After Wednesday's NBA Finals game, the local ABC affiliate had a couple former NBA players on the postgame show. They (Austin Croshere and Tracy Murray*) mentioned that European and international players were surpassing US players because the international players were practicing more while playing fewer games. This gives them a chance to develop skills, like learning to read a defense, passing, ball-handling, and shooting.
If that's the case, should Cal focus more on recruiting international players? Keep in mind, international players are ineligible to receive any compensation (i.e., NIL money, wages) under current immigration law. By focusing more on international players, this could also stretch the Cal collective's funds.
Of course, the international players Cal has landed lately have not been great shakes. It's possible that the better international players opt to forego college altogether and choose to play professionally, instead. This would limit Cal to recruiting players who need more development. If that's the case, would it still be worthwhile for Cal to recruit that international player?
*Lamond's cousin.
If that's the case, should Cal focus more on recruiting international players? Keep in mind, international players are ineligible to receive any compensation (i.e., NIL money, wages) under current immigration law. By focusing more on international players, this could also stretch the Cal collective's funds.
Of course, the international players Cal has landed lately have not been great shakes. It's possible that the better international players opt to forego college altogether and choose to play professionally, instead. This would limit Cal to recruiting players who need more development. If that's the case, would it still be worthwhile for Cal to recruit that international player?
*Lamond's cousin.