SF Comicle on Hoops Program

11,146 Views | 123 Replies | Last: 1 yr ago by calumnus
calumnus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Civil Bear said:

oskidunker said:

udaman1 said:

what if Braun wanted back in?
He doesnt. I asked him in the mens room at Haas.
Udaman1 was asking about Braun coaching the Bears again.


It is funny that people here complain about Cuonzo's offense underperforming his recruiting, but no one complains about Braun, who was essentially the same model with worse results.
Bobodeluxe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
calumnus said:

Civil Bear said:

oskidunker said:

udaman1 said:

what if Braun wanted back in?
He doesnt. I asked him in the mens room at Haas.
Udaman1 was asking about Braun coaching the Bears again.


It is funny that people here complain about Cuonzo's offense underperforming his recruiting, but no one complains about Braun, who was essentially the same model with worse results.
Everyone complained about Ben. That's why he was fired.
dimitrig
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bobodeluxe said:

calumnus said:

Civil Bear said:

oskidunker said:

udaman1 said:

what if Braun wanted back in?
He doesnt. I asked him in the mens room at Haas.
Udaman1 was asking about Braun coaching the Bears again.


It is funny that people here complain about Cuonzo's offense underperforming his recruiting, but no one complains about Braun, who was essentially the same model with worse results.
Everyone complained about Ben. That's why he was fired.


Both coaches did about as well as could be expected at Cal.

I have no issues with their tenures.

Mark Fox on the other hand…


bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
calumnus said:

Civil Bear said:

oskidunker said:

udaman1 said:

what if Braun wanted back in?
He doesnt. I asked him in the mens room at Haas.
Udaman1 was asking about Braun coaching the Bears again.


It is funny that people here complain about Cuonzo's offense underperforming his recruiting, but no one complains about Braun, who was essentially the same model with worse results.


I disagree. There is a reason Cuonzo Martin lasts about 3 years everywhere. Ben Braun is a decent HC that had good long HC tenures. Ben had an 11 or 12 year run at Cal and a winning percentage of .606. He got institutionally stale at Cal, just like Jeff Tedford did in football after 10 years. It basically happens to everyone sooner or later (other than your Woodens, etc).
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
bluesaxe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
calumnus said:

Civil Bear said:

oskidunker said:

udaman1 said:

what if Braun wanted back in?
He doesnt. I asked him in the mens room at Haas.
Udaman1 was asking about Braun coaching the Bears again.


It is funny that people here complain about Cuonzo's offense underperforming his recruiting, but no one complains about Braun, who was essentially the same model with worse results.
Braun did have five tournament teams and a Sweet 16, which I wouldn't call worse results than a single one and done.
BearlyCareAnymore
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HateRed said:

I can guarantee you that any student in California that would go to the high school where I taught would not garner a 3.0 gpa by sleep walking through classes. I would be very interested in seeing a writing sample of your high school student. A-G is not a piece of cake at the high school I taught at for many years.


Ok Boomer
Bobodeluxe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlyCareAnymore said:

HateRed said:

I can guarantee you that any student in California that would go to the high school where I taught would not garner a 3.0 gpa by sleep walking through classes. I would be very interested in seeing a writing sample of your high school student. A-G is not a piece of cake at the high school I taught at for many years.


Ok Boomer
Play nice.
Civil Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bluesaxe said:

Civil Bear said:

4thGenCal said:



Tough grade on Cuonzo. His record at Cal was very good - 62-39! won 19 straight regular season home wins (28 straight over a 2 year stretch) achieved a #14 regular season national ranking and Haas Arena was rocking with several sell outs and attendance in the 9-10K range/game. He brought in some outstanding players and had several other highly rated recruits that the admissions turned down unfortunately. Yes the offense was stagnate, but the overall results were solid. And his players highly respected him. I was sad to see him go - especially in light of what the following 6 years produced in the W/L column.
Yes, but that one season had 4 NBA prospects and a dead-eye 3-point shooter that went on to win an NC at Gonzaga the following year. Clearly, he was not going to be able to sustain that kind of roster as evidenced by the roster he left for Jones. With his overall career record, rehiring Martin now would be worse than hiring Fox in 2019.
No one has ever won a national championship in hoops at Gonzaga, but losing Matthews hurt.

I'm not sure the roster he left would have been the roster if he stayed. I sure as hell wouldn't go back to that well but I also wouldn't denigrate what he did at Cal despite being frustrated at times.

Mea culpa. I should have said "...went on to play for an NC".

I have no reason to think the roster would have been the same if he stayed. Had any of the players that left followed him to Missouri then there might have been a reason to think otherwise.
calumnus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bobodeluxe said:

calumnus said:

Civil Bear said:

oskidunker said:

udaman1 said:

what if Braun wanted back in?
He doesnt. I asked him in the mens room at Haas.
Udaman1 was asking about Braun coaching the Bears again.


It is funny that people here complain about Cuonzo's offense underperforming his recruiting, but no one complains about Braun, who was essentially the same model with worse results.
Everyone complained about Ben. That's why he was fired.

Not anymore. He is like Tedford that way. People criticize Cuonzo more by several magnitudes.
calumnus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

calumnus said:

Civil Bear said:

oskidunker said:

udaman1 said:

what if Braun wanted back in?
He doesnt. I asked him in the mens room at Haas.
Udaman1 was asking about Braun coaching the Bears again.


It is funny that people here complain about Cuonzo's offense underperforming his recruiting, but no one complains about Braun, who was essentially the same model with worse results.


I disagree. There is a reason Cuonzo Martin lasts about 3 years everywhere. Ben Braun is a decent HC that had good long HC tenures. Ben had an 11 or 12 year run at Cal and a winning percentage of .606. He got institutionally stale at Cal, just like Jeff Tedford did in football after 10 years. It basically happens to everyone sooner or later (other than your Woodens, etc).



And Fox was at Georgia for 9 years and Wilcox is going into year 7 on contract for 4 more with a losing record.

But my comparison was Braun's offense with Cuonzo's. Both sucked. Often relying on just getting the ball to Lampley,Shipp, Powe, Anderson, and letting them score. Recruiting well and underperforming the talent. Braun's last team: Hardin, Anderson, Boykin, Christopher, Randle with Kamp, Wilkes et al off the bench should have challenged for the championship, instead Braun started Vierneisal and Knezevic and we finished second to last. Monty took the same team, minus Anderson and Hardin, added JC transfers and won a championship.
BearlyCareAnymore
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HateRed said:

Like I said, I'd love to see a writing sample.


Old man yells at cloud. You can insult our kids all you want. My kid goes to a top high school and has actually had their writing awarded in extracurricular writing programs. My other kid is on track to graduate with honors from an elite university. They both took way more AP classes than UC's credit, as did all their friends, and that is a set curriculum so you can't claim they are too easy. (And the 5's on AP tests would contradict any such claim as well. Their education was fine. You seem to be confusing harder grading with good teaching, which are totally unrelated. There are many ways to learn and provide feedback and motivation beyond a letter grade. For instance, a lot of teachers grade tests and papers at a reasonable difficulty and then give a lot of easy homework that you basically get 100% on for turning in. or a lot of easy to achieve extra credit points. Like say a biology class giving extra credit for taking pictures of local plants or an art class giving credit for visiting a museum. They can basically raise their grade 5% - 15% over their tests with homework and extra credit. So they get the feedback but as long as they are trying they get a decent overall grade. A lot of Math classes allow kids to retake tests to demonstrate proficiency. You just need to be willing to go over your test and learn what you did wrong.

So think of a typical class grade breakdown like this. 40% of the grade may be homework. 10% is class participation. So turn in all your homework and speak in class once in a while, and you get 50 points. Then say 50% of the grade is tests, papers and projects. 60% on those gets you to 80% for your total grade - congrats, you got a B. Didn't quite make it to 80%, well, maybe the teacher had a free 5% you could get by doing extra credit work. Student still got the 60% feedback but they got a B. And as I said, statistically more than half the grades given in high schools are A's. It isn't just my personal experience. Colleges know this and have adjusted accordingly. And, by the way are all grading much easier as well. Grade inflation is just as rampant in college.


My experience is that kids are plenty motivated without the threat of a lower grade. It's a different way of teaching. It isn't worse just because that isn't what you are used to.

But I stand by my statements. Do your homework. Do extra credit if you have to. Then it is almost impossible not to pull a B. Basically a C gets pulled up to a B by just doing your work. Of course a lot of C students are C students because they don't do their work so they don't benefit. But if they can't be bothered to do that, then they don't belong.

I'd also say that if you really thought about it, even under your system, you probably had very few students who did all their work and didn't pull B's, because most kids who do all their work naturally pull at least a B on their tests because they actually learn the material.
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Yes, Braun's offense often could be characterized as passing it around the top of the key and burping one up as the shot clock expired. I also saw him call a time out at the front end of a Cal fast break a few times. Still take him over Martin.
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
BearlyCareAnymore
How long do you want to ignore this user?
calumnus said:

Bobodeluxe said:

calumnus said:

Civil Bear said:

oskidunker said:

udaman1 said:

what if Braun wanted back in?
He doesnt. I asked him in the mens room at Haas.
Udaman1 was asking about Braun coaching the Bears again.


It is funny that people here complain about Cuonzo's offense underperforming his recruiting, but no one complains about Braun, who was essentially the same model with worse results.
Everyone complained about Ben. That's why he was fired.

Not anymore. He is like Tedford that way. People criticize Cuonzo more by several magnitudes.


I really liked Cuonzo personally. He had a great story and I think he has done a lot of admirable things in his life. I defended him a lot especially against pretty relentless attacks from a certain poster from the City. But he seemed to refuse to adjust his recruiting, choosing instead to complain. And quite frankly that NIT game was a dirt bag thing to do and it was hard not to lose respect for him after that. It is probably the most unprofessional thing I've seen a Cal coach do. I kind of saw that train wreck coming so I didn't experience it first hand so could be more bemused than anything, but I think the anger from those that watched it is justified. He got out before his tanked recruiting caught up with him.

Braun actually left Monty a pretty great roster to build from and I would say left the program better than he found it. Warts and all, I think there is good reason to have more fondness for his tenure. Honestly, don't see the claim that he had worse results. Braun inherited a program in scandal coming of a first round knockout having lost a lottery player and what most thought was the bulk of the talent, suffered the loss to injury of the primary scorer, another lottery pick and came extremely close to the Elite Eight. Martin inherited a solid program that had gone 2nd, 2nd and 3rd in conference the prior 3 years, hadn't finished lower than 4th in 6 years, and proceeded to finish eighth. He had two massive signings and otherwise whiffed leaving the cupboard bare. He had one very good year with a loaded team that ended badly. Braun's best tournament results were better than Martin's. His best conference record was better than Martin's. Hell, his NIT results were better than Martin's. I'm not really sure what positives you can attribute to Martin other than signing Rabb and Brown. The team Martin had was easily more talented than the team that won two rounds in the NCAA's, easily more talented than Braun's team that finished higher in the conference standings, and easily more talented than the team that rode Brian Wethers and Joe Shipp to a better conference record and better tournament finish.

As for Tedford, that isn't close. It ended badly as it sometimes does with successful programs, but it was inevitable that with time people would come around on him. He flat out gave more joy than any football coach at Cal in almost anyone's living memory. When I look back at my Cal football fandom, it is basically Chuck Muncie, The Play, That is the only song you know, the Citrus Bowl, and a whole lot of Tedford.
BeachedBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
First and foremost, I was excited when Martin was hired. I wish two things had played out differently. And that he would have stayed and built something longer term.

1. First and foremost, he needed to break up his personal assistants crew and bring in SOMEONE who was offensive focused. he also needed to balance his practice time to focus a bit more on Offense.

2. First and foremost, the second thing is that he was a bad combination with Williams and the state of Cal administration at the time. Williams is gone and I don't think the Cal administration has changed much - but my sense is that he would have been more successful during the tenures when Campanelli/Bozeman/Braun were at Cal - in terms of overall program support.

First and foremost, as others have mentioned -maybe there is just something in him that last only 3 years.
Bobodeluxe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BeachedBear said:

First and foremost, I was excited when Martin was hired. I wish two things had played out differently. And that he would have stayed and built something longer term.

1. First and foremost, he needed to break up his personal assistants crew and bring in SOMEONE who was offensive focused. he also needed to balance his practice time to focus a bit more on Offense.

2. First and foremost, the second thing is that he was a bad combination with Williams and the state of Cal administration at the time. Williams is gone and I don't think the Cal administration has changed much - but my sense is that he would have been more successful during the tenures when Campanelli/Bozeman/Braun were at Cal - in terms of overall program support.

First and foremost, as others have mentioned -maybe there is just something in him that last only 3 years.
A con usually has a short run.
4thGenCal
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlyCareAnymore said:

calumnus said:

Bobodeluxe said:

calumnus said:

Civil Bear said:

oskidunker said:

udaman1 said:

what if Braun wanted back in?
He doesnt. I asked him in the mens room at Haas.
Udaman1 was asking about Braun coaching the Bears again.


It is funny that people here complain about Cuonzo's offense underperforming his recruiting, but no one complains about Braun, who was essentially the same model with worse results.
Everyone complained about Ben. That's why he was fired.

Not anymore. He is like Tedford that way. People criticize Cuonzo more by several magnitudes.


I really liked Cuonzo personally. He had a great story and I think he has done a lot of admirable things in his life. I defended him a lot especially against pretty relentless attacks from a certain poster from the City. But he seemed to refuse to adjust his recruiting, choosing instead to complain. And quite frankly that NIT game was a dirt bag thing to do and it was hard not to lose respect for him after that. It is probably the most unprofessional thing I've seen a Cal coach do. I kind of saw that train wreck coming so I didn't experience it first hand so could be more bemused than anything, but I think the anger from those that watched it is justified. He got out before his tanked recruiting caught up with him.

Braun actually left Monty a pretty great roster to build from and I would say left the program better than he found it. Warts and all, I think there is good reason to have more fondness for his tenure. Honestly, don't see the claim that he had worse results. Braun inherited a program in scandal coming of a first round knockout having lost a lottery player and what most thought was the bulk of the talent, suffered the loss to injury of the primary scorer, another lottery pick and came extremely close to the Elite Eight. Martin inherited a solid program that had gone 2nd, 2nd and 3rd in conference the prior 3 years, hadn't finished lower than 4th in 6 years, and proceeded to finish eighth. He had two massive signings and otherwise whiffed leaving the cupboard bare. He had one very good year with a loaded team that ended badly. Braun's best tournament results were better than Martin's. His best conference record was better than Martin's. Hell, his NIT results were better than Martin's. I'm not really sure what positives you can attribute to Martin other than signing Rabb and Brown. The team Martin had was easily more talented than the team that won two rounds in the NCAA's, easily more talented than Braun's team that finished higher in the conference standings, and easily more talented than the team that rode Brian Wethers and Joe Shipp to a better conference record and better tournament finish.

As for Tedford, that isn't close. It ended badly as it sometimes does with successful programs, but it was inevitable that with time people would come around on him. He flat out gave more joy than any football coach at Cal in almost anyone's living memory. When I look back at my Cal football fandom, it is basically Chuck Muncie, The Play, That is the only song you know, the Citrus Bowl, and a whole lot of Tedford.
Personally I liked both coaches (love Ben's loyalty to Cal and His ongoing willingness to advise/help when asked). People seem to be an overly tough critic of Cuonzo's record at Cal. He won at a very good clip for Cal historical comparison's and even to Ben as well. 62-39 (61.4%) won 18,23 and 21 games all season winning games and a 54% conf total winning record. Higher % wins for season and conf vs Ben. The offset is the post season record though accomplished over a longer duration. All the angst over one embarrassing NIT game (w/o best player Ivan) seems blown out of impact/proportion to body of work. Can absolutely say that His players respected him and believed in him. CM knew where his players were and He also checked in with their professor's as well. Quality Man.
HateRed
How long do you want to ignore this user?
My apologies, I didn't mean for you to think that I'm insulting your kids. Far from that. I always treated my students the way I would treat my own kids. You don't mess with somebody else's kids. Plus, I love kids. I don't necessarily disagree with your assertions, but I still hold to my own. I taught AP Economics and AP Government and Politics. Those classes are taught to the test and I always hated that. My regular classes were just as challenging but in a different way. There was very little homework because that is always geared to the book. I gave no extra credit and there was NO NEGOTIATION on grades. My point is that most schools make it very easy to get an A or a B even if the student work is inferior. Students today are more savvy than we were at their age. So are parents. They know how to play the system. I don't doubt that your kids are smart and deserve the grade they work for. Again, my point is that many, many schools make it easy to get that A and B. I can tell you that most students that transferred to our school from another school were shocked that they were no longer A students. Most of my students that were transferred into my regular classes told me that they were actually
learning something. I was the department chair for Social Sciences and as a department we decided that there was no extra credit given, what a student learned was going to be learned in our class instead of at home as "homework," and that our students were actually going to learn how to write. I can go on forever. Again, I'm sorry you mistook my opinion as an insult to your kids. That is never my intent. I bet I would have enjoyed having your kids in my classes. Also, used to run into my students at CAL. That was such a joy to see. Some still keep in touch.
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This move was at least six weeks overdue.
calumnus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover said:

This move was at least six weeks overdue.


At least, more like 12 months.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.