Lars, Joel, and Grant

2,916 Views | 25 Replies | Last: 2 yr ago by RedlessWardrobe
RedlessWardrobe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Got to see my first game this season in person last night. 3 takeaways.

FWIW Lars really has improved since his freshman year. He will never be anything really significant but the improvement is obvious. I was one of the the doubters, SFCity said he would get better and he was right. I eat my words. In this third season, now when Lars comes in I feel the team can use minutes from him, as opposed to his freshman year when I wondered if we could survive until he came back out. Better coordination, coupled with a better understanding of the game, more focused aggresiveness, and least at times can be an asset on defense. Hope he continues to progress.

I read the game thread. As usual someone took a shot at Joel. I don't think its appropriate. I know he has deficiencies but he also has significant strengths. He's our point guard, it is what is. His defense is excellent and he brings 100% effort every night. As far as this team goes, we are better when he's in the game.

Finally, I know our opponents scout us before playing, but watching the offense up close, and how often we set ball screens, seems to my simplistic mind that we don't utilize Grant on the "pick and pop" as much as we should. Last night I kept looking for it specifcally but it almost didn't materialize the entire game. At the very least we need to try it a few times. Again, I know the defense is looking for it but that shouldn't mean we just shut it down.
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
….walked into a bar…..

Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
SFCityBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Thanks for the mention. I don't like to make predictions, because I'm usually wrong when I make them, and I honestly don't remember predicting improvement for Lars. I defended him, because he was taking so many shots on the Bear Insider. My point was that I've seen enough basketball to know that some big men take a longer time to develop and blossom. For most big men, they don't start showing signs until the junior year or even the senior year. A couple of recent Cal players come to mind, Richard Solomon and Robert Thurman. Consider how athletic Solomon was when he arrived at Cal. But he was physically and emotionally immature and took some time to just grow up. And he envisioned himself as a stretch 4, who would rather hang out on the perimeter and shoot 3's than mix it up with other big bodies in the paint. Montgomery finally convinced him he could be a dominant center in the paint. nngHe showed signs of emerging in his junior year, and became a dominant center in the conference. Thurman also became a strong center for Cal by his final year. While I am really pleased by Lars' improvement this year, I am now really looking forward to seeing him give Cal good minutes this year, and I think we all might be really pleased with how he does next year.

As for Brown, I agree that he has to play, mostly for his defense, which is excellent, but also as a point guard on offense, mainly because we don't have anyone else capable of playing the position (unless Roberson, who we haven't seen yet, can play PG). Hyder gives us very little that I can see so far, and Shepherd is needed at the two guard, where we have no one else who could play there except maybe Celestine, but he does not seem ready to contribute 30 minutes and score a lot of points. What I can't stand is Brown's forays into the lane, which mostly result in getting tied up, a turnover, and when he does get a shot off, it is often wild with little chance of scoring. Defenses don't bother fouling him, because he is not likely to score anyway. If he must shoot, I would much rather see him shoot threes than drive the lane, because it has a better chance of the ball going in the basket. I wish he would concentrate on starting plays, passing, and making assists. He had 7 in each of 2 games so far, so he is capable of doing it.

As for the pick and pop, we don't have many successful plays in the playbook so far. But the season is still young, and we are improving a little. I've been saying for 2 years now that Grant needs to learn how to finish at the rim, and needs to drive to the basket much more often. That will open up his perimeter game. And Fox has been around long enough to know a lot of plays, so it is up to the coaches to teach these plays, and up to the players to run them. Once Fox settles on a rotation, then things should improve in that regard.

I know no one will agree with this, but I'd like to see Klonaras get a few more minutes. He is very scrappy, and seems to always know where the loose balls will be and he aggressively goes after them and gets them.
Finally, I was pretty high on Alajiki, and I am wondering why he is not playing much, and doesn't seem to be playing as hard as he was, when he does get in there.

SFCityBear
4thGenCal
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SFCityBear said:

Thanks for the mention. I don't like to make predictions, because I'm usually wrong when I make them, and I honestly don't remember predicting improvement for Lars. I defended him, because he was taking so many shots on the Bear Insider. My point was that I've seen enough basketball to know that some big men take a longer time to develop and blossom. For most big men, they don't start showing signs until the junior year or even the senior year. A couple of recent Cal players come to mind, Richard Solomon and Robert Thurman. Consider how athletic Solomon was when he arrived at Cal. But he was physically and emotionally immature and took some time to just grow up. And he envisioned himself as a stretch 4, who would rather hang out on the perimeter and shoot 3's than mix it up with other big bodies in the paint. Montgomery finally convinced him he could be a dominant center in the paint. nngHe showed signs of emerging in his junior year, and became a dominant center in the conference. Thurman also became a strong center for Cal by his final year. While I am really pleased by Lars' improvement this year, I am now really looking forward to seeing him give Cal good minutes this year, and I think we all might be really pleased with how he does next year.

As for Brown, I agree that he has to play, mostly for his defense, which is excellent, but also as a point guard on offense, mainly because we don't have anyone else capable of playing the position (unless Roberson, who we haven't seen yet, can play PG). Hyder gives us very little that I can see so far, and Shepherd is needed at the two guard, where we have no one else who could play there except maybe Celestine, but he does not seem ready to contribute 30 minutes and score a lot of points. What I can't stand is Brown's forays into the lane, which mostly result in getting tied up, a turnover, and when he does get a shot off, it is often wild with little chance of scoring. Defenses don't bother fouling him, because he is not likely to score anyway. If he must shoot, I would much rather see him shoot threes than drive the lane, because it has a better chance of the ball going in the basket. I wish he would concentrate on starting plays, passing, and making assists. He had 7 in each of 2 games so far, so he is capable of doing it.

As for the pick and pop, we don't have many successful plays in the playbook so far. But the season is still young, and we are improving a little. I've been saying for 2 years now that Grant needs to learn how to finish at the rim, and needs to drive to the basket much more often. That will open up his perimeter game. And Fox has been around long enough to know a lot of plays, so it is up to the coaches to teach these plays, and up to the players to run them. Once Fox settles on a rotation, then things should improve in that regard.

I know no one will agree with this, but I'd like to see Klonaras get a few more minutes. He is very scrappy, and seems to always know where the loose balls will be and he aggressively goes after them and gets them.
Finally, I was pretty high on Alajiki, and I am wondering why he is not playing much, and doesn't seem to be playing as hard as he was, when he does get in there.


Different views and the dialogue is good and respectful. Lars is better, but marginally and it was clear he could not stop/slow down the Fresno post player - like his effort and willingness to be physical, still needs to react quicker/anticipate passes coming to him (too often slow reactions and the ball is fumbled). Joel Brown is definitely one of the top 3 most important players on the team - his +- thus far is very good and other than one poor game, has been overall very effective. Teams can't press him/team when he gets the ball after a made basket. his defense and effort level is Jorge G like and he can hit the open 3 decently. No debate that he does over penetrate going to the rim and while sometimes successful (not last night) he does get blocked too many times. Desperately needs to develop a floater - which even if missed gives the Bigs a put back opportunity. Regarding Klonaras - not a competitive option. Slow footed, lacking athleticism to create a shot and a poor defender. Staff unfortunately made a recruiting mistake for this level of conference/competition. Btw a solid young man/academically minded - but only on the roster because the conference rules protect scholarship players and He wants to get his Cal degree (good for him)
puget sound cal fan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Grant plays like a 6'3" shooting guard rather than a 6"8" PF.
89Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
4thGenCal said:

SFCityBear said:

Thanks for the mention. I don't like to make predictions, because I'm usually wrong when I make them, and I honestly don't remember predicting improvement for Lars. I defended him, because he was taking so many shots on the Bear Insider. My point was that I've seen enough basketball to know that some big men take a longer time to develop and blossom. For most big men, they don't start showing signs until the junior year or even the senior year. A couple of recent Cal players come to mind, Richard Solomon and Robert Thurman. Consider how athletic Solomon was when he arrived at Cal. But he was physically and emotionally immature and took some time to just grow up. And he envisioned himself as a stretch 4, who would rather hang out on the perimeter and shoot 3's than mix it up with other big bodies in the paint. Montgomery finally convinced him he could be a dominant center in the paint. nngHe showed signs of emerging in his junior year, and became a dominant center in the conference. Thurman also became a strong center for Cal by his final year. While I am really pleased by Lars' improvement this year, I am now really looking forward to seeing him give Cal good minutes this year, and I think we all might be really pleased with how he does next year.

As for Brown, I agree that he has to play, mostly for his defense, which is excellent, but also as a point guard on offense, mainly because we don't have anyone else capable of playing the position (unless Roberson, who we haven't seen yet, can play PG). Hyder gives us very little that I can see so far, and Shepherd is needed at the two guard, where we have no one else who could play there except maybe Celestine, but he does not seem ready to contribute 30 minutes and score a lot of points. What I can't stand is Brown's forays into the lane, which mostly result in getting tied up, a turnover, and when he does get a shot off, it is often wild with little chance of scoring. Defenses don't bother fouling him, because he is not likely to score anyway. If he must shoot, I would much rather see him shoot threes than drive the lane, because it has a better chance of the ball going in the basket. I wish he would concentrate on starting plays, passing, and making assists. He had 7 in each of 2 games so far, so he is capable of doing it.

As for the pick and pop, we don't have many successful plays in the playbook so far. But the season is still young, and we are improving a little. I've been saying for 2 years now that Grant needs to learn how to finish at the rim, and needs to drive to the basket much more often. That will open up his perimeter game. And Fox has been around long enough to know a lot of plays, so it is up to the coaches to teach these plays, and up to the players to run them. Once Fox settles on a rotation, then things should improve in that regard.

I know no one will agree with this, but I'd like to see Klonaras get a few more minutes. He is very scrappy, and seems to always know where the loose balls will be and he aggressively goes after them and gets them.
Finally, I was pretty high on Alajiki, and I am wondering why he is not playing much, and doesn't seem to be playing as hard as he was, when he does get in there.


Different views and the dialogue is good and respectful. Lars is better, but marginally and it was clear he could not stop/slow down the Fresno post player - like his effort and willingness to be physical, still needs to react quicker/anticipate passes coming to him (too often slow reactions and the ball is fumbled). Joel Brown is definitely one of the top 3 most important players on the team - his +- thus far is very good and other than one poor game, has been overall very effective. Teams can't press him/team when he gets the ball after a made basket. his defense and effort level is Jorge G like and he can hit the open 3 decently. No debate that he does over penetrate going to the rim and while sometimes successful (not last night) he does get blocked too many times. Desperately needs to develop a floater - which even if missed gives the Bigs a put back opportunity. Regarding Klonaras - not a competitive option. Slow footed, lacking athleticism to create a shot and a poor defender. Staff unfortunately made a recruiting mistake for this level of conference/competition. Btw a solid young man/academically minded - but only on the roster because the conference rules protect scholarship players and He wants to get his Cal degree (good for him)
I really think Celestine is gonna be a player!! I like what I see from him.
What are you thinking this year will be like for him?
4thGenCal
How long do you want to ignore this user?
89Bear said:

4thGenCal said:

SFCityBear said:

Thanks for the mention. I don't like to make predictions, because I'm usually wrong when I make them, and I honestly don't remember predicting improvement for Lars. I defended him, because he was taking so many shots on the Bear Insider. My point was that I've seen enough basketball to know that some big men take a longer time to develop and blossom. For most big men, they don't start showing signs until the junior year or even the senior year. A couple of recent Cal players come to mind, Richard Solomon and Robert Thurman. Consider how athletic Solomon was when he arrived at Cal. But he was physically and emotionally immature and took some time to just grow up. And he envisioned himself as a stretch 4, who would rather hang out on the perimeter and shoot 3's than mix it up with other big bodies in the paint. Montgomery finally convinced him he could be a dominant center in the paint. nngHe showed signs of emerging in his junior year, and became a dominant center in the conference. Thurman also became a strong center for Cal by his final year. While I am really pleased by Lars' improvement this year, I am now really looking forward to seeing him give Cal good minutes this year, and I think we all might be really pleased with how he does next year.

As for Brown, I agree that he has to play, mostly for his defense, which is excellent, but also as a point guard on offense, mainly because we don't have anyone else capable of playing the position (unless Roberson, who we haven't seen yet, can play PG). Hyder gives us very little that I can see so far, and Shepherd is needed at the two guard, where we have no one else who could play there except maybe Celestine, but he does not seem ready to contribute 30 minutes and score a lot of points. What I can't stand is Brown's forays into the lane, which mostly result in getting tied up, a turnover, and when he does get a shot off, it is often wild with little chance of scoring. Defenses don't bother fouling him, because he is not likely to score anyway. If he must shoot, I would much rather see him shoot threes than drive the lane, because it has a better chance of the ball going in the basket. I wish he would concentrate on starting plays, passing, and making assists. He had 7 in each of 2 games so far, so he is capable of doing it.

As for the pick and pop, we don't have many successful plays in the playbook so far. But the season is still young, and we are improving a little. I've been saying for 2 years now that Grant needs to learn how to finish at the rim, and needs to drive to the basket much more often. That will open up his perimeter game. And Fox has been around long enough to know a lot of plays, so it is up to the coaches to teach these plays, and up to the players to run them. Once Fox settles on a rotation, then things should improve in that regard.

I know no one will agree with this, but I'd like to see Klonaras get a few more minutes. He is very scrappy, and seems to always know where the loose balls will be and he aggressively goes after them and gets them.
Finally, I was pretty high on Alajiki, and I am wondering why he is not playing much, and doesn't seem to be playing as hard as he was, when he does get in there.


Different views and the dialogue is good and respectful. Lars is better, but marginally and it was clear he could not stop/slow down the Fresno post player - like his effort and willingness to be physical, still needs to react quicker/anticipate passes coming to him (too often slow reactions and the ball is fumbled). Joel Brown is definitely one of the top 3 most important players on the team - his +- thus far is very good and other than one poor game, has been overall very effective. Teams can't press him/team when he gets the ball after a made basket. his defense and effort level is Jorge G like and he can hit the open 3 decently. No debate that he does over penetrate going to the rim and while sometimes successful (not last night) he does get blocked too many times. Desperately needs to develop a floater - which even if missed gives the Bigs a put back opportunity. Regarding Klonaras - not a competitive option. Slow footed, lacking athleticism to create a shot and a poor defender. Staff unfortunately made a recruiting mistake for this level of conference/competition. Btw a solid young man/academically minded - but only on the roster because the conference rules protect scholarship players and He wants to get his Cal degree (good for him)
I really think Celestine is gonna be a player!! I like what I see from him.
What are you thinking this year will be like for him?
Totally agree - Matt Bradley called him "his guy" and thought he was going to really shine (as does Paris Austin) issue is that he has had a prior dislocated knee cap and then had surgery on his fractured tibila with a rod inserted (not too different than Paul George surgery). He is getting healthier and more assertive, still has periods of soreness. Great young man - respectful and good Cal representative. Likely next season he will shine - especially since Grant/Shepard and maybe Kelly will be gone.
SFCityBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
4thGenCal said:

SFCityBear said:

Thanks for the mention. I don't like to make predictions, because I'm usually wrong when I make them, and I honestly don't remember predicting improvement for Lars. I defended him, because he was taking so many shots on the Bear Insider. My point was that I've seen enough basketball to know that some big men take a longer time to develop and blossom. For most big men, they don't start showing signs until the junior year or even the senior year. A couple of recent Cal players come to mind, Richard Solomon and Robert Thurman. Consider how athletic Solomon was when he arrived at Cal. But he was physically and emotionally immature and took some time to just grow up. And he envisioned himself as a stretch 4, who would rather hang out on the perimeter and shoot 3's than mix it up with other big bodies in the paint. Montgomery finally convinced him he could be a dominant center in the paint. nngHe showed signs of emerging in his junior year, and became a dominant center in the conference. Thurman also became a strong center for Cal by his final year. While I am really pleased by Lars' improvement this year, I am now really looking forward to seeing him give Cal good minutes this year, and I think we all might be really pleased with how he does next year.

As for Brown, I agree that he has to play, mostly for his defense, which is excellent, but also as a point guard on offense, mainly because we don't have anyone else capable of playing the position (unless Roberson, who we haven't seen yet, can play PG). Hyder gives us very little that I can see so far, and Shepherd is needed at the two guard, where we have no one else who could play there except maybe Celestine, but he does not seem ready to contribute 30 minutes and score a lot of points. What I can't stand is Brown's forays into the lane, which mostly result in getting tied up, a turnover, and when he does get a shot off, it is often wild with little chance of scoring. Defenses don't bother fouling him, because he is not likely to score anyway. If he must shoot, I would much rather see him shoot threes than drive the lane, because it has a better chance of the ball going in the basket. I wish he would concentrate on starting plays, passing, and making assists. He had 7 in each of 2 games so far, so he is capable of doing it.

As for the pick and pop, we don't have many successful plays in the playbook so far. But the season is still young, and we are improving a little. I've been saying for 2 years now that Grant needs to learn how to finish at the rim, and needs to drive to the basket much more often. That will open up his perimeter game. And Fox has been around long enough to know a lot of plays, so it is up to the coaches to teach these plays, and up to the players to run them. Once Fox settles on a rotation, then things should improve in that regard.

I know no one will agree with this, but I'd like to see Klonaras get a few more minutes. He is very scrappy, and seems to always know where the loose balls will be and he aggressively goes after them and gets them.
Finally, I was pretty high on Alajiki, and I am wondering why he is not playing much, and doesn't seem to be playing as hard as he was, when he does get in there.


Different views and the dialogue is good and respectful. Lars is better, but marginally and it was clear he could not stop/slow down the Fresno post player - like his effort and willingness to be physical, still needs to react quicker/anticipate passes coming to him (too often slow reactions and the ball is fumbled). Joel Brown is definitely one of the top 3 most important players on the team - his +- thus far is very good and other than one poor game, has been overall very effective. Teams can't press him/team when he gets the ball after a made basket. his defense and effort level is Jorge G like and he can hit the open 3 decently. No debate that he does over penetrate going to the rim and while sometimes successful (not last night) he does get blocked too many times. Desperately needs to develop a floater - which even if missed gives the Bigs a put back opportunity. Regarding Klonaras - not a competitive option. Slow footed, lacking athleticism to create a shot and a poor defender. Staff unfortunately made a recruiting mistake for this level of conference/competition. Btw a solid young man/academically minded - but only on the roster because the conference rules protect scholarship players and He wants to get his Cal degree (good for him)
As to Lars, it was one of his weaker games. Still he was up against a very good player, Robinson, who can make threes, and that stretches the floor for the defense, whether it is Kelly or Lars playing center. I looked at the play-by-play, and during the time when Lars and Robinson faced each other, Robinson was 1-4 from the floor, scored only 6 points, three of them from the free throw line. He got only one rebound, while Lars got 4. Robinson did get 2 assists, a steal, and a block. Lars had 2 fouls, while Robinson had none. It appeared to me that he was handling Robinson fairly well, but was helped by a spectacular block by Kuany on a dunk attempt. Robinson got 19 points against Kelly and whoever else might have been guarding him.

I agree on Brown being one of the most important, but so far I think there are 4 of them in the mix: Kelly, Brown, Anticevich, and Shepherd. Shepherd looks like he knows what to do, but he is streaky. Either he is hot that night or not. And I am hoping that Celestine gets over his physical problems, because it seems to be limiting his minutes, and I fully expected him to be a starter or major contributor this year. He has all the tools. One thing that concerns me is that Fox seems to be riding him hard, which I haven't seen but others have told me they have seen it a couple times in games and at practice. One thing about getting on a player is that the coach has to follow that by continuing to show confidence in the player, like after scolding him, putting him right back in the game, for example. If you ride a player too much or too hard, they might opt to play elsewhere, and I would hate to lose a player like him.
SFCityBear
SFCityBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
puget sound cal fan said:

Grant plays like a 6'3" shooting guard rather than a 6"8" PF.
I agree, but I don't think it is all his decision. He is the most experienced and maybe the best 3-point shooter on this team, so far, and every team needs to have some perimeter shooting. Shepherd may be inconsistent. Celestine looks good shooting threes, but he takes very few of them. Maybe we get some from Alajiki. Maybe Brown can make one or two a game. But Grant looks like the best option so far. Trouble is, if he doesn't drive, defenses will play him tight on the perimeter. But then you knew that already.
SFCityBear
4thGenCal
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SFCityBear said:

4thGenCal said:

SFCityBear said:

Thanks for the mention. I don't like to make predictions, because I'm usually wrong when I make them, and I honestly don't remember predicting improvement for Lars. I defended him, because he was taking so many shots on the Bear Insider. My point was that I've seen enough basketball to know that some big men take a longer time to develop and blossom. For most big men, they don't start showing signs until the junior year or even the senior year. A couple of recent Cal players come to mind, Richard Solomon and Robert Thurman. Consider how athletic Solomon was when he arrived at Cal. But he was physically and emotionally immature and took some time to just grow up. And he envisioned himself as a stretch 4, who would rather hang out on the perimeter and shoot 3's than mix it up with other big bodies in the paint. Montgomery finally convinced him he could be a dominant center in the paint. nngHe showed signs of emerging in his junior year, and became a dominant center in the conference. Thurman also became a strong center for Cal by his final year. While I am really pleased by Lars' improvement this year, I am now really looking forward to seeing him give Cal good minutes this year, and I think we all might be really pleased with how he does next year.

As for Brown, I agree that he has to play, mostly for his defense, which is excellent, but also as a point guard on offense, mainly because we don't have anyone else capable of playing the position (unless Roberson, who we haven't seen yet, can play PG). Hyder gives us very little that I can see so far, and Shepherd is needed at the two guard, where we have no one else who could play there except maybe Celestine, but he does not seem ready to contribute 30 minutes and score a lot of points. What I can't stand is Brown's forays into the lane, which mostly result in getting tied up, a turnover, and when he does get a shot off, it is often wild with little chance of scoring. Defenses don't bother fouling him, because he is not likely to score anyway. If he must shoot, I would much rather see him shoot threes than drive the lane, because it has a better chance of the ball going in the basket. I wish he would concentrate on starting plays, passing, and making assists. He had 7 in each of 2 games so far, so he is capable of doing it.

As for the pick and pop, we don't have many successful plays in the playbook so far. But the season is still young, and we are improving a little. I've been saying for 2 years now that Grant needs to learn how to finish at the rim, and needs to drive to the basket much more often. That will open up his perimeter game. And Fox has been around long enough to know a lot of plays, so it is up to the coaches to teach these plays, and up to the players to run them. Once Fox settles on a rotation, then things should improve in that regard.

I know no one will agree with this, but I'd like to see Klonaras get a few more minutes. He is very scrappy, and seems to always know where the loose balls will be and he aggressively goes after them and gets them.
Finally, I was pretty high on Alajiki, and I am wondering why he is not playing much, and doesn't seem to be playing as hard as he was, when he does get in there.


Different views and the dialogue is good and respectful. Lars is better, but marginally and it was clear he could not stop/slow down the Fresno post player - like his effort and willingness to be physical, still needs to react quicker/anticipate passes coming to him (too often slow reactions and the ball is fumbled). Joel Brown is definitely one of the top 3 most important players on the team - his +- thus far is very good and other than one poor game, has been overall very effective. Teams can't press him/team when he gets the ball after a made basket. his defense and effort level is Jorge G like and he can hit the open 3 decently. No debate that he does over penetrate going to the rim and while sometimes successful (not last night) he does get blocked too many times. Desperately needs to develop a floater - which even if missed gives the Bigs a put back opportunity. Regarding Klonaras - not a competitive option. Slow footed, lacking athleticism to create a shot and a poor defender. Staff unfortunately made a recruiting mistake for this level of conference/competition. Btw a solid young man/academically minded - but only on the roster because the conference rules protect scholarship players and He wants to get his Cal degree (good for him)
As to Lars, it was one of his weaker games. Still he was up against a very good player, Robinson, who can make threes, and that stretches the floor for the defense, whether it is Kelly or Lars playing center. I looked at the play-by-play, and during the time when Lars and Robinson faced each other, Robinson was 1-4 from the floor, scored only 6 points, three of them from the free throw line. He got only one rebound, while Lars got 4. Robinson did get 2 assists, a steal, and a block. Lars had 2 fouls, while Robinson had none. It appeared to me that he was handling Robinson fairly well, but was helped by a spectacular block by Kuany on a dunk attempt. Robinson got 19 points against Kelly and whoever else might have been guarding him.

I agree on Brown being one of the most important, but so far I think there are 4 of them in the mix: Kelly, Brown, Anticevich, and Shepherd. Shepherd looks like he knows what to do, but he is streaky. Either he is hot that night or not. And I am hoping that Celestine gets over his physical problems, because it seems to be limiting his minutes, and I fully expected him to be a starter or major contributor this year. He has all the tools. One thing that concerns me is that Fox seems to be riding him hard, which I haven't seen but others have told me they have seen it a couple times in games and at practice. One thing about getting on a player is that the coach has to follow that by continuing to show confidence in the player, like after scolding him, putting him right back in the game, for example. If you ride a player too much or too hard, they might opt to play elsewhere, and I would hate to lose a player like him.
Observant on Coach Fox riding Jalen a bit more than I like to see - but the reason is that coach believes that Jalen needs to play thru his soreness and not succumb mentally. He sees the talent and needs him to be more aggressive and assertive with and without the ball. Spot on comments on the main 4 players. Regarding Lars, while slightly more confident, he is still extremely slow on reacting to catching passes, anticipating loose balls/and simply being instinctive on shot openings (brief as they are). Nice to a fault, not a mean streak in him and has slow footwork. Net result is a serviceable back up for 8-10 minutes a game, but much more, otherwise the weaknesses are illuminated.
HoopDreams
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Regarding Lars, I've said from the start that he had potential to be a solid defender and rebounder once he strengthened his lower body and got more experience.

I am seeing that improvement defensively and rebounding now, and expect him to be better next year in these areas

For a big tall center, strengthening his lower body is key to being able to move well (lower defensive stance, move his feet better, and better/faster jumper).

More experience helps everyone defensively. Knowing where to be, help defense, limiting fouls, not always leaving your feet on the pump fake (especially when you're 7 feet), different ways to defend different players, etc.

Just one example: Lars used to commit a ton of dumb fouls. Do you remember when different players would go up to him after a dumb foul and show him to keep his hands/arms straight up? He doesn't commit those types of fouls nearly as often.

His rebounding has improved also because of his strengthened base. Again, it allows him to move better and faster, jump higher, etc. He's also been able to catch the rebound more often, which I think is just from practice.


Offensively, I never had as much hope. Of course a player can improve their reaction time and ability to catch a ball. Just ask the amateur baseball players who practice catch all time. But I just think Lars will always have poor hands.

When he does have the ball, he needs to be directly next to the basket, although he does occasionally hit a hook from slightly farther out. But basically, I think he will only be a dependable scorer when he receives the ball under the right side of the basket. That is his go to move, and I just don't see him developing the footwork or left hand to significantly improve.

The other issue, is no Cal player seem to be able to get him the ball in the right spot. When we do try, we seem to stare him down, telegraph our passes, and throw it when the defense is right there. Very low probability of success. We need to either pass it to him in the flow of the offense, or go to another option

Bottom line is Lars is improving and should continue to improve on offense and rebounding, but we probably won't see a major leap from him on offense, so we should stop trying so hard to get him the ball unless it's within the flow of the offense
calumnus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
4thGenCal said:

SFCityBear said:

4thGenCal said:

SFCityBear said:

Thanks for the mention. I don't like to make predictions, because I'm usually wrong when I make them, and I honestly don't remember predicting improvement for Lars. I defended him, because he was taking so many shots on the Bear Insider. My point was that I've seen enough basketball to know that some big men take a longer time to develop and blossom. For most big men, they don't start showing signs until the junior year or even the senior year. A couple of recent Cal players come to mind, Richard Solomon and Robert Thurman. Consider how athletic Solomon was when he arrived at Cal. But he was physically and emotionally immature and took some time to just grow up. And he envisioned himself as a stretch 4, who would rather hang out on the perimeter and shoot 3's than mix it up with other big bodies in the paint. Montgomery finally convinced him he could be a dominant center in the paint. nngHe showed signs of emerging in his junior year, and became a dominant center in the conference. Thurman also became a strong center for Cal by his final year. While I am really pleased by Lars' improvement this year, I am now really looking forward to seeing him give Cal good minutes this year, and I think we all might be really pleased with how he does next year.

As for Brown, I agree that he has to play, mostly for his defense, which is excellent, but also as a point guard on offense, mainly because we don't have anyone else capable of playing the position (unless Roberson, who we haven't seen yet, can play PG). Hyder gives us very little that I can see so far, and Shepherd is needed at the two guard, where we have no one else who could play there except maybe Celestine, but he does not seem ready to contribute 30 minutes and score a lot of points. What I can't stand is Brown's forays into the lane, which mostly result in getting tied up, a turnover, and when he does get a shot off, it is often wild with little chance of scoring. Defenses don't bother fouling him, because he is not likely to score anyway. If he must shoot, I would much rather see him shoot threes than drive the lane, because it has a better chance of the ball going in the basket. I wish he would concentrate on starting plays, passing, and making assists. He had 7 in each of 2 games so far, so he is capable of doing it.

As for the pick and pop, we don't have many successful plays in the playbook so far. But the season is still young, and we are improving a little. I've been saying for 2 years now that Grant needs to learn how to finish at the rim, and needs to drive to the basket much more often. That will open up his perimeter game. And Fox has been around long enough to know a lot of plays, so it is up to the coaches to teach these plays, and up to the players to run them. Once Fox settles on a rotation, then things should improve in that regard.

I know no one will agree with this, but I'd like to see Klonaras get a few more minutes. He is very scrappy, and seems to always know where the loose balls will be and he aggressively goes after them and gets them.
Finally, I was pretty high on Alajiki, and I am wondering why he is not playing much, and doesn't seem to be playing as hard as he was, when he does get in there.


Different views and the dialogue is good and respectful. Lars is better, but marginally and it was clear he could not stop/slow down the Fresno post player - like his effort and willingness to be physical, still needs to react quicker/anticipate passes coming to him (too often slow reactions and the ball is fumbled). Joel Brown is definitely one of the top 3 most important players on the team - his +- thus far is very good and other than one poor game, has been overall very effective. Teams can't press him/team when he gets the ball after a made basket. his defense and effort level is Jorge G like and he can hit the open 3 decently. No debate that he does over penetrate going to the rim and while sometimes successful (not last night) he does get blocked too many times. Desperately needs to develop a floater - which even if missed gives the Bigs a put back opportunity. Regarding Klonaras - not a competitive option. Slow footed, lacking athleticism to create a shot and a poor defender. Staff unfortunately made a recruiting mistake for this level of conference/competition. Btw a solid young man/academically minded - but only on the roster because the conference rules protect scholarship players and He wants to get his Cal degree (good for him)
As to Lars, it was one of his weaker games. Still he was up against a very good player, Robinson, who can make threes, and that stretches the floor for the defense, whether it is Kelly or Lars playing center. I looked at the play-by-play, and during the time when Lars and Robinson faced each other, Robinson was 1-4 from the floor, scored only 6 points, three of them from the free throw line. He got only one rebound, while Lars got 4. Robinson did get 2 assists, a steal, and a block. Lars had 2 fouls, while Robinson had none. It appeared to me that he was handling Robinson fairly well, but was helped by a spectacular block by Kuany on a dunk attempt. Robinson got 19 points against Kelly and whoever else might have been guarding him.

I agree on Brown being one of the most important, but so far I think there are 4 of them in the mix: Kelly, Brown, Anticevich, and Shepherd. Shepherd looks like he knows what to do, but he is streaky. Either he is hot that night or not. And I am hoping that Celestine gets over his physical problems, because it seems to be limiting his minutes, and I fully expected him to be a starter or major contributor this year. He has all the tools. One thing that concerns me is that Fox seems to be riding him hard, which I haven't seen but others have told me they have seen it a couple times in games and at practice. One thing about getting on a player is that the coach has to follow that by continuing to show confidence in the player, like after scolding him, putting him right back in the game, for example. If you ride a player too much or too hard, they might opt to play elsewhere, and I would hate to lose a player like him.
Observant on Coach Fox riding Jalen a bit more than I like to see - but the reason is that coach believes that Jalen needs to play thru his soreness and not succumb mentally. He sees the talent and needs him to be more aggressive and assertive with and without the ball. Spot on comments on the main 4 players. Regarding Lars, while slightly more confident, he is still extremely slow on reacting to catching passes, anticipating loose balls/and simply being instinctive on shot openings (brief as they are). Nice to a fault, not a mean streak in him and has slow footwork. Net result is a serviceable back up for 8-10 minutes a game, but much more, otherwise the weaknesses are illuminated.


The guys that are in their third year with Fox: Kelly, Anticevich, Kuany and Lars have all shown significant year over year statistical improvement (except Brown, but the season is young. And Thorpe, did you say he was injured? Is that why he hasn't played?). That speaks to Fox (and his staff) as teachers of fundamentals and developers of talent. Credit to the players as well as all learning is ultimately self-learning, and they have had to do it under trying circumstances.

I've written enough about Fox's coaching style, I'm not a fan, but the improvement in the play of the 4 big men over their time at Cal is a credit to Fox and his staff.
RedlessWardrobe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
My original post was about Lars, Joel, and Grant, but yes good conversation about J Celestine. He is a very smooth player, shows a lot of basketball smarts, and can shoot the three. Also made a great fake and underneath move on Sunday. Like everyone else, I have very high expectations of his play moving forward.
KoreAmBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
puget sound cal fan said:

Grant plays like a 6'3" shooting guard rather than a 6"8" PF.
And his role right now should be as SF.

I believe the next step is for him to take the path that Theo took. Theo was basically a SG marksman his freshman season. But as the team needed him during his career, he became Cal's SF slasher and went to the rim often, even though that was not his game to start with. However, Grant is not as athletic as Theo, although not by much. I do think it would help, and it would also get him to the line.
RedlessWardrobe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
KoreAmBear said:

puget sound cal fan said:

Grant plays like a 6'3" shooting guard rather than a 6"8" PF.
And his role right now should be as SF.

I believe the next step is for him to take the path that Theo took. Theo was basically a SG marksman his freshman season. But as the team needed him during his career, he became Cal's SF slasher and went to the rim often, even though that was not his game to start with. However, Grant is not as athletic as Theo, although not by much. I do think it would help, and it would also get him to the line.
Again, I'm beating it into the ground, but at 6-8 Grant has the size to set an effective ball screen, and the shooting ability to emphasize the pick and pop. Simple as that.
SFCityBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
4thGenCal said:

Joel Brown is definitely one of the top 3 most important players on the team - his +- thus far is very good and other than one poor game, has been overall very effective. Teams can't press him/team when he gets the ball after a made basket. his defense and effort level is Jorge G like and he can hit the open 3 decently. No debate that he does over penetrate going to the rim and while sometimes successful (not last night) he does get blocked too many times. Desperately needs to develop a floater - which even if missed gives the Bigs a put back opportunity.


One thing I forgot to mention is that I fully agree with you that Brown needs to develop a floater. A little pull up jumper would also help, although if he continues to approach the basket with maximum speed, that might not be the best option. but he needs other ways to score inside. In any case, I'd be surprised if he developed a floater this season, because summer is traditionally when players try to develop new shots. There is so much going on during the season with team practices, watching film, and studies, that there is little time for a player to get off by himself and practice a new shot, and then find teammates to work with and defend against it. But he needs to do this now or over the summer.

I remember going to a Warrior-Celtic game at the Cow Palace in the '60s, and sitting at the floor just behind the basket, where the great Tommy Heinsohn went off for 44 points, much of it near the basket on a dazzling array of shots. It was quite a feat, when you consider that if Heinsohn got by his man, there was Wilt Chamberlain protecting the rim and waiting for him. One of the Warrior players asked Heinsohn, if a particular shot was a new one, because he hadn't seen Heinsohn use it before. Heinsohn replied, "Yes, it is. Every year, I have to invent a new shot, because defenders have figured out how to stop most of my other shots."

Brown is very creative dribbling the ball, and some of his passes are creative. Now he needs to get with the rest of the program of being a basketball player and create or master some other shots.
SFCityBear
Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SFCityBear said:

4thGenCal said:

Joel Brown is definitely one of the top 3 most important players on the team - his +- thus far is very good and other than one poor game, has been overall very effective. Teams can't press him/team when he gets the ball after a made basket. his defense and effort level is Jorge G like and he can hit the open 3 decently. No debate that he does over penetrate going to the rim and while sometimes successful (not last night) he does get blocked too many times. Desperately needs to develop a floater - which even if missed gives the Bigs a put back opportunity.


One thing I forgot to mention is that I fully agree with you that Brown needs to develop a floater. A little pull up jumper would also help, although if he continues to approach the basket with maximum speed, that might not be the best option. but he needs other ways to score inside. In any case, I'd be surprised if he developed a floater this season, because summer is traditionally when players try to develop new shots. There is so much going on during the season with team practices, watching film, and studies, that there is little time for a player to get off by himself and practice a new shot, and then find teammates to work with and defend against it. But he needs to do this now or over the summer.

I remember going to a Warrior-Celtic game at the Cow Palace in the '60s, and sitting at the floor just behind the basket, where the great Tommy Heinsohn went off for 44 points, much of it near the basket on a dazzling array of shots. It was quite a feat, when you consider that if Heinsohn got by his man, there was Bill Russell protecting the rim and waiting for him. One of the Warrior players asked Heinsohn, if a particular shot was a new one, because he hadn't seen Heinsohn use it before. Heinsohn replied, "Yes, it is. Every year, I have to invent a new shot, because defenders have figured out how to stop most of my other shots."

Brown is very creative dribbling the ball, and some of his passes are creative. Now he needs to get with the rest of the program of being a basketball player and create or master some other shots.

The above last paragraph is a great "bottom line" for Joel Brown. I love his effort and some aspects of his game, but, in his third year, I wish he were a little further along than he is (specifically scoring and facilitating). Hopefully some of that will come over the next couple of months.
KoreAmBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Big C said:

SFCityBear said:

4thGenCal said:

Joel Brown is definitely one of the top 3 most important players on the team - his +- thus far is very good and other than one poor game, has been overall very effective. Teams can't press him/team when he gets the ball after a made basket. his defense and effort level is Jorge G like and he can hit the open 3 decently. No debate that he does over penetrate going to the rim and while sometimes successful (not last night) he does get blocked too many times. Desperately needs to develop a floater - which even if missed gives the Bigs a put back opportunity.


One thing I forgot to mention is that I fully agree with you that Brown needs to develop a floater. A little pull up jumper would also help, although if he continues to approach the basket with maximum speed, that might not be the best option. but he needs other ways to score inside. In any case, I'd be surprised if he developed a floater this season, because summer is traditionally when players try to develop new shots. There is so much going on during the season with team practices, watching film, and studies, that there is little time for a player to get off by himself and practice a new shot, and then find teammates to work with and defend against it. But he needs to do this now or over the summer.

I remember going to a Warrior-Celtic game at the Cow Palace in the '60s, and sitting at the floor just behind the basket, where the great Tommy Heinsohn went off for 44 points, much of it near the basket on a dazzling array of shots. It was quite a feat, when you consider that if Heinsohn got by his man, there was Bill Russell protecting the rim and waiting for him. One of the Warrior players asked Heinsohn, if a particular shot was a new one, because he hadn't seen Heinsohn use it before. Heinsohn replied, "Yes, it is. Every year, I have to invent a new shot, because defenders have figured out how to stop most of my other shots."

Brown is very creative dribbling the ball, and some of his passes are creative. Now he needs to get with the rest of the program of being a basketball player and create or master some other shots.

The above last paragraph is a great "bottom line" for Joel Brown. I love his effort and some aspects of his game, but, in his third year, I wish he were a little further along than he is (specifically scoring and facilitating). Hopefully some of that will come over the next couple of months.
I am a little perplexed that I have never seen Joel attempt a runner or even a mid-range jumper on a jump stop or pullup. I've only seen him go to the rim or shoot three pointers, pretty much.
Bear8995
How long do you want to ignore this user?
KoreAmBear said:

Big C said:

SFCityBear said:

4thGenCal said:

Joel Brown is definitely one of the top 3 most important players on the team - his +- thus far is very good and other than one poor game, has been overall very effective. Teams can't press him/team when he gets the ball after a made basket. his defense and effort level is Jorge G like and he can hit the open 3 decently. No debate that he does over penetrate going to the rim and while sometimes successful (not last night) he does get blocked too many times. Desperately needs to develop a floater - which even if missed gives the Bigs a put back opportunity.


One thing I forgot to mention is that I fully agree with you that Brown needs to develop a floater. A little pull up jumper would also help, although if he continues to approach the basket with maximum speed, that might not be the best option. but he needs other ways to score inside. In any case, I'd be surprised if he developed a floater this season, because summer is traditionally when players try to develop new shots. There is so much going on during the season with team practices, watching film, and studies, that there is little time for a player to get off by himself and practice a new shot, and then find teammates to work with and defend against it. But he needs to do this now or over the summer.

I remember going to a Warrior-Celtic game at the Cow Palace in the '60s, and sitting at the floor just behind the basket, where the great Tommy Heinsohn went off for 44 points, much of it near the basket on a dazzling array of shots. It was quite a feat, when you consider that if Heinsohn got by his man, there was Bill Russell protecting the rim and waiting for him. One of the Warrior players asked Heinsohn, if a particular shot was a new one, because he hadn't seen Heinsohn use it before. Heinsohn replied, "Yes, it is. Every year, I have to invent a new shot, because defenders have figured out how to stop most of my other shots."

Brown is very creative dribbling the ball, and some of his passes are creative. Now he needs to get with the rest of the program of being a basketball player and create or master some other shots.

The above last paragraph is a great "bottom line" for Joel Brown. I love his effort and some aspects of his game, but, in his third year, I wish he were a little further along than he is (specifically scoring and facilitating). Hopefully some of that will come over the next couple of months.
I am a little perplexed that I have never seen Joel attempt a runner or even a mid-range jumper on a jump stop or pullup. I've only seen him go to the rim or shoot three pointers, pretty much.
He tried a pull up from 10 feet against Fresno but used his right hand and it wasn't close.
HearstMining
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Lots of excellent, thoughtful discussion here. My thoughts:

  • Celestine - tantalized me last year. So far this year, looks uncomfortable and completely out of sync. One of you said he's still recovering from surgery, which would explain it. If so, why not redshirt the guy? I don't always like the idea of coaches getting players to "play through" pain. They don't know what the guy is feeling and they aren't going to have to live through possibly life-long consequences of not allowing something to heal completely. As a runner for 40+ years, I can tell you that you can't "play through" joint-related pain as though it doesn't exist.
  • Brown - He certainly improved from Year-1 to Year-2. I don't see the same jump this year. I do think he's slightly better at finishing his drives, but I don't have the data to back that up. Good points regarding the need for a floater or pull-up jumper. Came to Cal with similar attributes to Jorge but has not improved as consistently.
  • Lars - yep, a little better. He fights a little harder and his little hook shot is pretty reliable. I think his slow reaction isn't physical - he doesn't anticipate what's likely to happen so can't react quickly when it does - a function of not having played the game for very long. It's a good thing Kelly can play more minutes now because Lars really shouldn't be on the floor for more than 10 per game. He has good form on his free-throws, so I'm not sure why the % is so low - maybe not really visualizing the ball going through the hoop on each shot.
  • Grant - he's certainly trying a couple more drives and mid-range pullups each game with some success recently. He sets some good screens which are rarely well-used. The pick-and-pop idea is a good one and should play to his strengths. Of course, Fox has to officially include them in his "highly structured offense" or they'll never happen.

Hoop Dreams mentioned Cal players telegraphing their passes and I agree. In addition, they just miss opportunities. With today's switching defenses, a rolling screener is only open for a split second and Cal players miss that window, if they even look for it.
RedlessWardrobe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HearstMining said:

Lots of excellent, thoughtful discussion here. My thoughts:

  • Celestine - tantalized me last year. So far this year, looks uncomfortable and completely out of sync. One of you said he's still recovering from surgery, which would explain it. If so, why not redshirt the guy? I don't always like the idea of coaches getting players to "play through" pain. They don't know what the guy is feeling and they aren't going to have to live through possibly life-long consequences of not allowing something to heal completely. As a runner for 40+ years, I can tell you that you can't "play through" joint-related pain as though it doesn't exist.
  • Brown - He certainly improved from Year-1 to Year-2. I don't see the same jump this year. I do think he's slightly better at finishing his drives, but I don't have the data to back that up. Good points regarding the need for a floater or pull-up jumper. Came to Cal with similar attributes to Jorge but has not improved as consistently.
  • Lars - yep, a little better. He fights a little harder and his little hook shot is pretty reliable. I think his slow reaction isn't physical - he doesn't anticipate what's likely to happen so can't react quickly when it does - a function of not having played the game for very long. It's a good thing Kelly can play more minutes now because Lars really shouldn't be on the floor for more than 10 per game. He has good form on his free-throws, so I'm not sure why the % is so low - maybe not really visualizing the ball going through the hoop on each shot.
  • Grant - he's certainly trying a couple more drives and mid-range pullups each game with some success recently. He sets some good screens which are rarely well-used. The pick-and-pop idea is a good one and should play to his strengths. Of course, Fox has to officially include them in his "highly structured offense" or they'll never happen.

Hoop Dreams mentioned Cal players telegraphing their passes and I agree. In addition, they just miss opportunities. With today's switching defenses, a rolling screener is only open for a split second and Cal players miss that window, if they even look for it.

I like most of your assessments but I have to disagree on Celestine looking "uncomfortable." I'm guessing you're referring to his demeanor when we have the ball. My take on him is not only is he skilled but he plays offense "with a purpose", seems well aware of what kind of defense he is facing, good understanding of shot clock to quality of shot, and it also seems to me that he fully understands that there are certain times when being left handed can be used to his advantage. No need to blueshirt him, we can use his minutes right now.
bearmanpg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
KoreAmBear said:

Big C said:

SFCityBear said:

4thGenCal said:

Joel Brown is definitely one of the top 3 most important players on the team - his +- thus far is very good and other than one poor game, has been overall very effective. Teams can't press him/team when he gets the ball after a made basket. his defense and effort level is Jorge G like and he can hit the open 3 decently. No debate that he does over penetrate going to the rim and while sometimes successful (not last night) he does get blocked too many times. Desperately needs to develop a floater - which even if missed gives the Bigs a put back opportunity.


One thing I forgot to mention is that I fully agree with you that Brown needs to develop a floater. A little pull up jumper would also help, although if he continues to approach the basket with maximum speed, that might not be the best option. but he needs other ways to score inside. In any case, I'd be surprised if he developed a floater this season, because summer is traditionally when players try to develop new shots. There is so much going on during the season with team practices, watching film, and studies, that there is little time for a player to get off by himself and practice a new shot, and then find teammates to work with and defend against it. But he needs to do this now or over the summer.

I remember going to a Warrior-Celtic game at the Cow Palace in the '60s, and sitting at the floor just behind the basket, where the great Tommy Heinsohn went off for 44 points, much of it near the basket on a dazzling array of shots. It was quite a feat, when you consider that if Heinsohn got by his man, there was Bill Russell protecting the rim and waiting for him. One of the Warrior players asked Heinsohn, if a particular shot was a new one, because he hadn't seen Heinsohn use it before. Heinsohn replied, "Yes, it is. Every year, I have to invent a new shot, because defenders have figured out how to stop most of my other shots."

Brown is very creative dribbling the ball, and some of his passes are creative. Now he needs to get with the rest of the program of being a basketball player and create or master some other shots.

The above last paragraph is a great "bottom line" for Joel Brown. I love his effort and some aspects of his game, but, in his third year, I wish he were a little further along than he is (specifically scoring and facilitating). Hopefully some of that will come over the next couple of months.
I am a little perplexed that I have never seen Joel attempt a runner or even a mid-range jumper on a jump stop or pullup. I've only seen him go to the rim or shoot three pointers, pretty much.
I'm more perplexed with Bill Russell trying to stop his teammate from scoring....of course, if Heinsoln went for 44 it's obvious the Warriors needed help....
SFCityBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearmanpg said:

KoreAmBear said:

Big C said:

SFCityBear said:

4thGenCal said:

Joel Brown is definitely one of the top 3 most important players on the team - his +- thus far is very good and other than one poor game, has been overall very effective. Teams can't press him/team when he gets the ball after a made basket. his defense and effort level is Jorge G like and he can hit the open 3 decently. No debate that he does over penetrate going to the rim and while sometimes successful (not last night) he does get blocked too many times. Desperately needs to develop a floater - which even if missed gives the Bigs a put back opportunity.


One thing I forgot to mention is that I fully agree with you that Brown needs to develop a floater. A little pull up jumper would also help, although if he continues to approach the basket with maximum speed, that might not be the best option. but he needs other ways to score inside. In any case, I'd be surprised if he developed a floater this season, because summer is traditionally when players try to develop new shots. There is so much going on during the season with team practices, watching film, and studies, that there is little time for a player to get off by himself and practice a new shot, and then find teammates to work with and defend against it. But he needs to do this now or over the summer.

I remember going to a Warrior-Celtic game at the Cow Palace in the '60s, and sitting at the floor just behind the basket, where the great Tommy Heinsohn went off for 44 points, much of it near the basket on a dazzling array of shots. It was quite a feat, when you consider that if Heinsohn got by his man, there was Bill Russell protecting the rim and waiting for him. One of the Warrior players asked Heinsohn, if a particular shot was a new one, because he hadn't seen Heinsohn use it before. Heinsohn replied, "Yes, it is. Every year, I have to invent a new shot, because defenders have figured out how to stop most of my other shots."

Brown is very creative dribbling the ball, and some of his passes are creative. Now he needs to get with the rest of the program of being a basketball player and create or master some other shots.

The above last paragraph is a great "bottom line" for Joel Brown. I love his effort and some aspects of his game, but, in his third year, I wish he were a little further along than he is (specifically scoring and facilitating). Hopefully some of that will come over the next couple of months.
I am a little perplexed that I have never seen Joel attempt a runner or even a mid-range jumper on a jump stop or pullup. I've only seen him go to the rim or shoot three pointers, pretty much.
I'm more perplexed with Bill Russell trying to stop his teammate from scoring....of course, if Heinsoln went for 44 it's obvious the Warriors needed help....

Dear Bearmanpg,

Congratulations. You caught my stupendous blunder. Of course, I meant that if Heinsohn beat his man on a drive, he would then have Wilt Chamberlain lurking around the basket to block any shot that Heinsohn could dream up.

Yours Truly,

Egg on Face
SFCityBear
SFCityBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HearstMining said:

Lots of excellent, thoughtful discussion here. My thoughts:

  • Celestine - tantalized me last year. So far this year, looks uncomfortable and completely out of sync. One of you said he's still recovering from surgery, which would explain it. If so, why not redshirt the guy? I don't always like the idea of coaches getting players to "play through" pain. They don't know what the guy is feeling and they aren't going to have to live through possibly life-long consequences of not allowing something to heal completely. As a runner for 40+ years, I can tell you that you can't "play through" joint-related pain as though it doesn't exist.
  • Brown - He certainly improved from Year-1 to Year-2. I don't see the same jump this year. I do think he's slightly better at finishing his drives, but I don't have the data to back that up. Good points regarding the need for a floater or pull-up jumper. Came to Cal with similar attributes to Jorge but has not improved as consistently.
  • Lars - yep, a little better. He fights a little harder and his little hook shot is pretty reliable. I think his slow reaction isn't physical - he doesn't anticipate what's likely to happen so can't react quickly when it does - a function of not having played the game for very long. It's a good thing Kelly can play more minutes now because Lars really shouldn't be on the floor for more than 10 per game. He has good form on his free-throws, so I'm not sure why the % is so low - maybe not really visualizing the ball going through the hoop on each shot.
  • Grant - he's certainly trying a couple more drives and mid-range pullups each game with some success recently. He sets some good screens which are rarely well-used. The pick-and-pop idea is a good one and should play to his strengths. Of course, Fox has to officially include them in his "highly structured offense" or they'll never happen.

Hoop Dreams mentioned Cal players telegraphing their passes and I agree. In addition, they just miss opportunities. With today's switching defenses, a rolling screener is only open for a split second and Cal players miss that window, if they even look for it.

You've made some very good points. However, I don't think we have seen enough of Celestine or Lars to judge them yet. Especially Lars. He just played a game against a very tough opponent, Robinson, who was able to stretch the floor against him, was quicker and more athletic, and Lars out-rebounded him, 4 to 1, and held him to 1 for 4 shooting the ball. It is true he picked up 3 fouls and Robinson made 2 of 3 free throws. Lars did not take a shot, but he also committed no turnovers. He really did not hurt the Cal team much at all. When Kelly was in the game, Robinson scored 19 points on 8-12 shooting, and got 8 rebounds. How many PAC12 teams have a center as good as Robinson?

I think in certain matchups Lars should be able to play 15-20 minutes. Since Kelly is now capable of playing 30-35 minutes, I feel a good lineup for Cal against centers not a good as Robinson or the center for Florida, would be to move Kelly to PF, his natural position for part of the game. Kelly is more of a face up player, and Lars is a back to the basket player. I don't know the PAC12 personnel that well, but against teams with an average center, especially the fellow bottom-half teams, then that is where Lars could get some more minutes.

So far, no one has reached out and made a claim on the small forward spot. It would seem to be between Celestine, Kuany, and Alajiki. As KoreAmBear has suggested, Anticevich might be best as a SF. I'm not sure he can be successful against other SFs, who will likely be faster, quicker, and more athletic than him, but I like a lineup with a front line of Lars, Kelly, and Anticevich against some matchups. It would necessitate Grant and Kelly playing minutes at two positions each in a game, but it might work against some teams.
SFCityBear
HearstMining
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm intrigued by Alajiki. He's athletic and an enthusiastic defender. He's hit a couple of threes but I can't tell if he has any kind of slashing or mid-range offensive game. He should be able to grab rebounds as Betley rebounded well from the same position with less athleticism.
stu
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Betley had a nose for the ball - he just seemed to know where it would come down.
RedlessWardrobe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
stu said:

Betley had a nose for the ball - he just seemed to know where it would come down.
He did have that ability. Unfortunately once he posessed the ball, quite frequently he had trouble holding onto it. (Kind of a turnover machine.)
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.