Bleacher Report, moving from SF to NY, cites...

6,181 Views | 49 Replies | Last: 12 yr ago by calumnus
The Duke!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You may not like this legislation, but I disagree with those who say all retroactive legislation is unfair.

I think the war crimes tribunals which judged Nazis based on legal definitions of genocide that were only adopted after the Holocaust were valid trials.
82gradDLSdad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
pingpong2;842113382 said:

Aren't you generalizing about generalizations? Doesn't that mean your generalization about generalizations being false is itself false?

I can think of plenty of generalizations that are true:

1) Rape is never ok.
2) Elder abuse is never ok
3) Rooting for Stanfurd DEFINITELY is never ever ever ok.


All generalizations are false...including this one.
CalBear68
How long do you want to ignore this user?
pingpong2;842113382 said:

Aren't you generalizing about generalizations? Doesn't that mean your generalization about generalizations being false is itself false?

I can think of plenty of generalizations that are true:

1) Rape is never ok.
2) Elder abuse is never ok
3) Rooting for Stanfurd DEFINITELY is never ever ever ok.


Ding! Ding! Ding!

Holmoephobic
How long do you want to ignore this user?
pingpong2;842113382 said:

Aren't you generalizing about generalizations? Doesn't that mean your generalization about generalizations being false is itself false?

I can think of plenty of generalizations that are true:

1) Rape is never ok.
2) Elder abuse is never ok
3) Rooting for Stanfurd DEFINITELY is never ever ever ok.


That one sailed right over your head.
GoBears635
How long do you want to ignore this user?
pingpong2;842113382 said:

3) Rooting for Stanfurd DEFINITELY is never ever ever ok.


In the interest of the Bay Area, the PAC-12 and West Coast sports in general, I always root for Stanfurd unless a victory would be detrimental to Cal.
pingpong2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Holmoephobic;842113661 said:

That one sailed right over your head.


Just like a Maynard pass?

ZING
The Duke!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GoBears63;842113683 said:

In the interest of the Bay Area, the PAC-12 and West Coast sports in general, I always root for Stanfurd unless a victory would be detrimental to Cal.


Let me guess -- you couldn't have graduated from Cal. Or are you joking?
calumnus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GoBears63;842113683 said:

In the interest of the Bay Area, the PAC-12 and West Coast sports in general, I always root for Stanfurd unless a victory would be detrimental to Cal.


Any Stanford victory is detrimental to Cal :tree
march2397
How long do you want to ignore this user?
pingpong2;842113266 said:

Retroactive legislation is never fair.


Are you saying this with the benefit of hindsight?
burritos
How long do you want to ignore this user?
What is the biggest example of a big company that left California say for example to Texas?
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
calumnus;842113723 said:

Any Stanford victory is detrimental to Cal :tree


Given that the Big Game is no longer the last game of the season, what if a Stanford win helped the Bears clinch a division title? I'd say we'd have to root for them then.
SonOfCalVa
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Dear employees,
Because of a personal problem that I have, the company is moving to New York City.
If you want to keep your job, prepare to relocate and pay the price for doing so.
If you have a family, kids in school, etc etc and they object, tough luck to them.
Move or you're fired.
Love
Your boss
82gradDLSdad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SonOfCalVa;842113977 said:

Dear employees,
Because of a personal problem that I have, the company is moving to New York City.
If you want to keep your job, prepare to relocate and pay the price for doing so.
If you have a family, kids in school, etc etc and they object, tough luck to them.
Move or you're fired.
Love
Your boss


Because of a personal problem that I have, more of the profits of my company are moving from you to me. If you want to keep your job, well, that's not up to you either. Bend over and take it until the day I tell you to stop. Then I'll fire you. Remember, it is not about you, it is about me and our shareholders.
Love, Your BOSS.

The message is clear: either become the boss or the shareholder or both. Be the employee only to facilitate becoming the boss or the shareholder or both.

Mel Brooks had it right, "It's good to be the king"
SonOfCalVa
How long do you want to ignore this user?
82gradDLSdad;842113979 said:

Because of a personal problem that I have, more of the profits of my company are moving from you to me. If you want to keep your job, well, that's not up to you either. Bend over and take it until the day I tell you to stop. Then I'll fire you. Remember, it is not about you, it is about me and our shareholders.
Love, Your BOSS.

The message is clear: either become the boss or the shareholder or both. Be the employee only to facilitate becoming the boss or the shareholder or both.

Mel Brooks had it right, "It's good to be the king"


The flogging will continue until morale improves.
Love, The Boss
GoBears58
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearyWhite;842113290 said:

Regardless of tax fairness, cost of living and the impact of relocation on the company, Bleacher Report still sucks ass.


definitely. He should move his HQ further east into the north Atlantic.
calumnus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey;842113974 said:

Given that the Big Game is no longer the last game of the season, what if a Stanford win helped the Bears clinch a division title? I'd say we'd have to root for them then.


OK, I will agree that, though it has never happened in 120 years, it is possible, that at some time in the future there will be a game where a Stanford victory will be good for Cal.
Refresh
Page 2 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.