SonOfCalVa;842317394 said:
Yenser tweeted
"Zach Yenser @CalCoachYenser May 16
Flying home after a great week of recruiting the pacific NW. Have some great young men coming to campus this weekend!"
He didn't name names.
going4roses;842317440 said:
the canadian OL harper sherman
http://california.scout.com/a.z?s=166&p=8&c=1&nid=6291630
interesting he is his on CAL and ARZ .. arz coach M has couple few guys playing in the NFL has to be a draw
and from the islands OL Semisi Uluave was on visit / got offer this weekend
SonOfCalVa;842317446 said:
We have a few in the NFL also :p
Time for Yenser to get some commits. Helluva lot of offers out for OL.
Maybe coaches want to wait to see how those guys do their senior year.
One (1) good OL commit would certainly be nice though.
beeasyed;842317632 said:
rough estimation: ~35 offers out for OL, about 10 committed elsewhere already, about 6-10 with little interest in Cal. that leaves ~8 in the sweet spot. some linemen's stocks have been going up, others down... and i'm sure for some, the amount of attention get from Cal coaches will change in their final seasons...
i don't think OL/DL recruiting will pick up any time soon.
going4roses;842317638 said:
why not? then what information is this based on ?
going4roses;842317644 said:
ohhh ok .. last years results lead you to believe in the future things will look the same .. you do not think it can get any better ... or do you expect the same
beeasyed;842317645 said:
what i believe Cal will do this season is irrelevant. i'm not the one trying to make a "50-year decision", as the Cal staff--past and present--is fond of saying, and signing my body away next February.
the reality is kids, especially the ones with many offers, are skeptical of what this unproven staff is pitching, and rightfully so. they want to see the results back up the recruiting pitches. why is that hard to believe?
beeasyed;842317641 said:
you want one simple answer? b/c the weakest unit in 2013 was the OL, and kids as smart as ones Cal recruits know how to say "Show me." they want to know the coaches can deliver on what they are selling.
Eeyore;842317659 said:
by your reasoning, the OLs Cal signed this past spring must be dumb cuz they definitely didn't say "Show me."
going4roses;842317648 said:
maybe these unproven coaches are good at making certain young men not feel like they are signing their bodies away ... [What????]
are you inside all the minds of the prospects CAL has offered ? NO
thus you have no idea what they are thinking .. nor should you try to assume
unproven 1 year = very very bad start
what are the pitches that Cal is employing ?
have you meet any of the coaches personally ?
why is that hard to believe?
the 23 young men that committed last feb had other offers and choose CAL and the unproven coaches/ no DC over other schools
moonpod;842317653 said:
I actually think DL recruiting will improve this year. Tate is a proven guy. And most likely regardless of record they will improve the defense substantially (granted that could mean 45 to 35 points a game but that's still a big swing). Maybe I'm smoking peace pipe but that's my opinion.
SonOfCalVa;842317656 said:
Tate already has two (2) ... hope he gets Takk
Meister Petz;842318082 said:
Looks like Cal offered Tyler Hilinski yesterday. He committed to WSU about a month ago.
beeasyed;842318179 said:
This whole offering of QBs one-by-one has been a disaster. Should've expanded their search after Rosen. Losing Browning and White is looking worse and worse.
going4roses;842318185 said:
turned out ok this past recruiting cycle .. it is a long time next feb a lot things can change up till the 5th..
1-11 and you expect the world in our hands ... wake up worry about getting wins
maybe the staff does not have the same level of desire for a QB this cycle as you do ... you ok with that ?.. are you a D1 ball coach that has knowledge of today's recruiting landscape
beeasyed;842318186 said:
yes. Rubenzer picked Cal early on, and stuck with Cal the whole time.
if the staff does not have the "level of desire for a QB" that I supposedly do (?) then they would've stopped offering additional QBs, DTQBs, or otherwise. Rosen, then Browning, then White, then Waller, then oh ****, Hilinksi.
"expect the world in our hands". damn, hoping the staff would evaluate multiple QBs at once and not assume they are sure to land one = "expecting the world"?
sorry you don't take criticism of this staff well. on the plus side, have you heard? our APR has gone up! if you're only interested in posts that blow smoke up the program's ass, there are more than enough posters for that. i'm just pointing out some areas for improvement, or things that does not seem to compute.
going4roses;842318190 said:
did not know you were a recruiter for CAL football
competent rational critique of staff is fine with me ..that is far from what i get from you !!! say no to hissy fits
beeasyed;842317645 said:
what i believe Cal will do this season is irrelevant. i'm not the one trying to make a "50-year decision", as the Cal staff--past and present--is fond of saying, and signing my body away next February.
the reality is kids, especially the ones with many offers, are skeptical of what this unproven staff is pitching, and rightfully so. they want to see the results back up the recruiting pitches. why is that hard to believe?
NYCGOBEARS;842318209 said:
We have laid a major turd QB wise this cycle. Can't argue that. The TFS is a QB friendly system that should have top notch QB's banging down the doors to come here. Why aren't they? 1-11 is one reason. Also, I surmise that Goff being a true soph is a factor. Mostly, I think the top recruits want to see if this staff can coach cuz if they can't turn this ship around, chances are that they won't be around by the time the class of '15 hits campus.
MiZery;842318214 said:
Wow! Its a wonder how we can get any commits. I'm depressed
going4roses;842318215 said:
that is fair perspective
see bees it is not that hard to do ..
NYCGOBEARS;842318209 said:
We have laid a major turd QB wise this cycle. Can't argue that. The TFS is a QB friendly system that should have top notch QB's banging down the doors to come here.
beeasyed;842318179 said:
This whole offering of QBs one-by-one has been a disaster. Should've expanded their search after Rosen. Losing Browning and White is looking worse and worse.
NYCGOBEARS;842318209 said:
Why aren't they? 1-11 is one reason. Also, I surmise that Goff being a true soph is a factor. Mostly, I think the top recruits want to see if this staff can coach cuz if they can't turn this ship around, chances are that they won't be around by the time the class of '15 hits campus.
beeasyed;842317645 said:
the reality is kids, especially the ones with many offers, are skeptical of what this unproven staff is pitching, and rightfully so. they want to see the results back up the recruiting pitches. why is that hard to believe?
beeasyed;842318219 said:
1A.
1B.
2A.
2B.
Like I said before: you only see what you want to see. So go ahead, tell me, what have I said that is "irrational" and incorrect?
Looks like you just like to disagree with me for the sake of disagreeing, and then saying I'm all wrong, without ever saying exactly why that is. Just like Mizery does!
NYCGOBEARS;842318224 said:
Damn, did I plagiarize your whole schtick?
beeasyed;842318226 said:
no, but you just proved my point! :beer: + whiskey
NYCGOBEARS;842318228 said:
Are we gonna get booted again?
