)<br /><br /><br />I am sure the excuses can be piled on (NFL, over all grad rates, injuries, etc), but for a guy who is putting emphasis on education, it does not look as good as advertised.<br /><br />That is far more troubling than his WL ratio.

<blockquote><div class="name-said">bearblast;650052 said:</div><hr>Mediocrity is what we were for 50 years (save a season or two) before Tedford came. He reshaped a half century of losing (save a good season or two). Plus he did take us to Rose Bowl, only to be cheated out by a systemic slight of hand<hr></blockquote><br /><br />No. <br /><br />He <i>ALMOST</i> took us to a second place Rose Bowl that was made possible by a ridiculous BCS system<br /><br />The same ridiculous BCS system also prevented us from going to that same Rose Bowl.<br /><br />You cant take some of the ridiculous and dismiss other ridiculous to prove your point; it dont fly...

<blockquote><div class="name-said">BTUR;650288 said:</div><hr>You know, I don't really understand the focus on blowout losses, and why that gets brought up over and over like it's such a big deal. Arkansas is #6 in the BCS standings, and they got blown out by LSU and Alabama. Stanford is #4 and got blown out by Oregon. Kansas State is #8 and they got blown out by Oklahoma. These are Top 10 teams (by one measure), you know? You can go down the list to find other examples (teams like VTech and Baylor) of good teams that got blown out. It's kind of the nature of college football. It happens. It's not that big of a deal. I completely understand where you're coming from when with your complaint about middle of the Pac not being something to brag about, but I don't really understand the blowout thing. When the team starts to do better, the blowouts should happen less frequently...but the truth is, they're just a part of college football and something that's gonna happen from time to time. I'm completely on board with the idea of cutting down on them, and mixing in more quality wins with them...but I think we'd all be happy to have the kind of season Stanford just had, right?<hr></blockquote><br /><br /><br />The blow out in 2006 to Tenn stung bad, and stuck around for a while, but that season was great...<br /><br /><br />It is not if you get blown out... It is context. It is no longer once a season, it is endemic. Tedford teams consistently get destroyed by teams for no reason...<br /><br />(lets not forget that UCLA or Maryland are not LSU or Oregon)<br /><br /><br />That is why it is a focus.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />Anyway, I still am happy with the season. Actually really happy. Holiday Bowl against Texas is damn nice... certainly does not feel like we were 4-5 or 5-5 in the Pac12... Not letting Furd run away with the Big Game had a lot to do with it, I think.

<blockquote><div class="name-said">drunkoski;650515 said:</div><hr>on this same board people used to laud holmoe for his academics and doing things the right way and that obviously was completely wrong. <b>i wonder if there is any coach in cal history who teh alumns didn't think was doing things the right way</b>.<hr></blockquote><br /><br />Ever hear of Mike White?<br /><br />(BTW thanks for that softball)

What we should be doing is assembling our Mac Brown voodoo dolls and contemplating the chance for some payback for 200-and-effing-4!!!!

<blockquote><div class="name-said">Jeff82;650678 said:</div><hr>What we should be doing is assembling our Mac Brown voodoo dolls and contemplating the chance for some payback for 200-and-effing-4!!!!<hr></blockquote><br /><br />Dude, I'm totally down with this plan. If you provide me with assembling plans I will poke the holy snot out of that thing all game long. Let me at him!!! I can't wait, and have not anticipated a game like this in years!<br /><br />For good measure, provide me with assembly instructions for members of the Rose Bowl selection committee who passed over one from their own conference (us) in favor of foreign invaders (TX). I'm wanting to inflict some pain on them, too!

This is a copy of a post I submitted last year:<br /><br />How has Cal done vs. the Top Half of the PAC-10? I took a look at the last 5 years (including this year), and this is what I found.<br /><br />* Note * In the years Cal finished in the top 5, I only included the other 4 teams that made up the Top 5.<br /><br />2006 - 3 Wins and 1 Loss<br />2007 - 1 Win and 4 Losses (Cal averaged 22 points / gave up 29 in losses)<br />2008 - 1 Win and 3 Losses (Cal averaged 17 points / gave up 31 in losses)<br />2009 - 2 Wins and 3 Losses (Cal averaged 7 points / gave up 34 in losses)<br />2010 - 0 Wins and 5 Losses (Cal averaged 11 points / gave up 31 in losses)<br /><br />For a 5 year average, Cal won 26 to 20, and Cal lost 14 - 31. (7 Wins and 16 losses overall)<br /><br />This is the reason Cal has not succeeded, and goes to average Bowl games. We beat some OCC opponents, and feast on the bottom 5 in the Pac-10. Until we can beat the good teams in the PAC-10, this is all we are going to achieve.<br /><br />Now add 2011 to the list:<br /><br />0-5 against the top 5 (Oregon, Stanford, Wash, USC, and UCLA). Average score in the losses is Cal 18 Opponent 33. Average loss is by 15 points. So in the last 6 years, Cal is 7 and 21 against the best in the conference. (.333 winning percentage) These are the facts.<br /><br />It is not about being a "negabear". We all want Cal to be successful, and I do not care who is coaching or who is playing what position. I want us to be competitive, win games against the best in conference, and go to the Rose Bowl or some other BCS bowl game. Overall winning records are nice, but when you beat nobodys, it is hard to get overly excited.

<blockquote><div class="name-said">goldenbear1968;650756 said:</div><hr>This is a copy of a post I submitted last year:<br /><br />How has Cal done vs. the Top Half of the PAC-10? I took a look at the last 5 years (including this year), and this is what I found.<br /><br />* Note * In the years Cal finished in the top 5, I only included the other 4 teams that made up the Top 5.<br /><br />2006 - 3 Wins and 1 Loss<br />2007 - 1 Win and 4 Losses (Cal averaged 22 points / gave up 29 in losses)<br />2008 - 1 Win and 3 Losses (Cal averaged 17 points / gave up 31 in losses)<br />2009 - 2 Wins and 3 Losses (Cal averaged 7 points / gave up 34 in losses)<br />2010 - 0 Wins and 5 Losses (Cal averaged 11 points / gave up 31 in losses)<br /><br />For a 5 year average, Cal won 26 to 20, and Cal lost 14 - 31. (7 Wins and 16 losses overall)<br /><br />This is the reason Cal has not succeeded, and goes to average Bowl games. We beat some OCC opponents, and feast on the bottom 5 in the Pac-10. Until we can beat the good teams in the PAC-10, this is all we are going to achieve.<br /><br />Now add 2011 to the list:<br /><br />0-5 against the top 5 (Oregon, Stanford, Wash, USC, and UCLA). Average score in the losses is Cal 18 Opponent 33. Average loss is by 15 points. So in the last 6 years, Cal is 7 and 21 against the best in the conference. (.333 winning percentage) These are the facts.<br /><br />It is not about being a "negabear". We all want Cal to be successful, and I do not care who is coaching or who is playing what position. I want us to be competitive, win games against the best in conference, and go to the Rose Bowl or some other BCS bowl game. Overall winning records are nice, but when you beat nobodys, it is hard to get overly excited.<hr></blockquote><br /><br />Yes, this is a function of Cal being a middle of the Pac team. That's what happens, it's pretty expected. Cal improving will help solve this problem.

Losing coach Marshall, bringing Coach M and Kiesau back, and getting Kline should help with the offensive woes. Moreover, we need home run threats at WR, and RB at the same time.. Like Djax and Marshawn, Rodgers + Arrington and Lyman, Pawlawski + white and Dawkins.. We had squat at WR and QB when Best and Vereen were around.

In recent years, there have been some predictable seasons of content and discontent amongst Cal fans, especially those on the message boards:<br /><br /><b>Season - Discontent:</b> <br />Extreme frustration at Tedford for not taking us to the next level. For most, this started with the complete collapse in 2007. But for others, it started in 2006 when Tedford couldn't beat SC or Arizona to get us in the Rose Bowl. Or in 2004 when he couldn't/wouldn't play politics like Mack Brown did.<br /><br /><b>Offseason - Hope and/or Content:</b><br />We all love Cal, and each off season we hope for big things. Over the last three years, this has been based solely on Tedford and his staff's impressive recruiting prowess. Before that, it was based on the belief that the staff would get a lot out of our players even though our recruiting classes were not great.<br /><br /><b>What is new:</b><br />But something changed last year. Our first losing season carried the discontent into the offseason (despite a stellar recruiting class). But now that we are back to "normal" (a decent/mediocre season with flashes of promise), the clash between the malcontents and contented Cal fans is even bigger. Some want to return to the same seasonal patterns as before. Others point to the fact that almost everyone agreed that he needed to get us to a BCS by now, and that the bar keeps moving lower.<br /><br />Personally, I don't see how or why we would either exonerate or bash Tedford based on offseason hopes or disappointments. It needs to be based on the field. And that simply hasn't been good enough. He needs to beat SC, beat stanfurd, and make a run at a Rose Bowl next year. Otherwise, what is the point of getting great recruits?<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><blockquote><div class="name-said">freshfunk;650460 said:</div><hr>Cal fan categorization:<br /><br />Uber Sunshine Pumper - "Woohoo! Those losses were total flukes. Oregon and $C here we come! You better watch out! [incoming QB] looks like Aaron Rodgers."<br /><br />Pumper - "With our top recruiting classes, SAHPC, and awesome asst coaches we will be a strong competitor every year."<br /><br />Conflicted Soul - "The swings from week to week make my heart week. One day it's rah-rah-rah, other days it's DOOOOOM. We've tasted the Rose Bowl and I think we can get to that point again.. some day."<br /><br />Negabear - "JT has had success in the past but cannot get us to the next level. Time for him to go."<br /><br />UberNega - "Tedfraud", "Tedfurd", Amy<hr></blockquote>

<blockquote><div class="name-said">Phantomfan;650504 said:</div><hr>No. <br /><br />He <i>ALMOST</i> took us to a second place Rose Bowl that was made possible by a ridiculous BCS system<br /><br />The same ridiculous BCS system also prevented us from going to that same Rose Bowl.<br /><br />You cant take some of the ridiculous and dismiss other ridiculous to prove your point; it dont fly...<hr></blockquote><br /><br />Agreed--If there were no BCS system, we would not have gone in 2004 either. USC would have. We have to win the conference. A back-door Rose Bowl would be nice, but the real goal is to be the conference champ.

<blockquote><div class="name-said">GoBears58;650962 said:</div><hr>Losing coach Marshall, bringing Coach M and Kiesau back, and getting Kline should help with the offensive woes. Moreover, we need home run threats at WR, and RB at the same time.. Like Djax and Marshawn, Rodgers + Arrington and Lyman, Pawlawski + white and Dawkins.. We had squat at WR and QB when Best and Vereen were around.<hr></blockquote><br /><br />The reason many of us think Tedford is not a great coach is he requires an overwhelming talent advantage with a top 5 defense and future Pro Bowl players and NFL Hall of Famers just to get to second place in the conference (2004 and 2006) and would have to have far and away the best talent in the conference in order to win it.<br /><br />Fortunately, that is exactly what it looks like we are going to have!

<blockquote><div class="name-said">drunkoski;650568 said:</div><hr>They felt that way when he was coach or after?<hr></blockquote><br /><br />I was a law student season ticket holder during MW's tenure. There were lots of rumors that rules were being bent (maybe broken) to give Cal a team that was tied for 1st place in the PAC8 (and with one more break would have gone to the RB).<br />Many alums did not like it. Eventually (the way I heard it) he was let go because of it.

What you say about Holmoe is definitely true, but I wouldn't say people thought Gilby was particularly doing things the right way. <br /><br />But there is no question that the opinion of Mike White was fully formed during his tenure, not after. It was VERY blatant. Let's just say there was a time when every Cal fan knew what the statute of limitations on NCAA violations was.

<blockquote><div class="name-said">calumnus;651539 said:</div><hr>Agreed--If there were no BCS system, we would not have gone in 2004 either. USC would have. We have to win the conference. A back-door Rose Bowl would be nice, but the real goal is to be the conference champ.<hr></blockquote><br /><br />Re 2004 Rose Bowl: Agree with both you and Phantom... <b>[U]BUT[/U]</b> we would most certainly have gone to at least the Fiesta or Sugar Bowls. Not the Holiday Bowl. That system giveth, taketh and taketh away once again.

<blockquote><div class="name-said">xultaif;651616 said:</div><hr>Re 2004 Rose Bowl: Agree with both you and Phantom... <b>[U]BUT[/U]</b> we would most certainly have gone to at least the Fiesta or Sugar Bowls. Not the Holiday Bowl. That system giveth, taketh and taketh away once again.<hr></blockquote><br /><br />The Fiesta Bowl in 2005 was Pitt and Utah--Holiday Bowl wasn't that much worse. <br /><br />Just one reason I hate the BCS. <br /><br />If it isn't the Rose Bowl or the National Championship Game, it is just another bowl to me. Some marginally better than others.

<blockquote><div class="name-said">calumnus;651622 said:</div><hr>The Fiesta Bowl in 2005 was Pitt and Utah--Holiday Bowl wasn't that much worse. <br /><br />Just one reason I hate the BCS. <br /><br />If it isn't the Rose Bowl or the National Championship Game, it is just another bowl to me. Some marginally better than others.<hr></blockquote><br /><br />But if the BCS wasn't in place it wouldn't have been Pitt / Utah in the Fiesta Bowl... actually, just looking at it now, the following could have very well been the case:<br /><br />Rose would've been USC / Michigan<br />Sugar would've been Auburn / Utah (maybe)<br />Orange would've been Oklahoma and Georgia<br /><br />leaving the Fiesta with... wait for it...<br /><br />Cal / Texas<br /><br />Which would have been epic (even with our lack of WRs)

<blockquote><div class="name-said">goldenbear1968;650756 said:</div><hr>This is a copy of a post I submitted last year:<br /><br />How has Cal done vs. the Top Half of the PAC-10? I took a look at the last 5 years (including this year), and this is what I found.<br /><br />* Note * In the years Cal finished in the top 5, I only included the other 4 teams that made up the Top 5.<br /><br />2006 - 3 Wins and 1 Loss<br />2007 - 1 Win and 4 Losses (Cal averaged 22 points / gave up 29 in losses)<br />2008 - 1 Win and 3 Losses (Cal averaged 17 points / gave up 31 in losses)<br />2009 - 2 Wins and 3 Losses (Cal averaged 7 points / gave up 34 in losses)<br />2010 - 0 Wins and 5 Losses (Cal averaged 11 points / gave up 31 in losses)<br /><br />For a 5 year average, Cal won 26 to 20, and Cal lost 14 - 31. (7 Wins and 16 losses overall)<br /><br />This is the reason Cal has not succeeded, and goes to average Bowl games. We beat some OCC opponents, and feast on the bottom 5 in the Pac-10. Until we can beat the good teams in the PAC-10, this is all we are going to achieve.<br /><br />Now add 2011 to the list:<br /><br />0-5 against the top 5 (Oregon, Stanford, Wash, USC, and UCLA). Average score in the losses is Cal 18 Opponent 33. Average loss is by 15 points. So in the last 6 years, Cal is 7 and 21 against the best in the conference. (.333 winning percentage) These are the facts.<br /><br />It is not about being a "negabear". We all want Cal to be successful, and I do not care who is coaching or who is playing what position. I want us to be competitive, win games against the best in conference, and go to the Rose Bowl or some other BCS bowl game. Overall winning records are nice, but when you beat nobodys, it is hard to get overly excited.<hr></blockquote><br /><br />I think we were all JT honks for the first 2-3 years. But the above statistics, along with the obvious coaching mistakes of the last few years--i.e., not realizing we needed to go for a 2 point conversion trailing by 10 with less than 2 minutes left in the '09 Poinsettia Bowl, causing us to have to burn a timeout--are what have turned many of us into critics.

<blockquote><div class="name-said">calumnus;651547 said:</div><hr>The reason many of us think Tedford is not a great coach is he requires an overwhelming talent advantage with a top 5 defense and future Pro Bowl players and NFL Hall of Famers just to get to second place in the conference (2004 and 2006) and would have to have far and away the best talent in the conference in order to win it.<br /><br />Fortunately, that is exactly what it looks like we are going to have!<hr></blockquote><br /><br />In all fairness though, I don't think we were more talented overall than USC was in 04 and 06. We matched favorably at QB in 04 and at RB both times, but SC had more depth through its roster. It was a case of really bad luck, just like in 1991, when our best teams and cycle peaks coincided with some of the very best teams in the history of the conference.

And in 04 USC had a QB and RB that were <i>both </i>Heisman winners, something that's nearly unprecedented in the history of college football. <br /><br />We still did match them there, but there is no question about USC having had the edge in terms of depth across the roster, Carroll had been pulling in top recruiting classes every year.

The Heisman has everything to do with the talent of the winner, and that of the team around it.<br /><br />Right now USC has many more players on NFL rosters than we do (44 to 33), which does confirm the fact that they've had a significant edge over us in depth of talent during the last decade.

In 2006 we were PX co-champions, tied with USC, despite having less overall talent, and with Longshore as our QB. 31 players from the 2006 USC football team are in the NFL, so you're definitely wrong about us having a talent advantage, I mean that's almost all their entire starting roster and half of their backups...<br /><br /><a href="<a href="<a href="<a href="<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2006_USC_Trojans_football_team#2006_Team_Players_in_the_NFL""""" class="postlink " target="_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2006_USC_Trojans_football_team#2006_Team_Players_in_the_NFL""""</a> class="postlink " target="_blank"><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2006_USC_Trojans_football_team#2006_Team_Players_in_the_NFL"""</a>" class="postlink " target="_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2006_USC_Trojans_football_team#2006_Team_Players_in_the_NFL"""</a></a> class="postlink " target="_blank"><a href="<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2006_USC_Trojans_football_team#2006_Team_Players_in_the_NFL""</a>"" class="postlink " target="_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2006_USC_Trojans_football_team#2006_Team_Players_in_the_NFL""</a>"</a> class="postlink " target="_blank"><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2006_USC_Trojans_football_team#2006_Team_Players_in_the_NFL""</a></a>" class="postlink " target="_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2006_USC_Trojans_football_team#2006_Team_Players_in_the_NFL""</a></a></a> class="postlink " target="_blank"><a href="<a href="<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2006_USC_Trojans_football_team#2006_Team_Players_in_the_NFL"</a>""" class="postlink " target="_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2006_USC_Trojans_football_team#2006_Team_Players_in_the_NFL"</a>""</a> class="postlink " target="_blank"><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2006_USC_Trojans_football_team#2006_Team_Players_in_the_NFL"</a>"</a>" class="postlink " target="_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2006_USC_Trojans_football_team#2006_Team_Players_in_the_NFL"</a>"</a></a> class="postlink " target="_blank"><a href="<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2006_USC_Trojans_football_team#2006_Team_Players_in_the_NFL"</a></a>"" class="postlink " target="_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2006_USC_Trojans_football_team#2006_Team_Players_in_the_NFL"</a></a>"</a> class="postlink " target="_blank"><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2006_USC_Trojans_football_team#2006_Team_Players_in_the_NFL"</a></a></a>" class="postlink " target="_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2006_USC_Trojans_football_team#2006_Team_Players_in_the_NFL"</a></a></a></a> class="postlink " target="_blank"><a href="<a href="<a href="<a href="<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2006_USC_Trojans_football_team#2006_Team_Players_in_the_NFL""""" class="postlink " target="_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2006_USC_Trojans_football_team#2006_Team_Players_in_the_NFL""""</a> class="postlink " target="_blank"><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2006_USC_Trojans_football_team#2006_Team_Players_in_the_NFL"""</a>" class="postlink " target="_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2006_USC_Trojans_football_team#2006_Team_Players_in_the_NFL"""</a></a> class="postlink " target="_blank"><a href="<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2006_USC_Trojans_football_team#2006_Team_Players_in_the_NFL""</a>"" class="postlink " target="_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2006_USC_Trojans_football_team#2006_Team_Players_in_the_NFL""</a>"</a> class="postlink " target="_blank"><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2006_USC_Trojans_football_team#2006_Team_Players_in_the_NFL""</a></a>" class="postlink " target="_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2006_USC_Trojans_football_team#2006_Team_Players_in_the_NFL""</a></a></a> class="postlink " target="_blank"><a href="<a href="<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2006_USC_Trojans_football_team#2006_Team_Players_in_the_NFL"</a>""" class="postlink " target="_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2006_USC_Trojans_football_team#2006_Team_Players_in_the_NFL"</a>""</a> class="postlink " target="_blank"><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2006_USC_Trojans_football_team#2006_Team_Players_in_the_NFL"</a>"</a>" class="postlink " target="_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2006_USC_Trojans_football_team#2006_Team_Players_in_the_NFL"</a>"</a></a> class="postlink " target="_blank"><a href="<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2006_USC_Trojans_football_team#2006_Team_Players_in_the_NFL"</a></a>"" class="postlink " target="_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2006_USC_Trojans_football_team#2006_Team_Players_in_the_NFL"</a></a>"</a> class="postlink " target="_blank"><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2006_USC_Trojans_football_team#2006_Team_Players_in_the_NFL"</a></a></a>" class="postlink " target="_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2006_USC_Trojans_football_team#2006_Team_Players_in_the_NFL"</a></a></a></a> class="postlink " target="_blank"><a href="<a href="<a href="<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2006_USC_Trojans_football_team#2006_Team_Players_in_the_NFL</a></a>"""" class="postlink " target="_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2006_USC_Trojans_football_team#2006_Team_Players_in_the_NFL</a></a>"""</a> class="postlink " target="_blank"><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2006_USC_Trojans_football_team#2006_Team_Players_in_the_NFL</a></a>""</a>" class="postlink " target="_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2006_USC_Trojans_football_team#2006_Team_Players_in_the_NFL</a></a>""</a></a> class="postlink " target="_blank"><a href="<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2006_USC_Trojans_football_team#2006_Team_Players_in_the_NFL</a></a>"</a>"" class="postlink " target="_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2006_USC_Trojans_football_team#2006_Team_Players_in_the_NFL</a></a>"</a>"</a> class="postlink " target="_blank"><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2006_USC_Trojans_football_team#2006_Team_Players_in_the_NFL</a></a>"</a></a>" class="postlink " target="_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2006_USC_Trojans_football_team#2006_Team_Players_in_the_NFL</a></a>"</a></a></a> class="postlink " target="_blank"><a href="<a href="<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2006_USC_Trojans_football_team#2006_Team_Players_in_the_NFL</a></a></a>""" class="postlink " target="_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2006_USC_Trojans_football_team#2006_Team_Players_in_the_NFL</a></a></a>""</a> class="postlink " target="_blank"><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2006_USC_Trojans_football_team#2006_Team_Players_in_the_NFL</a></a></a>"</a>" class="postlink " target="_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2006_USC_Trojans_football_team#2006_Team_Players_in_the_NFL</a></a></a>"</a></a> class="postlink " target="_blank"><a href="<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2006_USC_Trojans_football_team#2006_Team_Players_in_the_NFL</a></a></a></a>"" class="postlink " target="_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2006_USC_Trojans_football_team#2006_Team_Players_in_the_NFL</a></a></a></a>"</a> class="postlink " target="_blank"><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2006_USC_Trojans_football_team#2006_Team_Players_in_the_NFL</a></a></a></a></a>" class="postlink " target="_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2006_USC_Trojans_football_team#2006_Team_Players_in_the_NFL</a></a></a></a></a></a>