Cal vs the Cronin low aptitude baby bears

9,304 Views | 136 Replies | Last: 10 mo ago by oskidunker
HoopDreams
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Let's get it

bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Good game thread title! Lots of empty seats. We get double Don-ed this week.
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
JimSox
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Hmmm. 9-0 Bears!
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
A turn around jumper is not what I would have drawn up for Daws.
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
75bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Unselfish play on offense, ball moving, Cone gets a set and well balanced 3pt shot off.... things are looking up!
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Am I going out on a limb here to predict that we have more than a puncher's chance to beat these stiffs?
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
JimSox
How long do you want to ignore this user?
14-6 but missing a lot of shots and fouling.
75bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The Bruin players seem like they just met each other for the first time tonight.
Johnfox
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cone's got a lot of good looks. Keeps rattling in n out.
bearsandgiants
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Kennedy is the heart and it's not enough. Need 5 like that. Guys look lethargic tonight, except Cone who always seems eager to fire off shots. Daws is slogging, not boxing out. Guys not following their shots. Lack of confidence from most of the team. This isn't a great start, despite the score.
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Coach Jim Harrick
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
JimSox
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearsandgiants said:

Kennedy is the heart and it's not enough. Need 5 like that. Guys look lethargic tonight, except Cone who always seems eager to fire off shots. Daws is slogging, not boxing out. Guys not following their shots. Lack of confidence from most of the team. This isn't a great start, despite the score.


21-10. Must be doing something right. Don't like the fouling though. Six already.
75bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If I were in Pauley, I'd be too tempted to rip that lollipop out of Jim Harrick's mouth and stomp on it.
bearsandgiants
How long do you want to ignore this user?
They're settling in a bit more with aimaq on the bench. Much better on both sides of the ball.
JimSox
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Scoring drought
BadNewsBear1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Newell is uh……not good.
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The outcome may boil down to who tries harder to lose.
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
harebear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Hearing the "Go Bears" chant!
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BadNewsBear1 said:

Newell is uh……not good.

He is capable of having good games, and he has had them.
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HoopDreams is the One Hit Wonder of this thread,
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
75bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This is definitely a winnable game. Would be a shame to not come away with a victory today.
75bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

HoopDreams is the One Hit Wonder of this thread,
He's beyond locked in.
bearsandgiants
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Officials just gonna let ucla shoot free throws all night I guess.
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Don is being dishonest. He knows it was a flop and each replay just drives the point home more. Now Don equivocates and sheepishly says, "…or it could be a flop."
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
bearsandgiants
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We lead the nation all time in ****ing up final half possessions. This has been going on since the 90s
oskidunker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Was that a technical,on Cronin?
bearsandgiants
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We have been handed this game on a platter and we keep sending it back to the chef.
75bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oskidunker said:

Was that a technical,on Cronin?
Yep
oskidunker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
75bear said:

oskidunker said:

Was that a technical,on Cronin?
Yep


Mc clean too busy talking to tell us.
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
oskidunker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The good news. Tyson got a rest.

The bad news. This smells like over time.
bearsandgiants
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oskidunker said:

The good news. Tyson got a rest.

The bad news. This smells like over time.


They're outshooting us! Lol. This is nuts
JimSox
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I think it's 32-23, not 24
ncbears
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Is the score 32-24 or 32-23. I know McLean said the final shot was a three, but livestats shows it as a two.
oskidunker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ncbears said:

Is the score 32-24 or 32-23. I know McLean said the final shot was a three, but livestats shows it as a two.


2
Last Page
Page 1 of 4
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.