concordtom said:
calbears4ever said:
Maybe you are saying that from a football and MBB standpoint, which is true. On the other hand, recruits for sports like swimming, soccer, water polo, track and field, volleyball, and gymnastics have never overlooked Cal. It is clear that Cal values Olympic sports more than football and basketball (and indoor VB is in the top 3 in revenue for all Olympic sports, if I'm not mistaken)
Or, maybe Cal simply doesn't pay players and their families money or other things of value under the table.
There are four advantages to non-revenue sports at Cal.
1. We have major donors that specifically donate to nonrevenue sports. I don't think it is a coincidence that one of our biggest donors values swimming and one of our most successful programs is swimming. We certainly are not successful at all non-revenue sports
2. A lot fewer schools care about non-revenue sports and none of them care as much as like 50 schools care about football. Frankly, a lot of schools operate revenue sports at a significant loss either out of emotion or out of a pipe dream that they will make a ton of money one day. Which is not to say that Cal doesn't generally fare well among the schools that care about specific non-revenue sports.
3. Offering preferred admissions to an elite academic institution is a huge draw to non-revenue sports athletes and virtually zero draw to revenue sports athletes.
4. The faculty is not nearly as hostile to non-revenue sports both out of their own bias and due to the fact that academic concessions to non-revenue sports are much more subtle than they are for revenue sports (though they are definitely there) and also, yes, the million dollar salaries for the coaches grates.