Sebastabear;842118001 said:
Ted Miller picks USC as our most important game for next season and lays out a pretty compelling argument for doing so (having as much to do with SC being our last home game and one of our more winnable games against a long time foe). I wouldn't have agreed with this if someone just asked me "what's your most important game this year" (default answer always being Stanford) but he makes a good argument.
http://espn.go.com/blog/pac12/post/_/id/56156/most-important-game-california-2
SC is the most iimportant game because of the impression that winning would leave. Granted, a win over UO would leave a big impression, but it's much less likely and even then wouldn't leave as big an impression.
The whole country knows SC; many, except the knowledgable, still regard UO as somewhat unknown. To the rest of the country, Stanford is still the twin brother who inherited all of grandpa's dough because we grew a beard in 1965 and they didn't. No one can figure out the Big Game and, by that time of year, no one cares.
This year the SC game is winnable, it comes late in the year when we've historically weakened, everyone ALWAYS assumes that SC will be strong, just because they're SC. The entire country would sit up and take notice of a Cal win, as would donors, writers, recruits, and students. People would say, oh, this is different.
It would be the foundation for the construction of the next FB "program" by SD.