Poll: Best QB today

9,430 Views | 56 Replies | Last: 7 yr ago by BearlyClad
hanky1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
1. Nathan Elliott
2. Ross Bowers
3. Chase Garbers
4. Brandon McIIWain


Please vote
SoFlaBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Garbers but I wouldn't draw any long term conclusions from today.
BerlinerBaer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'd actually rank it as you have it, hanky, unfortunately...
MTBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I think the better question is, who do you go with for development. I don't have an answer - yet.
oasisbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So I guess Ross Bowers was not the starting QB by much coming out of camp??

I was stunned by the offensive play calling and game plan!
BearSD
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Garbers could have seized the starting job for good today, but didn't. It's still open.

He'll probably get another chance against BYU, though.
Yogi Is King
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BerlinerBaer said:

I'd actually rank it as you have it, hanky, unfortunately...
The guy threw four picks, all of which were his fault.
operbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
1 Garbers
2 McIlwain
3. Elliot






Last. Bowers
Nasal Mucus Goldenbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bowers w/ <50 combined yds for the game, 47.1% completion, 0 TDs.

I'm predicting he'll no longer be starter by the start of conference play.
FloriDreaming
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Garbers by default. Bowers is not a good QB but Cal's QB problems fall on Baldwin and Wilcox.

Check that. The entire offense was poor all game. For crying out loud, you hand the ball off almost every play to one and only one RB and that guy didn't even get 100 yards rushing. And it's not like the defense didn't give the offense plenty of drives to work with. Even Wazzou can get more out of their running game than this.

So basically this vaunted OL can't pass protect or run block, the QBs can't throw and the receivers can't catch. What else is there to say about this offense? Nice uniforms, way to keep them clean?
Rushinbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Uthaithani said:

Garbers by default. Bowers is not a good QB but Cal's QB problems fall on Baldwin and Wilcox.

Check that. The entire offense was poor all game. For crying out loud, you hand the ball off almost every play to one and only one RB and that guy didn't even get 100 yards rushing. And it's not like the defense didn't give the offense plenty of drives to work with. Even Wazzou can get more out of their running game than this.

So basically this vaunted OL can't pass protect or run block, the QBs can't throw and the receivers can't catch. What else is there to say about this offense? Nice uniforms, way to keep them clean?
UNC lines were strong. Let's see how our lines do in the next couple of games.

Bowers may start next week, but should be replaced by Garber after 2 series. I don't think we have a qb on the roster...not a Pac 12 one, anyway. Maybe Garber can develop - a little stronger all around.
okaydo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Garb Chasers
PtownBear1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Not sure it matters who's under center when the playcalling is so predictable.
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Elliot was the worst qb. He threw 4 picks. For all the criticism of Cal qbs they made 32 throws with no interceptions.

Garber showed something in the 2nd half but he only made 1 completion downfield and that catch was all big Moe Ways. Whoever the coaches like between Bowers and Garbers they should just roll with him. No more rotating.
ducky23
How long do you want to ignore this user?
hanky1 said:

1. Nathan Elliott
2. Ross Bowers
3. Chase Garbers
4. Brandon McIIWain


Please vote



Cmon man

That's just pure trolling

When you throw 4 picks, you're automatically last

Garbers or Bowers probably could have been more aggressive and forced throws too
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ducky23 said:

hanky1 said:

1. Nathan Elliott
2. Ross Bowers
3. Chase Garbers
4. Brandon McIIWain


Please vote



Cmon man

That's just pure trolling

When you throw 4 picks, you're automatically last

Garbers or Bowers probably could have been more aggressive and forced throws too


Plus, let's be honest: a couple of TD drives after the game is pretty much lost isn't that much to crow about. I guess if he's your fantasy QB that would make you happier.
OdontoBear66
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Certainly not Baldwin. None great, but Garbers ability to run opened up the offense. Bowers statued in the pocket or handed off.
hanky1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I listed them in order of appearance, not how I would personally rank them.
oskidunker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
None are great. Thats why all three played. Bowers looks worse than last year although tigh end drops did not help him.
Bring back It’s It’s to Haas Pavillion!
OdontoBear66
How long do you want to ignore this user?
And do remember who has had all the snaps, all the experience when comparing. One game does not a season make but this is Bwers#13 I think
PtownBear1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
OdontoBear66 said:

And do remember who has had all the snaps, all the experience when comparing. One game does not a season make but this is Bwers#13 I think


Speaking of snaps, there were a lot of low ones today. Surprised none got away from the QBs
calgo430
How long do you want to ignore this user?
1. mcilwain
2. mcilwain
3.mcilwain
.
82gradDLSdad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Something is up. Bowers started last year. He supposedly clearly retained the starting job this year. And then he gets pulled halfway through the 1st quarter of the 1st game and hardly plays again???? I thought he might be hurt but no mention of that. You just don't treat your starting QB like that unless he barely won the job or the OC doesn't really care for him as the starter.
oskidunker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Also very dissapointibg Starkey didnt ask the coach what was goingbon after discussing it with Pawlaski all day long. very strange.
Golden One
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Uthaithani said:

Garbers by default. Bowers is not a good QB but Cal's QB problems fall on Baldwin and Wilcox.

Check that. The entire offense was poor all game. For crying out loud, you hand the ball off almost every play to one and only one RB and that guy didn't even get 100 yards rushing. And it's not like the defense didn't give the offense plenty of drives to work with. Even Wazzou can get more out of their running game than this.

So basically this vaunted OL can't pass protect or run block, the QBs can't throw and the receivers can't catch. What else is there to say about this offense? Nice uniforms, way to keep them clean?
Our OL absolutely sucked today. Both the run blocking and pass blocking were horrific. If this is as good as it gets, we're in for a long season.
MB Cal Golf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Garbers can run ... but his accuracy down field ... did he hit any receivers past 5 yards? While Bowers struggled he did convert a few longer throws. If Garbers is the answer he must convert down the field otherwise there will be 9 in the box when he is on the field.
BerlinerBaer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Yogi Bear said:

BerlinerBaer said:

I'd actually rank it as you have it, hanky, unfortunately...
The guy threw four picks, all of which were his fault.
I was half joking.

To answer seriously, I think it's a three-way tie between our guys. You have to give Bowers the tiebreaker based on experience, although I see the most upside with McIlwain. He'd look a lot like the QBs Beau had up at EWU if he can develop.
hanky1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
WRs are never open. Baldwin needs to find more innovative ways to get his WRs open. Look at the LA Rams. Their receivers stink but they're always open cuz their coach knows how to scheme them open.
Yogi Is King
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BerlinerBaer said:

Yogi Bear said:

BerlinerBaer said:

I'd actually rank it as you have it, hanky, unfortunately...
The guy threw four picks, all of which were his fault.
I was half joking.

To answer seriously, I think it's a three-way tie between our guys. You have to give Bowers the tiebreaker based on experience, although I see the most upside with McIlwain. He'd look a lot like the QBs Beau had up at EWU if he can develop.
They hardly let him pass the ball though.
doorknobs
How long do you want to ignore this user?
McIlwain only threw a few passes - can definitely run. He looked small out there and at least one of his balls got batted down at the line.not sure he's our long term solution. Surprised the coaches bailed on Bowers so quick.
ducky23
How long do you want to ignore this user?
doorknobs said:

Surprised the coaches bailed on Bowers so quick.


If it were tedford [insert clever remark here]
Shoreline
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Demetrius Robertson leaving becomes a lot more clearer.
killa22
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Incredibly vanilla game plan, especially the pass game.

Disparate concepts and formations groupings didn't seem like it all jived together.

Reminded me of the Weber state game last year.

Lack of explosive plays largely due to QB play and OL execution imo.

Saw a lot of 2 man and Man free that we couldn't crack.
Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We coulda gone 5-6-7 deep before we found anybody as lame as Elliott.
StillNoStanfurdium
How long do you want to ignore this user?
hanky1 said:

WRs are never open. Baldwin needs to find more innovative ways to get his WRs open. Look at the LA Rams. Their receivers stink but they're always open cuz their coach knows how to scheme them open.
Woods and Kupp are no slouches. It's not like Kupp only broke out in the NFL. He has the most receiving yards and touchdowns in FCS history under the eye of...Beau Baldwin and Nicholas Edwards.
Page 1 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.