Sorry for another thread, but this is IMO a different angle. I was approaching the Oregon game as a fun one off event, but something has been bothering me about the idea and how the AD has written about both the potential Furd game to 'equalize' odd and even year schedules, and their justification for this Oregon game being on a weeknight so we are shifting the crowd away from Berkeley.
It's pretty obvious our even year home schedules are great for selling SEASON tickets, odd years no so much with only USC to anchor. This was not always the case - in the past before the 9 game schedule, the non CA schools were rotated differently so they wouldn't show up as every other year (we skipped one), so we were never locked into a even year rotation with oregon/washington for instance.
Now look at the 2016 hosting schedule:
Nevada
TEXAS
UCLA
Stanford
Oregon
Washington
either ASU or Utah
No FCS games. 4 bona fide marquee games. +3 that will be of decent interest.
Think someone might want to bump one of those conference games down to Levi's to boost the 'incremental' revenue? Shoot, think the conference wouldn't love to get Cal involved in a THURSDAY game @ Levis?
Just something to think about....
It's pretty obvious our even year home schedules are great for selling SEASON tickets, odd years no so much with only USC to anchor. This was not always the case - in the past before the 9 game schedule, the non CA schools were rotated differently so they wouldn't show up as every other year (we skipped one), so we were never locked into a even year rotation with oregon/washington for instance.
Now look at the 2016 hosting schedule:
Nevada
TEXAS
UCLA
Stanford
Oregon
Washington
either ASU or Utah
No FCS games. 4 bona fide marquee games. +3 that will be of decent interest.
Think someone might want to bump one of those conference games down to Levi's to boost the 'incremental' revenue? Shoot, think the conference wouldn't love to get Cal involved in a THURSDAY game @ Levis?
Just something to think about....