ducktilldeath;842164760 said:

---

No, correct call. Call it a terrible rule if you want, you can't leave your feet and hit a "defenseless" player above the shoulders with your helmet. The problem I have with the rule is that it says "targeting". As if any of these players are intentionally trying to take an opponents head off. It's an insult to the players who get called for these penalties, as if they are dirty or something. It's nonsense.

---

elpbear;842164773 said:

---

I must not understand this rule. He hit him with his shoulder he did not hit him in the helmet. Where's the penalty. Where's the objection?

---

vanity;842164770 said:

---

cannot believe mccain was ejected there. that is just bizarre.hit him in the chest.

---

freshfunk;842164763 said:

---

This is Pac12 football. :/

---

ducktilldeath;842164760 said:

---

No, correct call. Call it a terrible rule if you want, you can't leave your feet and hit a "defenseless" player above the shoulders with your helmet. The problem I have with the rule is that it says "targeting". As if any of these players are intentionally trying to take an opponents head off. It's an insult to the players who get called for these penalties, as if they are dirty or something. It's nonsense.

---

ultramantaro;842164793 said:

---

that was the game. at least we tried.

---

ducktilldeath;842164795 said:

---

Err...it was clearly helmet to helmet and he left his feet. Was it dirty? No? I don't even think that hit should be a penalty, but come on. McCain clearly hit him in the face with his helmet after launching off his feet.

---

liverflukes;842164803 said:

---

That's the Cal luck I remember...

---

Cal88;842164794 said:

---

unlucky

---