Either based on post count (10?) or maybe account age?

This is getting ridiculous.

We could just include a captcha. That should take care of things.

packawana said:

---

We could just include a captcha. That should take care of things.

---

I didn't realize we didn't have a captcha...

We should.

LunchTime said:

---

Either based on post count (10?) or maybe account age?

This is getting ridiculous.

---

Read this thread...

https://bearinsider.com/forums/6/topics/84644

LunchTime said:

---

Either based on post count (10?) or maybe account age?

This is getting ridiculous.

---

It would be way more effective to require a minimum IQ level...

Try to be a little more open-minded. I tried those black magic spells from Mississippi and they were totally legit. Those folks down there know their spells.

okaydo said:

---

LunchTime said:

---

Either based on post count (10?) or maybe account age?

This is getting ridiculous.

---

Read this thread...

https://bearinsider.com/forums/6/topics/84644

---

My industry is full of low cost thrid world labor based fraud.

I think not allowing new users to post new threads is the best answer. There are ways around it, but it's harder.

Who cares. I prefer taking it all in vs Fahrenheit 451 or Orwellian 1984 approach.

LunchTime said:

---

okaydo said:

---

LunchTime said:

---

Either based on post count (10?) or maybe account age?

This is getting ridiculous.

---

Read this thread...

https://bearinsider.com/forums/6/topics/84644

---

My industry is full of low cost thrid world labor based fraud.

I think not allowing new users to post new threads is the best answer. There are ways around it, but it's harder.

---

so I suppose "new" users don't have the collective wisdom of some of the vets here? Oh boy.

cal83dls79 said:

---

LunchTime said:

---

okaydo said:

---

LunchTime said:

---

Either based on post count (10?) or maybe account age?

This is getting ridiculous.

---

Read this thread...

https://bearinsider.com/forums/6/topics/84644

---

My industry is full of low cost thrid world labor based fraud.

I think not allowing new users to post new threads is the best answer. There are ways around it, but it's harder.

---

so I suppose "new" users don't have the collective wisdom of some of the vets here? Oh boy.

---

I didn't say prevent them from posting.

I said make them show they are part of the community before they can start a new thread (or 30 in a few minutes). Perhaps you missed when the first two pages of this forum were all spam topics?

Go to 4chan if you want no moderation. We already require handles and registration. Most forums don't allow new users unlimited access. And to compare moderation to 451 is asinine. You should know better. I am talking about paid spam.

You are right. My comment was asinine. Would help if I read the whole deal. I was skimming. This is literally the only forum I participate in...sorta. It's enough of a time suck as it is. Thanks for the correction Lunch.

TheSouseFamily said:

---

Try to be a little more open-minded. I tried those black magic spells from Mississippi and they were totally legit. Those folks down there know their spells.

---

Who uses non-Louisiana spells? FAKE HOODOOS

LunchTime said:

---

Either based on post count (10?) or maybe account age?

This is getting ridiculous.

---

Are you excepting wise old stalwarts who were making a case for TH into year 5, people who don't proofread (seemingly ever) and those who can't get their point across in less than 11 tight paragraphs?

I suggest you cast a wider net.

Fyght4Cal said:

---

TheSouseFamily said:

---

Try to be a little more open-minded. I tried those black magic spells from Mississippi and they were totally legit. Those folks down there know their spells.

---

Who uses non-Louisiana spells? FAKE HOODOOS

---

Fair enough. Louisiana is absolutely first rate and world class when it comes to black magic spells. But those babies ain't cheap. I find the Mississippi spells are just as good for the most part, but for half the cost.