I am vindicated

10,682 Views | 59 Replies | Last: 11 yr ago by sycasey
MugsVanSant
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MSaviolives;842328745 said:

Hmmm....a variety of screen names...why would that be I wonder. Banned? Sock Puppet? Forgot your name?

So wasn't OriginalRugby the guy who contended that he had a legal right to hold season tickets in the same long time location without donating? How did that go for you?


You have it wrong. I was not complaining about how I was treated. There was an article in the SF Comical about an elderly couple who bought their season tickets in the late 50's and travelled to Berkeley from Arizona. At the time of the article their seats were in GG. They were bitter because they remembered the promise made at the time they first bought the tickets that they would get the same seats or better every year they bought tickets. I can remember this promise being made into the 60's. That promise was easy to make in the late 50's. Tickets were not in great demand. In fact, Cal gave free seats in the south endzone to kids from local schools, playgrounds, and members of the Berkeley Junior Traffic Police. Then, when Tedford brought some success, tickets were in great demand and Cal was the hot ticket. It was more difficult to keep the promise made in the late 50's. Then, in a display of expediency and immorality, Ms. Barbour broke this historical promise to the dishonor of our program. This is what caused me to initially dislike her. As I saw her in action more I disliked her more. At the time I started this criticism I had seats in EE. I still have seats in EE. By the time I bought my seats in 1978 the athletic department had stopped making this promise. It was never about me at all.
Bear8
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MugsVanSant;842328500 said:

For the last 7 years I have been calling for the removal of Ms. Barbour under a variety of name. I have been ridiculed by the likes of WifeIsAFurd, Tim55Bear, GrandMastaPoop and a host of other who called me a "loser" and a variety of less flattering names. At last practically everyone has come around to my thinking. The tragedy is the wasted money and seasons it took to get to this point. Cal fans will be paying for Ms. Barbour's nest feathering (15 deputy, associate, and assistant athletic directors) for decades to come. Now let's hire somebody for his competence instead of his "diversity" characteristics.

All the best to my fellow Blues. Here's hoping for the big turnaround.

MugsVanSant (aka OriginalRugby and ThinkingBear, among others)


Dear Mugs:
You're still a loser.
Phantomfan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MugsVanSant;842328500 said:

For the last 7 years I have been calling for the removal of Ms. Barbour under a variety of name. I have been ridiculed by the likes of WifeIsAFurd, Tim55Bear, GrandMastaPoop and a host of other who called me a "loser" and a variety of less flattering names. At last practically everyone has come around to my thinking. The tragedy is the wasted money and seasons it took to get to this point. Cal fans will be paying for Ms. Barbour's nest feathering (15 deputy, associate, and assistant athletic directors) for decades to come. Now let's hire somebody for his competence instead of his "diversity" characteristics.

All the best to my fellow Blues. Here's hoping for the big turnaround.

MugsVanSant (aka OriginalRugby and ThinkingBear, among others)


I didn't think you were a douche or loser then.

Now I do.
HaasBear04
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Is this 2014's Albany Bowl thread? Has potential.
NYCGOBEARS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HaasBear04;842329004 said:

Is this 2014's Albany Bowl thread? Has potential.


Nah, in this case the OP isn't naive, quirky and self effacing, but rather is just egomaniacal and a blowhard.
HaasBear04
How long do you want to ignore this user?
NYCGOBEARS;842329009 said:

Nah, in this case the OP isn't naive, quirky and self effacing, but rather is just egomaniacal and a blowhard.


So,

Albany Bowl: laughing with OP

This thread: laughing @ OP
NYCGOBEARS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HaasBear04;842329014 said:

So,

Albany Bowl: laughing with OP

This thread: laughing @ OP

Nailed it.

Also, it is becoming a case study on internet fan board self delusion.
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MugsVanSant;842328943 said:

Well, I'm certainly not politically correct. Apparently you can be manipulated by the forces of political correctness.


I'm still trying to figure out how this comment was inspired by . . . well, anything.
davetdds
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wasn't it about 7 years ago that Amy re-applied and got rejected again??
NYCGOBEARS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
davetdds;842329035 said:

Wasn't it about 7 years ago that Amy re-applied and got rejected again??


Any word on Amy lately, anywhere?
MugsVanSant
How long do you want to ignore this user?
6bear6;842328965 said:

Dear Mugs:
You're still a loser.


Loser or not, I feel like a winner. Judging from the anger of the posts of my critics, I don't think that any of them feels like a winner.
okaydo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MugsVanSant;842329041 said:

Loser or not, I feel like a winner. Judging from the anger of the posts of my critics, I don't think that any of them feels like a winner.


You are a winner.

Don't worry. I remember your post on Barbour from Oct. 4, 2007 at 5:43 pm.

You were right.

We were wrong.

Mea culpa.
NYCGOBEARS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
okaydo;842329045 said:

You are a winner.

Don't worry. I remember your post on Barbour from Oct. 4, 2007 at 5:43 pm.

You were right.

We were wrong.

Mea culpa.

Okaydo, you've been unusually and uncharacteristically sharp in your rebuttals lately. I like it.
MugsVanSant
How long do you want to ignore this user?
okaydo;842329045 said:

You are a winner.

Don't worry. I remember your post on Barbour from Oct. 4, 2007 at 5:43 pm.

You were right.

We were wrong.

Mea culpa.


Good! I'm glad that you are not angry any more.
SonOfCalVa
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MugsVanSant;842329041 said:

Loser or not, I feel like a winner. Judging from the anger of the posts of my critics, I don't think that any of them feels like a winner.


You feel ... feeling is good.
I think the OP was an intentional spoof, intended to allow people to laugh and/or vent, relieving some of the BI tension.
Well done.
C6Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SonOfCalVa;842329099 said:

You feel ... feeling is good.
I think the OP was an intentional spoof, intended to allow people to laugh and/or vent, relieving some of the BI tension.
Well done.


Or a legend in his own mind? :p
march2397
How long do you want to ignore this user?
tommie317;842328547 said:

Just getting ahead of the game, I am calling for the removal of whoever is replacing Sandy. Thats right, you heard it first: Fire Sandy's replacement!


Excellent! And gender neutral.
SonOfCalVa
How long do you want to ignore this user?
tommie317;842328547 said:

Just getting ahead of the game, I am calling for the removal of whoever is replacing Sandy. Thats right, you heard it first: Fire Sandy's replacement!


Can we terminate the contract quickly ... then go through the process again and then terminate that one?
Might this lower the average employment length, making up for keeping certain people past their competence-performance expiration dates?

Raising the APR is good.
Lowering the average employment period for AD's is also good to make the negas happy.
(hmm ... make the negas happy ???? oxymoron? fully funding sex changes might be cheaper and easier)
BearlyCareAnymore
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SonOfCalVa;842329099 said:

You feel ... feeling is good.
I think the OP was an intentional spoof, intended to allow people to laugh and/or vent, relieving some of the BI tension.
Well done.


If OP is the other posters he claims to be, it is not a spoof. And for the most part people did not get on his case for his opinion about Sandy other than some of the stated reasons for a lot of his opinions were objectionable to most civilized humans.
NYCGOBEARS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Can we rename this thread "I Am Vilified"?
SonOfCalVa
How long do you want to ignore this user?
NYCGOBEARS;842329711 said:

Can we rename this thread "I Am Vilified"?


Self-Impaling for Dummies by MugsVanSant (aka et.al.)
93gobears
How long do you want to ignore this user?
NYCGOBEARS;842329711 said:

Can we rename this thread "I Am Vilified"?


"I am Rectalfied?"
BearDevil
How long do you want to ignore this user?
OaktownBear;842329695 said:

If OP is the other posters he claims to be, it is not a spoof. And for the most part people did not get on his case for his opinion about Sandy other than some of the stated reasons for a lot of his opinions were objectionable to most civilized humans.


The needy chest pumping is pretty funny, but admitting he trolled the board under at least 4 handles is hilarious. Why would anyone need to use multiple handles and why brag about it?!? Only ones I can think of are: Amy, calmo (had at least a half dozen names), that fish guy who worshiped Bobby Knight, and now OriginalRugby (the crusading attorney who now claims he only wanted to sue Cal on behalf of some elderly couple). Wow.
93gobears
How long do you want to ignore this user?
NYCGOBEARS;842329048 said:

Okaydo, you've been unusually and uncharacteristically sharp in your rebuttals lately. I like it.


Okaydo's testes finally dropped. :bravo
Vandalus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MugsVanSant;842329041 said:

Loser or not, I feel like a winner. Judging from the anger of the posts of my critics, I don't think that any of them feels like a winner.


sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MugsVanSant;842329041 said:

Loser or not, I feel like a winner. Judging from the anger of the posts of my critics, I don't think that any of them feels like a winner.


Refresh
Page 2 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.