BearSD said:

---

We are all red pandas.

It's Friday! Many people fall in love with the red panda for its sweet, kitten-like face, cinnamon-red fur, fluffy tail, and astonishing agility. The Chinese name for the red panda is "hun-ho," meaning "fire fox." pic.twitter.com/sUUwcq9dEA

— Cincinnati Zoo (@CincinnatiZoo) December 9, 2022

---

Hun ho!

coming into the season knowing Celestine was out, i was concerned with our shooting

i assumed Clayton would provide some, but hes undersized and known more as a scorer than a shooter

We didn't need shooting vs UT Arlington but we cant survive without shooting vs the pac12

even with Clayton and Celestine i don't think wed be a good shooting team, just not as poor as we are now

if we can only score inside teams will continue to sag on the perimeter, cut off drives, double Lars and dare us to beat them with outside shots

i

calumnus said:

---

#349 (4th from last) in points per game.

I find this to be incredible. That is a lot of teams to lower scoring than. Every single team out of 351 makes more 3 pointers than us.

---

HoopDreams said:

---

coming into the season knowing Celestine was out, i was concerned with our shooting

i assumed Clayton would provide some, but hes undersized and known more as a scorer than a shooter

We didn't need shooting vs UT Arlington but we cant survive without shooting vs the pac12

even with Clayton and Celestine i don't think wed be a good shooting team, just not as poor as we are now

if we can only score inside teams will continue to sag on the perimeter, cut off drives, double Lars and dare us to beat them with outside shots

i

calumnus said:

---

#349 (4th from last) in points per game.

I find this to be incredible. That is a lot of teams to lower scoring than. Every single team out of 351 makes more 3 pointers than us.

---

---

Hey man. It's the holiday season. Can't you say anything positive? Please, just once.

SFCityBear said:

---

HoopDreams said:

---

coming into the season knowing Celestine was out, i was concerned with our shooting

i assumed Clayton would provide some, but hes undersized and known more as a scorer than a shooter

We didn't need shooting vs UT Arlington but we cant survive without shooting vs the pac12

even with Clayton and Celestine i don't think wed be a good shooting team, just not as poor as we are now

if we can only score inside teams will continue to sag on the perimeter, cut off drives, double Lars and dare us to beat them with outside shots

i

calumnus said:

---

#349 (4th from last) in points per game.

I find this to be incredible. That is a lot of teams to lower scoring than. Every single team out of 351 makes more 3 pointers than us.

---

---

Hey man. It's the holiday season. Can't you say anything positive? Please, just once.

---

"UT Arlington is our best chance for a win" was a positive statement.

"Robinson is a really good 3pt shooter" IS a positive statement. "I think Robinson can help us" is being optimistic. I was addressing a problem and looking for a solution. You were the Negative Nelly on that thread.

That is the difference. I don't ignore problems and blindly support the status quo, then seek to stifle dissent. I analyze the facts and look for solutions.

A year ago I was against extending Fox and wanted us to hire Gates. That was actually a positive, position.

So even my saying Andrew Francis is the best candidate for interim head coach is a positive outlook.

Cal 46. Utes 72. Thats my prediction.

I first thought we should think outside the box and shoot exclusively treys for the entire game.
Now I'm changing gears. Every play of the game slash to the hoop for a layup. The possible outcomes:

1. A made layup;

2. A foul with a chance to make 1 or 2 FT;

3. A miss with a puncher's chance of getting an O board and a chance to rinse and repeat.


4. An offensive foul.

Also no huddle and no coaching. It doesn't help and the overwhelming circumstantial evidence is that it actual hurts. At breaks and time outs eat snacks and drink Cokes.

Is there a way I can text my strategy to Coach Fox or does he use fax?

oskidunker said:

---

Cal 46. Utes 72. Thats my prediction.

---

I'm confused. I'm pretty sure Bears don't cover the spread under your scenario. I'm getting light headed and gassy.

bearister said:

---

I first thought we should think outside the box and shoot exclusively treys for the entire game.
Now I'm changing gears. Every play of the game slash to the hoop for a layup. The possible outcomes:

1. A made layup;

2. A foul with a chance to make 1 or 2 FT;

3. A miss with a puncher's chance of getting an O board and a chance to rinse and repeat.


4. An offensive foul.

Also no huddle and no coaching. It doesn't help and the overwhelming circumstantial evidence is that it actual hurts. At breaks and time outs eat snacks and drink Cokes.

Is there a way I can text my strategy to Coach Fox or does he use fax?

---

or maybe spark up a joint and see if we shoot better high. literally couldn't be worse.

The 2 threes we made today didn't help our average.

Econ141 said:

---

There is no excuse that we are THIS bad. COVID, rebuilding, whatever the case fox and Knowlton come up with can't explain this level of ineptitude. So what can explain it?!? It's the godd@mn leadership.

Too much of my mind space is frustrated with cal revenue sports ... Wish I'd never got into it but alas ... Going to the ncaa sweet 16 tourney game in Syracuse as a student when we had tony g and ed gray made me a passionate fan for life. That passion though is slowly melting away.

---

At this stage, the only thing that makes sense is that Fox has convinced Knowlton we are tanking to get the first pick in the 2023 HS draft in order to select Victor Wembanyama.