WSJ: Tony Franklin's crowdsourcing of ideas through TFS

4,239 Views | 29 Replies | Last: 10 yr ago by PAC-10-BEAR
B.A. Bearacus
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Good read. Link.

Quote:

At a time when innovation in football increasingly flows upstream from high schools to colleges and then to the NFL, Franklin has a direct line to some of the game’s brightest offensive minds. “High-school coaches have been dealing with this [up-tempo] stuff for years, they’re steps ahead of us,” Franklin said. “I get to interact with these guys every week. No other college coach would have the time.”

Franklin holds a weekly conference call every Monday during the season for the roughly 250 TFS clients, who pay between $1,595 and $2,995 in annual membership fees. The sessions are meant to give members the chance to ask questions about play-calling or for advice on upcoming opponents. But Franklin says they invariably end up providing him with ideas, suggestions and tips for improving Cal’s offense.
Dbearson
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whatever works. keep on truckin tony
hanky1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
For whatever reason those east coast newspapers love Cal. There are a disproportionate amount of Cal articles in publications like WSJ, NY Times, Post, etc.
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
And just like that the TFS goes from distraction to strategic advantage
MisterNoodle
How long do you want to ignore this user?
hanky1;842546271 said:

For whatever reason those east coast newspapers love Cal. There are a disproportionate amount of Cal articles in publications like WSJ, NY Times, Post, etc.


High octane offense, haven't won in years, entertaining novelty, everyone wants to pick a big winner before they win big.
NYCGOBEARS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
hanky1;842546271 said:

For whatever reason those east coast newspapers love Cal. There are a disproportionate amount of Cal articles in publications like WSJ, NY Times, Post, etc.

They're attempting to appease Janet Yellen.
nowa68
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Makes sense to me...you can learn something new everyday no matter how long you've been at it...Your growth stops when you think your the guru and you know everything...
Unit2Sucks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
hanky1;842546271 said:

For whatever reason those east coast newspapers love Cal. There are a disproportionate amount of Cal articles in publications like WSJ, NY Times, Post, etc.


East coast bias, amirite?
Redonkulous Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This sounds like a Tequila Steve move:

Quote:

Not everyone is welcome to join Franklin's fraternity of coaches, however. Shortly after moving to Cal in 2013, he received a membership application from one of the few clients with whom he wasn't all that interested in trading ideas.

"One of the other schools in the Pac-12 had one of their graduate assistants try to sign up," Franklin said. "They didn't even try to hide who they werethey used their real name and a credit card from the school. We didn't sell it to them, of course, but I almost wish I could've got their feedback. I'll take ideas from anyone."
Cal89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Thanks much sharing. Very nice exposure for Cal and TF...
Vandalus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Definitely a sarkesque move. Would love to know who it actually was, but there's no question that his has the sleaziest appearance.
PalyBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"Not only do TFS clients share their ideas with Franklin, but through their membership, they have access to almost every element of his offense, from passing drills and practice plans to his entire offensive playbook. "

Sharing the playbook seems scary to me but it doesn't seem to matter. I wonder how DCs feel when they have the opposing team's playbook and still can't stop them.
txwharfrat
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9;842546272 said:

And just like that the TFS goes from distraction to strategic advantage


It has been an advantage from Day 1.
okaydo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
hanky1;842546271 said:

For whatever reason those east coast newspapers love Cal. There are a disproportionate amount of Cal articles in publications like WSJ, NY Times, Post, etc.


What's funny is that all three really don't have many Cal alums working for them.

NY Times has always been cool with Berkeley and UC Berkeley...the city once had (and may still have) the highest Times readership per capita. They're also close to the J-school. The Times a conference with hosted Dirks this week.

The WSJ...I think there's one guy.

The NY Post....one of their most frequent writers is a Cal alum/Cal football fan.
http://nypost.com/author/david-k-li/
Vandalus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PalyBear;842546308 said:

"Not only do TFS clients share their ideas with Franklin, but through their membership, they have access to almost every element of his offense, from passing drills and practice plans to his entire offensive playbook. "

Sharing the playbook seems scary to me but it doesn't seem to matter. I wonder how DCs feel when they have the opposing team's playbook and still can't stop them.


Read the CBS article about Goff with a bunch of quotes from Franklin. Having our playbook doesn't mean anything at all, because all of our routes are predicated on a concept; so each call is for a particular concept, and each route within the concept can be tagged or changed either in the call or at the line of scrimmage. Since he keeps the signals a secret, it really matters not if they have the playbook.
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
hanky1;842546271 said:

For whatever reason those east coast newspapers love Cal. There are a disproportionate amount of Cal articles in publications like WSJ, NY Times, Post, etc.


Berkeley might have something to do with it.
berk18
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The playbook thing isn't a big deal. A playbook is the thing that you give your guys during week 1 install at the start of spring or fall camp, and contains the plays that are your bread and butter. Here's Mike Leach's playbook from 1999: https://jameslightfootball.files.wordpress.com/2015/03/1999-oklahoma-air-raid-mike-leach.pdf

4-verticals, one of our most common plays, is on the seventh page of that document. That's how much information is in a playbook for any given play. At this point defenses have 26 games of all-22 footage of Tony's offense at Cal, from both pressbox and end zone angles. A D1 coordinator could come up with that playbook after a day of film study (actually, that and a lot more is exactly what GA's do two weeks before playing an opponent).

The question is, how do you get from there to a gameplan that can confuse opposing defenses? The players learn the playbook first, so that they know the basics of the route that they're running on any given play, but then there are hours and hours of film study and practice where the coaches and players watch the play against different coverages and techniques, talking about the finer points of getting open against whatever defense they're facing. In film study the coaches don't just say "read that guy," they give their players all of the specifics that they need to run the offense at maximum efficiency. None of that's in the playbook, and that's the first place where coaches who use the exact same plays start to differ from each other.

Then, once that's coached up, you get into the gameplan specific coaching points each week. "They like to run coverage X, so we're going to start attacking them with play Y so that we can open up play Z," or "that safety gets caught looking into the backfield, so when we run this concept change up the order of your read." That's the really important information, and it's obviously not in the playbook either.

Then finally, there are gameplan specific tagged variants of your base plays, or new/trick plays added on a game-by-game basis. These are the kinds of things that might never have been on tape, and they aren't in your base playbook, either.

If a GA did get into the conference call, so that they could actually hear Tony talk about how he approaches gameplanning, what new ideas he's considering, and how he thinks about strategy, that would be more of a problem, because they would be in a better position to anticipate what'll be on his mind during gameplanning, and to predict changes from previous years' strategies, but the playbook isn't that valuable. Nick Saban's LSU and Alabama playbooks have been online for years, and they have way, way more information about his defense than Air Raid playbooks have about our offense.
socaliganbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
hanky1;842546271 said:

For whatever reason those east coast newspapers love Cal. There are a disproportionate amount of Cal articles in publications like WSJ, NY Times, Post, etc.


And we've been pretty bad. I can only imagine how much space we'd get if we actually have a great season.

But yeah, I think Berkeley (the brand) has something to do with it.
Vandalus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
berk18;842546374 said:

...


As usual, what he said.

:gobears:
TouchedTheAxeIn82
How long do you want to ignore this user?
txwharfrat;842546314 said:

It has been an advantage from Day 1.


dajo9 was goofing on the people who complain about Franklin's side business.
Fyght4Cal
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The concept is epic. Spread your gospel, host weekly bible study, collect offerings from the faithful.
Vandalus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Fyght4Cal;842546533 said:

The concept is epic. Spread your gospel, host weekly bible study, collect offerings from the faithful.


Praise be unto you.



http://www.ourladyofperpetualexemption.com/
Fyght4Cal
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PalyBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
berk18;842546374 said:

The playbook thing isn't a big deal. A playbook is the thing that you give your guys during week 1 install at the start of spring or fall camp, and contains the plays that are your bread and butter. Here's Mike Leach's playbook from 1999: https://jameslightfootball.files.wordpress.com/2015/03/1999-oklahoma-air-raid-mike-leach.pdf.......




Good to know. Thanks for the info!
GivemTheAxe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
nowa68;842546277 said:

Makes sense to me...you can learn something new everyday no matter how long you've been at it...Your growth stops when you think your the guru and you know everything...


Sounds like you are talking about Tedford. He had to Micro-manage the Offense. Which is why he could not keep one OC for long.
He had to live in his office since he wanted to address aspect of the game.
Once he made up his mind he refused to change or listen to criticism.
When he had made up his mind that Riley was a bonehead, he never gave him a fair shot at starting. Even to the point of starting an obviously injured Longshore.
When every pundit criticized his sticking with Maynard he was even more determined to prove them wrong. Even to the point of never giving any backup any playing time.
GMP
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GivemTheAxe;842546651 said:

Sounds like you are talking about Tedford. He had to Micro-manage the Offense. Which is why he could not keep one OC for long.
He had to live in his office since he wanted to address aspect of the game.
Once he made up his mind he refused to change or listen to criticism.
When he had made up his mind that Riley was a bonehead, he never gave him a fair shot at starting. Even to the point of starting an obviously injured Longshore.
When every pundit criticized his sticking with Maynard he was even more determined to prove them wrong. Even to the point of never giving any backup any playing time.


What's funny is that you are making these complaints despite the fact that Tedford was proven CORRECT on all accounts.

Riley had serious issues. He had a good arm but was not a good QB. And did you SEE Brock Mansion play QB? Maynard was the best QB we had. These are recruiting failures by JT. They are not poor decisions. They are not stubbornness. He was at practice every day and saw what we could not see. I get why people got angsty about this at the time - but your failure to recognize that he was right is on you.
Unit2Sucks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GMP in fairness they are also development failures and the points raised by GTA could have materially contributed to Tedford's inability to properly develop these guys as he sunk deeper and deeper into his controlling tailspin.
GMP
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Unit2Sucks;842546664 said:

GMP in fairness they are also development failures and the points raised by GTA could have materially contributed to Tedford's inability to properly develop these guys as he sunk deeper and deeper into his controlling tailspin.


Plenty of possible failures. But they were proven not to be stubbornness or a lack of judgment. IMO, every time the fans whined for a change, Tedford was proven correct in sticking with his QB.
Unit2Sucks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
grandmastapoop;842546665 said:

Plenty of possible failures. But they were proven not to be stubbornness or a lack of judgment. IMO, every time the fans whined for a change, Tedford was proven correct in sticking with his QB.


I agree the decision of who to give the ball to on game day was almost always correct (you can quibble about whether Levy should have started earlier in the 2005 season). Almost everything else to me is open to debate.
Logy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
grandmastapoop;842546665 said:

Plenty of possible failures. But they were proven not to be stubbornness or a lack of judgment. IMO, every time the fans whined for a change, Tedford was proven correct in sticking with his QB.


Tedford's chosen quarterback didn't run the system well in the end and the backups looked inept. Either he didn't develop them, he recruited poorly, or his system was flawed. None of these are positives.
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Is Cal paying the telephone bills for his business or does this fall under recruiting?
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.