<blockquote><div class="name-said">BoaltBear;681906 said:</div><hr>Not sure about the time frame point, but restricting the employee's ability to solicit former clients has been held to be an invalid non-compete clause: <br /><br />"The agreement restricted Edwards from performing work for Andersen's Los Angeles clients and therefore restricted his ability to practice his accounting profession. (See Thompson v. Impaxx, Inc. (2003) 113 Cal.App.4th 1425, 1429, 7 Cal.Rptr.3d 427 [distinguishing "trade route" and solicitation cases that protect trade secrets or confidential proprietary information].) The noncompetition agreement that Edwards was required to sign before commencing employment with Andersen was therefore invalid because it restrained his ability to practice his profession." Edwards v. Arthur Andersen LLP, 44 Cal. 4th 937, 948, 189 P.3d 285, 292 (2008).<br /><br />Your "soliciting customers" argument seems more like a tortious interference with a contractual relationship argument, but there's no contract between Cal and potential recruits yet, unfortunately. <br /><br />However, I like the trade secrets argument --- especially because there is actually a "list" being stolen here. <br /><br />I don't know the facts, but if what is being said is true, some of Tosh's actions taken while still employed by Cal may have breached his contract.<br /><br />All thin. I'd still like to know if this is all kosher under NCAA rules.<hr></blockquote><br /><br />:headbang great, another one of god's gift to the law profession flexing his legal knowledge.