Not much to say. Can't believe they couldn't get it done against Trinidad and Tobego.
ferCALgm2 said:
Not much to say. Can't believe they couldn't get it done against Trinidad and Tobego.
Did he really say that?? Does he have any idea what kind of beatdown he would've gotten in CONMEBOL or UEFA? Then again, who could possibly compete against freakin' Panama or Honduras? They're consistently in the knockout stages of previous WCs right?Bear19 said:
"I would love to see one of these hotshot teams from Europe come here and play in our CONCACAF qualifying and really get a taste of this and see what that's about," Arena said. "This is very challenging, it's like survival of the fittest. They could do one of those TV shows on this. Who will survive in the end, that's basically what this is." -- Bruce Arena
Yes, Bruce, we had to contend with a mushy field and a raucous crowd of at least 1,000 T&T supporters! Unfair!
On the brighter side of this, the USNMT doesn't need to worry about a trip to the Trump White House.
Goobear said:ferCALgm2 said:
Not much to say. Can't believe they couldn't get it done against Trinidad and Tobego.
It is a joke. Same like my birth country Holland also did not make it to the World Cup.
sketchy9 said:Did he really say that?? Does he have any idea what kind of beatdown he would've gotten in CONMEBOL or UEFA? Then again, who could possibly compete against freakin' Panama or Honduras? They're consistently in the knockout stages of previous WCs right?Bear19 said:
"I would love to see one of these hotshot teams from Europe come here and play in our CONCACAF qualifying and really get a taste of this and see what that's about," Arena said. "This is very challenging, it's like survival of the fittest. They could do one of those TV shows on this. Who will survive in the end, that's basically what this is." -- Bruce Arena
Yes, Bruce, we had to contend with a mushy field and a raucous crowd of at least 1,000 T&T supporters! Unfair!
On the brighter side of this, the USNMT doesn't need to worry about a trip to the Trump White House.
Yes de Rode Duivels should get far this time. Will be rooting for them. My favorite player is de Bruyne. Wow is he good!Grigsby said:Goobear said:ferCALgm2 said:
Not much to say. Can't believe they couldn't get it done against Trinidad and Tobego.
It is a joke. Same like my birth country Holland also did not make it to the World Cup.
Sorry goo, I guess my Rode Duivels monopolized all the talent in the Low Lands for the time being.
Granted we still have a hack for a coach
BerlinerBaer said:
We would have gotten trounced in the group stage in Russia next summer had we qualified. No question in my mind. I'm not sure how much better that would have been for growth of the sport.
At least now meaningful change might actually happen instead of just going through the motions, and we have the rare luxury of lots of time.
philly1121 said:
FIRE Sunil Gulati. Fire Bruce Arena. There is no excuse for what happened tonight. Tim Howard earned legend status in a losing effort at the last World Cup. But he should never be allowed to play on the National Team again after he let that bomb in. Freaking awful.
Goobear said:Yes de Rode Duivels should get far this time. Will be rooting for them. My favorite player is de Bruyne. Wow is he good!Grigsby said:Goobear said:ferCALgm2 said:
Not much to say. Can't believe they couldn't get it done against Trinidad and Tobego.
It is a joke. Same like my birth country Holland also did not make it to the World Cup.
Sorry goo, I guess my Rode Duivels monopolized all the talent in the Low Lands for the time being.
Granted we still have a hack for a coach
Holland is a joke right now. They can hold hands with the US.
lolokaydo said:
Good. I don't want our children and future generations to be interested in such a boring and European sport.
USA! USA! USA! USA!
BearSD- This is the very core of the problem for developing international level players. Your assessment is right on. In Europe the best players are picked out early and developed through their club system. They play year round and do way more training and skill development than we do here. Soccer while an athletic endeavor is at it's core a skill game. Of course if you are a superior athlete in combination with skill you will excel. But skills are needed.BearSD said:philly1121 said:
FIRE Sunil Gulati. Fire Bruce Arena. There is no excuse for what happened tonight. Tim Howard earned legend status in a losing effort at the last World Cup. But he should never be allowed to play on the National Team again after he let that bomb in. Freaking awful.
Yes. Howard's game deteriorated rapidly over the last 3 years; it's pathetic that USMNT didn't have anyone better to put in goal.
So little development of younger talent at almost every position. Pulisic looks like a future superstar, but he developed in Europe.
The pay-to-play, "travel team" youth development is rotten to the core. It develops the children of wealthy families who are looking for college soccer scholarships and thus both severely limits the talent pool and only develops the players they do have to a low ceiling, ie getting that college scholarship. And let's not even start on how funneling kids into college soccer does nothing to develop potential future world-class talent.
BearSD said:philly1121 said:
FIRE Sunil Gulati. Fire Bruce Arena. There is no excuse for what happened tonight. Tim Howard earned legend status in a losing effort at the last World Cup. But he should never be allowed to play on the National Team again after he let that bomb in. Freaking awful.
Yes. Howard's game deteriorated rapidly over the last 3 years; it's pathetic that USMNT didn't have anyone better to put in goal.
So little development of younger talent at almost every position. Pulisic looks like a future superstar, but he developed in Europe.
The pay-to-play, "travel team" youth development is rotten to the core. It develops the children of wealthy families who are looking for college soccer scholarships and thus both severely limits the talent pool and only develops the players they do have to a low ceiling, ie getting that college scholarship. And let's not even start on how funneling kids into college soccer does nothing to develop potential future world-class talent.
Just curious. What is your solution?6956bear said:BearSD- This is the very core of the problem for developing international level players. Your assessment is right on. In Europe the best players are picked out early and developed through their club system. They play year round and do way more training and skill development than we do here. Soccer while an athletic endeavor is at it's core a skill game. Of course if you are a superior athlete in combination with skill you will excel. But skills are needed.BearSD said:philly1121 said:
FIRE Sunil Gulati. Fire Bruce Arena. There is no excuse for what happened tonight. Tim Howard earned legend status in a losing effort at the last World Cup. But he should never be allowed to play on the National Team again after he let that bomb in. Freaking awful.
Just curious What is your solution?
Yes. Howard's game deteriorated rapidly over the last 3 years; it's pathetic that USMNT didn't have anyone better to put in goal.
So little development of younger talent at almost every position. Pulisic looks like a future superstar, but he developed in Europe.
The pay-to-play, "travel team" youth development is rotten to the core. It develops the children of wealthy families who are looking for college soccer scholarships and thus both severely limits the talent pool and only develops the players they do have to a low ceiling, ie getting that college scholarship. And let's not even start on how funneling kids into college soccer does nothing to develop potential future world-class talent.
The US Soccer federation has favored athleticism and size at the youth level over skill for years. We are seeing the results of that thinking in international events. Not in World Cup, fail to make the Olympics (US under 23) and out of U17 world Cup as well.
Combining the flawed selection criteria with the pay to play component which eliminates so many talented kids who do not have the ability to pay or travel for practices, scrimmages and tournaments and you end up with a pool of players that is nowhere near close to the best players.
College soccer (and my son played) will never prepare you for anything beyond college soccer. The substitution rules are different, the practices are geared towards games and little time is spent on skill development. And they play a total of 18-20 matches before NCAA tournament against teams that have similar skill. My son played against better players in club matches.
Finally and this is a big one. Americans want to play games. They want trophies, they want the action of games and tournaments. Many of these tournaments are showcase events with college scouts attending. Players attempt to catch the eyes of the coaches with individual play rather than team play. It gets rewarded and so it goes.
If the USA wants to be a true power on the international level in soccer, they have much to change. IMO will not happen and despite having the greatest level of participation in the world at the youth level the USA will constantly come up short because of the training and selection process in place.
Lastly Bruce Arena is a dinosaur and his awful 4-4-2 formation needs to be put out to pasture. He is an awful coach and belongs nowhere near a real soccer program. Gulati is a bureaucrat that is corrupt and needs to be removed as well. The system is entrenched and will be hard to cleanse. That is why the US stinks at soccer. Starts at 8 years old and ends up in losses to Trinidad and Tobago who should have been beaten by a score of 5-0 at a minimum.
Damn good question Bonsall. Any solution that does not tap into the Hispanic pipeline of players is destined to fall short. My experience with youth soccer was that many of the very best players were Hispanic. They grow up playing the game with their families and friends not even in an organized fashion. It is a game that many love and play in much the same way other groups play basketball or baseball in the park. My son played on a club team that was half Hispanic. The passion they have for the game is crazy. But many are not in a good financial situation. The club subsidized many of them to at least some degree. The marginal players families were outraged. They felt like they were used to subsidize players that played over their child. Politics rule the day at many clubs.bonsallbear said:Just curious. What is your solution?6956bear said:BearSD- This is the very core of the problem for developing international level players. Your assessment is right on. In Europe the best players are picked out early and developed through their club system. They play year round and do way more training and skill development than we do here. Soccer while an athletic endeavor is at it's core a skill game. Of course if you are a superior athlete in combination with skill you will excel. But skills are needed.BearSD said:philly1121 said:
FIRE Sunil Gulati. Fire Bruce Arena. There is no excuse for what happened tonight. Tim Howard earned legend status in a losing effort at the last World Cup. But he should never be allowed to play on the National Team again after he let that bomb in. Freaking awful.
Just curious What is your solution?
Yes. Howard's game deteriorated rapidly over the last 3 years; it's pathetic that USMNT didn't have anyone better to put in goal.
So little development of younger talent at almost every position. Pulisic looks like a future superstar, but he developed in Europe.
The pay-to-play, "travel team" youth development is rotten to the core. It develops the children of wealthy families who are looking for college soccer scholarships and thus both severely limits the talent pool and only develops the players they do have to a low ceiling, ie getting that college scholarship. And let's not even start on how funneling kids into college soccer does nothing to develop potential future world-class talent.
The US Soccer federation has favored athleticism and size at the youth level over skill for years. We are seeing the results of that thinking in international events. Not in World Cup, fail to make the Olympics (US under 23) and out of U17 world Cup as well.
Combining the flawed selection criteria with the pay to play component which eliminates so many talented kids who do not have the ability to pay or travel for practices, scrimmages and tournaments and you end up with a pool of players that is nowhere near close to the best players.
College soccer (and my son played) will never prepare you for anything beyond college soccer. The substitution rules are different, the practices are geared towards games and little time is spent on skill development. And they play a total of 18-20 matches before NCAA tournament against teams that have similar skill. My son played against better players in club matches.
Finally and this is a big one. Americans want to play games. They want trophies, they want the action of games and tournaments. Many of these tournaments are showcase events with college scouts attending. Players attempt to catch the eyes of the coaches with individual play rather than team play. It gets rewarded and so it goes.
If the USA wants to be a true power on the international level in soccer, they have much to change. IMO will not happen and despite having the greatest level of participation in the world at the youth level the USA will constantly come up short because of the training and selection process in place.
Lastly Bruce Arena is a dinosaur and his awful 4-4-2 formation needs to be put out to pasture. He is an awful coach and belongs nowhere near a real soccer program. Gulati is a bureaucrat that is corrupt and needs to be removed as well. The system is entrenched and will be hard to cleanse. That is why the US stinks at soccer. Starts at 8 years old and ends up in losses to Trinidad and Tobago who should have been beaten by a score of 5-0 at a minimum.
In fairness, there has been a ton of progress in US Soccer over the last two decades. Within my lifetime, I've seen it go from: (1) expected to miss the World Cup and no one in the USA watched the World Cup anyway to (2) expected to always make the World Cup and usually advance out of the group stage. Missing out is now considered an embarrassment. That was not true when I was a kid. So that is good progress and the federation deserves credit for growing the game to this point.6956bear said:
We loved his time and it was good for us and him. He was not going to be a pro player, just a very good youth and college player. I love soccer, it is a great game that is unappreciated by many Americans. That many do not care that the US failed to qualify for the World Cup shows just how hard it will be to get the US to the level it could be. It could and should be a powerhouse internationally.
Certainly promotion and relegation would help. But it will never happen as new owners paid way too much for their teams for this to happen. It needed to built into the original bylaws of MLS.Grigsby said:
Promotion relegation is needed. The MLS interest (money making) diametrically opposes soccer's development in the United States. The problem is that the closed league system doesn't work because unlike the other 4 major sports league, MLS is not the destination spot for 95% of the top players.
While the owners have acted in their best interests to ensure money making they have effectively capped their profits. This is especially problematic with current cable cutting issues and lack of a quality product.
It is in the best interest of soccer in US both for the national team and the domestic leagues to move toward an open league structure. Given the sheer numbers this is the only way to greatly improve talent recognition and development.
The college level of play is probably at 6th division of the English pyramid.
I think this is how some other countries do it, right? The South American powerhouses like Argentina and Brazil are under no illusions that their domestic leagues are going to prepare their best players for competing on the world stage. They all go to Europe.sluggo said:
Certainly promotion and relegation would help. But it will never happen as new owners paid way too much for their teams for this to happen. It needed to built into the original bylaws of MLS.
Anyway, it does not matter much, because US soccer professional development mostly takes place in Germany. Development is fine going up to 16. Between 16 and 18 the best players play division 2 before they go to Germany. It is not the best system, but it is working. See my other post.
Sluggo
The top players go to Europe for the $$$$$$. The South American leagues do not pay anything like Europe. Not even close. The domestic leagues in South America are not much better than MLS. Maybe they were at one time but no longer.sycasey said:I think this is how some other countries do it, right? The South American powerhouses like Argentina and Brazil are under no illusions that their domestic leagues are going to prepare their best players for competing on the world stage. They all go to Europe.sluggo said:
Certainly promotion and relegation would help. But it will never happen as new owners paid way too much for their teams for this to happen. It needed to built into the original bylaws of MLS.
Anyway, it does not matter much, because US soccer professional development mostly takes place in Germany. Development is fine going up to 16. Between 16 and 18 the best players play division 2 before they go to Germany. It is not the best system, but it is working. See my other post.
Sluggo